This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Viewpoints and Perspectives (522) Security and Privacy of mHealth and uHealth (126) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (486) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (586) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1660) Data Science (276) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (781) Recruitment of Research Participants (300)

Published on in Vol 23, No 12 (2021): December

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/25414, first published .
Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists

Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists

Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists

Authors of this article:

Rebecca Bartlett Ellis1 Author Orcid Image ;   Julie Wright2 Author Orcid Image ;   Lisa Soederberg Miller3 Author Orcid Image ;   Danielle Jake-Schoffman4 Author Orcid Image ;   Eric B Hekler5, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Carly M Goldstein7 Author Orcid Image ;   Danielle Arigo8 Author Orcid Image ;   Camille Nebeker5, 6 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (25) Metrics

Journals

  1. Hackett K, Giovannetti T. Capturing Cognitive Aging in Vivo: Application of a Neuropsychological Framework for Emerging Digital Tools. JMIR Aging 2022;5(3):e38130 View
  2. Mackey T, Baur C, Eysenbach G. Advancing Infodemiology in a Digital Intensive Era. JMIR Infodemiology 2022;2(1):e37115 View
  3. Seiferth C, Vogel L, Aas B, Brandhorst I, Carlbring P, Conzelmann A, Esfandiari N, Finkbeiner M, Hollmann K, Lautenbacher H, Meinzinger E, Newbold A, Opitz A, Renner T, Sander L, Santangelo P, Schoedel R, Schuller B, Stachl C, Terhorst Y, Torous J, Wac K, Werner-Seidler A, Wolf S, Löchner J. How to e-mental health: a guideline for researchers and practitioners using digital technology in the context of mental health. Nature Mental Health 2023;1(8):542 View
  4. Meyer K, Gonzalez A, Benton D. Qualitative Evaluation of Family Caregivers’ Experiences Participating in Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships (KINDER): Web-Based Intervention to Improve Relationship Quality. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e42561 View
  5. Baron R, Hamdiui N, Helms Y, Crutzen R, Götz H, Stein M. Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e44728 View
  6. Goldstein S, Nebeker C, Ellis R, Oser M. Ethical, legal, and social implications of digital health: A needs assessment from the Society of Behavioral Medicine to inform capacity building for behavioral scientists. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2024;14(3):189 View
  7. Kim M, Patrick K, Nebeker C, Godino J, Stein S, Klasnja P, Perski O, Viglione C, Coleman A, Hekler E. The Digital Therapeutics Real-World Evidence Framework: An Approach for Guiding Evidence-Based Digital Therapeutics Design, Development, Testing, and Monitoring. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e49208 View
  8. Zrubka Z, Champion A, Holtorf A, Di Bidino R, Earla J, Boltyenkov A, Tabata-Kelly M, Asche C, Burrell A. The PICOTS-ComTeC Framework for Defining Digital Health Interventions: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report. Value in Health 2024;27(4):383 View
  9. Hackett K, Xu S, McKniff M, Paglia L, Barnett I, Giovannetti T. Mobility-Based Smartphone Digital Phenotypes for Unobtrusively Capturing Everyday Cognition, Mood, and Community Life-Space in Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity Study. JMIR Human Factors 2024;11:e59974 View