Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 04.05.15 in Vol 17, No 5 (2015): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/4261, first published Jan 19, 2015.

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    Online and Offline Recruitment of Young Women for a Longitudinal Health Survey: Findings From the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health 1989-95 Cohort

    1Priority Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia

    2Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia

    Corresponding Author:

    Deborah Loxton, B Psych (Hons), PhD

    Priority Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing

    School of Medicine and Public Health

    University of Newcastle

    Level 4 West, HMRI

    c/- University Drive

    Callaghan, 2308

    Australia

    Phone: 61 240420690

    Fax:61 240420044

    Email:


    ABSTRACT

    Background: In 2012, we set out to recruit a cohort of at least 10,000 women aged 18-23 from across Australia. With recent research demonstrating the inadequacy of traditional approaches to recruiting women in this age group, we elected to conduct open recruiting.

    Objective: Our aim was to report on the overall success of open recruiting and to evaluate the relative success of a variety of recruitment methods in terms of numbers and demographics.

    Methods: We used referrals, Facebook, formal advertising, and incentives in order to recruit the cohort.

    Results: In all, 17,069 women were recruited for the longitudinal online survey, from 54,685 initiated surveys. Of these women, most (69.94%, n=11,799) who joined the longitudinal cohort were recruited via Facebook, 12.72% (n=2145) via the fashion promotion, 7.02% (n=1184) by referral, 4.9% (n=831) via other Web activities, and 5.4% (n=910) via traditional media.

    Conclusions: Facebook was by far the most successful strategy, enrolling a cohort of women with a similar profile to the population of Australian women in terms of age, area of residence, and relationship status. Women recruited via fashion promotion were the least representative. All strategies underrepresented less educated women—a finding that is consistent with more traditional means of recruiting. In conclusion, flexibility in recruitment design, embracing new and traditional media, adopting a dynamic responsive approach, and monitoring the results of recruiting in terms of sample composition and number recruited led to the successful establishment of a new cohort.

    J Med Internet Res 2015;17(5):e109

    doi:10.2196/jmir.4261

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    Recruiting participants has become increasingly challenging in the face of telemarketing, mass direct marketing, privacy concerns, and expectations of rewards for survey completion [1]. Traditional methods of recruiting participants, such as mailed invitations to random samples drawn from existing databases [2-4] have become less effective and more expensive [5]. Furthermore, changes to privacy laws have resulted in limited access to some national databases, even for the purposes of health research [6]. These findings point to the need for new methods that are tailored to recruit young people in the present day. This paper reports on the methods that were developed to recruit a new national cohort of women aged 18-23 into an existing longitudinal study on women’s health.

    Advances in technology offer opportunities for adapting recruitment methods to reach younger generations. Online recruitment has been shown to be more cost-effective than postal recruitment for young people [5,7,8]. Furthermore, social media, particularly Facebook [9], has been identified by young women as being a trusted communication channel that could entice them to participate in research [10]. Importantly, advertising on Facebook has been found to be an effective recruitment tool, with broad populations of young adults successfully recruited in Australia, Canada, and United States [8,11-13]. Additionally, there is some evidence that samples recruited through Facebook are ethnically diverse and geographically representative [8,11,12]. However, there are mixed results regarding whether Facebook advertising can be used to successfully recruit a sample that is demographically representative of the target population, particularly with regard to age, education level, and income [8,12,14]. In addition, not all young women use social media, and those who do not engage with social networking sites have been found to be less economically stable and less educated than those who participate in social media [15]. Therefore, recruiting entirely through social media may result in a biased sample.

    There is some evidence that using a number of recruitment methods is an effective strategy. In the United States, smokers were successfully recruited via traditional and online methods including media, word of mouth, email referrals, medical Internet media, Google AdWords [16], and social networking sites [17]. Similarly, Ramo et al [18] successfully recruited young American adults into an online tobacco use survey through a variety of methods, including online classified advertisements, paid advertising through an Internet marketing company, and purchased completed surveys through an online survey sampling company. When specifically focused on young women, Harris et al [19] successfully recruited women aged 18-23 years into a study of contraception use using Facebook advertising supported by a social media presence, in conjunction with network snowballing, poster distribution, and attending tertiary education events to raise awareness of the study. Despite these findings, the relative success of each type of recruiting method in terms of demographic representativeness has not been examined.

