Social Annotation Valence: The Impact on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior

Social Annotation Valence: The Impact on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior

Social Annotation Valence: The Impact on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior

Journals

  1. Karpinska-Krakowiak M, Modlinski A. Popularity of Branded Content in Social Media. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2020;60(4):309 View
  2. Skelton E, Drey N, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2020;143:104271 View
  3. De Sutter E, Zaçe D, Boccia S, Di Pietro M, Geerts D, Borry P, Huys I. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders’ Perspectives: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e19129 View
  4. Müller S. Is there a civic duty to support medical AI development by sharing electronic health records?. BMC Medical Ethics 2022;23(1) View
  5. Yusof M, Teo C, Ng C. Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review. BMC Medical Ethics 2022;23(1) View
  6. Kassam I, Ilkina D, Kemp J, Roble H, Carter-Langford A, Shen N. Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42507 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Salmons J. The Ethics of Online Research. View
  2. Senders J, Maher N, Hulsbergen A, Lamba N, Bredenoord A, Broekman M. Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery. View