This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science (406) e-Learning and Digital Medical Education (701) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (542) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1660) Peer-to-Peer Support and Online Communities (646)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/42927, first published .
Cues Disseminated by Professional Associations That Represent 5 Health Care Professions Across 5 Nations: Lexical Analysis of Tweets

Cues Disseminated by Professional Associations That Represent 5 Health Care Professions Across 5 Nations: Lexical Analysis of Tweets

Cues Disseminated by Professional Associations That Represent 5 Health Care Professions Across 5 Nations: Lexical Analysis of Tweets

Authors of this article:

Ann Dadich1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rebecca Wells2 Author Orcid Image ;   Sharon J Williams3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nazim Taskin4 Author Orcid Image ;   Mustafa Coskun4 Author Orcid Image ;   Corinne Grenier5 Author Orcid Image ;   Frederic Ponsignon5 Author Orcid Image ;   Shane Scahill6 Author Orcid Image ;   Stephanie Best7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (4) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, Australia

    2Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, University of Texas, Texas, TX, United States

    3School of Health & Social Care, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom

    4Department of Management Information Systems, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey

    5Kedge Business School, Talence, France

    6Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    7Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

    Corresponding Author:

    Ann Dadich, BScoSci (Hons), PhD

    School of Business

    Western Sydney University

    169 Macquarie Street

    Parramatta, 2150

    Australia

    Phone: 61 296859475

    Email: A.Dadich@westernsydney.edu.au


    Background: Collaboration across health care professions is critical in efficiently and effectively managing complex and chronic health conditions, yet interprofessional care does not happen automatically. Professional associations have a key role in setting a profession’s agenda, maintaining professional identity, and establishing priorities. The associations’ external communication is commonly undertaken through social media platforms, such as Twitter. Despite the valuable insights potentially available into professional associations through such communication, to date, their messaging has not been examined.

    Objective: This study aimed to identify the cues disseminated by professional associations that represent 5 health care professions spanning 5 nations.

    Methods: Using a back-iterative application programming interface methodology, public tweets were sourced from professional associations that represent 5 health care professions that have key roles in community-based health care: general practice, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and social work. Furthermore, the professional associations spanned Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A lexical analysis was conducted of the tweets using Leximancer (Leximancer Pty Ltd) to clarify relationships within the discourse.

    Results: After completing a lexical analysis of 50,638 tweets, 7 key findings were identified. First, the discourse was largely devoid of references to interprofessional care. Second, there was no explicit discourse pertaining to physiotherapists. Third, although all the professions represented in this study support patients, discourse pertaining to general practitioners was most likely to be connected with that pertaining to patients. Fourth, tweets pertaining to pharmacists were most likely to be connected with discourse pertaining to latest and research. Fifth, tweets about social workers were unlikely to be connected with discourse pertaining to health or care. Sixth, notwithstanding a few exceptions, the findings across the different nations were generally similar, suggesting their generality. Seventh and last, tweets pertaining to physiotherapists were most likely to refer to discourse pertaining to profession.

    Conclusions: The findings indicate that health care professional associations do not use Twitter to disseminate cues that reinforce the importance of interprofessional care. Instead, they largely use this platform to emphasize what they individually deem to be important and advance the interests of their respective professions. Therefore, there is considerable opportunity for professional associations to assert how the profession they represent complements other health care professions and how the professionals they represent can enact interprofessional care for the benefit of patients and carers.

    J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e42927

    doi:10.2196/42927

    Keywords

    professional associations; social media; professional identity; collaboration; knowledge translation 


    Background

    Systemic challenges in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic have drawn increased attention to the complexities of health care delivery [1]. These include the ways in which different health care professionals work together [2,3]; for instance, although interprofessional care is deemed best practice [4], during the COVID-19 pandemic, some health care professionals “experienced ambiguous professional identities and role confusion in interprofessional teams” [5].

    Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, the increasing prevalence of chronic disease worldwide underscored the need for different health care professionals to work together—to be in each other’s sphere of practice [6-9]. This is because the complementary knowledge and skills of different health care professionals are critical to the care of patients with complex and chronic conditions, such as congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, and cognitive disorders [10,11]. As the post-COVID-19 condition results in additional chronic disease [12], the need for complementary knowledge and skills will continue to rise.

    As important as interprofessional care is for the increasing numbers of patients, such collaboration does not occur automatically [13]. Different professions typically have discrete roles in patient care, are based in disparate departments or organizations, have different payers and regulations, and record information into separate data systems. Professions often compete for domains within patient care, such as assessment and treatment planning [14]. Furthermore, different organizations often have diverse priorities—although they might all espouse the importance of patient well-being, they might pursue this aspiration by reducing patient costs, reducing societal costs, or applying a blend of these at different times [15]. Interprofessional teams also typically include multiple professional cultures, habits, and identities that can hinder collaboration [16]. Therefore, interprofessional care requires both systemic and personal commitment [17]. However, it has been challenging to create the ethos to support such care [18].

    Contexts in which different health care professionals work together best are characterized by “a shared purpose, critical reflection, innovation, and leadership” [19-21]. However, there is a limited understanding of what fosters such contexts [22,23]. Health care professionals tend to use their respective disciplines, in addition to local cues from organizational leaders and peers, to guide their practice. The salience of professional identity in health care raises the question of what cues the professional associations provide to their members regarding their respective roles in patient care. In addition, the globally increasing need for interprofessional care does not mean that professional norms are internationally consistent. Thus, there is also a question of how the messaging of professional associations varies across nations.

    This study identifies salient themes across professional associations in 5 high-income nations, all of which espouse interprofessional care: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States [24-26]. Specifically, this study presents a lexical analysis of the tweets posted by professional associations in these nations that represent 5 professions with key roles in community-based health care: general practice, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and social work. Enhanced cooperation across health care roles entails new ways of thinking, which raises the question of how to foster such mindsets [27]. This inquiry reflects the ongoing influence of professional associations on professionals’ frames of reference for their work. Given the popularity of Twitter for professional communication [28-31], tweets were examined to reveal what professional associations deem to be salient.

    Before presenting the study, this paper commences with a social identity perspective on health professional communication, given that professions are closely related to social identity [32-34]. Next, the paper describes the method used to examine professional associations’ use of Twitter as well as the associated results. The paper concludes with key findings and the associated implications for scholars and professional associations.

    The Social Identity of Professions

    Social identity theory asserts that individuals define themselves largely in comparison with proximate others. Specifically, individuals tend to see themselves as belonging to in-groups that they view more favorably than they view members of out-groups [35,36]. The assumed motivation behind such biases is a desire to maintain a positive self-image because individual esteem rises along with group esteem [37].

