Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (3918) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (1254) Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science (828) Artificial Intelligence (5108) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (1679) Reviews in Metascience (3) Technology in Scientific Publishing (23) AI for Writing and Research Communication (33) Tools and Software for Metascience and Research Integrity Research (27)

Published on in Vol 28 (2026)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/81597, first published .
Doctor analyzing medical scans on laptop surrounded by futuristic screens

Artificial Intelligence Tools for Automating Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Review

Artificial Intelligence Tools for Automating Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Sashika Harasgama1 Author Orcid Image ;   Helen Pearce1 Author Orcid Image ;   Cameron Appel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Liam Loftus1 Author Orcid Image ;   Helena Painter1 Author Orcid Image ;   Isla Kuhn2 Author Orcid Image ;   Justine Karpusheff3 Author Orcid Image ;   Aji Ceesay3 Author Orcid Image ;   John Ford1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Zhang S, Lang X, Liu L, Chi H. From Variant Interpretation to Biomarker Translation: Multi‐omics Integration in Inherited Neuromuscular Diseases. Human Mutation 2026;2026(1) View
  2. Owusu S, Gil M, Tutu-Boahene B, Brew Y. Unlocking research output with ChatGPT- 4 and SciSpace Ai through the mediating and moderating roles of research orientation. Discover Artificial Intelligence 2026;6(1) View
  3. Roever L, Page M, Moher D. PRISMA 2020: strengthening transparency and usefulness of systematic reviews. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition) 2026;76(6):844834 View
  4. Kim S. Evolution of evidence-based medicine: toward digital evidence ecosystems and artificial intelligence. Journal of Evidence-Based Practice 2026;2(2):56 View
  5. Nussbaumer-Streit B, Dobrescu A, Sharifan A, Klerings I, Neubauer-Bruckner C, Nowak C, Gartlehner G. LLM-based classifiers can reduce the proportion of records to screen with minimal loss of relevant studies: a case study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2026;200:112517 View
  6. Han B, Mathrani A, Wanniarachchi V, Susnjak T. Evaluating prompting strategies and large language models in systematic literature review screening: Relevance and task-stage classification. Research Synthesis Methods 2026:1 View
  7. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Li N, He J. Automation and artificial intelligence in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 2026;16 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Paz del Rio M, Aguilar Medrano F, Rivero Castedo L. Critical reading of scientific articles on health: A practical guide (Spanish Edition). View