This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (806) Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (689) Usability Evaluation Case Studies (196) Patient Education for Cancer (153)

Published on in Vol 18, No 7 (2016): July

Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study

Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study

Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study

Authors of this article:

Sifra Bolle1 Author Orcid Image ;   Geke Romijn1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ellen M A Smets3 Author Orcid Image ;   Eugene F Loos1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marleen Kunneman3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Julia C M van Weert1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (73) Tweetations (14) Metrics

Journals

  1. Gorini A, Mazzocco K, Triberti S, Sebri V, Savioni L, Pravettoni G. A P5 Approach to m-Health: Design Suggestions for Advanced Mobile Health Technology. Frontiers in Psychology 2018;9 View
  2. van Beukering M, Velu A, van den Berg L, Kok M, Mol B, Frings-Dresen M, de Leeuw R, van der Post J, Peute L. Usability and Usefulness of a Mobile Health App for Pregnancy-Related Work Advice: Mixed-Methods Approach. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(5):e11442 View
  3. van Weert J. Facing frailty by effective digital and patient-provider communication?. Patient Education and Counseling 2020;103(3):433 View
  4. den Bakker C, Schaafsma F, van der Meij E, Meijerink W, van den Heuvel B, Baan A, Davids P, Scholten P, van der Meij S, van Baal W, van Dalsen A, Lips D, van der Steeg J, Leclercq W, Geomini P, Consten E, Schraffordt Koops S, de Castro S, van Kesteren P, Cense H, Stockmann H, ten Cate A, Bonjer H, Huirne J, Anema J. Electronic Health Program to Empower Patients in Returning to Normal Activities After General Surgical and Gynecological Procedures: Intervention Mapping as a Useful Method for Further Development. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(2):e9938 View
  5. Shaffer K, Tigershtrom A, Badr H, Benvengo S, Hernandez M, Ritterband L. Dyadic Psychosocial eHealth Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(3):e15509 View
  6. Bol N, Helberger N, Weert J. Differences in mobile health app use: A source of new digital inequalities?. The Information Society 2018;34(3):183 View
  7. Ramello M, Audisio R. “Understanding older patients: Communication as the key step for a comprehensive approach”. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2020;46(3):301 View
  8. van Lent L, Stoel N, van Weert J, van Gurp J, de Jonge M, Lolkema M, Gort E, Pulleman S, Oomen-de Hoop E, Hasselaar J, van der Rijt C. Realizing better doctor-patient dialogue about choices in palliative care and early phase clinical trial participation: towards an online value clarification tool (OnVaCT). BMC Palliative Care 2019;18(1) View
  9. Ananthan K. Letter to the editor on “Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review”. European Journal of Cancer Care 2020;29(1) View
  10. Haase K, Sattar S, Holtslander L, Thomas R. The role of Internet cancer information for older adults with cancer: Perspectives of older adults and healthcare professionals. International Journal of Older People Nursing 2020;15(2) View
  11. Bolle S, Romijn G, Smets E, Loos E, Kunneman M, van Weert J. Authors’ Reply: Response to “Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(11):e289 View
  12. Biduski D, Bellei E, Rodriguez J, Zaina L, De Marchi A. Assessing long-term user experience on a mobile health application through an in-app embedded conversation-based questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior 2020;104:106169 View
  13. Nguyen M, van Weert J, Bol N, Loos E, Tytgat K, van de Ven A, Smets E. Tailoring the Mode of Information Presentation: Effects on Younger and Older Adults' Attention and Recall of Online Information. Human Communication Research 2017;43(1):102 View
  14. Wildenbos G, Peute L, Jaspers M. Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US). International Journal of Medical Informatics 2018;114:66 View
  15. Lleras de Frutos M, Casellas‐Grau A, Sumalla E, de Gracia M, Borràs J, Ochoa Arnedo C. A systematic and comprehensive review of internet use in cancer patients: Psychological factors. Psycho-Oncology 2020;29(1):6 View
  16. Kureck K, Homölle S. Individuals’ Perception and Processing of Risk Information: Exploratory Evidence from Germany. Schmalenbach Business Review 2018;70(3):255 View