    The nature of these comparisons varies according to which social categories are prominent in any given context. In health care, one such categorization is that of professions, which are visible and continually re-emphasized through distinct roles, status, and identity. Professional identity is understood to be “an organized group’s norms, values, and behavioral knowledge that situate an individual into group membership” [38]; in other words, it is “the relationship between the collective level of the profession and the individual level of the professional” [36]. The tertiary education of health care professionals not only qualifies them to practice in their field but also imparts a sense of identity with their profession, along with their responsibilities [39]. However, in addition to tertiary education, professional identity is influenced by myriad factors, including gender, cultural background, and professional ethos, as well as working experience [40-43]. As such, the development of professional identity is iterative [36], and it can become more salient via interactions with different professions; for instance, nurses become more aware of their nursing identity when they interact with physicians or social workers than when they work solely with other nurses [36].

    In interprofessional contexts, questions such as Who am I? are likely to involve professional identity (eg, nurse), and questions such as What should I do? are likely to involve professional referent groups (eg, other nurses). This might partly account for health care professionals’ “tribal behaviors”—even on social media—whereby they “communicate within their own profession and within a clinical specialty” [44]. After formal training, the most salient referent group might be a professional association [36,45].

    How Membership Associations Shape Professional Identity

    Many health care professionals and those studying to join the profession are members of a professional association, that is, “an organisation with individual members practicing a profession or occupation in which the organisation maintains an oversight of the knowledge, skills, conduct and practice of that profession or occupation” [46]. Indeed, the formation of an association is a key stage in the professionalization process [47]. Member benefits typically include contemporary information on factors that can affect workplace practices, such as trends in patient needs, regulatory changes, and any given profession’s scope of practice. Professional associations also normally provide ongoing member education, including that needed to maintain registration and licenses, and often publish periodicals to advance practice. In addition, many hold annual meetings and conferences at which members establish and nurture relationships with colleagues and learn about developments in their field. Through these mechanisms, professional associations can shape members’ references for interprofessional practice [48].

    One of the primary ways that professional associations serve their members is through ongoing communication, increasingly through social media. This includes both factual updates and “a range of professional scripts” to recreate meaning in dynamic contexts [36]. The substance and tone of such interpretive cues are part of the social context of interprofessional care. Professional associations, such as the Royal College of Nursing in the United Kingdom, have reported using social media accounts to share important information with, and cascade it to, members and other stakeholders [49]. The organization recognized social media as fundamental to campaigns to raise awareness of, and support for, member priorities. Members of the Royal College of Nursing were encouraged to incorporate activity on the web into their continuing professional development hours for revalidation and expand their networks with other nurses and professionals. Similarly, as the American Nurses Association’s website noted, “Social media is now a daily part of all our lives. It can not only be entertaining and informative, but it also has the potential to help your career as a nurse and the nursing profession in general” [50]. Even as the COVID-19 pandemic ends (or continues), the recent global shift to web-based communication is likely to increase the prominence of social media.

    Among the various social media platforms, Twitter plays a particularly prominent role for health care professionals [51]. Twitter allows users to post short text messages (of up to 280 characters) to others directly (for instance, by replying to a tweet) or indirectly (by mentioning another user or including a hashtag that another user might search for). Other Twitter users can forward (or retweet) messages or might be encouraged to visit a website by accessing embedded hyperlinks. Such flexibility and convenience have attracted increasing users, recently estimated at 350 million, all across the world [52]. This is notable because research suggests that tweets correlate with public opinion [53].

    Because of its accessibility, reach, and lack of fees, Twitter has advantages for nonprofit organizations, such as professional associations, which are usually constrained by a limited marketing budget [54]. Twitter, along with other forms of social media, offers nonprofit organizations an opportunity to strengthen support for the organization and its brand [55].

    Research offers glimpses into the role of social media among different individual professions [56]; for example, pharmacists are reported to be high users of social media to expand their networks, rather than for education or professional development [57]. A recent study examined social media content to explore public perceptions of interprofessional teams. The authors found that social media can be used to demonstrate the breadth of interprofessional care and highlight the value of less visible professions [58]. However, there is limited research on professional associations’ use of social media, particularly comparative international research.

    The global reach of social media conveys an impression of uniformity across the world. However, there has been little empirical examination of where health care dynamics are similar or divergent. Even among high-income nations with commonalities in national origins, there are striking differences in health care [59]. For instance, the United States differs from other high-income nations, such as Australia, in lacking a national health care system. Similarly, although the health systems in the United Kingdom and New Zealand emphasize “preventive care, safe care, coordinated care, and engagement and patient preferences,” some have suggested that the Canadian health system does not do so [60] (in the quoted text, the italicization reflects the original presentation). Such structural differences reflect distinct national histories and cultures, often characterized in the prominent framework developed by Hofstede [61] in terms of individualism versus collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity (with an emphasis on power) versus femininity (with an emphasis on nurturing), and long-term versus short-term orientation. As researchers have noted, such differences in national culture can shape the nature of professional collaboration [62]; for instance, the absence of a national health care system in the United States partly originates in relative emphases on individualism and the short-term. In turn, such cultural attributes might affect how professionals interpret their respective roles [62].

    Given the importance of interprofessional care and the attendant challenges, the aim of this study was to clarify a potentially important normative influence, namely the cues that professional associations disseminate. This was achieved via a lexical analysis of tweets across 5 professions and 5 nations.


    Sample

    To clarify how professional associations used social media, a sample of tweets was sourced from 25 professional associations across Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States (Table 1). These nations were selected because they represent high-income English-speaking nations [63]. The main professional association in each nation that represented each of the following professions was identified: general practice, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and social work. These disciplines were selected because they commonly work together in community-based health care, that is, “integrated, accessible health care services by clinicians who are accountable for addressing a large majority of personal health care needs, developing a sustained partnership with patients, and practicing in the context of family and community” [64]. Although the 5 aforementioned nations sometimes had more than 1 professional association to represent a profession (eg, the Australian College of Nursing and the Australian College of Midwives in Australia, as well as the American Association of Family Physicians and the American Medical Association in the United States), only the professional association specific to 1 of the 5 aforementioned professions was included in this study.

    Table 1. Professional associations (n=25).
    NationGeneral practiceNursingPharmacyPhysiotherapySocial work
    AustraliaRoyal Australian College of General PractitionersAustralian College of NursingAustralian Pharmaceutical SocietyAustralian Physiotherapy AssociationAustralian Association of Social Workers
    CanadaCollege of Family Physicians of CanadaCanadian Nurses AssociationCanadian Pharmacists AssociationCanadian Physiotherapy AssociationCanadian Association of Social Work
    New ZealandRoyal New Zealand College of General PractitionersNurses Society of New ZealandPharmaceutical Society of New ZealandPhysiotherapy New ZealandAotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
    United KingdomRoyal College of General PractitionersRoyal College of NursingRoyal Pharmaceutical SocietyChartered Society of PhysiotherapyBritish Association of Social Workers
    United StatesAmerican Association of Family PhysiciansAmerican Nurses AssociationAmerican Pharmacists AssociationAmerican Physical Therapy AssociationNational Association of Social Workers

    An iterative approach was used to collect the tweets because the Twitter developer application programming interface only allowed 100 of the most recent tweets to be collected. Using a back-iterative application programming interface methodology, the maximum number of public (rather than private) tweets was retrieved from the 25 accounts. This culminated in a collection of 52,440 tweets, posted from June 12, 2018, to October 20, 2020 (approximately 28 months). To optimize comparability, non-English tweets were removed; these included French tweets from Canada (1801/52,440, 3.43%) and a Spanish tweet from Australia. Thus, of the 52,440 tweets collected, 50,638 (96.56%) were used for the lexical analysis.

