Accessibility settings

Journal of Medical Internet Research

The leading peer-reviewed journal for digital medicine and health and health care in the internet age. 

Editor-in-Chief:

Gunther Eysenbach, MD, MPH, FACMI, Founding Editor and Publisher; Adjunct Professor, School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada

Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, DHSc, MSc, MA, FACTS, Lead Editor; Research Director of Real-World Evidence, Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Washington, DC


Impact Factor 6.0 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 11.7 More information about CiteScore

The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is the pioneer open access eHealth journal, and is the flagship journal of JMIR Publications. It is a leading health services and digital health journal globally in terms of quality/visibility (Journal Impact Factor 6.0, Journal Citation Reports 2025 from Clarivate), ranking Q1 in both the 'Medical Informatics' and 'Health Care Sciences & Services' categories, and is also the largest journal in the field. The journal is ranked #1 on Google Scholar in the 'Medical Informatics' discipline. The journal focuses on emerging technologies, medical devices, apps, engineering, telehealth and informatics applications for patient education, prevention, population health and clinical care.

JMIR is indexed in all major literature indices including National Library of Medicine(NLM)/MEDLINE, Sherpa/Romeo, PubMed, PMCScopus, Psycinfo, Clarivate (which includes Web of Science (WoS)/ESCI/SCIE), EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, DOAJ, GoOA and others. Journal of Medical Internet Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 11.7 (2024), placing it in the 92nd percentile (#12 of 153) as a Q1 journal in the field of Health Informatics. It is a selective journal complemented by almost 30 specialty JMIR sister journals, which have a broader scope, and which together receive over 10,000 submissions a year. 

As an open access journal, we are read by clinicians, allied health professionals, informal caregivers, and patients alike, and have (as with all JMIR journals) a focus on readable and applied science reporting the design and evaluation of health innovations and emerging technologies. We publish original research, viewpoints, and reviews (both literature reviews and medical device/technology/app reviews). Peer-review reports are portable across JMIR journals and papers can be transferred, so authors save time by not having to resubmit a paper to a different journal but can simply transfer it between journals. 

We are also a leader in participatory and open science approaches, and offer the option to publish new submissions immediately as preprints, which receive DOIs for immediate citation (eg, in grant proposals), and for open peer-review purposes. We also invite patients to participate (eg, as peer-reviewers) and have patient representatives on editorial boards.

As all JMIR journals, the journal encourages Open Science principles and strongly encourages publication of a protocol before data collection. Authors who have published a protocol in JMIR Research Protocols get a discount of 20% on the Article Processing Fee when publishing a subsequent results paper in any JMIR journal.

Be a widely cited leader in the digital health revolution and submit your paper today!

Recent Articles

Futuristic digital tunnel with glowing blue light and orange accents
Viewpoints and Perspectives

Health care is undergoing rapid change due to digitalization, artificial intelligence, data-driven decision-making, and shifting patient needs. These developments raise complex ethical, social, and organizational questions that cannot always be addressed by conventional research methods alone. There is a growing need for tools that help stakeholders imagine alternative futures to surface underlying values. Futures studies and speculative fiction respond to this need by presenting “what if” scenarios that make uncertain futures concrete and discussable, enabling dialogue among diverse stakeholders such as health care professionals, researchers, policy makers, and decision makers. This paper examines how speculative fiction can be used as a structured yet imaginative tool in health care research. It positions speculative fiction as a tool within futures studies and participatory research approaches, outlining its conceptual grounding and clarifying its role that stimulates interpretation and reflection within methods such as focus groups, workshops, and surveys. In this way, speculative fiction complements established approaches such as human-centered design, contextual inquiry, and value specification by addressing what does not yet exist and making abstract future issues tangible. The paper presents a case study, The Digital Data Divide, in which speculative fiction was used to explore the use of personal data in health care. Two contrasting short films were developed to stimulate dialogue and invite participants to reflect on associated values. Insights from this case are structured into a 6-step practical reporting guide: determining whether speculative fiction fits the research aim, choosing an appropriate form of speculative fiction, creating or selecting speculative scenarios, engaging participants, analyzing responses, and sharing and disseminating results. Across these steps, the paper discusses methodological and ethical considerations, including alignment between scenarios and study aims, balancing utopian and dystopian elements, questions of plausibility and interpretability, and the need for researcher reflexivity. Overall, this paper contributes to the growing discussion on future-oriented tools in health care research by showing how speculative fiction can help address complex and uncertain challenges in ways that are accessible to a wide range of stakeholders and that support dialogue across perspectives, provided that its use is ethically transparent, methodologically explicit, and carefully reported. The paper concludes with a call to other researchers to also experiment with speculative fiction and to share their experiences with the health care research community to learn and advance its use.

