This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (485) Viewpoints and Perspectives (521)

Published on in Vol 18, No 12 (2016): December

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science

Authors of this article:

Cinnamon Bloss1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Camille Nebeker1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Matthew Bietz4 Author Orcid Image ;   Deborah Bae5 Author Orcid Image ;   Barbara Bigby6 Author Orcid Image ;   Mary Devereaux7 Author Orcid Image ;   James Fowler8, 9 Author Orcid Image ;   Ann Waldo10 Author Orcid Image ;   Nadir Weibel1, 11 Author Orcid Image ;   Kevin Patrick1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Scott Klemmer11, 12 Author Orcid Image ;   Lori Melichar5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (30) Tweetations (47) Metrics

Journals

  1. Nelson B, Allen N. Extending the Passive-Sensing Toolbox: Using Smart-Home Technology in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2018;13(6):718 View
  2. Torous J, Nebeker C. Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(2):e38 View
  3. Jones M, Johnson M, Shervey M, Dudley J, Zimmerman N. Privacy-Preserving Methods for Feature Engineering Using Blockchain: Review, Evaluation, and Proof of Concept. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e13600 View
  4. Dunseath S, Weibel N, Bloss C, Nebeker C. NIH support of mobile, imaging, pervasive sensing, social media and location tracking (MISST) research: laying the foundation to examine research ethics in the digital age. npj Digital Medicine 2018;1(1) View
  5. Nebeker C, Bartlett Ellis R, Torous J. Development of a decision-making checklist tool to support technology selection in digital health research. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2020;10(4):1004 View
  6. Nebeker C, Harlow J, Espinoza Giacinto R, Orozco-Linares R, Bloss C, Weibel N. Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 2017;8(4):266 View
  7. Bhavnani S, Parakh K, Atreja A, Druz R, Graham G, Hayek S, Krumholz H, Maddox T, Majmudar M, Rumsfeld J, Shah B. 2017 Roadmap for Innovation—ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017;70(21):2696 View
  8. Nebeker C, Torous J, Bartlett Ellis R. Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine 2019;17(1) View
  9. Lee J, Hamideh D, Nebeker C. Qualifying and quantifying the precision medicine rhetoric. BMC Genomics 2019;20(1) View
  10. Nebeker C, Dunseath S, Linares-Orozco R. A retrospective analysis of NIH-funded digital health research using social media platforms. DIGITAL HEALTH 2020;6 View
  11. Hekler E, Tiro J, Hunter C, Nebeker C. Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2020;54(11):805 View
  12. Harlow J, Weibel N, Al Kotob R, Chan V, Bloss C, Linares-Orozco R, Takemoto M, Nebeker C. Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) Commons. Science and Engineering Ethics 2020;26(1):183 View
  13. Jackson S, Daverio M, Perez S, Gesualdo F, Tozzi A. Improving Informed Consent for Novel Vaccine Research in a Pediatric Hospital Setting Using a Blended Research-Design Approach. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2021;8 View
  14. Rosa C, Marsch L, Winstanley E, Brunner M, Campbell A. Using digital technologies in clinical trials: Current and future applications. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2021;100:106219 View
  15. Tromble R. Where Have All the Data Gone? A Critical Reflection on Academic Digital Research in the Post-API Age. Social Media + Society 2021;7(1) View
  16. Ferretti A, Ienca M, Sheehan M, Blasimme A, Dove E, Farsides B, Friesen P, Kahn J, Karlen W, Kleist P, Liao S, Nebeker C, Samuel G, Shabani M, Rivas Velarde M, Vayena E. Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?. BMC Medical Ethics 2021;22(1) View
  17. Nebeker C, Gholami M, Kareem D, Kim E. Applying a Digital Health Checklist and Readability Tools to Improve Informed Consent for Digital Health Research. Frontiers in Digital Health 2021;3 View
  18. Coravos A, Goldsack J, Karlin D, Nebeker C, Perakslis E, Zimmerman N, Erb M. Digital Medicine: A Primer on Measurement. Digital Biomarkers 2019;3(2):31 View
  19. Watson S. ‘Don't cross the line, you're a researcher and not an educator’: Incorporating indigenous researchers' moral perspectives to improve ethical protocols in health research. Social Science & Medicine 2022;315:115503 View
  20. Sturdy J. Book review for Ethics for Evaluation: Beyond ‘Doing No Harm’ to ‘Tackling Bad’ and ‘Doing Good’. Journal of Development Effectiveness 2023;15(2):264 View
  21. Beskow L, Hammack-Aviran C, Brelsford K, O'Rourke P. Expert Perspectives on Oversight for Unregulated mHealth Research: Empirical Data and Commentary. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2020;48(S1):138 View
  22. Nebeker C. mHealth Research Applied to Regulated and Unregulated Behavioral Health Sciences. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2020;48(S1):49 View
  23. Vyas A, Bhargava T, Saraf S, Jain V, Dubey D. A Review on digital medicine and its implications in drug development process. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2023:263 View
  24. Behnke M, Saganowski S, Kunc D, Kazienko P. Ethical Considerations and Checklist for Affective Research With Wearables. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 2024;15(1):50 View
  25. McInnis B, Pindus R, Kareem D, Gamboa S, Nebeker C. Exploring the Future of Informed Consent: Applying a Service Design Approach. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2024;8(CSCW1):1 View
  26. Grant A, Wolf G, Nebeker C. Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study. BMJ Open 2019;9(4):e025633 View
  27. McInnis B, Pindus R, Kareem D, Nebeker C. Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant Perspectives. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2024;19(4-5):175 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Martinez-Martin N. Ethical Dimensions of Commercial and DIY Neurotechnologies. View
  2. Martinez-Martin N. Artificial Intelligence in Brain and Mental Health: Philosophical, Ethical & Policy Issues. View