    To optimize the likelihood of a systematic approach to the lexical analysis [65], we used Leximancer data mining software (Leximancer Pty Ltd), which uses Bayesian reasoning to detect key concepts and reveal their relationships [66]. Using algorithms, Leximancer “transform[s] lexical co-occurrence information from natural language into semantic patterns in an unsupervised manner” [67]. The software identifies frequently occurring and co-occurring words and amalgamates these to form and visually map concepts that reflect themes within the text [68]. The maps convey 3 types of information: “the main concepts in the text and their relative importance; the strengths of links between concepts (how often they co-occur); and similarities in contexts where links occur” [69]. Concepts represent “collections of words that generally travel together throughout the text” [70]. The components of these concepts are ordered within a thesaurus, comprising relevant words and weightings to indicate relative importance. Within the map, connections among concepts that are most probable are represented by a spanning tree of gray lines or branches, specifically, “The spanning tree...shows the most-likely connections between concepts (like a road map of highways), but there are other (less-strong) connections between concepts (like backstreets)” [71]. Clusters of concepts within a map—known as themes—suggest contextual similarity [72]. Themes are color coded to signify those that are (and are not) important, whereby the “most important theme appears in red, and the next hottest in orange, and so on according to the colour wheel” [70].

    In addition to the novelty of a lexical analysis using Leximancer, compared with other approaches to analyze qualitative data (eg, thematic analyses [73-76]), there are 2 advantages to using this software. First, Leximancer can manage a large corpus of qualitative data, akin to those sourced from social media platforms. Second, compared with other forms of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (eg, NVivo [QSR International]), the researcher is at a greater arm’s length of the analysis when using Leximancer—this can reduce researcher bias and increase reliability because the researcher is encouraged to “discover” [77,78] how discourse travels together [79]. These reasons might partly explain growing interest in lexical analyses using Leximancer [80-84].

    Leximancer was used in 3 steps. First, we uploaded an Excel (Microsoft Corp) file of all tweets into Leximancer and then used the “discovery mode” to “see what concepts were automatically generated by Leximancer without intervention” [85]. Although Leximancer automatically removes words with low semantic content (eg, “the” and “is”), we manually reviewed the concepts to identify those that should be merged because they were semantically and conceptually similar [86]. Those that we merged included COVID and Covid19, GP (a reference to general practitioner) and gps, Join and join, NASW (a reference to the National Association of Social Workers in the United States) and nasw, and patient and patients. Furthermore, we removed the concepts re and ve because they tended to be separated from words such as “you” within a tweet; as such, they offered no conceptual value. We reclustered the map several times to ensure that the concepts were stable. Next, we analyzed the discovery mode concept map by considering the key clusters of concepts represented within the tweets, particularly those relevant to the 5 professions of interest, as described in the Results section.

    Second, we used Leximancer to examine the comparative importance of the concepts, as denoted by relevance percentage. A relevance percentage represents “the percentage frequency of text segments which are coded with that concept, relative to the frequency of the most frequent concept in the list...This measure is an indicator of the relative strength of a concept’s frequency of occurrence” [87]. In addition to examining the concept with the greatest relevance percentage (100%), we considered the relevance percentages between the concept with the greatest relevance percentage and the concepts that denoted the 5 professions of interest, given the focus of this study.

    Third and last, for comparative value, we associated each tweet with 2 tags. Tagging helps to compare the conceptual content of different data [71]. To determine whether (and how) geography influenced the professional associations’ contributions to the Twittersphere, we tagged each tweet according to the nation where the professional associations were located, namely Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Furthermore, to determine the influence of the profession, each tweet was tagged according to the profession represented by each professional association, namely general practice, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and social work. Subsequently, we set the concept generality to 12 concepts to ensure that those that were mined were not too broad; informed by previous research [88], we enabled the Learn from Tags function to ensure that Leximancer searched for concepts associated with each tag independently, disabled the number of concepts to discover “to allow the software to identify the number of relevant concepts,” and selected the Themed Discovery option of Concepts in Each to “discover concepts that distinguish...categories from one another” [70]. For succinctness, we focused on the concept that was most likely to share the most content with each tag concept, as indicated by the likelihood percentage. Specifically, we analyzed the likelihood of shared content, as described in the Results section. As calculated by Leximancer, the likelihood percentage denotes the proportion of text segments that is shared by a tag concept and another concept, thus providing both directions of conditional probability [87].

    Ethical Considerations

    This study solely involved an analysis of secondary data, namely tweets in the public domain posted by the official Twitter handles of professional associations. For this reason, the approval of a human research ethics committee was not sought.


    Key Themes

    The discovery mode concept map revealed 4 themes: care, Join, NASW, and Read (Figure 1). These highlight the key clusters of concepts represented within the text. Theme position illustrates the relationships among the themes, as calculated by Leximancer using Bayesian reasoning [66]. Consider the prominence of care, which appears in red and overlaps with the 3 other less prominent themes, particularly Join. This suggests that when the tweets referred to care (and the concepts therein), they tended to refer to Join (and the concepts therein):

    In a shifting landscape, tools and ways of working must evolve to meet the needs of patients, GPs and clinical teams. Join the #RCGPConnex networking event and meet like-minded people committed to finding new ways to improve primary care
    Join...[these MDs] for Managing The COVID-19 Crisis: Maternal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic and gain knowledge on how to adjust your practices to maintain the level of care for essential woman s health services. Tune in live on Friday at 7 p.m. CT

    The absence of a concept (a gray circle accompanied by a word) that denoted physiotherapy is curious. Although the discovery mode concept map includes the concepts GPs, nurses, pharmacists, and socialworkers, it is devoid of a concept pertaining to physiotherapists. This suggests that discourse pertaining to physiotherapists—regardless of who tweeted it—was not prominent within the data set compared with that pertaining to their professional counterparts:

    When is it okay for GPs not to tell parents of their child’s medical treatment?
    High caseloads risk driving away #socialworkers
    ‎
    Figure 1. Discovery mode concept map (visible concepts: 100%, theme size: 75%). Words circled in green denote themes, words circled in blue denote professions, and words circled in purple denote the 4 most frequent concepts. In terms of themes, red denotes the most important theme, followed by yellow, green, and purple. AAFP: American Association of Family Physicians; GP: general practitioner; NASW: National Association of Social Workers.

