This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (657) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (878) eHealth Infrastructures (430) Health Information Exchange (147) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (897) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (700) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (621)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/41635, first published .
Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information

Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information

Trust and Health Information Exchanges: Qualitative Analysis of the Intent to Share Personal Health Information

Authors of this article:

Julia Busch-Casler1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marija Radic1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Esteves R, Ghandour Z, Straume O. Quality discrimination in healthcare markets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 2025;34(1):24 View
  2. Kyytsönen M, Vehko T, Jylhä V, Kinnunen U. Privacy concerns among the users of a national patient portal: A cross-sectional population survey study. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024;183:105336 View
  3. Cirkel L, Lechner F, Schlicker N, Leipe J, Mühlensiepen F, Grgic I, Hirsch M, Kuhn S, Knitza J. Adoption and perception of prescribable digital health applications (DiGA) and the advancing digitalization among German internal medicine physicians: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  4. Smoła P, Młoźniak I, Wojcieszko M, Zwierczyk U, Kobryn M, Rzepecka E, Duplaga M. The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2024;24(1) View
  5. Alhasan T. Managing legal risks in health information exchanges: A comprehensive approach to privacy, consent, and liability. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management 2025;44(4):12 View
  6. Tsirozidis G, Kirk U, Zaggl M. Benefits for thee, not for me? mHealth engagement through the lens of privacy calculus theory and trust. Behaviour & Information Technology 2025;44(19):4663 View
  7. Sassa M, Eguchi A, Maruyama-Sakurai K, Fujita T, Kawamura Y, Kawashima T, Tanoue Y, Yoneoka D, Miyata H, Yamashita T, Nakashima N, Nomura S. Heterogeneity in willingness to share personal health information: a nationwide cluster analysis of 20,000 adults in Japan. Archives of Public Health 2025;83(1) View
  8. Jha V, Saeedi S, Clausen M, Assamad D, Grewal S, Hirjikaka D, Lee W, Luca S, Shaw A, Hayeems R, Bombard Y. What are patient perspectives on privacy and trust in digital genomic tools? A qualitative study. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2025;34(3) View
  9. Luo Y, Li S, Ye Q, Zheng J. How privacy calculus builds user engagement through trust in AI medical consultation. Electronic Markets 2025;35(1) View
  10. Guo S, Song Y, Chen G, Han H, Wu H, Ma J. Promoting trust and intention to adopt health information generated by ChatGPT among healthcare customers: An empirical study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2025;11 View
  11. Stenzel J, Kopkow C, Bahns C. Nutzung mobiler Gesundheits-Apps durch Personen mit Hüft- und Kniegelenksarthrose in Deutschland. physioscience 2025 View
  12. Zhang L, Hussain W, Md Ali S. Trust transfer in digital healthcare: The role of self-service systems in reducing patient treatment barriers. DIGITAL HEALTH 2025;11 View