    The aim of this study was to recruit a cohort of at least 10,000 women aged 18-23 years into the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). This paper reports on the open recruiting campaign and the variety of methods that were used to recruit the cohort. The relative success of the different recruiting strategies in terms of the number of women recruited and the demographic representativeness of the subsamples that resulted from each strategy are reported.


    Methods

    Study Overview

    The ALSWH is a national study that recruited over 40,000 women into three age cohorts in 1996 [20]. The original three cohorts, born 1973-78, 1946-51, and 1921-26, were randomly sampled from the Medicare (national health insurance) database and have completed mailed omnibus health surveys every 3 years [4,21,22]. Random sampling from the Medicare database for the new cohort was not feasible due to the very low response rate (6%) reported by another study that attempted to recruit women aged 18-23 years using this method [5]. The ALSWH aims to assess the health and well-being of Australian women to provide an evidence base for both policy and practice. The study measures multiple aspects of health including physical health, mental health, health service use, as well as the social and environmental determinants of health. In 2011, ALSWH was funded to incorporate the use of online surveys as well as to recruit a new cohort of women aged 18-23 years who would complete annual online health surveys.

    Participants

    Eligibility criteria for the 1989-95 cohort included living in Australia, being a female aged 18-23, possessing a Medicare (ie, Australian national health insurer) number (Australian and New Zealand citizens and permanent residents living in Australia are eligible for a Medicare number), and consenting to have survey data linked with administrative data (eg, records of health service use). The final inclusion criterion involved verification by the Australian Department of Human Services that sufficient details had been provided for data linkage to occur. Sufficient details included as many of the following as were needed for a match to be made with the administrative dataset: name, address, date of birth, Medicare number.

    Recruitment Campaign

    The recruitment campaign comprised two promotions: ALSWH and Women’s Health of Australia! (WHoA!). Due to a slow rate of participation at the beginning of recruitment, it was decided that assistance from a marketing communications company could be beneficial for the second campaign. ALSWH ran for the total campaign (October 2012-December 2013) and was designed and implemented by ALSWH staff (see Figure 1 and Multimedia Appendices 1 and 2). WHoA! commenced October 2013 and was conducted by a marketing company with ALSWH staff support (see Figure 2 and Multimedia Appendices 3 and 4). Slogans, branding, and incentives differed for the two promotions. ALSWH offered the chance to win one of 100 AU $50 prepaid debit cards and WHoA! used a 1990s-themed fashion incentive of the chance to win one of 2000 exclusive items of clothing. Participants in South Australia were offered the chance to win one of 99 AU $50 prepaid debit cards instead of the fashion promotion due to the state’s lotteries legislation.

    Multiple recruitment strategies were used for both promotions and are summarized in (Table 1) (for examples of advertising and promotional materials, see Figures 1-3 and Multimedia Appendices 1-4). Strategies were categorized as Facebook, which included Facebook pages and advertising; other Web-based activities, which involved establishing accounts on other social media platforms as well as dedicated websites; referral, which utilized existing networks and snowballing; traditional media that included direct and mass marketing as well as bulk mailouts (eg, to tertiary institutions); and the WHoA! fashion company, which involved direct and indirect marketing focused on the fashion company’s involvement with ALSWH.