    Of the 4 other professions, the concept GPs was most likely to be connected with the concept patients—this is indicated by the gray line between them. This suggests that discourse pertaining to this profession travelled with that pertaining to patients; conversely, discourse pertaining to the other professions was unlikely to travel with that pertaining to patients—the people they work with and support:

    GPs have a really important role in ‘selling’ weight loss the right way to their patients and helping them on their journey. [One] Dietitian...gives GPs 10 tips on how you can sow the seed for how they can have an exciting change in their lifestyle

    Compared with the other 4 professions, the concept nurses was most likely to be connected with the concept take, as indicated by the gray line between them. This latter concept included active language, encouraging tweet recipients to ignite action. Conversely, discourse pertaining to the other 4 professions was unlikely to travel with such active language:

    Since the changes to student funding, nearly 900 fewer students were due to start on nursing degree courses this year in England. The Government must fix this. Email your MP and ask them to take action to #FundOurFuture nurses

    Unlike the other 4 professions, the concept pharmacists was most likely to be connected with the concepts latest and research. As such, when the tweets spoke of this profession, they were likely to be framed as pertaining to contemporary matters, including studies to advance knowledge. Moreover, when the tweets spoke of the other professions, they were unlikely to speak of the concepts latest and research:

    Drug Discovery and Development is the latest e-book available to members via #RPSLibrary . Highlighting scientific advances, future trends and the role of pharmacists in research, it s a must read

    Finally, the concept socialworkers was most likely to be connected with the concepts pertaining to this profession, namely socialwork and NASW. Curiously, it was also connected with the concept via, which served to direct tweet recipients to particular Twitter handles or websites. This suggests that discourse pertaining to the other professions was unlikely to be connected with this concept and, as such, relatively unlikely to direct recipients to other sources of information:

    MI Social Workers Call for Change Ahead of Midterm Elections... #nasw… #ElectionDay

    The concept health was the most frequent, as denoted by its relevance percentage of 100% (Table 2). This was followed by the concepts care (92%), patients (87%), and COVID (71%), among others. As “indicator[s] of the relative strength of a concept’s frequency of occurrence” [87], this means that the discourse pertaining to these subsequent concepts was highly relevant to that pertaining to health, compared with that pertaining to the other concepts:

    “There are elements of our health care system that are failing our most vulnerable.”...MACN, Chair of the ACN Advanced Practice COI. #ACNinParliament
    #Pharmacists can help steer teen patients with #diabetes toward long-term good health
    Today, we d like to highlight how physiotherapy can help in the recovery from COVID-19. Get all the information here...and find out why physiotherapy is key to your overall health
    Table 2. Ten most frequent concepts.
    ConceptCount (relevance: %)
    health5186 (100)
    care4748 (92)
    patients4490 (87)
    COVID3679 (71)
    workers3458 (67)
    social3395 (65)
    GPsa3241 (62)
    support3166 (61)
    practice3040 (59)
    work3037 (59)
    health

    		GPs460 (14)

    		nurses218 (14)

    		pharmacists253 (14)

    		socialworkers73 (7)
    care

    		GPs600 (19)

    		nurses258 (17)

    		pharmacists259 (14)

    		socialworkers29 (3)

    aGP: general practitioner.

    Relationships Among Concepts

    In the context of a study on professional associations that represent health care professions, the frequency of, and relationships among, the concepts health, care, patients, and COVID (as calculated using Bayesian reasoning [66]) are perhaps unsurprising. However, the relationships between these salient concepts and the concepts that denote the professions represented by the associations are noteworthy; for instance, compared with the frequent concept health, the concepts GPs, nurses, and pharmacists each had a relevance percentage of 14%, whereas the concept socialworkers had a relevance percentage of 7% (Table 2). Similarly, compared with the second most frequent concept care, the concepts GPs (19%), nurses (17%), and pharmacists (14%) each had a relevance percentage that was greater than that of socialworkers (3%). These findings suggest that discourse pertaining to socialworkers was unrelated to that pertaining to the salient concepts health or care in comparison with the other 4 professions. This suggests that discourse pertaining to the profession of social work was somewhat separate or distinct from that pertaining to general practice, nursing, and pharmacy.

    The professional associations included in this study collectively represented 5 nations: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The centrality of the theme health suggests its salience among these nations (Figure 2). However, the positions of the themes NASW and Newsgp suggest that the former had relatively greater relevance to the United States, whereas the latter had relatively greater relevance to Australia and New Zealand. This is perhaps unsurprising, given the NASW’s location and that newsGP is “the RACGP’s news hub, designed to keep Australian GPs informed about the latest in general practice” [89]. However, once again, the absence of a concept that denoted physiotherapy is noteworthy, suggesting that discourse pertaining to this profession—regardless of origin—was not prominent within the data set compared with the other 4 professions. This suggests that this pattern tended to be similar across the 5 nations.

    The position of each tag concept—specifically, the 5 nations—suggests that discourse within the tweets was influenced by geography (Table 3); for instance, tweets issued by professional associations in Australia were most likely to refer to the concept Newsgp (100%); tweets from Canada were most likely to speak of the concept webinar (39%); tweets from New Zealand were most likely to allude to the concepts general (5%), GPs (5%), and Read (5%); tweets from the United Kingdom typically referred to the concept Circatrcgp (100%)—a reference to the Clinical Innovation and Research Centre at the Royal College of General Practitioners; and tweets from the United States tended to mention the concepts AAFP, which refers to the American Association of Family Physicians (100%), NASW (100%), and pleaseshare (100%). The close relationships between the tag concepts (as calculated using Bayesian reasoning [66]), that is, the nations, and the concepts that were specific to particular professional associations, such as Newsgp, Circatrcgp, AAFP, and NASW, are unsurprising; for instance, given that newsGP is “the RACGP’s news hub” [89], it is unsurprising that it is in close proximity to the concept tag Australia. However, it is noteworthy that tweets from the Canadian and New Zealander professional associations were unlikely to mention discourse specific to each of these nations or the professional associations therein; for instance, rather than tweeting about resources specific to Canadian or New Zealander professionals, they promoted more generic information via webinars or written material:

    There s still time to register for today s special edition of the Coffee with Claire webinars. Topic: 2020 and beyond: the future of #Nursing and #midwifery. Join us 12 p.m. ET. Register...#yearofthenurseandmidwife
    The Pharmaceutical Society of NZ agrees with...[a representative of] the Immunisation Advisory Centre, who said recently that a measles outbreak in New Zealand “should not be happening.” Read press release
    ‎
    Figure 2. Concept map tagged by nation (visible concepts: 100%, theme size: 75%). Words circled in green denote themes, words circled in blue denote professions, and words circled in purple denote the concepts that were most likely to share content with the tag concept. In terms of themes, red denotes the most important theme, followed by green and blue. AAFP: American Association of Family Physicians; Circatrcgp: Clinical Innovation and Research Centre at the Royal College of General Practitioners; GP: general practitioner; NASW: National Association of Social Workers.
    Table 3. Top 3 likely concepts for each tag concept.
    Tag concept and conceptCount (likelihood: %)
    Australia

    		Newsgp785 (100)

    		Australia669 (99)

    		general479 (49)

    		GPsa1453 (49)
    Canada

    		webinar491 (39)

    		Check277 (33)

    		family333 (33)
    New Zealand

    		general44 (5)

    		GPs136 (5)

    		Read71 (5)
    United Kingdom

    		Circatrcgpb596 (100)

    		UK780 (93)

    		guidance556 (82)
    United States

    		AAFPc611 (100)

    		NASWd2721 (100)

    		pleaseshare498 (100)
    General Practice

    		Newsgp785 (100)

    		Circatrcgp596 (100)

    		AAFP611 (100)
    Nursing

    		nursing1891 (98)

    		nurse695 (96)

    		nurses1213 (94)
    Pharmacy

    		pharmacy1305 (99)

    		pharmacists1551 (98)

    		Register295 (28)
    Physiotherapy

    		profession231 (21)

    		treatment92 (18)

    		members315 (15)
    Social Work

    		NASW2733 (100)

    		socialworkers800 (100)

    		socialwork570 (100)

    		pleaseshare498 (100)

    aGP: general practitioner.

    bCircatrcgp: Clinical Innovation and Research Centre at the Royal College of General Practitioners.

    cAAFP: American Association of Family Physicians.

    dNASW: National Association of Social Workers.

