Published on in Vol 18, No 12 (2016): December

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science

Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science

Journals

  1. Nelson B, Allen N. Extending the Passive-Sensing Toolbox: Using Smart-Home Technology in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2018;13(6):718 View
  2. Torous J, Nebeker C. Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(2):e38 View
  3. Jones M, Johnson M, Shervey M, Dudley J, Zimmerman N. Privacy-Preserving Methods for Feature Engineering Using Blockchain: Review, Evaluation, and Proof of Concept. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e13600 View
  4. Dunseath S, Weibel N, Bloss C, Nebeker C. NIH support of mobile, imaging, pervasive sensing, social media and location tracking (MISST) research: laying the foundation to examine research ethics in the digital age. npj Digital Medicine 2018;1(1) View
  5. Nebeker C, Bartlett Ellis R, Torous J. Development of a decision-making checklist tool to support technology selection in digital health research. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2020;10(4):1004 View
  6. Nebeker C, Harlow J, Espinoza Giacinto R, Orozco-Linares R, Bloss C, Weibel N. Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 2017;8(4):266 View
  7. Bhavnani S, Parakh K, Atreja A, Druz R, Graham G, Hayek S, Krumholz H, Maddox T, Majmudar M, Rumsfeld J, Shah B. 2017 Roadmap for Innovation—ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017;70(21):2696 View
  8. Nebeker C, Torous J, Bartlett Ellis R. Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine 2019;17(1) View
  9. Lee J, Hamideh D, Nebeker C. Qualifying and quantifying the precision medicine rhetoric. BMC Genomics 2019;20(1) View
  10. Nebeker C, Dunseath S, Linares-Orozco R. A retrospective analysis of NIH-funded digital health research using social media platforms. DIGITAL HEALTH 2020;6:205520761990108 View
  11. Hekler E, Tiro J, Hunter C, Nebeker C. Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2020;54(11):805 View
  12. Harlow J, Weibel N, Al Kotob R, Chan V, Bloss C, Linares-Orozco R, Takemoto M, Nebeker C. Using Participatory Design to Inform the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) Commons. Science and Engineering Ethics 2020;26(1):183 View
  13. Jackson S, Daverio M, Perez S, Gesualdo F, Tozzi A. Improving Informed Consent for Novel Vaccine Research in a Pediatric Hospital Setting Using a Blended Research-Design Approach. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2021;8 View
  14. Rosa C, Marsch L, Winstanley E, Brunner M, Campbell A. Using digital technologies in clinical trials: Current and future applications. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2021;100:106219 View
  15. Tromble R. Where Have All the Data Gone? A Critical Reflection on Academic Digital Research in the Post-API Age. Social Media + Society 2021;7(1):205630512198892 View
  16. Ferretti A, Ienca M, Sheehan M, Blasimme A, Dove E, Farsides B, Friesen P, Kahn J, Karlen W, Kleist P, Liao S, Nebeker C, Samuel G, Shabani M, Rivas Velarde M, Vayena E. Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?. BMC Medical Ethics 2021;22(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Martinez-Martin N. Ethical Dimensions of Commercial and DIY Neurotechnologies. View