    Table 1. Strategies used to recruit the ALSWH 1989-95 cohort over the recruitment period October 2012 to December 2013.a
    View this table

    The campaign was dynamic by design so that successful strategies could be augmented. To monitor the success of the campaign in relation to the strategies that were being used, responses to an item that asked participants how they had heard about the study were reviewed on a weekly basis. For the purposes of this paper, the response options for this item (which varied slightly between the two recruitment promotions) were allocated to one of the five recruitment strategies defined in Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the respondents were monitored on a weekly basis and compared to the Australian Census to examine demographic representativeness. So, as well as being responsive to the number of participants entering the study, it was also possible to target recruitment strategies to respond to the composition of the sample. In particular, paid Facebook advertisements targeted underrepresented groups throughout recruitment (see Figure 3 for an example of a Facebook advertisement targeting an underrepresented group). Overall, ads were targeted to augment particular ages, areas of residence, and level of education. The decision about when to target underrepresented groups was determined by there being at least a 2% difference between the sample category and equivalent category in the census.

    Figure 1. A postcard created as part of the ALSWH promotion, distributed across 1439 venues, at events, and through mailouts.
    View this figure
    Figure 2. A less successful Facebook advertisement created as part of the WHoA! promotion, targeted at women aged 18-23 living within 16 kilometres of Henley Beach South Australia (0 users clicked the link).
    View this figure
    Figure 3. A successful Facebook advertisement created as part of the ALSWH promotion, targeted at women living in Australia aged 19 (7669 users clicked the link). Copyright User:couscouschocolat / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-2.0.
    View this figure

    Procedure

    In all promotional materials, potential participants were directed to a website that included a link to the survey and participant information, including the inclusion criteria, information statement, and details concerning incentives for participation. The documentation was updated once the WHoA! promotion started, but essentially participants experienced a similar process of reading documentation and then commencing the online survey.

    The survey contained questions about health and well-being as well as items that concerned demographic characteristics and life experiences [23]. In addition, participants were asked to provide formal consent to their data being linked to administrative datasets and to provide compulsory contact details and their Medicare number to facilitate data linkage. Follow-up phone calls were made to participants who had provided contact details but who had not completed other survey requirements. Data were sent to the Department of Human Services to verify participants’ Medicare numbers and personal details. All methods, including obtaining informed consent as implied by survey initiation, were approved by the University of Newcastle and the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committees.

    Statistical Analysis

    Sociodemographic characteristics (age, area of residence, education, study, and relationship status) were compared for each recruitment strategy with results for women in the same age group in the 2011 Australian Census. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare sociodemographic characteristics for each strategy relative to the reference category (Facebook). These models simultaneously estimate the odds ratio for each characteristic for each recruitment strategy relative to an odds ratio of one for the same characteristic in the Facebook group. All analyses were conducted using SAS software, version 9.3. The significance level was set at .05.


    Results

    A total of 54,685 surveys were initiated; however, 16,753 exited before providing enough information to determine whether they belonged to valid survey respondents. Of the remaining 37,932 initiated surveys, 19,955 were considered invalid for the following reasons: 3148 excluded personal details needed to verify participants, 36 were not eligible for a Medicare number; 13,476 were excluded for issues relating to consent to data linkage (ie, did not answer consent item, refused data linkage); 3159 were excluded due to identity concerns (eg, survey completed by someone else, duplicate); and 9 were considered invalid for other reasons. Before the verification process, 127 survey respondents withdrew. Data from the remaining 17,977 potential participants were sent to the Department of Human Services to have their Medicare numbers and personal details verified. Of those, 255 failed the verification process and 155 were excluded post verification (eg, duplicate). That left a total of 17,567 verified participants, 498 of whom were allocated to the future pilot group, in keeping with ALSWH procedures of maintaining a separate group of participants for pilot testing each new survey. The final cohort was 17,069 participants.

    Figure 4 shows the periods when various recruitment methods were active, along with the number of participants recruited each week. Women were exposed to Facebook pages with recruiting posts and advertisements, other online media, and ALSWH referral for the entire recruitment period. Facebook advertising was reasonably constant, with breaks due to technical issues, pricing, and the changeover from the ALSWH promotion to WHoA!. In June 2013, Facebook introduced newsfeed advertising, so that advertisements appeared in the central part of the screen (rather than to the side) and on mobile devices that used the Facebook app. Targeted Facebook advertising was also introduced in June 2013, whereby particular sections of the community were identified and advertisements were shown only to those people who met the specified criteria. For example, advertisements designed for women of a particular age (eg, 19 years) appeared only on the Facebook pages of women who were that age (see Figure 3).