    The associations also represented 5 professions: general practice, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and social work. The centrality of the theme health suggests its salience among these professions (Figure 3). However, unsurprisingly, the positions of the themes nursing, social, and Newsgp suggest that they had relatively greater relevance to the professions nursing, social work, and general practice, respectively.

    The position of each tag concept—specifically, the 5 professions—suggests that discourse within the tweets was influenced by profession (Table 3); for instance, tweets issued by professional associations for GPs were most likely to refer to the concepts Newsgp (100%), Circatrcgp (100%), and AAFP (100%); tweets from professional associations for nurses were most likely to speak of the concept nursing (98%); tweets from professional associations for pharmacists were most likely to allude to the concept pharmacy (99%); tweets from professional associations for physiotherapists typically referred to the concept profession (21%); and tweets from professional associations for social workers tended to mention the concepts NASW (100%), socialworkers (100%), socialwork (100%), and pleaseshare (100%). The close relationships between the tag concepts (as calculated using Bayesian reasoning [66]), that is, the professions, and the concepts that were specific to particular professions or professional associations, such as nursing and pharmacy, are perhaps expected. However, it is noteworthy that tweets from physiotherapists’ professional associations were most likely to mention discourse pertaining to profession (although it is not the purpose of this study to clarify the reasons for this finding, it suggests a heightened need to champion this allied health care role as a profession):

    Make a difference by shaping our profession. The APA is taking expressions of interest from physios to participate in two new digital projects funded by the PRF. Click below to participate
    This week s CSP Newscast discusses student placements and how education has adapted...[we] then reflect...on how the profession has adapted and looks to the future. Listen now
    ‎
    Figure 3. Concept map tagged by profession (visible concepts: 100%, theme size: 75%). Words circled in green denote themes, and words circled in purple denote the concepts that were most likely to share content with the tag concept. In terms of themes, red denotes the most important theme, followed by yellow, green, and purple. Circatrcgp: Clinical Innovation and Research Centre at the Royal College of General Practitioners; GP: general practitioner; NASW: National Association of Social Workers.

    Principal Findings

    Despite the increasing importance of interprofessional care for patient well-being, health care professionals do not always work together to deliver care throughout the patient journey [15,18]. The salience of professional identity raises the question of what cues professional associations provide to their members regarding their respective roles in patient care. In addition, the role of national culture in influencing managerial practices suggests that there is also a question of how the messaging of professional associations varies across nations.

    To address these questions, a large corpus of tweets was examined to reveal the cues that professional associations disseminate. Specifically, the tweets of 25 professional associations were examined lexically. These associations represent 5 professions with key roles in community-based health care across 5 nations. This analysis clarified the cues that professional associations disseminate via Twitter, communicating to members and others what is (and is not) important.

    From the lexical analysis, 7 key findings are noteworthy. First, the discourse within the tweets was devoid of references to interprofessional care. Irrespective of the profession represented by the associations or their geographical location, they were largely silent on interprofessional care. From a social identity perspective, this implies that professional associations are not scripting their members regarding the importance of interprofessional care.

    Second, within the discovery mode concept map and the concept map tagged by nation, there was no concept pertaining to physiotherapists. Thus, this profession was not salient among the corpus of tweets from the 25 associations.

    Third, although all the professions represented within this study support patients, the concept pertaining to GPs within the discovery mode concept map was most likely to be connected with the concept patients. Thus, when the tweets spoke of the other 4 professions, they were unlikely to speak of patients.

    Fourth, despite the continued importance of evidence-based practice in all health care professions [90,91], within the discovery mode concept map, the tweets pertaining to pharmacists were most likely to be connected with tweets pertaining to latest and research. As such, the tweets about the other 4 professions were unlikely to speak of latest and research. This might demonstrate an effort to increase the stature of pharmacy—perhaps more of a competitive strategy than a cooperative one.

    Fifth, within the discovery mode concept map, tweets about social workers were unlikely to be connected with the concepts health or care compared with tweets about the 4 other professions. Instead, tweets about social workers were relatively more likely to direct tweet recipients to particular Twitter handles or websites; although this might serve to broker connections, these connections did not explicitly speak to interprofessional cooperation, perhaps representing a missed opportunity. Nevertheless, collectively, these findings demonstrate how discourse regarding social workers differed from that regarding their professional counterparts.

    Sixth, notwithstanding a few exceptions, the findings across the different nations were generally similar, suggesting their generality. With reference to the exceptions, tweets disseminated by professional associations in Canada and New Zealand encouraged recipients to access broad information that was not nation specific. Conversely, tweets disseminated by professional associations in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States tended to direct recipients to geographically specific information. Thus, whereas those in Canada and New Zealand facilitated connections to varied sources of information, those in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States drew attention to local content.

    Seventh and last, the cues of the professional associations were also influenced by the profession they represented; for instance, tweets pertaining to physiotherapists were more likely to refer to discourse pertaining to profession, suggesting a need to raise the profile of this specialty as a profession.

    Comparison With Prior Work

    The 5 nations represented in this study all emphasize rationalization, coordination, integration, a patient-centered approach, and technological change, as well as managerial governance, as espoused by new public management [92,93]. Collectively, these emphases influence the roles and competencies of health care professionals; how they enact these roles and competencies, independently and collaboratively; and the position of the health system. In this context, health care professionals use social media to voice, defend, and restore their professional identity [94].

    Previous research emphasized how cultural differences can shape the nature of professional collaboration [62]. Contrary to the framework developed by Hofstede [61], this study found no evidence of national differences in professional association social media emphasis on individualism versus collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, power versus nurturing, or long-term versus short-term orientation. Despite the international importance of interprofessional care [4], discourse within the tweets from 25 professional associations revealed no explicit references to interprofessional care. Instead, the discourse largely ostracized references to physiotherapy. Furthermore, the discourse on particular professions was likely to be coupled with discourse on what they deemed to be important, which was demonstrated by the connections between GPs and patients, pharmacists and latest and research, and Physiotherapy and profession. These findings reveal similar patterns across the sample of nations, failing to find support for cultural differences. Given this transnational view of health care, if professional associations (are to) have a fundamental role in shaping professional identity [47,48], it is essential that their messaging recognizes the complementary roles of different professions.

