Published on in Vol 20, No 1 (2018): January

“Why Do They Need to Check Me?” Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study

“Why Do They Need to Check Me?” Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study

“Why Do They Need to Check Me?” Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study

Journals

  1. Rubanovich C, Cheung C, Mandel J, Bloss C. Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States. Human Molecular Genetics 2018;27(R2):R250 View
  2. Moll J, Cajander Å. Oncology health-care professionals’ perceived effects of patient accessible electronic health records 6 years after launch: A survey study at a major university hospital in Sweden. Health Informatics Journal 2020;26(2):1392 View
  3. Ospina-Pinillos L, Davenport T, Navarro-Mancilla A, Cheng V, Cardozo Alarcón A, Rangel A, Rueda-Jaimes G, Gomez-Restrepo C, Hickie I. Involving End Users in Adapting a Spanish Version of a Web-Based Mental Health Clinic for Young People in Colombia: Exploratory Study Using Participatory Design Methodologies. JMIR Mental Health 2020;7(2):e15914 View
  4. Sánchez López J, Cambil Martín J, Villegas Calvo M, Moreno Martín M. Limitaciones del consentimiento informado ¿afectan a la calidad asistencial?. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research 2019;34(5):273 View
  5. Collado-Borrell R, Escudero-Vilaplana V, Calles A, Garcia-Martin E, Marzal-Alfaro B, Gonzalez-Haba E, Herranz-Alonso A, Sanjurjo-Saez M. Oncology Patient Interest in the Use of New Technologies to Manage Their Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(10):e11006 View
  6. Chao D, Lin T, Ma W. Enhanced Self-Efficacy and Behavioral Changes Among Patients With Diabetes: Cloud-Based Mobile Health Platform and Mobile App Service. JMIR Diabetes 2019;4(2):e11017 View
  7. Hulter P, Pluut B, Leenen-Brinkhuis C, de Mul M, Ahaus K, Weggelaar-Jansen A. Adopting Patient Portals in Hospitals: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(5):e16921 View
  8. Sánchez López J, Rodríguez I, Carriel Araya V, Moreno Martín M. Calidad asistencial. Importancia del consentimiento informado. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research 2018;33(3):179 View
  9. Seckin G, Hughes S. Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Nationally Representative Sample of Older Internet Users: Cross-sectional Survey. JMIR Aging 2021;4(4):e16006 View
  10. Jepsen N, Charania N, Mooney S. Health care experiences of mothers of children with bronchiectasis in Counties Manukau, Auckland, New Zealand. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1) View
  11. Erlingsdóttir G, Petersson L, Jonnergård K. A Theoretical Twist on the Transparency of Open Notes: Qualitative Analysis of Health Care Professionals’ Free-Text Answers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14347 View
  12. Petersson L, Erlingsdóttir G. Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 2): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals. JMIR Mental Health 2018;5(2):e10521 View
  13. Scott Duncan T, Riggare S, Koch S, Sharp L, Hägglund M. From Information Seekers to Innovators: Qualitative Analysis Describing Experiences of the Second Generation of E-Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e13022 View
  14. Augustin M, Wimmer J, Biedermann T, Blaga R, Dierks C, Djamei V, Elmer A, Elsner P, Enk A, Gass S, Henningsen M, Hofman‐Wellenhof R, von Kiedrowski R, Kunz H, Liebram C, Navarini A, Otten M, Reusch M, Schüller C, Zink A, Strömer K. Praxis der Teledermatologie. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 2018;16(S5):6 View
  15. Åkerstedt U, Cajander Å, Moll J, Ålander T, Topa G. On threats and violence for staff and patient accessible electronic health records. Cogent Psychology 2018;5(1):1518967 View
  16. Meskó B, Radó N, Győrffy Z. Opinion leader empowered patients about the era of digital health: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019;9(3):e025267 View
  17. RAFIQ M, A HAMID M, HAFIZ E, AMIN S. Rehabilitation protocol with or without mobile health in overweight and obese knee osteoarthritis patients - a pilot study. Balneo Research Journal 2019;10(Vol 10 No. 4):580 View
  18. Leese J, Macdonald G, Tran B, Wong R, Backman C, Townsend A, Davis A, Jones C, Gromala D, Avina‐Zubieta J, Hoens A, Li L. Using Physical Activity Trackers in Arthritis Self‐Management: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Rehabilitation Professional Perspectives. Arthritis Care & Research 2019;71(2):227 View
