Accessibility settings

Journal of Medical Internet Research

The leading peer-reviewed journal for digital medicine and health and health care in the internet age. 

Editor-in-Chief:

Gunther Eysenbach, MD, MPH, FACMI, Founding Editor and Publisher; Adjunct Professor, School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada

Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA, FACTS, Lead Editor; Research Director of Real-World Evidence, Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Washington, DC


Impact Factor 8.2 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 10.4 More information about CiteScore

The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is the pioneer open access eHealth journal, and is the flagship journal of JMIR Publications. The journal is ranked #1 on Google Scholar in the 'Medical Informatics' discipline. The journal focuses on emerging technologies, medical devices, apps, engineering, telehealth and informatics applications for patient education, prevention, population health and clinical care.

As an open access journal, we are read by clinicians, allied health professionals, informal caregivers, and patients alike, and have (as with all JMIR journals) a focus on readable and applied science reporting the design and evaluation of health innovations and emerging technologies. We publish original research, viewpoints, and reviews (both literature reviews and medical device/technology/app reviews). Peer-review reports are portable across JMIR journals and papers can be transferred, so authors save time by not having to resubmit a paper to a different journal but can simply transfer it between journals. 

We are also a leader in participatory and open science approaches, and offer the option to publish new submissions immediately as preprints, which receive DOIs for immediate citation (eg, in grant proposals), and for open peer-review purposes. We also invite patients to participate (eg, as peer-reviewers) and have patient representatives on editorial boards.

As all JMIR journals, the journal encourages Open Science principles and strongly encourages publication of a protocol before data collection. Authors who have published a protocol in JMIR Research Protocols get a discount of 20% on the Article Processing Fee when publishing a subsequent results paper in any JMIR journal.

JMIR is indexed in all major literature indices including National Library of Medicine(NLM)/MEDLINE, Sherpa/Romeo, PubMed, PMC, Scopus, Psycinfo, Clarivate (which includes Web of Science (WoS)/ESCI/SCIE), EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, DOAJ, GoOA and others. 

The Journal of Medical Internet Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 8.2, ranking Q1 in Medical Informatics (4/54) and Health Care Sciences & Services (8/194).

Journal of Medical Internet Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 10.4 (2025), placing it in the 87th percentile (130/1022) as a first quartile (Q1) journal in the field of Computer Science Applications, and in the 87th percentile (22/168) as a first quartile (Q1) journal in the field of Health Informatics.

Be a widely cited leader in the digital health revolution and submit your paper today!

Recent Articles

Medical team monitors patient data on screen showing risk prediction
Artificial Intelligence

The trajectory of a patient with trauma is often complex and nonlinear. Real-time estimation of the mortality risk from prehospital care to discharge is critical for point-of-care decision-making and for benchmarking the quality of care. Conventional risk assessment systems in trauma are simple and data-sparse, leaving potential for harvesting available data for personalized risk assessments accounting for developing patient states.

Woman wearing VR headset outdoors, reaching with hands
Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology

Urban green spaces support psychological well-being, yet access is often limited for city residents. Virtual reality (VR) offers a promising indoor alternative, but evidence on sustained mental health effects of longer-term VR nature exposure remains limited.

Laptop screen shows GenAI summary on managing high blood pressure, with students studying in library.
Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues

Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly used by health information consumers to interpret medical content and support decision-making. Although these systems provide accessible and timely information, they may also produce inaccurate or misleading outputs. Effective use of GenAI, therefore, depends on users’ ability to calibrate trust based on information accuracy. However, little is known about how learned dependency on GenAI (the habitual reliance on AI systems for solving problems) influences trust calibration in health information contexts.

Young woman using a smartphone at a desk
Chatbots and Conversational Agents

Digital health tools, such as health chatbots, may improve access to scalable health support, but adoption remains inconsistent. Existing models do not fully integrate technology acceptance factors with health motivation factors relevant to digital health use.

Woman in plaid shirt texting on smartphone, close-up of hands
Digital Health Reviews

Social media has become an important channel for health information dissemination and public discussion of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Previous reviews have examined social media and HPV vaccination, often focusing on single platforms, broader HPV-related topics, or the potential effects on knowledge, leaving limited cross-platform synthesis specifically focused on HPV vaccine–related communication content, information sources, and analytical approaches.

Young Asian man in glasses using a laptop outdoors, with a bicycle nearby.
Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues

Digital platforms are primary sources of sexual health information for young adults, yet they are widely perceived as unreliable. This tension between distrust and reliance remains undertheorized.

Four seniors reminisce over old photos at a table with flowers and tea.
Artificial Intelligence

Quality of life (QoL) plays a crucial role in dementia care; however, QoL and its dynamic, context-dependent nature can be difficult to capture among people living with dementia due to challenges in memory and communication, and limitations of self-reported QoL instruments. Observational tools such as the Maastricht Electronic Daily Life Observation (MEDLO) provide narrative descriptions of the daily life of people living with dementia in nursing homes. However, the MEDLO tool was not developed to assess QoL specifically, and it remains unclear to what extent its narrative descriptions reflect aspects of QoL. Analyzing these narrative descriptions is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Recent advances in natural language processing, including large language models (LLMs), offer the potential to analyze these narrative descriptions at scale.

Doctor taking blood pressure reading of a patient's arm with a sphygmomanometer
Data Science

Hypertension is a leading preventable cause of cardiovascular disease, yet a substantial proportion of adults remain undiagnosed, limiting opportunities for early intervention. A predictive model was commissioned by the North West London (NWL) Integrated Care Board to identify undiagnosed hypertension. The model was developed using health records from the Whole Systems Integrated Care (WSIC) database.

Asian female doctor in blue scrubs touching a medical icon on a digital interface.
Artificial Intelligence

AI-enabled digital health services are rapidly expanding within health care systems and are expected to improve health management and access to health information. However, rigorous empirical evidence on whether AI health service use is associated with individual health satisfaction remains limited, particularly regarding whether these potential benefits differ across socioeconomic groups.

Doctor in white coat looking at computer screen in modern office with medical imaging.
Artificial Intelligence

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly entering health care, but limited empirical data exist on health care professionals’ perceptions. Understanding health care professionals’ attitudes is essential for responsible implementation as LLMs transition from experimental to routine tools.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member

  • Committee on Publication Ethics

  • Open Access

  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association

  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member

  •  

This journal is indexed in

 
  • PubMed

  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE

  •  
  • SCOPUSDOAJCINAHL (EBSCO)PsycInfoSherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO EssentialsGoOA - Chinese Academy of Sciences

  •  
  • Web of Science - SCIE

  •  

  •  
  •