This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Editorial (50) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (414) Artificial Intelligence (1603) Chatbots and Conversational Agents (589) Epublishing and Open Access (94) Digital Science, Open Science (84) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (531) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (581)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/51584, first published .
Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor

Authors of this article:

Tiffany I Leung1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Taiane de Azevedo Cardoso1 Author Orcid Image ;   Amaryllis Mavragani1 Author Orcid Image ;   Gunther Eysenbach1, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (30) Tweetations (17) Metrics

Journals

  1. van Manen M. What Does ChatGPT Mean for Qualitative Health Research?. Qualitative Health Research 2023;33(13):1135 View
  2. Munro L. Are Human Peer Reviewers Still the Bedrock of Scientific Publications?. South African Radiographer 2023;61(2):5 View
  3. Miao J, Thongprayoon C, Suppadungsuk S, Garcia Valencia O, Qureshi F, Cheungpasitporn W. Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review. Clinics and Practice 2023;14(1):89 View
  4. Inam M, Sheikh S, Minhas A, Vaughan E, Krittanawong C, Samad Z, Lavie C, Khoja A, D'Cruze M, Slipczuk L, Alarakhiya F, Naseem A, Haider A, Virani S. A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing. Current Problems in Cardiology 2024;49(3):102387 View
  5. Chen N, Sng B. Ethical Principles of Clinical and Translational Research. Anesthesiology Clinics 2024;42(4):581 View
  6. Ma S, Rohatgi N, Chen J. The promises and limitations of artificial intelligence for quality improvement, patient safety, and research in hospital medicine. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2025;20(1):85 View
  7. Hamed A, Wu X. Detection of ChatGPT fake science with the xFakeSci learning algorithm. Scientific Reports 2024;14(1) View
  8. Laohawetwanit T, Pinto D, Bychkov A. A survey analysis of the adoption of large language models among pathologists. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2025;163(1):52 View
  9. Levin G, Piedimonte S, Zand B. Navigating the complexities of artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a dual perspective. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 2024;34(10):1495 View
  10. Yu H, Fan L, Li L, Zhou J, Ma Z, Xian L, Hua W, He S, Jin M, Zhang Y, Gandhi A, Ma X. Large Language Models in Biomedical and Health Informatics: A Review with Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research 2024;8(4):658 View
  11. Suchikova Y, Tsybuliak N. ChatGPT isn’t an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed. Accountability in Research 2024:1 View
  12. Silva G, Khera R, Schwamm L, Acampa M, Adelman E, Boltze J, Broderick J, Brodtmann A, Christensen H, Dalli L, Duncan K, Elgendy I, Ergul A, Goldstein L, Hinkle J, Johansen M, Jood K, Kasner S, Levine S, Li Z, Lip G, Marsh E, Muir K, Ospel J, Pera J, Quinn T, Räty S, Ranta A, Richards L, Romero J, Willey J, Hillis A, Veerbeek J. Reviewer Experience Detecting and Judging Human Versus Artificial Intelligence Content: The Stroke Journal Essay Contest. Stroke 2024;55(10):2573 View
  13. Buvat I, Weber W. Is ChatGPT a Reliable Ghostwriter?. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2024;65(10):1499 View
  14. Hu J, Li C, Ge Y, Yang J, Zhu S, He C. Mapping the Evolution of Digital Health Research: Bibliometric Overview of Research Hotspots, Trends, and Collaboration of Publications in JMIR (1999-2024). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e58987 View
  15. Gawlik-Kobylińska M. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Scientific Collaboration: Insights from Students and Educational Implications. Education Sciences 2024;14(10):1132 View
  16. Ou P, Wen R, Deng L, Shi L, Liang H, Wang J, Liu C. Exploring the changing landscape of medical imaging: insights from highly cited studies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Radiology 2024 View
  17. Bertolo R, Campi R, Zaorsky N, Antonelli A, Serni S, Crestani A, Giannarini G. Unravelling the evolution of medical scientific publishing to hold the promise of science for better patient care. BJU International 2025;135(2):186 View
  18. Giray L. Benefits and Challenges of Using AI for Peer Review: A Study on Researchers’ Perceptions. The Serials Librarian 2024;85(5-6):144 View
  19. González Morcillo C. Repensando el valor en la ciencIA: más allá del estigma de la inteligencia artificial en comunicación académica. Anales de Pediatría 2025;102(2):503696 View
  20. Seghier M. AI-powered peer review needs human supervision. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2025;23(1):104 View
  21. Nazari A, Askari A, Rahimi Foroushani A, Garmaroudi G. The effect of educational intervention based on social media on mental health literacy of high school students in Ramhormoz city: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychology 2024;15 View
  22. Salazar A, Kunc M. The contribution of GenAI to business analytics. Journal of Business Analytics 2025:1 View
  23. González Morcillo C. Rethinking value in science: Moving beyond the stigma of artificial intelligence in academic communication. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition) 2025;102(2):503696 View
  24. Yoşumaz İ. Generative Artificial Intelligence and Usage in Academia. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2025;35(1):1 View
  25. Yin S, Huang S, Xue P, Xu Z, Lian Z, Ye C, Ma S, Liu M, Hu Y, Lu P, Li C. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals. BMC Medicine 2025;23(1) View
  26. Doskaliuk B, Zimba O, Yessirkepov M, Klishch I, Yatsyshyn R. Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity. Journal of Korean Medical Science 2025;40(7) View
  27. Ebadi S, Nejadghanbar H, Salman A, Khosravi H. Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers. Journal of Academic Ethics 2025 View
  28. Schneider D, Mishra A, Gluski J, Shah H, Ward M, Brown E, Sciubba D, Lo S. Prevalence of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Text in Neurosurgical Publications: Implications for Academic Integrity and Ethical Authorship. Cureus 2025 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Thiga M. Facilitating Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education With Generative AI. View
  2. Papadopoulou P, Lytras M. Precision Health in the Digital Age. View