    Limitations

    Despite the value of the findings presented in this paper, 4 methodological limitations warrant mention. First, given the purposeful selection of professional associations in particular nations, we do not claim that the findings can be generalized to other professional associations or other nations. Second, given that the study solely involved the analysis of tweets, which are limited in content [95], professional associations might communicate different (and more detailed) messages via alternative platforms. Third, because the data set was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, the motif and regularity of the professional associations’ tweets might have differed from the tweets they post during nonpandemic periods, thus limiting the applicability to such periods. Fourth and last, the use of Leximancer moderates the researcher’s interpretive skills, which some argue is the key to robust qualitative research [79,96].

    Conclusions

    This study reveals how the professional associations of 5 health care professions, across 5 nations, used Twitter to communicate top-of-mind or salient themes. Specifically, the lexical analysis of a large corpus of tweets clarified what they communicated and how they communicated these messages. Furthermore, the analysis highlighted how communication compared among professions as well as among nations.

    Considering extant research [4,47,48,61,62], the contributions of this study are 3-fold. First, this study demonstrated an absence of discourse regarding interprofessional care and its importance in health care across 5 professions and 5 countries; in fact, discourse regarding physiotherapists was entirely absent among the remaining professions. Given the importance of interprofessional care and its contribution to the performance of health care systems [97], this finding is important because it highlights that professional associations have not yet been able to exploit the opportunity afforded by modern communication media to raise this issue and make it salient to their members and beyond. Second, there was evidence of posturing and efforts to raise the profile of particular interests. Although this is unsurprising for membership associations, it suggests that to some extent they might foster competitive rather than cooperative stances toward other health care professions. This finding lends a degree of support to the view that “managed competition” among these professions might support the pursuit of efficiency goals at the expense of patient-centered care [98], reinforcing the previous point about the lack of discourse regarding interprofessional care. Third and last, these patterns were similar across all 5 countries, despite their differing cultures and economic systems. This finding provides an interesting point of departure from previous research examining communication between GPs and patients. Specifically, Meuweesen et al [99] found that wealth and national culture dimensions influence medical communication among various European countries. Our study provides robust evidence suggesting that national culture does not substantially contribute to differences in how professional associations communicate via Twitter.

    The contributions offered by this study have clear implications for scholars and professional associations. For scholars, they open opportunities for further research on the relationship among social media, the professional identity of health care professionals, and interprofessional care. Specifically, future research is needed to clarify how social media platforms compare with other forms of collective spaces, such as communities of practice, in maintaining or altering professional identity and promoting interprofessional practices. Furthermore, given that the findings revealed a transnational view of health care across 5 nations, there is opportunity to test similar approaches to foster interprofessional care across these nations as well as extend the study further afield (eg, Asia, Africa, and South America) to determine the limits of this transnational view.

    For professional associations, the findings suggest that there is much they can do to strengthen their connection with their profession as well as other health care professions; for instance, they can assert, more regularly and clearly, how the profession they represent complements other health care professions and how the professionals they represent can enact interprofessional care for the benefit of patients and carers. However, to promote interprofessional care in a sustainable way, associations will need to do this in ways that attract as well as appeal to their members. This is likely to require “attention to others” [100], that is, a consideration of the social media content their members engage with and respond to as well as an active presence on social media platforms to demonstrate responsiveness. The need to explicitly promote interprofessional care is particularly important now, given that COVID-19 has drawn heightened attention to interprofessional care [101,102]. Future efforts might test the extent and duration of this trend, as well as the potentially evolving roles of professional associations in promoting related norms.

    Data Availability

    The data set generated and analyzed during this study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    Authors' Contributions

