This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (287) mHealth for Symptom and Disease Monitoring, Chronic Disease Management (1380) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (943) E-Health / Health Services Research and New Models of Care (503) Health Care Quality and Health Services Research (266) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (829) Usability Evaluation Case Studies (188) Usability and Technology Use Studies with Elder Subjects (162)

Published on in Vol 23, No 12 (2021): December

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/29071, first published .
Assessing the Implementation and Effectiveness of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Older Adults With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study

Assessing the Implementation and Effectiveness of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Older Adults With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study

Assessing the Implementation and Effectiveness of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Older Adults With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Carolyn Steele Gray1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Edward Chau2 Author Orcid Image ;   Farah Tahsin2 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah Harvey3 Author Orcid Image ;   Mayura Loganathan4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Brian McKinstry6 Author Orcid Image ;   Stewart W Mercer6 Author Orcid Image ;   Jason Xin Nie7 Author Orcid Image ;   Ted E Palen8 Author Orcid Image ;   Tim Ramsay9, 10 Author Orcid Image ;   Kednapa Thavorn9, 10 Author Orcid Image ;   Ross Upshur1, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Walter P Wodchis2, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (19) Metrics

Journals

  1. Tawfik B, Burgess E, Kosich M, Jaffe S, Guest D, Brown-Glaberman U, Pankratz V, Sussman A. Patient, provider, and nurse preferences of patient reported outcomes (PRO) and side effect management during cancer treatment of underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups, rural and economically disadvantaged patients: a mixed methods study. Cancer Causes & Control 2022;33(9):1193 View
  2. Miranda R, Bhuiya A, Thraya Z, Hancock-Howard R, Chan B, Steele Gray C, Wodchis W, Thavorn K. An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Older Adults With Complex Chronic Conditions: Cost-Utility Analysis. JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e35075 View
  3. Tahsin F, Austin T, McKinstry B, Mercer S, Loganathan M, Thavorn K, Upshur R, Steele Gray C. Examining Use Behavior of a Goal-Supporting mHealth App in Primary Care Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(4):e37684 View
  4. Iqbal M, Newman B, Ellis L, Mears S, Harrison R. Characterising consumer engagement in virtual models of care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Patient Education and Counseling 2023;115:107922 View
  5. Rouleau G, Wu K, Ramamoorthi K, Boxall C, Liu R, Maloney S, Zelmer J, Scott T, Larsen D, Wijeysundera H, Ziegler D, Bhatia S, Kishimoto V, Steele Gray C, Desveaux L. Mapping Theories, Models, and Frameworks to Evaluate Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e51098 View
  6. Steele Gray C, Ramachandran M, Brinton C, Forte M, Loganathan M, Walsh R, Callaghan J, Upshur R, Wiljer D. Digitally mediated relationships: How social representation in technology influences the therapeutic relationship in primary care. Social Science & Medicine 2024;353:116962 View
  7. Yi M, Hui Y, Hu L, Zhang W, Wang Z. The Experiences and Perceptions of Older Adults with Multimorbidity Toward E-Health Care: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Telemedicine and e-Health 2024;30(10):2527 View
  8. Vaca-Benavides D, Uthayakumar S, McSwiggan E, Ostrishko K, Wanok G, Halpenny C, Cardamone E. Experiences of Digital Transitions in Health and Social Care Services in Later Life: Findings and Reflections from a Collaborative, Interdisciplinary Exploratory Review. Social Sciences 2024;13(10):526 View