  19. Andersen‐Hollekim T, Solbjør M, Kvangarsnes M, Hole T, Landstad B. Narratives of patient participation in haemodialysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2020;29(13-14):2293 View
  20. Bernaerdt J, Moerenhout T, Devisch I. Vulnerable patients' attitudes towards sharing medical data and granular control in patient portal systems: an interview study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2021;27(2):429 View
  21. Kernebeck S, Busse T, Böttcher M, Weitz J, Ehlers J, Bork U. Impact of mobile health and medical applications on clinical practice in gastroenterology. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020;26(29):4182 View
  22. Shah A, Yan X, Khan S, Khurrum W, Khan Q. A multi-modal approach to predict the strength of doctor–patient relationships. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2021;80(15):23207 View
  23. Gilljam B, Nygren J, Svedberg P, Arvidsson S. Impact of an Electronic Health Service on Child Participation in Pediatric Oncology Care: Quasiexperimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e17673 View
  24. Verma S, Goshtasbi K, Berry L, Anderson C, Francis D, Gelbard A. Utilization and Influence of Online Support Communities in Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis Patients. The Laryngoscope 2021;131(8):1821 View
  25. Avdagovska M, Menon D, Stafinski T. Capturing the Impact of Patient Portals Based on the Quadruple Aim and Benefits Evaluation Frameworks: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e24568 View
  26. Luo H, Liu G, Lu J, Xue D. Association of shared decision making with inpatient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2021;21(1) View
  27. Andersen-Hollekim T, Landstad B, Solbjør M, Kvangarsnes M, Hole T. Nephrologists’ experiences with patient participation when long-term dialysis is required. BMC Nephrology 2021;22(1) View
  28. Donovan L, Mog A, Blanchard K, Magid K, Syed A, Kelley L, Palen B, Parsons E, McCall C, Thompson W, Charlton M, Spece L, Kirsh S, Au D, Sayre G. Patient experiences with telehealth in sleep medicine: a qualitative evaluation. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 2021;17(8):1645 View
  29. Huvila I, Cajander Å, Moll J, Enwald H, Eriksson-Backa K, Rexhepi H. Technological and informational frames: explaining age-related variation in the use of patient accessible electronic health records as technology and information. Information Technology & People 2022;35(8):1 View
  30. Turvey C, Fuhrmeister L, Klein D, Moeckli J, Howren M, Chasco E. Patient and Provider Experience of Electronic Patient Portals and Secure Messaging in Mental Health Treatment. Telemedicine and e-Health 2022;28(2):189 View
  31. Blease C, Salmi L, Rexhepi H, Hägglund M, DesRoches C. Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice. Journal of Medical Ethics 2022;48(10):785 View
  32. van Rijt A, Hulter P, Weggelaar-Jansen A, Ahaus K, Pluut B. Mental Health Care Professionals’ Appraisal of Patients’ Use of Web-Based Access to Their Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(8):e28045 View
  33. Rexhepi H, Huvila I, Åhlfeldt R, Cajander Å. Cancer patients’ information seeking behavior related to online electronic healthcare records. Health Informatics Journal 2021;27(3) View
  34. Burgess A, Gartrell K, Anderson T. Feasibility of Using Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring and the Epic MyChart Blood Pressure Flowsheet to Monitor Blood Pressure After Preeclampsia. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2021;39(8):432 View
  35. Finnegan R, Flanagan O, Cantillon P, McGlacken‐Byrne S. The hidden benefits of patient encounters. The Clinical Teacher 2023;20(1) View
  36. Blease C, Torous J, Dong Z, Davidge G, DesRoches C, Kharko A, Turner A, Jones R, Hägglund M, McMillan B. Patient Online Record Access in English Primary Care: Qualitative Survey Study of General Practitioners’ Views. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e43496 View
  37. Hulter P, Langendoen W, Pluut B, Schoonman G, Luijten R, van Wetten F, Ahaus K, Weggelaar-Jansen A, Rubinelli S. Patients’ choices regarding online access to laboratory, radiology and pathology test results on a hospital patient portal. PLOS ONE 2023;18(2):e0280768 View