    AD conceived the study, conducted the lexical analysis, wrote the Methods and Results sections, and contributed to every other section of the paper as well. SB wrote the abstract and contributed to every other section of the paper as well. RW and SW drafted the Introduction section. NT, MC, and SS collected the data set and contributed to the Methods section. FP and CG drafted the Discussion section. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Bauchner H, Easley TJ, entire editorial publishing staff of JAMA. Health care heroes of the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020 May 26;323(20):2021. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. World Health Organization. 2010.   URL: https:/​/www.​who.int/​publications/​i/​item/​framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-​education-collaborative-practice [accessed 2023-02-27]
    3. Measuring the Impact of Interprofessional Education on Collaborative Practice and Patient Outcomes. Washington, D.C., United States: National Academies Press; 2015.
    4. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education. Workshop, Patricia A. Cuff, Board on Global Health, Institute of Medicine. Interprofessional Education for Collaboration Learning How to Improve Health from Interprofessional Models Across the Continuum of Education to Practice: Workshop Summary. Washington, D.C., United States: National Academies Press; 2013.
    5. Liu C, Xu Y, Li Q. Experiences of China’s social workers in interprofessional practice during the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Evidence Based Social Work 2022 Mar 08;19(3):287-303. [CrossRef]
    6. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol 2019 Jan;70(1):151-171. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Jeuring HW, Comijs HC, Deeg DJ, Stek ML, Huisman M, Beekman AT. Secular trends in the prevalence of major and subthreshold depression among 55-64-year olds over 20 years. Psychol Med 2018 Aug;48(11):1824-1834. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019 Jan;18(1):88-106 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Xie Y, Bowe B, Mokdad AH, Xian H, Yan Y, Li T, et al. Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study highlights the global, regional, and national trends of chronic kidney disease epidemiology from 1990 to 2016. Kidney Int 2018 Sep;94(3):567-581 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Nester J. The importance of interprofessional practice and education in the era of accountable care. N C Med J 2016;77(2):128-132 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Abley C, Bond J, Robinson L. Improving interprofessional practice for vulnerable older people: gaining a better understanding of vulnerability. J Interprof Care 2011 Sep 08;25(5):359-365. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Ramakrishnan RK, Kashour T, Hamid Q, Halwani R, Tleyjeh IM. Unraveling the mystery surrounding post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Front Immunol 2021 Jun 30;12:686029 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Supper I, Catala O, Lustman M, Chemla C, Bourgueil Y, Letrilliart L. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. J Public Health (Oxf) 2015 Dec 18;37(4):716-727. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Currie G, Finn R, Martin G. Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS. Work Employment Soc 2009 Jun 17;23(2):267-284. [CrossRef]
    15. Williams I. Offender health and social care: a review of the evidence on inter-agency collaboration. Health Soc Care Community 2009 Nov;17(6):573-580. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Martin V, Rogers A. Leading Interprofessional Teams in Health and Social Care. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2004.
    17. Wells R, Chuang E, Haynes LE, Lee I, Bai Y. Child welfare agency ties to providers and schools and substance abuse treatment use by adolescents. J Subst Abuse Treat 2011 Jan;40(1):26-34 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Dickinson H. Making a reality of integration: less science, more craft and graft. J Integrated Care 2014;22(5/6):189-196. [CrossRef]
    19. Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R. Evidence of communication, influence and behavioural norms in interprofessional teams: a realist synthesis. J Interprof Care 2015 Mar 22;29(2):100-105. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Sims S, Hewitt G, Harris R. Evidence of collaboration, pooling of resources, learning and role blurring in interprofessional healthcare teams: a realist synthesis. J Interprof Care 2015 Jan 22;29(1):20-25. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Sims S, Hewitt G, Harris R. Evidence of a shared purpose, critical reflection, innovation and leadership in interprofessional healthcare teams: a realist synthesis. J Interprof Care 2015 May 22;29(3):209-215. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Best S, Williams S. Professional identity in interprofessional teams: findings from a scoping review. J Interprof Care 2019 Oct 18;33(2):170-181. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD000072 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Herath C, Zhou Y, Gan Y, Nakandawire N, Gong Y, Lu Z. A comparative study of interprofessional education in global health care: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017 Sep;96(38):e7336 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Peurois M, Chopin M, Texier-Legendre G, Angoulvant C, Bellanger W, Bègue C, et al. To which non-physician health professionals do French general practitioners refer their patients to and what factors are associated with these referrals? Secondary analysis of the French national cross-sectional ECOGEN study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022 Jan 05;22(1):25 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Bajeux E, Corvol A, Somme D. Integrated care for older people in France in 2020: findings, challenges, and prospects. Int J Integr Care 2021;21(4):16 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Hastings SE, Suter E, Bloom J, Sharma K. Introduction of a team-based care model in a general medical unit. BMC Health Serv Res 2016 Jul 11;16(1):245 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Wojcik S, Hughes A. Sizing up Twitter users. Pew Research Center.   URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/ [accessed 2023-02-27]
    29. El Tantawi M, Al-Ansari A, AlSubaie A, Fathy A, Aly NM, Mohamed AS. Reach of messages in a dental Twitter network: cohort study examining user popularity, communication pattern, and network structure. J Med Internet Res 2018 Sep 13;20(9):e10781 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Pershad Y, Hangge P, Albadawi H, Oklu R. Social medicine: Twitter in healthcare. J Clin Med 2018 May 28;7(6):121 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Stier S, Bleier A, Lietz H, Strohmaier M. Election campaigning on social media: politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Commun 2018 Jan 22;35(1):50-74. [CrossRef]
    32. Gallagher M, Muldoon OT, Pettigrew J. An integrative review of social and occupational factors influencing health and wellbeing. Front Psychol 2015 Sep 01;6:1281 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Professional Identity and Social Work. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2017.
    34. Eriksson Y, Linde M. "Being" or "Doing" a profession: work as a matter of social identity. Int J Interdisciplin Cultural Stud 2014;8(1):33-43. [CrossRef]
    35. Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur J Soc Psychol 1971;1(2):149-178. [CrossRef]
    36. Hotho S. Professional identity – product of structure, product of choice: linking changing professional identity and changing professions. J Organizational Change Manage 2008;21(6):721-742. [CrossRef]
    37. Wagner U, Lampen L, Syllwasschy J. In-group inferiority, social identity and out-group devaluation in a modified minimal group study. Br J Soc Psychol 1986;25(1):15-23. [CrossRef]
    38. Byrnes ME, Engler TA, Greenberg CC, Fry BT, Dombrowski J, Dimick JB. Coaching as a mechanism to challenge surgical professional identities. Ann Surg 2021 Aug 01;274(2):319-323 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Egan T, Jaye C. Communities of clinical practice: the social organization of clinical learning. Health (London) 2009 Jan 01;13(1):107-125. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Sawatsky AP, Beckman TJ, Hafferty FW. Cultural competency, professional identity formation and transformative learning. Med Educ 2017 May 10;51(5):462-464. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Organizational identities: on identity ambiguity, identity conflict members' reactions. In: Identity and the Modern Organization. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2007.
    42. Adams K, Hean S, Sturgis P, Clark JM. Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care 2006 Jun;5(2):55-68. [CrossRef]
    43. Lingard L, Reznick R, DeVito I, Espin S. Forming professional identities on the health care team: discursive constructions of the 'other' in the operating room. Med Educ 2002 Aug;36(8):728-734. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res 2016 Jun 16;18(6):e166. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Hogg MA, Terry DJ. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad Manage Rev 2000 Jan;25(1):121-140. [CrossRef]
    46. Our definition of a professional body. Science Council.   URL: https://sciencecouncil.org/about-science/our-definition-of-a-​professional-body/ [accessed 2019-01-03]
    47. Abbott A. The Order of professionalization. Work Occup 2016 Aug 17;18(4):355-384. [CrossRef]
    48. Wardle J, Steel A, McIntyre E. Independent registration for naturopaths and herbalists in Australia: the coming of age of an ancient profession in contemporary healthcare. Aus J Herbal Med 2013;25(3).
    49. Using social media to campaign. RCN Magazines. 2021 Jan 15.   URL: https://www.rcn.org.uk/magazines/activate/2021/jan/using-social-media-to-campaign [accessed 2023-02-28]
    50. Social media. ANA Enterprise.   URL: https://www.nursingworld.org/social/ [accessed 2021-06-06]
    51. Chan WS, Leung AY. Use of social network sites for communication among health professionals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018 Mar 28;20(3):e117 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Dean B. How many people use Twitter in 2022? [new Twitter stats]. Backlinko.   URL: https://backlinko.com/twitter-users#twitter-statistics [accessed 2021-06-06]
