Journal of Medical Internet Research
The leading peer-reviewed journal for digital medicine and health and health care in the internet age.
Editor-in-Chief:
Gunther Eysenbach, MD, MPH, FACMI, Founding Editor and Publisher; Adjunct Professor, School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA, FACTS, Lead Editor; Research Director of Real-World Evidence, Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Washington, DC
Impact Factor 8.2 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 10.4 More information about CiteScore
Recent Articles
The rise of video-based social media platforms and the shift toward a video-first content strategy by social media companies have altered how people consume and engage with food-related content. However, little is known about how young adults experience, interpret, and are influenced by food-related videos on social media across different national and cultural contexts.
Video consultations have become an established component of general practice and are increasingly promoted to improve access, efficiency, and health care sustainability. While previous research has primarily explored the perspectives of individual patients and health care professionals, less is known about how organizations involved in strategic video consultation implementation consider their benefits, challenges, and future role within health care systems.
Among community-dwelling older adults living alone, less frequent preintervention social contact was associated with greater reductions in loneliness during a social robot intervention. Future trials should examine whether preintervention social contact modifies the effects of social robot interventions.
People with intellectual disabilities experience a disproportionate burden of preventable health conditions, often linked to low levels of physical activity and poor dietary habits. Although digital health interventions hold considerable promise for addressing these challenges, many existing solutions remain difficult to use for this population due to limited accessibility. Co-design is increasingly advocated to develop digital health solutions that better align with users’ needs, yet there is limited empirical guidance for co-design processes with people with intellectual disabilities.
Preprints Open for Peer Review
Open Peer Review Period:
-
Open Peer Review Period:
-
Open Peer Review Period:
-
We are working in partnership with
This journal is indexed in