  38. Ericsson C, Skagerström J, Schildmeijer K, Årestedt K, Broström A, Pakpour A, Nilsen P. Can patients contribute to safer care in meetings with healthcare professionals? A cross-sectional survey of patient perceptions and beliefs. BMJ Quality & Safety 2019;28(8):657 View
  39. Mutsonziwa G, Green J, Blundell J. A phenomenological exploration of source isolation in patients infected with multi‐drug resistant organisms. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2022;78(1):211 View
  40. Cohen Rodrigues T, de Buisonjé D, Keesman M, Reijnders T, van der Geer J, Janssen V, Kraaijenhagen R, Atsma D, Evers A. Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(10):e25646 View
  41. Teela L, Verhagen L, Gruppen M, Santana M, Grootenhuis M, Haverman L. Including the voice of paediatric patients: Cocreation of an engagement game. Health Expectations 2022;25(4):1861 View
  42. Kujala S, Hörhammer I, Väyrynen A, Holmroos M, Nättiaho-Rönnholm M, Hägglund M, Johansen M. Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(6):e37438 View
  43. Reyes M, Vance-Chalcraft H, Menezes R. Understanding undergraduate students’ eHealth usage and views of the patient-provider relationship. PLOS ONE 2022;17(4):e0266802 View
  44. Sergeeva A. Why developers matter: The case of patient portals. Health Informatics Journal 2023;29(1) View
  45. Muys J, Blaumeiser B, Janssens K, Loobuyck P, Jacquemyn Y. Chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: ethical considerations of the Belgian approach. Journal of Medical Ethics 2020;46(2):104 View
  46. Rexhepi H, Moll J, Huvila I, Åhlfeldt R. Do you want to receive bad news through your patient accessible electronic health record? A national survey on receiving bad news in an era of digital health. Health Informatics Journal 2021;27(3) View
  47. Blease C, McMillan B, Salmi L, Davidge G, Delbanco T. Adapting to transparent medical records: international experience with “open notes”. BMJ 2022:e069861 View
  48. Simpson E, Brown R, Sillence E, Coventry L, Lloyd K, Gibbs J, Tariq S, Durrant A. Understanding the Barriers and Facilitators to Sharing Patient-Generated Health Data Using Digital Technology for People Living With Long-Term Health Conditions: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Public Health 2021;9 View
  49. Wang Z, Zhang X, Ma L, Cai W. How to Maintain a Sustainable Doctor-Patient Relationship in Healthcare in China: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2022;2022:1 View
  50. TOPRAK M, ŞENGEL N, CAVLI B. Quality of Information in YoutubeTM Videos on Dental Sedation. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2022;11(3):262 View
  51. Frennert S, Petersson L, Muhic M, Rydenfält C, Nymberg V, Ekman B, Erlingsdottir G. Materiality and the mediating roles of eHealth: A qualitative study and comparison of three cases. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211167 View
  52. van Velsen L, Ludden G, Grünloh C. The Limitations of User-and Human-Centered Design in an eHealth Context and How to Move Beyond Them. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(10):e37341 View
  53. Cajander Å, Huvila I, Salminen-Karlsson M, Lind T, Scandurra I. Effects of patient accessible electronic health records on nurses’ work environment: a survey study on expectations in Sweden. BMJ Open 2022;12(11):e059188 View
  54. Wang Z, Zhang X, Han D, Zhao Y, Ma L, Hao F. How the use of an online healthcare community affects the doctor-patient relationship: An empirical study in China. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  55. Yang C, Chen Y, Hsu W, Chen Y. Evaluation of smart long-term care information strategy portfolio decision model: the national healthcare environment in Taiwan. Annals of Operations Research 2023;326(1):505 View
  56. Walker L, Sillence E. Examining Healthcare Professionals’ Communication Around Decision-Making with Internet-Informed Patients. Health Communication 2024;39(6):1094 View
  57. Premanandan S, Ahmad A, Cajander Å, Ågerfalk P, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Design suggestions for a persuasive e-coaching application: A study on informal caregivers’ needs. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  58. Moll J, Myreteg G, Rexhepi H. Experiences of Patients With Mental Health Issues Having Web-Based Access to Their Records: National Patient Survey. JMIR Mental Health 2024;11:e48008 View