  17. Driesenaar J, van Dulmen S, van Weert J, Noordman J. Patients’ Evaluation of a Preparatory Online Communication Tool for Older Patients With Cancer Preceding Chemotherapy. Cancer Nursing 2020;43(2):E71 View
  18. Nguyen M, Bol N, van Weert J, Loos E, Tytgat K, Geijsen D, Drenth E, Janse M, Smets E. Optimising eHealth tools for older patients: Collaborative redesign of a hospital website. European Journal of Cancer Care 2019;28(1):e12882 View
  19. Noordman J, Driesenaar J, van Bruinessen I, Portielje J, van Dulmen S. Evaluation and Implementation of ListeningTime: A Web-Based Preparatory Communication Tool for Elderly Patients With Cancer and Their Health Care Providers. JMIR Cancer 2019;5(1):e11556 View
  20. Cao Y, Li J, Qin X, Hu B. Examining the Effect of Overload on the MHealth Application Resistance Behavior of Elderly Users: An SOR Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(18):6658 View
  21. Nguyen M, Smets E, Bol N, Loos E, Van Weert J. How Tailoring the Mode of Information Presentation Influences Younger and Older Adults’ Satisfaction with Health Websites. Journal of Health Communication 2018;23(2):170 View
  22. Motoo Y, Yukawa K, Hisamura K, Arai I. Usability of the evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine (eJIM) information site: analysis with focus group discussion and internet survey on the general population. Integrative Medicine Research 2018;7(3):238 View
  23. Timpel P, Kabeza C, Harst L. Smartphone-App für Diabetespatienten — was lernen wir aus Ruanda?. Info Diabetologie 2019;13(4):27 View
  24. Nieroda M, Lophatananon A, McMillan B, Chen L, Hughes J, Daniels R, Clark J, Rogers S, Muir K. Online Decision Support Tool for Personalized Cancer Symptom Checking in the Community (REACT): Acceptability, Feasibility, and Usability Study. JMIR Cancer 2018;4(2):e10073 View
  25. Golsteijn R, Bolman C, Peels D, Volders E, de Vries H, Lechner L. A Web-Based and Print-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention for Prostate and Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Comparison of User Characteristics and Intervention Use. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e298 View
  26. Vreugdenhil M, Kool R, van Boven K, Assendelft W, Kremer J. Use and Effects of Patient Access to Medical Records in General Practice Through a Personal Health Record in the Netherlands: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2018;7(9):e10193 View
  27. Haase K, Drury A, Puts M. Supportive Care and eHealth: A Narrative Review of Technologies, Interventions, and Opportunities for Optimizing Care in Patients With Cancer. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing 2020;24(3):32 View
  28. van Dulmen S, Driesenaar J, van Weert J, van Osch M, Noordman J. PatientVOICE: Development of a Preparatory, Pre-Chemotherapy Online Communication Tool for Older Patients With Cancer. JMIR Research Protocols 2017;6(5):e85 View
  29. Nguyen M, Smets E, Bol N, Loos E, van Laarhoven H, Geijsen D, van Berge Henegouwen M, Tytgat K, van Weert J. Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(10):e14407 View
  30. Gokani S, Kerry G, Sharma E, Ash J, Zargaran A, Rasasingam D, Mittal A. Response to “Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(11):e273 View
  31. Yılmaz N, Sungur H, van Weert J, van den Muijsenbergh M, Schouten B. Enhancing patient participation of older migrant cancer patients: needs, barriers, and eHealth. Ethnicity & Health 2022;27(5):1123 View
  32. Wang J, Liang C, Li K. Impact of Internet Use on Elderly Health: Empirical Study Based on Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) Data. Healthcare 2020;8(4):482 View
  33. Li C, Neugroschl J, Zhu C, Aloysi A, Schimming C, Cai D, Grossman H, Martin J, Sewell M, Loizos M, Zeng X, Sano M. Design Considerations for Mobile Health Applications Targeting Older Adults. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2021;79(1):1 View
  34. Sungur H, Yılmaz N, Chan B, van den Muijsenbergh M, van Weert J, Schouten B. Development and Evaluation of a Digital Intervention for Fulfilling the Needs of Older Migrant Patients With Cancer: User-Centered Design Approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e21238 View
  35. Saur N, Montroni I, Audisio R. Considerations in Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal Cancer in Older Patients. Current Oncology Reports 2021;23(1) View