    The introduction of targeted newsfeed advertising in combination with increased advertising had a significant impact on participant responses. Prior to this time, an average of 10.5 women responded per day (2434 surveys over 232 days). After the introduction of targeted newsfeed advertisements and before the WHoA! promotion, responses rose to an average of 54.3 per day (6787 surveys over 125 days). The WHoA! promotion was officially launched in early October 2013, and the fashion company database was emailed late October 2013, resulting in a spike of responses. However, WHoA! prelaunch activities were conducted from July until the launch to engage the interest of potential participants in the WHoA! materials. During the WHoA! promotion, responses rose to an average of 100.6 per day (7849 surveys over 78 days). As can be seen in Figure 4, this was the most intensive period of recruiting activities during the campaign incorporating both ALSWH and WHoA! activities.

    Of the 17,069 women enrolled in the 1989-95 cohort, 200 did not indicate how they heard about the survey. Of the remaining 16,869 women, 69.94% (n=11,799) indicated Facebook, 4.93% (n=831) other Web activities, 7.02% (n=1184) referral, 5.39% (n=910) traditional media, and 12.72% (n=2145) the fashion company (see Table 2). Compared with the 2011 Australian Census, respondents to each of the recruitment strategies were more likely to have a university degree and to be studying. Most of the strategies resulted in relatively representative samples of women with regards to age, except that referral and the fashion company overrepresented older women compared to the population. There was also a higher proportion of women living in urban areas among the women recruited via the fashion company. With regards to education, all recruitment strategies led to an underrepresentation of less educated women compared to the 2011 Australian Census; however, Facebook was the least biased in this regard. Facebook resulted in the most representative sample in relation to the Australian Census, whereas the fashion company sample was the least representative. As would be expected and has been reported in detail in Mishra et al [24], the overall sample was broadly representative of women in this age group with overrepresentation of women with higher levels of education.

    Table 2. Demographic characteristics by recruitment strategyaof 18-23 year old women from the ALSWH 1989-95 cohort compared with 18-23 year old women from the 2011 Australian Census.
    View this table

    Odds ratios for sociodemographic characteristics of women in each recruitment group relative to women recruited via Facebook are shown in Table 3. Compared to women aged 20, women aged 21-23 were more likely to be recruited via other Web activities, referral, and through the fashion company than via Facebook (significant ORs between 1.20 and 1.33). Compared to women with Year 12 qualifications, less educated women were less likely to be recruited by strategies other than Facebook (ORs between 0.50 and 0.72). Women recruited via the fashion company also differed from those recruited via Facebook in that they were less likely to live outside a major city (ORs between 0.34 and 0.69), were less likely to be studying (OR 0.89), and were less likely to have a partner (OR 0.96 for in a de facto relationship and OR 0.42 for married).

    Table 3. Odds ratios for demographic characteristics by recruitment strategy of 18-23 year old women from the ALSWH 1989-95 cohort recruited October 2012-December 2013, using Facebook as the reference category.
    View this table
    Figure 4. Survey completions by week in relation to recruitment strategies for the ALSWH 1989-95 cohort over the recruitment period October 2012 to December 2013.
    View this figure

    Discussion

    Principal Findings

    The primary aim of recruiting over 10,000 women aged 18-23 years was met, with 17,069 meeting the inclusion criteria and forming the 1989-95 ALSWH cohort. The most successful strategy used in terms of number of participants gained was Facebook, under both the ALSWH and WHoA! promotions. Direct marketing strategies were the next most successful, with the fashion company under the WHoA! promotion and the more general referral strategy together accounting for 20% of the final sample. While other Web activities and traditional media were the least successful activities, they still managed to attract 5% each of the final sample.

