This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Recruitment of Research Participants (380) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (1207) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (703) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (622) Innovations in Clinical Trials and Research Data Management (126) New Methods (1140) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (1001) Methods in Human Factors Research (63) Cardiology (228)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/54867, first published .
Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Comparison of the Response to an Electronic Versus a Traditional Informed Consent Procedure in Terms of Clinical Patient Characteristics: Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Anna G M Zondag1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marieke J Hollestelle2 Author Orcid Image ;   Rieke van der Graaf2 Author Orcid Image ;   Hendrik M Nathoe3 Author Orcid Image ;   Wouter W van Solinge1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michiel L Bots2 Author Orcid Image ;   Robin W M Vernooij2, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Saskia Haitjema1 Author Orcid Image ;   UCC-CVRM study group5
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Zondag A, Jongsma K, van Solinge W, Bots M, Vernooij R, Haitjema S. Dashboards to Improve Extractability of Cardiovascular Indicators in a Learning Health Care System: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2025;27:e71978 View