  36. Guni A, Normahani P, Davies A, Jaffer U. Harnessing Machine Learning to Personalize Web-Based Health Care Content. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(10):e25497 View
  37. Grabbe P, Gschwendtner K, Maatouk I, Strobel S, Salzmann M, Bossert J, Eich W, Wild B, Meier F, Hassel J, Bieber C. Development and validation of a web-based patient decision aid for immunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials 2021;22(1) View
  38. Evans H, Forbes C, Galvão D, Vandelanotte C, Newton R, Wittert G, Chambers S, Vincent A, Kichenadasse G, Girard D, Brook N, Short C. Usability, Acceptability, and Safety Analysis of a Computer-Tailored Web-Based Exercise Intervention (ExerciseGuide) for Individuals With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Multi-Methods Laboratory-Based Study. JMIR Cancer 2021;7(3):e28370 View
  39. Yadav L, Gill T, Taylor A, De Young J, Chehade M. Identifying Opportunities, and Motivation to Enhance Capabilities, Influencing the Development of a Personalized Digital Health Hub Model of Care for Hip Fractures: Mixed Methods Exploratory Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(10):e26886 View
  40. Harst L, Wollschlaeger B, Birnstein J, Fuchs T, Timpel P. Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT. International Journal of Integrated Care 2021;21(2) View
  41. Kernebeck S, Busse T, Jux C, Meyer D, Dreier L, Zenz D, Zernikow B, Ehlers J. Participatory Design of an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Study with Nurses and Physicians. Children 2021;8(8):695 View
  42. de Looper M, Smets E, Schouten B, Bolle S, Belgers E, Eddes E, Leijtens J, van Weert J. The Patient Navigator: Can a systematically developed online health information tool improve patient participation and outcomes related to the consultation in older patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer?. BMC Cancer 2022;22(1) View
  43. Ng C, Singh D, Tan M, Kumar S, Ugargol A. Malaysian older persons’ perceptions about falls and their desired educational website characteristics: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE 2022;17(7):e0270741 View
  44. van Strien-Knippenberg I, Altendorf M, Hoving C, van Weert J, Smit E. Message Frame–Tailoring in Digital Health Communication: Intervention Redesign and Usability Testing. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(4):e33886 View
  45. Sinabell I, Ammenwerth E. Challenges and recommendations for eHealth usability evaluation with elderly users: systematic review and case study. Universal Access in the Information Society 2024;23(1):455 View
  46. Sun K, Goodfellow H, Konstantara E, Hill A, Lennard D, Lloyd-Dehler E, Mughal M, Pritchard-Jones K, Robson C, Murray E. The multidisciplinary, theory-based co-design of a new digital health intervention supporting the care of oesophageal cancer patients. DIGITAL HEALTH 2021;7 View
  47. Esfandiari E, Miller W, King S, Mortenson W, Ashe M. Development of a co-created online self-management program for people with lower limb loss: self-management for amputee rehabilitation using technology (SMART). Disability and Rehabilitation 2024;46(4):763 View
  48. Pais S, Petrova K, Parry D. Enhancing System Acceptance through User-Centred Design: Integrating Patient Generated Wellness Data. Sensors 2021;22(1):45 View
  49. Lindayani L, Permana B, Darmawati I, Taryudi T. Usability and Usefulness of a Mobile Heath App for HIV Prevention among Adolescents in Indonesia. Creative Nursing 2021;27(3):201 View
  50. Kernebeck S, Jux C, Busse T, Meyer D, Dreier L, Zenz D, Zernikow B, Ehlers J. Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians. Children 2022;9(1):82 View
  51. Otto L, Schlieter H, Harst L, Whitehouse D, Maeder A. The telemedicine community readiness model—successful telemedicine implementation and scale-up. Frontiers in Digital Health 2023;5 View
  52. Vromans R, van Eenbergen M, Geleijnse G, Pauws S, van de Poll-Franse L, Krahmer E. Exploring Cancer Survivor Needs and Preferences for Communicating Personalized Cancer Statistics From Registry Data: Qualitative Multimethod Study. JMIR Cancer 2021;7(4):e25659 View
  53. Hu S, Han J, Rong L, Zong Q, Dai M. Research on user satisfaction of sports and healthcare integration system in post-pandemic era. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 2023;44(1):871 View