    Comparison With Prior Work

    Facebook was the most successful in recruiting a sample of young women that represented those in the Australian population. This was most likely due to the ability to constantly monitor women’s particular characteristics in relation to the Australian Census and post Facebook advertising as necessary to target any underrepresented groups. Such a strategy most likely mitigated the age bias reported by past research, which found that Facebook attracted a lower proportion of older women (ie, aged 22-25) compared to Australian Census data [12]. There was, however, an age bias among those recruited via referral and the fashion company strategies. These strategies attracted a higher proportion (56.17% and 59.35% respectively) of women aged over 20 years than is apparent in the population (50.98%) and were more likely than Facebook to attract women aged over 20 years. The multiple strategies approach to the recruiting campaign resulted in a total sample that has been found to be representative of the population with regard to age [24].

    Unfortunately, the same was not true for education. Compared with Australian Census data, all of the recruiting strategies resulted in subsamples that were overrepresentative of women with a tertiary education or who were studying. Overall, referral was the most likely and Facebook the least likely to attract women with a university degree. This is not surprising since referral largely consisted of using networks of people who worked on, participated in, or who were close to the ALSWH. It is noteworthy that Facebook achieved the highest proportion of women with less than a Year 12 education, although this was still 6% below the proportion indicated by the Australian Census as having this level of education. Education bias is a common occurrence for survey research [4,8,25], which warrants future research to utilize more refined targeting to recruit less educated individuals.

    Facebook, referral, and traditional media attracted women in similar proportions by area as those that exist in the population. The most notable difference here was the tendency for the fashion company incentive to attract more women from urban areas than the other strategies. Nevertheless, the sample as a whole has been found to be representative of the population with regard to area [24].

    It is difficult to compare relationship status with Australian Census data. The Australian Census records registered marital status, so that figures on the percentage of women living in de facto relationships were not available. Including women living in de facto relationships with those who had never married, the proportions are similar for all strategies. Fewer married women were recruited via the fashion company strategy, making these women the least representative of the population.

    Limitations

    In generalizing the results of our recruiting techniques to other situations, a number of limitations must be considered. First, the sample was limited to women aged 18-23 years. The strategies used may be more or less effective in recruiting males or other age groups. Second, the requirement that women had to consent to linking their survey data with administrative datasets reduced the number of eligible participants and might have resulted in differential participant bias for different strategies. However, Medicare verification is also a strength of this method in ensuring participants are valid and removing the risk of multiple survey submissions from any one participant. Our previous work determined that the ALSWH 1989-95 cohort were demographically representative overall and heterogeneous with respect to health and health behavior [24]. The diversity of the sample and the wide range of variables collected, including the use of well-recognized psychometric measures, allows for valid statistical comparisons to be made. Further, when compared with women who consented to data linkage, those who did not consent were not significantly different in terms of age, area of residence, income management, education, general health, or psychological distress [26]. Last, we were unable to assess the cumulative impact of multiple approaches on the individual and relied on a single response from participants as to what attracted them to the survey. Anecdotally, participants reported having multiple contacts with various recruiting materials before joining the study. It would be a useful avenue for future research to measure not only which strategies bring participants to a research project but how many strategies are encountered by an individual before they commit to participation.

    Conclusions

    Facebook was by far the most successful recruiting strategy, in line with other research results [19]. The current study found that the strengths of a Facebook recruiting approach included the reach of the advertising in terms of demographic diversity, the ability to target advertising to specific groups, and the capacity to be responsive to the sample composition as it was recruited. Weaknesses included a lack of control over how advertising is presented, variable costs that can be challenging to budget, and the inability to reach those who do not (or cannot) participate in Facebook [14,15]. Supporting Facebook advertising with a substantial social media platform assisted with recruiting and with study credibility [7,12], and the promotion of incentives via Facebook likely also increased the appeal and reach of the Facebook posts. We found that supplementing Facebook with other approaches helped to mitigate biases attributable to the use of a single method. This is in agreement with research that has recommended using social media to complement more traditional recruiting approaches [14].