Office team stretching together during a break.
Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions

Regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) reduces the risk of noncommunicable diseases, yet one-third of adults globally fail to meet MVPA recommendations. Office employees, among the least active groups, face heightened risks due to prolonged sedentary behavior and barriers like lack of time, fatigue, and low motivation. Although scalable, web-based interventions frequently face challenges, such as low engagement, high attrition, and limited personalization. Blended interventions, combining digital tools with interactive components, show promise but lack robust evidence among office employees.

Woman in waiting room uses smartphone while others sit on chairs.
Digital Health Reviews

Digital tools continue to evolve and have the potential to improve health care delivery. However, they are associated with challenges, including accessibility issues and health misinformation. Individuals need eHealth literacy (eHL) to reliably use these tools, and providers require appropriate eHL measurement approaches to offer targeted solutions. For around 2 decades, researchers have been operationalizing and measuring eHL.

Elderly couple smiling at a laptop, learning technology
Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions

Survivors of cardiac arrest often face multifaceted challenges—cognitive, emotional, physical, and existential—that extend beyond clinical recovery. Despite these long-term consequences, follow-up care is often insufficient, and access to reliable information and support remains limited. Broader initiatives to address post–cardiac arrest care are still lacking. This qualitative study represents the initial phase of a multiphase development process to cocreate, design, and later evaluate a web-based support and learning platform for cardiac arrest survivors. The platform is intended to complement existing health care services and support survivors in managing life after cardiac arrest.

Team collaborates on a project, writing in notebooks and using a tablet.
Tutorial

Applying digital health technologies (DHTs) for health promotion and disease prevention is recommended by official bodies such as the World Health Organization. User-centered co-design with systematic patient and public involvement is considered best practice for developing such complex interventions. Although well-established methodological guides and frameworks are available, an important gap is that they are either holistic but generic, offering minimal operational guidance, or context-specific and operational, but focusing only on subphases of establishing DHT-enhanced interventions.

Doctor on the phone with stethoscope and laptop in a clinic
Digital Health Reviews

Many inductive reviews exploring telehealth and its application in health care have identified missing or inconsistently reported implementation data, calling for a standardized approach to telehealth research.

Doctor in white coat showing medical information on laptop to patient.
Digital Health Reviews

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. The complexity of guideline-concordant care and unstructured clinical data has driven demand for decision-support tools. Large language models (LLMs) show promise for processing clinical data and patient–provider communication, yet evidence is fragmented, and a CRC-specific synthesis across the full care continuum is lacking.

Teenage boy in blue hoodie walking in high school hallway and sitting on bench
Digital Health Reviews

The transition from adolescence to young adulthood (age 10‐25 years) constitutes a sensitive developmental period marked by rapid biological, psychological, and social change, during which preventive health interventions can shape long-term outcomes. Mobile health tools offer accessible opportunities for tailored support for this population, but often adapt poorly to dynamic contexts, resulting in inconsistent engagement and effects. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs), which tailor support in real time using ongoing data, are increasingly explored as precision health strategies. However, how these mechanisms are designed, implemented, and evaluated for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) has not been systematically reviewed.

Benchmarking LLMs in Microsatellite Instability Cancers: Knowledge, strategies, accuracy, safety.
Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT

The reliability of general-purpose large language models (LLMs) for complex clinical tasks in specialized domains such as microsatellite instability (MSI) cancers remains critically uncharacterized. The absence of a domain-specific benchmark to evaluate and guide the optimization of their capabilities across diverse clinical tasks poses unevaluated risks to patient safety.

Human and robot finger touching with blue light connecting them
Clinical Informatics

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in medicine, including clinical decision-making. AI-based decision support systems (DSS) can enhance early risk detection and treatment optimization. However, the perspectives of patients and their support persons on AI-assisted DSS in clinical care, particularly regarding shared decision-making (SDM), remain underexplored.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member

  • Committee on Publication Ethics

  • Open Access

  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association

  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member

  •  

This journal is indexed in

 
  • PubMed

  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE

  •  
  • SCOPUSDOAJCINAHL (EBSCO)PsycInfoSherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO EssentialsGoOA - Chinese Academy of Sciences

  •  
  • Web of Science - SCIE

  •  

  •  
  •