This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

New Methods (957) Ubiquitous Health (uHealth) (125)

Published on in Vol 18, No 7 (2016): July

The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology Innovation in Primary Health Care Services: An Integrative Review

The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology Innovation in Primary Health Care Services: An Integrative Review

The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology Innovation in Primary Health Care Services: An Integrative Review

Authors of this article:

Randi Stokke1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (50) Tweetations (13) Metrics

Journals

  1. Stokke R. "Maybe we should talk about it anyway": a qualitative study of understanding expectations and use of an established technology innovation in caring practices. BMC Health Services Research 2017;17(1) View
  2. Astell A, McGrath C, Dove E. ‘That's for old so and so's!’: does identity influence older adults’ technology adoption decisions?. Ageing and Society 2020;40(7):1550 View
  3. Thilo F, Hahn S, Halfens R, Schols J. Usability of a wearable fall detection prototype from the perspective of older people–A real field testing approach. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2019;28(1-2):310 View
  4. Offermann-van Heek J, Ziefle M. Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage. Frontiers in Public Health 2019;7 View
  5. Frischer R, Krejcar O, Maresova P, Fadeyi O, Selamat A, Kuca K, Tomsone S, Teixeira J, Madureira J, Melero F. Commercial ICT Smart Solutions for the Elderly: State of the Art and Future Challenges in the Smart Furniture Sector. Electronics 2020;9(1):149 View
  6. Ayton D, Morello R, Natora A, Yallop S, Barker A, Soh S. Perceptions of falls and falls prevention interventions among Personal Alert Victoria clients. Health & Social Care in the Community 2018;26(6):970 View
  7. op den Buijs J, Simons M, Golas S, Fischer N, Felsted J, Schertzer L, Agboola S, Kvedar J, Jethwani K. Predictive Modeling of 30-Day Emergency Hospital Transport of Patients Using a Personal Emergency Response System: Prognostic Retrospective Study. JMIR Medical Informatics 2018;6(4):e49 View
  8. Agboola S, Golas S, Fischer N, Nikolova-Simons M, op den Buijs J, Schertzer L, Kvedar J, Jethwani K. Healthcare utilization in older patients using personal emergency response systems: an analysis of electronic health records and medical alert data. BMC Health Services Research 2017;17(1) View
  9. Chang F, Eriksson A, Östlund B. Discrepancies between Expected and Actual Implementation: The Process Evaluation of PERS Integration in Nursing Homes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(12):4245 View
  10. Haried P, Claybaugh C, Dai H. Evaluation of health information systems research in information systems research: A meta-analysis. Health Informatics Journal 2019;25(1):186 View
  11. Stokke R. Older People Negotiating Independence and Safety in Everyday Life Using Technology: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(10):e10054 View
  12. Vacher M, Aman F, Rossato S, Portet F, Lecouteux B. Making Emergency Calls More Accessible to Older Adults Through a Hands-free Speech Interface in the House. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 2019;12(2):1 View
  13. Frennert S. Hitting a moving target: digital transformation and welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2021;16(1):103 View
  14. Frennert S, Baudin K. The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation 2021;43(9):1220 View
  15. op den Buijs J, Pijl M, Landgraf A. Predictive Modeling of 30-Day Emergency Hospital Transport of German Patients Using a Personal Emergency Response: Retrospective Study and Comparison with the United States. JMIR Medical Informatics 2021;9(3):e25121 View
  16. Thilo F, Schols J, Halfens R, Linhart M, Hahn S. Deciding about the use of a Personal Safety Alerting Device—The need for a legitimation process: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2021;77(1):331 View
  17. Trento M, Franceschini M, Fornengo P, Tricarico L, Mazzeo A, Bertello S, Clerico A, Oleandri S, Chiesa M, Di Leva A, Charrier L, Cavallo F, Porta M. Ambient intelligence for long-term diabetes care (AmILCare). Qualitative analysis of patients’ expectations and attitudes toward interactive technology. Endocrine 2021;73(2):472 View
  18. Smith R, Barnes I, Green J, Reeves G, Beral V, Floud S. Social isolation and risk of heart disease and stroke: analysis of two large UK prospective studies. The Lancet Public Health 2021;6(4):e232 View
  19. Andrew N, Wang Y, Teo K, Callisaya M, Moran C, Snowdon D, Ellmers S, Beare R, Richardson D, Srikanth V. Exploring patterns of personal alarm system use and impacts on outcomes. Australasian Journal on Ageing 2021;40(3):252 View
  20. Frennert S. Gender blindness: On health and welfare technology, AI and gender equality in community care. Nursing Inquiry 2021;28(4) View