    The dynamic design allowed for successes to be augmented but also required almost constant contact with institutional ethics committees who needed to approve every material and individual procedure that involved recruiting. For example, every advertisement or post that mentioned recruiting had to be preapproved. In our original ethics application, we included examples of potential ads and posts in an effort to have materials readily available. However, the need to provide relevant and topical posts and ads on a frequent basis meant that this strategy was only partially successful in mitigating the need for ongoing ethics approvals. These types of delays are not in keeping with social media, where responsiveness is the key to success within the paradigm. It would be helpful for both ethics committees and researchers if clear guidelines with regard to ethical recruiting using social and other modern media were developed to prevent such labor intensive procedures.

    The recruiting campaign resulted in the establishment of a national cohort of over 17,000 women aged 18-23 years. While some overrepresentation in tertiary-educated women is apparent and was unable to be fully mitigated by the multiple techniques employed, the sample is broadly representative across other demographic measures and has sufficient size and diversity to allow for subgroup comparisons [24]. In conclusion, flexibility in recruitment design, embracing new and traditional media, providing incentives, adopting a dynamic responsive approach, and monitoring the results of recruiting in terms of sample composition and number recruited led to the successful establishment of a new cohort.

    Acknowledgments

    The research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Health, the University of Newcastle and University of Queensland. We are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health for funding and to the women who completed the survey. Researchers at the Priority Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing at the University of Newcastle are members of the Hunter Medical Research Institute.

    Members of the ALSWH recruitment team are Annette Dobson, and in alphabetical order: Ashleigh Baker, Catherine Chojenta, Katherine De Maria, Megan Ferguson, Leonie Gemmel, Anna Graves, Sheree Harris, Jayne Lucke, Clare Thomson, Britta Wigginton.

    Authors' Contributions

    DL was responsible for the study concept and design, acquisition of the data, interpretation of the data, drafting and revising the manuscript. JP contributed to the study design, acquisition of the data, analysis, and interpretation of the data as well as drafting and revising the manuscript. AA contributed to data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data as well as drafting and revising the manuscript. NT and SP contributed to the study design, as well as drafting and revising the manuscript. MH contributed to data acquisition, interpretation of the data, as well as drafting and revising the manuscript. RT contributed to the study design, acquisition of the data, and revision of the manuscript. GM contributed to the acquisition of the data and revision of the manuscript. JB contributed to the study concept and design, data acquisition as well as drafting and revising the manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Advertising and recruitment materials from the ALSWH promotion.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 345KB

    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Example of a YouTube video created as part of the ALSWH promotion.

    AVI File, 2MB

    Multimedia Appendix 3

    Advertising and recruitment materials from the WHoA! promotion.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 239KB

    Multimedia Appendix 4

    Example of a YouTube video created as part of the WHoA! promotion.

