This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (588) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (781) Breast Cancer (212)

Published on in Vol 22, No 2 (2020): February

Perspective of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed Methods Study

Perspective of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed Methods Study

Perspective of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Christina Baun1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Marianne Vogsen1, 2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Marie Konge Nielsen5 Author Orcid Image ;   Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen1, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (21) Metrics

Journals

  1. Vieira L, Pires A, Grilo A. Anxiety experienced by oncological patients who undergo 18F-FDG PET CT: A systematic review. Radiography 2021;27(4):1203 View
  2. Mano M, Morgan G. Telehealth, Social Media, Patient Empowerment, and Physician Burnout: Seeking Middle Ground. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 2022;(42):28 View
  3. Thielmann R, Hoving C, Schutgens-Kok E, Cals J, Crutzen R. Patient online access to general practice medical records: A qualitative study on patients’ needs and expectations. Health Information Management Journal 2024;53(3):166 View
  4. Rogers C, Willis S, Gillard S, Chudleigh J. Patient experience of imaging reports: A systematic literature review. Ultrasound 2023;31(3):164 View
  5. Derry-Vick H, Heathcote L, Glesby N, Stribling J, Luebke M, Epstein A, Prigerson H. Scanxiety among Adults with Cancer: A Scoping Review to Guide Research and Interventions. Cancers 2023;15(5):1381 View
  6. Thielmann R, Hoving C, Cals J, Crutzen R. The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e47659 View
  7. Petrovskaya O, Karpman A, Schilling J, Singh S, Wegren L, Caine V, Kusi-Appiah E, Geen W. Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Patient Access to Test Results via Web Portals: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e43765 View
  8. Hussain M, Chau S, Turner M, Paterson C. Scan-Associated Distress in People Affected by Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 2023;39(5):151502 View
  9. Butler J, Harrington M, Tong Y, Rosenbaum A, Samsonov A, Walls R, Kennedy J. From jargon to clarity: Improving the readability of foot and ankle radiology reports with an artificial intelligence large language model. Foot and Ankle Surgery 2024;30(4):331 View
  10. Thielmann R, Hoving C, Cals J, Crutzen R. Patient online access to medical records in general practice: Perceived effects after one year follow-up. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;125:108309 View
  11. van Kessel R, Ranganathan S, Anderson M, McMillan B, Mossialos E. Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024;189:105513 View
  12. Keefe A. First a Provider, Now a Patient: Receiving a Devastating Diagnosis Through the Patient Portal. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 2024;196(2-3) View
  13. Alarifi M, Hughes M, Jabour A, Alashban Y, Vernon E. Patient, Referring Physician, and Radiologist Opinions Over Time on Providing Patients Access to Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2024;21(12):1862 View
  14. van der Mee F, Ottenheijm R, Gentry E, Nobel J, Zijta F, Cals J, Jansen J. The impact of different radiology report formats on patient information processing: a systematic review. European Radiology 2024 View