  21. Stokke R, Melby L, Isaksen J, Obstfelder A, Andreassen H. A qualitative study of what care workers do to provide patient safety at home through telecare. BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1) View
  22. Thilo F, Hahn S, Halfens R, Heckemann B, Schols J. Facilitating the use of personal safety alerting device with older adults: The views, experiences and roles of relatives and health care professionals. Geriatric Nursing 2021;42(4):935 View
  23. Valokivi H, Carlo S, Kvist E, Outila M. Digital ageing in Europe: a comparative analysis of Italian, Finnish and Swedish national policies on eHealth. Ageing and Society 2023;43(4):835 View
  24. Rostad H, Stokke R. Integrating Welfare Technology in Long-term Care Services: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(8):e22316 View
  25. Valor C, Antonetti P, Crisafulli B. Emotions and consumers’ adoption of innovations: An integrative review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2022;179:121609 View
  26. Steenwinckel B, De Brouwer M, Stojchevska M, De Turck F, Van Hoecke S, Ongenae F. TALK: Tracking Activities by Linking Knowledge. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2023;122:106076 View
  27. Stokke R, Hellesø R, Sogstad M. Hvorfor er det så vanskelig å integrere velferdsteknologii omsorgstjenesten?. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning 2019;5(3):7 View
  28. Wang T, Giunti G, Melles M, Goossens R. Digital Patient Experience: Umbrella Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(8):e37952 View
  29. Adepu V, Tathacharya M, CS R, Mattela V, Sahatiya P. TeNWs/Ti3C2Tx Nanohybrid-Based Flexible Pressure Sensors for Personal Safety Applications Using Morse Code. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2022;5(12):18209 View
  30. Stokke R, Furnes M, Vifladt A, Ringsby Odberg K. Pasientsikkerhet og velferdsteknologi – parhester i utakt. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning 2020;6(2):165 View
  31. Mohanty N, Ghosh A, Jindal S. IoT based Resuscitation and Hypoxemia Diagnosis System using Embedded Microcontroller Architecture and IFTTT Implementation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2022;1225(1):012057 View
  32. Wang C, Lu W, Redmond S, Stevens M, Lord S, Lovell N. A Low-Power Fall Detector Balancing Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2018;22(6):1929 View
  33. Reid B, Davis L, Gordon L. Capturing what and why in healthcare innovation. BMJ Leader 2023;7(4):307 View
  34. Oladinrin O, Mesthrige J, Ojo L, Alencastro J, Rana M. Smart Home Technologies to Facilitate Ageing-in-Place: Professionals Perception. Sustainability 2023;15(8):6542 View
  35. Chang F, Östlund B, Kuoppamäki S. Domesticating Social Alarm Systems in Nursing Homes: Qualitative Study of Differences in the Perspectives of Assistant Nurses. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44692 View
  36. Friedman C. Personal emergency response systems and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 2023;20(4):380 View
  37. Bergschöld J, Gunnes M, Eide A, Lassemo E. Characteristics and Range of Reviews About Technologies for Aging in Place: Scoping Review of Reviews. JMIR Aging 2024;7:e50286 View
  38. Khatri R, Endalamaw A, Erku D, Wolka E, Nigatu F, Zewdie A, Assefa Y. Preparedness, impacts, and responses of public health emergencies towards health security: qualitative synthesis of evidence. Archives of Public Health 2023;81(1) View
  39. Casabona E, Campagna S, Charrier L, Viotti D, Castello A, Di Giulio P, Dimonte V. Evaluation of a Telemergency Service for Older People Living at Home: A Cross-Sectional Study. Electronics 2023;12(23):4786 View
  40. Wang T, Giunti G, Goossens R, Melles M. Timing, Indicators, and Approaches to Digital Patient Experience Evaluation: Umbrella Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e46308 View
  41. Ipakchian Askari S, Vasseur D, Hofstede B, Koowattanataworn P, Nap H. Mapping Dementia Care Technology: Tailored Digital Solutions across Stages. International Medical Education 2024;3(2):140 View
  42. Skinner M, Førland O, Sogstad M, Rostad H. Strategiske prioriteringer på nasjonalt og lokalt nivå: Gir omsorgspolitikken på nasjonalt plan gjenklang i kommunene?. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning 2024;10(2):108 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Wischer N, Mullan L. The Art and Science of Personalising Care with Older People with Diabetes. View
  2. Singh G, Doss R, Adibi S. The Science behind the COVID Pandemic and Healthcare Technology Solutions. View
  3. Holgersson C, Östlund B. Gendered Norms at Work. View
  4. Taneja M, Mohanty N, Bhiwapurkar S, Jindal S. Proceedings of the International Conference on Paradigms of Communication, Computing and Data Sciences. View
  5. Jacob L, Thomas K, Shukla S. The Role of AI, IoT and Blockchain in Mitigating the Impact of COVID-19. View
  6. Thilo F. Digitale Chancen in der häuslichen Pflege nutzen. View