    AVI File, 2MB

    References

    1. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 2007 Sep;17(9):643-653. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Belanger CF, Hennekens CH, Rosner B, Speizer FE. The nurses' health study. Am J Nurs 1978 Jun;78(6):1039-1040. [Medline]
    3. Maconochie N, Doyle P, Prior S. The National Women's Health Study: assembly and description of a population-based reproductive cohort. BMC Public Health 2004 Aug 7;4:35 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles JE, Dobson AJ, Lee C, Mishra G, et al. Women's Health Australia: recruitment for a national longitudinal cohort study. Women Health 1998;28(1):23-40. [Medline]
    5. Harris ML, Herbert D, Loxton D, Dobson A, Wigginton B, Lucke JC. Recruiting young women for health surveys: traditional random sampling methods are not cost-effective. Aust N Z J Public Health 2014 Oct;38(5):495. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Loff B, Campbell EA, Glass DC, Kelsall HL, Slegers C, Zion DR, et al. Access to the Commonwealth electoral roll for medical research. Med J Aust 2013 Jul 22;199(2):128-130. [Medline]
    7. Batterham PJ. Recruitment of mental health survey participants using Internet advertising: content, characteristics and cost effectiveness. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2014 Jun;23(2):184-191. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Fenner Y, Garland SM, Moore EE, Jayasinghe Y, Fletcher A, Tabrizi SN, et al. Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(1):e20 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Facebook Inc. Facebook. 2015.   URL: https://www.facebook.com/ [accessed 2015-04-28] [WebCite Cache]
    10. Herbert DL, Loxton D, Bateson D, Weisberg E, Lucke JC. Challenges for researchers investigating contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions of young women living in urban and rural areas of Australia: face-to-face discussions to increase participation in a web-based survey. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(1):e10 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Chu JL, Snider CE. Use of a social networking web site for recruiting Canadian youth for medical research. J Adolesc Health 2013 Jun;52(6):792-794. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Parkinson S, Bromfield L. Recruiting young adults to child maltreatment research through Facebook: a feasibility study. Child Abuse Negl 2013 Sep;37(9):716-720. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Ramo DE, Prochaska JJ. Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(1):e28 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Frandsen M, Walters J, Ferguson SG. Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine Tob Res 2014 Feb;16(2):247-251. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Bobkowski P, Smith J. Social media divide: characteristics of emerging adults who do not use social network websites. Media, Culture & Society 2013 Sep 16;35(6):771-781. [CrossRef]
    16. Google. Google AdWords. 2015.   URL: http://www.adwords.google.com [accessed 2015-04-28] [WebCite Cache]
    17. Heffner JL, Wyszynski CM, Comstock B, Mercer LD, Bricker J. Overcoming recruitment challenges of web-based interventions for tobacco use: the case of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation. Addict Behav 2013 Oct;38(10):2473-2476 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Ramo DE, Hall SM, Prochaska JJ. Reaching young adult smokers through the internet: comparison of three recruitment mechanisms. Nicotine Tob Res 2010 Jul;12(7):768-775 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Harris ML, Loxton D, Wigginton B, Lucke JC. Recruiting Online: Lessons From a Longitudinal Survey of Contraception and Pregnancy Intentions of Young Australian Women. Am J Epidemiol 2015 Apr 15:-. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Women’s Health Australia. Study overview. 2015.   URL: http://www.alswh.org.au/ [accessed 2015-01-13] [WebCite Cache]
    21. Lee C, Dobson AJ, Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles J, Warner-Smith P, et al. Cohort Profile: the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Int J Epidemiol 2005 Oct;34(5):987-991 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Brown W, Bryson L, Byles J, Dobson A, Manderson L, Schofield M, et al. Women's Health Australia: Establishment of The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. Journal of Women's Health 1996 Oct;5(5):467-472. [CrossRef]
    23. Women’s Health Australia. Surveys. 2015.   URL: http://www.alswh.org.au/for-researchers/surveys [accessed 2015-01-13] [WebCite Cache]
    24. Mishra GD, Hockey R, Powers J, Loxton D, Tooth L, Rowlands I, et al. Recruitment via the Internet and social networking sites: the 1989-1995 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(12):e279 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Strandhagen E, Berg C, Lissner L, Nunez L, Rosengren A, Torén K, et al. Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk. Eur J Epidemiol 2010 Mar;25(3):163-172. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Mishra G, Loxton D, Anderson A, Hockey R, Powers J, Brown W, et al. Health and wellbeing of women aged 18 to 23 in 2013 and 1996: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2014.   URL: http://alswh.org.au/images/content/pdf/major_reports/2014Major_Report%20I_FINAL.pdf [accessed 2015-03-03] [WebCite Cache]


    Abbreviations

    ALSWH: Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health
    WHoA!: Women’s Health of Australia!


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 19.01.15; peer-reviewed by M Tracy, M Frandsen; comments to author 18.02.15; revised version received 02.03.15; accepted 03.03.15; published 04.05.15

    ©Deborah Loxton, Jennifer Powers, Amy E Anderson, Natalie Townsend, Melissa L Harris, Ryan Tuckerman, Stephanie Pease, Gita Mishra, Julie Byles. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.05.2015.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.