    53. Cody E, Reagan A, Dodds P, Danforth C. Public opinion polling with Twitter. ArXiv 2016.
    54. Bloom PN, Novelli WD. Problems and challenges in social marketing. J Market 2018 Dec 06;45(2):79-88. [CrossRef]
    55. Kanter B, Fine A. The Networked Nonprofit Connecting with Social Media to Drive Change. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2010.
    56. Hazzam J, Lahrech A. Health care professionals' social media behavior and the underlying factors of social media adoption and use: quantitative study. J Med Internet Res 2018 Nov 07;20(11):e12035 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Alkhateeb FM, Clauson KA, Latif DA. Pharmacist use of social media. Int J Pharm Pract 2011 Apr;19(2):140-142. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. El-Awaisi A, O'Carroll V, Koraysh S, Koummich S, Huber M. Perceptions of who is in the healthcare team? A content analysis of social media posts during COVID-19 pandemic. J Interprof Care 2020 Sep 22;34(5):622-632. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Brown LD. Comparing health systems in four countries: lessons for the United States. Am J Public Health 2003 Jan;93(1):52-56. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Mirror, mirror 2021: reflecting poorly health care in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries. The Common Wealth Fund. 2021.   URL: https:/​/www.​commonwealthfund.org/​publications/​fund-reports/​2021/​aug/​mirror-mirror-2021-​reflecting-poorly [accessed 2023-02-28]
    61. Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
    62. D. Ryan S, C. Windsor J, Ibragimova B, R. Prybutok V. Organizational practices that foster knowledge sharing: validation across distinct national cultures. Inform Sci J 2010;13:139-164. [CrossRef]
    63. Schneider E, Sarnak D, Squires D, Shah A, Doty M. Mirror, mirror 2017: international comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better U.S. Health care. The Commonwealth Fund. 2017.   URL: https://www.issuelab.org/resources/27698/27698.pdf [accessed 2023-02-28]
    64. Donaldson M. Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1996.
    65. Gephart RP. Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Acad Manage J 2004 Aug;47(4):454-462. [CrossRef]
    66. Zuell C, Weber R, Mohler, PP. Computer-assisted Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: The General Inquirer III. Mannheim, Germany: Center for Surveys, Methods, and Analysis (ZUMA); 1989.
    67. Smith AE, Humphreys MS. Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behav Res Method 2006 May;38(2):262-279. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    68. Young L, Denize S. Competing interests: the challenge to collaboration in the public sector. Int J Sociol Social Policy 2008;28:46-58. [CrossRef]
    69. Hewett DG, Watson BM, Gallois C, Ward M, Leggett BA. Intergroup communication between hospital doctors: implications for quality of patient care. Soc Sci Med 2009 Dec;69(12):1732-1740. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    70. Leximancer. SAGE Publications, Ltd. 2021.   URL: https://methods.sagepub.com/tools-directory/leximancer [accessed 2023-02-28]
    71. Leximancer. Leximancer user guide: Release 5.0. Brisbane, QLD: Leximancer Pty Ltd; 2021.
    72. Hepworth N, Paxton SJ. Pathways to help-seeking in bulimia nervosa and binge eating problems: a concept mapping approach. Int J Eat Disord 2007 Sep;40(6):493-504. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    73. Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol 2020 Aug 12;18(3):328-352. [CrossRef]
    74. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy A Guide for Students and Practitioners. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2011.
    75. Content and thematic analysis. In: Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Thousand Oaks, California, United States: Sage Publications; 2003.
    76. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, California, United States: Sage Publications; 1998.
    77. Cheng M, Edwards D, Darcy S, Redfern K. A tri-method approach to a review of adventure tourism literature: bibliometric analysis, content analysis, and a quantitative systematic literature review. J Hospital Tourism Res 2016 Mar 30;42(6):997-1020. [CrossRef]
    78. Gapp R, Stewart H, Harwood I, Woods P. Discovering the value in using Leximancer for complex qualitative data analysis. In: Proceedings of the British Academy of Management (BAM2013). 2013 Presented at: British Academy of Management (BAM2013); Jan 15 - Feb 26, 2013; Liverpool, GB.
    79. Sotiriadou P, Brouwers J, Le T. Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool: a comparison of NVivo and Leximancer. Annals Leisure Res 2014 Apr 22;17(2):218-234. [CrossRef]
    80. Hewitt L, Dahlen HG, Hartz DL, Dadich A. Leadership and management in midwifery-led continuity of care models: a thematic and lexical analysis of a scoping review. Midwifery 2021 Jul;98:102986. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    81. Eapen V, Dadich A, Balachandran S, Dani A, Howari R, Sequeria AZ, et al. E-mental health in child psychiatry during COVID-19: an initial attitudinal study. Australas Psychiatry 2021 Oct 14;29(5):498-503. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    82. Dadich A, Moore L, Eapen V. What does it mean to conduct participatory research with Indigenous peoples? A lexical review. BMC Public Health 2019 Oct 29;19(1):1388 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    83. Dadich A, Jarrett C. Understanding practitioner perspectives of youth healthcare using thematic and lexical analyses. Health Expect 2019 Oct 13;22(5):1144-1155 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    84. Dadich A, Doloswala N. What can organisational theory offer knowledge translation in healthcare? A thematic and lexical analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2018 May 10;18(1):351 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    85. Angus-Leppan T, Benn S, Young L. A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Env 2010;19(4):230-244. [CrossRef]
    86. Lemon L, Hayes J. Enhancing trustworthiness of qualitative findings: using leximancer for qualitative data analysis triangulation. Qual Report 2020 Mar 1;25(3):604-614. [CrossRef]
    87. Understanding displays and outputs. Leximancer.   URL: https://hypermancer.leximancer.com/faq/display_and_output.html# [accessed 2013-03-21]
    88. McKenzie K, Campbell MA, Scott DA, Discoll TR, Harrison JE, McClure RJ. Identifying work related injuries: comparison of methods for interrogating text fields. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010 Apr 07;10(1):19 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    89. About newsGP. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.   URL: https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/about [accessed 2021-01-11]
    90. Institute of Medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine and the Changing Nature of Health Care: 2007 IOM Annual Meeting Summary. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 2008.
    91. Straus S. Evidence-based Medicine : How to Practice and Teach it ; [includes CD-ROM]. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2011.
    92. Bresnen M, Hodgson D, Bailey S, Hyde P, Hassard J. Managing Modern Healthcare Knowledge, Networks and Practice. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.
    93. Osborne D, Gaebler T, Silverberg R. Reinventing Government How The Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming The Public Sector. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1992.
    94. von Knorring M, Alexanderson K, Eliasson MA. Healthcare managers' construction of the manager role in relation to the medical profession. J Health Organ Manag 2016 May 16;30(3):421-440 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    95. Macy M, Mejova Y, Weber I. Twitter: A Digital Socioscope. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
    96. Hansson T, Carey G, Kjartansson R. A multiple software approach to understanding values. J Beliefs Values 2010 Dec;31(3):283-298. [CrossRef]
    97. Sidani S, Fox M. Patient-centered care: clarification of its specific elements to facilitate interprofessional care. J Interprof Care 2014 Mar;28(2):134-141. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    98. Segall M. From cooperation to competition in national health systems--and back?: impact on professional ethics and quality of care. Int J Health Plann Manage 2000;15(1):61-79. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    99. Meeuwesen L, van den Brink-Muinen A, Hofstede G. Can dimensions of national culture predict cross-national differences in medical communication? Patient Educ Couns 2009 Apr;75(1):58-66. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    100. Gruzd A, Haythornthwaite C. Enabling community through social media. J Med Internet Res 2013 Oct 31;15(10):e248 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    101. Braune K, Rojas P, Hofferbert J, Valera Sosa A, Lebedev A, Balzer F, et al. Interdisciplinary online hackathons as an approach to combat the COVID-19 pandemic: case study. J Med Internet Res 2021 Feb 08;23(2):e25283 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    102. Sasangohar F, Bradshaw MR, Carlson MM, Flack JN, Fowler JC, Freeland D, et al. Adapting an outpatient psychiatric clinic to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a practice perspective. J Med Internet Res 2020 Oct 01;22(10):e22523 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AAFP: American Association of Family Physicians
    Circatrcgp: Clinical Innovation and Research Centre at the Royal College of General Practitioners
    GP: general practitioner
    NASW: National Association of Social Workers

    Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 24.09.22; peer-reviewed by M Kapsetaki, JJ Mira; comments to author 17.11.22; revised version received 09.01.23; accepted 27.01.23; published 15.03.23

    Copyright

    ©Ann Dadich, Rebecca Wells, Sharon J Williams, Nazim Taskin, Mustafa Coskun, Corinne Grenier, Frederic Ponsignon, Shane Scahill, Stephanie Best. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 15.03.2023.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.