  54. Sharman A, Ferguson E, Dhillon H, Macleod P, McCrossin J, Sundaresan P, Clark J, Smith M, Dodd R. An education resource for human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer patients: think-aloud interviews. Supportive Care in Cancer 2023;31(3) View
  55. Chan Z, Lim C, Leow J, Chium F, Lim S, Tong C, Zhou J, Tsi M, Tan R, Chew L. Using the technology acceptance model to examine acceptance of telemedicine by cancer patients in an ambulatory care setting. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2022;31 View
  56. Hasnan S, Aggarwal S, Mohammadi L, Koczwara B. Barriers and enablers of uptake and adherence to digital health interventions in older patients with cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Geriatric Oncology 2022;13(8):1084 View
  57. Todio E, Schofield P, Sharp J. A Qualitative Study of Men’s Experiences Using Navigate: A Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Aid. MDM Policy & Practice 2023;8(2) View
  58. Pasvanis M, Hegarty S, Russell H, Peate M, Marino J. Exploring the experiences and priorities of women with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer 2023;31(7) View
  59. van Gurp J, van Lent L, Stoel N, van der Rijt C, van Weert J, Hasselaar J. Accentuating patient values in shared decision-making: A mixed methods development of an online value clarification tool and communication training in the context of early phase clinical cancer trials. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;119:108075 View
  60. Liang F, Yang X, Peng W, Zhen S, Cao W, Li Q, Xiao Z, Gong M, Wang Y, Gu D. Applications of digital health approaches for cardiometabolic diseases prevention and management in the Western Pacific region. The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific 2024;43:100817 View
  61. Fridriksdottir N, Ingadottir B, Skuladottir K, Zoëga S, Gunnarsdottir S. Supportive Digital Health Service During Cancer Chemotherapy: Single-Arm Before-and-After Feasibility Study. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e50550 View
  62. Jindal A, Sumodhee D, Brandao-de-Resende C, Melo M, Neo Y, Lee E, Day A. Usability of an artificially intelligence-powered triage platform for adult ophthalmic emergencies: a mixed methods study. Scientific Reports 2023;13(1) View
  63. Son Y, Nam K, Shim J. Factors influencing the supportive care needs of female patients with genital cancer in South Korea. Medicine 2023;102(51):e36650 View
  64. Darley A, Furlong E, Maguire R, McCann L, Coughlan B. Relationship and Attachment to Digital Health Technology During Cancer Treatment. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 2024;40(2):151587 View
  65. Medina-García R, López-Rodríguez J, Lozano-Hernández C, Ruiz Bejerano V, Criscio P, Del Cura-González I. A Technological Tool Aimed at Self-Care in Patients With Multimorbidity: Cross-Sectional Usability Study. JMIR Human Factors 2024;11:e46811 View
  66. Cyrkot S, Hartling L, Scott S, Elliott S. Parents’ User Experience Accessing and Using a Web-Based Map of COVID-19 Recommendations for Health Decision-Making: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e53593 View
  67. Carayannis E, Canestrino R, Magliocca P. From the Dark Side of Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Looking “Beyond the Box” to Developing Human-Centric Innovation Ecosystems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024;71:6695 View
  68. Lazarou I, Krooupa A, Nikolopoulos S, Apostolidis L, Sarris N, Papadopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I. Cancer Patients’ Perspectives and Requirements of Digital Health Technologies: A Scoping Literature Review. Cancers 2024;16(13):2293 View
  69. Tesfaye W, Jordan M, Chen T, Castelino R, Sud K, Dabliz R, Aslani P. Usability Evaluation Methods Used in Electronic Discharge Summaries: Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e55247 View
  70. Huijgens F, Kwakman P, Hillen M, van Weert J, Jaspers M, Smets E, Linn A. How Cancer Patients Use the Internet to Search for Health Information: A Scenario-Based Think Aloud Study (Preprint). JMIR Infodemiology 2024 View
  71. Lay K, Hutchinson C, Song J, Milte R, Khadka J, Ratcliffe J. Cognitive interviewing for assessing the content validity of older-person specific outcome measures for quality assessment and economic evaluation: a scoping review. Quality of Life Research 2024 View
  72. Yan C, Shan Y, Lu H, Han L, Xie T, Wang W. Barriers to and Facilitators of e‐Learning Health Education Based on the Mental Workload Framework: A Scoping Review. Nursing & Health Sciences 2024;26(4) View