Published on in Vol 17, No 7 (2015): July

This is a member publication of UC Davis - Shields Library, Davis, CA, USA

Characterizing the Processes for Navigating Internet Health Information Using Real-Time Observations: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Characterizing the Processes for Navigating Internet Health Information Using Real-Time Observations: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Characterizing the Processes for Navigating Internet Health Information Using Real-Time Observations: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Journals

  1. Miller W, Gesselman A, Garcia J, Groves D, Buelow J. Epilepsy-related romantic and sexual relationship problems and concerns: Indications from Internet message boards. Epilepsy & Behavior 2017;74:149 View
  2. Kobayashi R, Ishizaki M. Examining the Interaction Between Medical Information Seeking Online and Understanding: Exploratory Study. JMIR Cancer 2019;5(2):e13240 View
  3. Kanthawala S, Vermeesch A, Given B, Huh J. Answers to Health Questions: Internet Search Results Versus Online Health Community Responses. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(4):e95 View
  4. Mueller J, Jay C, Harper S, Davies A, Vega J, Todd C. Web Use for Symptom Appraisal of Physical Health Conditions: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(6):e202 View
  5. Kwakernaak J, Eekhof J, De Waal M, Barenbrug E, Chavannes N. Patients’ Use of the Internet to Find Reliable Medical Information About Minor Ailments: Vignette-Based Experimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(11):e12278 View
  6. Dehn-Hindenberg A, Saßmann H, Dierks M, Haack M, Meyer A, Walter U, Lange K. „Die ersten drei Einträge …“. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2021;16(4):374 View
  7. Perez S, Kravitz R, Bell R, Chan M, Paterniti D. Characterizing internet health information seeking strategies by socioeconomic status: a mixed methods approach. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2016;16(1) View
  8. Dubbeldam I, Sanders J, Spooren W, Meijman F, van den Haak M. Motives for Health Information Behavior: Patterns More Refined Than Traditional Dichotomies. A Study Among Women in a Cervix Treatment Process. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2018;22(2):126 View
  9. Marcu A, Muller C, Ream E, Whitaker K. Online Information-Seeking About Potential Breast Cancer Symptoms: Capturing Online Behavior With an Internet Browsing Tracking Tool. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(2):e12400 View
  10. Lambert K, Mullan J, Mansfield K, Koukomous A, Mesiti L. Evaluation of the quality and health literacy demand of online renal diet information. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2017;30(5):634 View
  11. Holtz B, Kanthawala S. #T1DLooksLikeMe: Exploring Self-Disclosure, Social Support, and Type 1 Diabetes on Instagram. Frontiers in Communication 2020;5 View
  12. Szmuda T, Talha S, Singh A, Ali S, Słoniewski P. YouTube as a source of patient information for meningitis: A content-quality and audience engagement analysis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 2021;202:106483 View
  13. AKYOL M, AKPINAR SÖYLEMEZ B, ÖZGÜL E. COVID-19 Pandemi Sürecinde Demanslı Bireylere Bakım Veren Aile Üyelerinin Sağlık Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ve İlişkili Faktörler. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi 2023;6(1):55 View
  14. Alsoghier A. Assessments of the Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of Arabic Web-Based Content on Oral Cancer and Precancerous Disorders. Saudi Journal of Health Systems Research 2024;4(3):114 View
  15. Blank C, Biedka S, Montalmant A, Saft K, Lape M, Mao K, Bradt J, Liou K. Scope, Findability, and Quality of Information About Music-Based Interventions in Oncology: Quantitative Content Analysis of Public-Facing Websites at National Cancer Institute–Designated Cancer Centers. JMIR Cancer 2024;10:e53440 View