This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Viewpoints and Perspectives (619) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (1005) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (894) E-Health Policy and Health Systems Innovation (341)

Published on in Vol 23, No 6 (2021): June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/26694, first published .
Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment

Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment

Why Are Digital Health Care Systems Still Poorly Designed, and Why Is Health Care Practice Not Asking for More? Three Paths Toward a Sustainable Digital Work Environment

Authors of this article:

Johanna Persson1 Author Orcid Image ;   Christofer Rydenfält1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (24) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Scott P, Emerson K, Henderson-Reay T. Data saves lives. BMJ 2021:n1694 View
  2. Stoumpos A, Kitsios F, Talias M. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(4):3407 View
  3. Glock H, Milos Nymberg V, Borgström Bolmsjö B, Holm J, Calling S, Wolff M, Pikkemaat M. Attitudes, Barriers, and Concerns Regarding Telemedicine Among Swedish Primary Care Physicians: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of General Medicine 2021;Volume 14:9237 View
  4. Frennert S, Erlingsdóttir G, Muhic M, Rydenfält C, Milos Nymberg V, Ekman B. ‘It increases my ability to influence my ways of working’: A qualitative study on digitally mediated patient management in primary healthcare. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2023;37(1):88 View
  5. Guandalini I. Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research 2022;148:456 View
  6. Nordmark S, Lindberg I, Zingmark K. “It’s all about time and timing”: nursing staffs’ experiences with an agile development process, from its initial requirements to the deployment of its outcome of ICT solutions to support discharge planning. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2022;22(1) View
  7. Persson J, Larsson R, Erlingsdottir G, Rydenfält C. How Digital Systems Are Used in Swedish Home Care Nursing Practice. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2023;41(8):586 View
  8. Hohm A, Happel O, Hurtienne J, Grundgeiger T. "When the Beeping Stops, you Completely Freak Out" - How Acute Care Teams Experience and Use Technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2023;7(CSCW1):1 View
  9. Koebe P, Bohnet-Joschko S. The Impact of Digital Transformation on Inpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2023;9:e40622 View
  10. Rossi E, Attaianese E. Research Synergies between Sustainability and Human-Centered Design: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2023;15(17):12884 View
  11. White M. Workarounds and shadow IT – balancing innovation and risk. Business Information Review 2023;40(3):114 View
  12. Srivastava U, Dasari S, Shah N. Learnings in Digital Health Design: Insights From a Pilot Web App for Structured Note-Taking for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e49358 View
  13. Wang T, Zhu H, Qian S, Giunti G, Goossens R, Melles M. Designing digital patient experiences: The digital health design framework. Applied Ergonomics 2024;119:104289 View
  14. Bosworth K, Ghosh P, Flowers L, Proffitt R, Koopman R, Tosh A, Wilson G, Braddock A. The user-centered design and development of a childhood and adolescent obesity Electronic Health Record tool, a mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Digital Health 2024;6 View
  15. Wieslander L, Bäckström I, Häggström M. Participation in the digital transformation of healthcare: a review of qualitative studies. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2024;37(3/4):68 View
  16. Cahill M, Cleary B, Cullinan S. The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 2025;25(1) View
  17. LEIVADITIS V, SEPETIS A. DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AS A CATALYST FOR SUSTAINABLE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF CURRENT EVIDENCE. International Journal of Innovation Management 2025;29(05n06) View
  18. L. Claggett J, Karahanna E. Understanding the Role of Technology in Coordination Through Affordance Configurations. Journal of Management Information Systems 2025;42(2):599 View
  19. Rikala P, Heilala V, Karhapää A, Hämäläinen R. Exploring Technostress and Meta-Work: Identifying Subgroups Among Finnish Employees. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2025:1 View
  20. Andreas Rio A, Mai N, Alanu Dinasti P, Wilson Liman S, Dinda S. Evaluation of Interaction Design in the Fast Food Restaurant’s Self-Service Kiosk (Case Study: Mcdonald’s Outlet).. ALAM CIPTA International Journal Of Sustainable Tropical Design & Practice 2025;18(S1) View
  21. Dermody G, Cook D, Fritz R. Interpretation of Health-Smart Home Data and Implications for Clinical Decision-Making: Inductive Content Analysis. JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e75234 View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Söderberg E, Church L, Börstler J, Niehorster D, Rydenfält C. The International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2022. Understanding the Experience of Code Review: Misalignments, Attention, and Units of Analysis View
  2. Bjarnason E, Persson J, Rydenfält C. 2023 IEEE 31st International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW). Initial Case Study Findings for Requirements on Work-Related Health Aspects View
  3. Lin D, Zhang C, Xiao B, Yuan X. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Digital Society and Artificial Intelligence. Exploring Success Factors for Digital Patient Decision Aid Implementation: A Hybrid Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL Approach View