  59. Bavngaard M, Lüchau E, Hvidt E, Grønning A. Exploring patient participation during video consultations: A qualitative study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  60. Pietrantonio F, Vinci A, Maurici M, Ciarambino T, Galli B, Signorini A, La Fazia V, Rosselli F, Fortunato L, Iodice R, Materazzo M, Ciuca A, Cicerchia L, Ruggeri M, Manfellotto D, Rosiello F, Moriconi A. Intra- and Extra-Hospitalization Monitoring of Vital Signs—Two Sides of the Same Coin: Perspectives from LIMS and Greenline-HT Study Operators. Sensors 2023;23(12):5408 View
  61. Wróbel-Lachowska M, Dominiak J, Woźniak M, Bartłomiejczyk N, Diethei D, Wysokińska A, Niess J, Grudzień K, Woźniak P, Romanowski A. ‘That’s when I put it on’: stakeholder perspectives in large-scale remote health monitoring for older adults. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2023;27(6):2193 View
  62. Ramamoorthi K, Stamenova V, Liu R, Bhattacharyya O. The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e45751 View
  63. te Braake E, Grünloh C, Tabak M. Shifting Responsibilities: Developing a Pan-European Service Model for an eHealth Technology Supporting Self-Management of People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Comorbidities. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2024;Volume 19:175 View
  64. Nassehi D, Gripsrud B, Ramvi E. Theoretical Perspectives Underpinning Research on the Physician-Patient Relationship in a Digital Health Practice: Scoping Review. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2024;13:e47280 View
  65. Seebacher B, Geimer C, Neu J, Schwarz M, Diermayr G, Roman N. Identifying central elements of the therapeutic alliance in the setting of telerehabilitation: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE 2024;19(3):e0299909 View
  66. Hagström J, Blease C, Scandurra I, Moll J, Cajander Å, Rexhepi H, Hägglund M. Adolescents’ reasons for accessing their health records online, perceived usefulness and experienced provider encouragement: a national survey in Sweden. BMJ Paediatrics Open 2024;8(1):e002258 View
  67. Meier-Diedrich E, Neumann K, Heinze M, Schwarz J. Einstellungen und Erwartungen von psychologischen und ärztlichen Psychotherapeut*innen gegenüber Open Notes: Analyse qualitativer Survey-Antworten. Psychiatrische Praxis 2024;51(07):376 View
  68. Liosatos K, Tobiano G, Gillespie B. Patient participation in surgical wound care in acute care settings: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2024;157:104839 View
  69. Hägglund M, Kharko A, Bärkås A, Blease C, Cajander Å, DesRoches C, Fagerlund A, Hagström J, Huvila I, Hörhammer I, Kane B, Klein G, Kristiansen E, Moll J, Muli I, Rexhepi H, Riggare S, Ross P, Scandurra I, Simola S, Soone H, Wang B, Ghorbanian Zolbin M, Åhlfeldt R, Kujala S, Johansen M. A Nordic Perspective on Patient Online Record Access and the European Health Data Space. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e49084 View
  70. Agali K, Masrom M, Abdul Rahim F, Yahya Y. IoT‐based remote monitoring system: A new era for patient engagement. Healthcare Technology Letters 2024 View
  71. Muli I, Cajander Å, Hvitfeldt H, Lagerros Y, Söderberg D, Sjöblom L, Dahlgren A, Bertilson B, Farrokhnia N, Amer-Wåhlin I, Taloyan M, Hägglund M. To read or not to read – A cross-sectional study of Swedish primary care patients’ adoption of patient accessible electronic health records. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  72. Huvila I, Rexhepi H, Moll J, Ghorbanian Zolbin M, Blease C, Bärkås A, Åhlfeldt R, Hagström J, Kane B, Scandurra I, Hägglund M, Klein G, Wang B, Kharko A. Affordance trajectories and the usefulness of online records access among older adults in Sweden. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  73. Hulter P, Weggelaar-Jansen A, Ahaus K, Pluut B. Patient discourses on real-time access to test results via hospital portals: a discourse analysis of semistructured interviews with Dutch patients. BMJ Open 2024;14(11):e088201 View
  74. Su J, Shen K, Guo X. Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians’ Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e59904 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Lopez Y, Aguilera L. VipIMAGE 2019. View
  2. Goke R, Berndt M. Cases on Applied and Therapeutic Humor. View
  3. Ursano A, Sonnenberg S, Lapid M, Ursano R. Tasman’s Psychiatry. View
  4. Ursano A, Sonnenberg S, Lapid M, Ursano R. Tasman’s Psychiatry. View