Published on in Vol 2, No 2 (2000):

e-Health Code of Ethics (May 24)

e-Health Code of Ethics (May 24)

e-Health Code of Ethics (May 24)

Authors of this article:

Helga Rippen ;   Ahmad Risk

Journals

  1. Devine T, Broderick J, Harris L, Wu H, Hilfiker S. Making Quality Health Websites a National Public Health Priority: Toward Quality Standards. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e211 View
  2. Boulos M, Roudsari A, Gordon C, Gray J. The Use of Quality Benchmarking in Assessing Web Resources for the Dermatology Virtual Branch Library of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(1):e5 View
  3. Dyer K. Ethical Challenges of Medicine and Health on the Internet: A Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(2):e23 View
  4. Verhoeven F, Steehouder M, Hendrix R, van Gemert-Pijnen J. Factors affecting health care workers’ adoption of a website with infection control guidelines. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78(10):663 View
  5. Rivera-Romero O, Konstantinidis S, Denecke K, Gabarrón E, Petersen C, Househ M, Merolli M, Mayer M. Ethical Considerations for Participatory Health through Social Media: Healthcare Workforce and Policy Maker Perspectives. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2020;29(01):071 View
  6. Eysenbach G. An Ontology of Quality Initiatives and a Model for Decentralized, Collaborative Quality Management on the (Semantic) World Wide Web. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(4):e34 View
  7. OWAIMRIN A, STEINBECK K. Accessibility for parents of weight management information on the Internet. Nutrition & Dietetics 2006;63(2):117 View
  8. Martin‐Facklam M, Kostrzewa M, Martin P, Haefeli W. Quality of drug information on the World Wide Web and strategies to improve pages with poor information quality.  An intervention study on pages about sildenafil. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2004;57(1):80 View
  9. Pinto S, Caldeira S, Marques G, da Conceição A. Healthcare technologies: An ethical discussion. British Journal of Healthcare Management 2018;24(2):65 View
  10. Groß D, Schmidt M. E-Health und Gesundheitsapps aus medizinethischer Sicht. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2018;61(3):349 View
  11. Klugman C, Dunn L, Schwartz J, Cohen I. The Ethics of Smart Pills and Self-Acting Devices: Autonomy, Truth-Telling, and Trust at the Dawn of Digital Medicine. The American Journal of Bioethics 2018;18(9):38 View
  12. Chan M, Estève D, Escriba C, Campo E. A review of smart homes—Present state and future challenges. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2008;91(1):55 View
  13. Soobrah R, Clark S. Your patient information website: how good is it?. Colorectal Disease 2012;14(3) View
  14. Yegenoglu S, Aslan D, Acar A, Calgan Z. What Is Missing on Their Web Sites? An Evaluation of National and International Pharmaceutical Companies in Turkey. Telemedicine and e-Health 2005;11(6):684 View
  15. Eysenbach G. The New Health-Related Top-Level Domains Are Coming: Will Cureforcancer.health Go to the Highest Bidder?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e73 View
  16. Landman M, Shelton J, Kauffmann R, Dattilo J. Guidelines for Maintaining a Professional Compass in the Era of Social Networking. Journal of Surgical Education 2010;67(6):381 View
  17. Domínguez-Castro A, Iñesta-García A. Evaluación de la calidad de las webs de centros de farmacoeconomía y economía de la salud en Internet mediante un cuestionario validado. Gaceta Sanitaria 2004;18(4):295 View
  18. Lenaerts G, Bekkering G, Goossens M, De Coninck L, Delvaux N, Cordyn S, Adriaenssens J, Vankrunkelsven P. Tools to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(1):e15415 View
  19. Alam M, Reaz M, Ali M. A Review of Smart Homes—Past, Present, and Future. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 2012;42(6):1190 View
  20. Mayer Pujadas M. Acreditar webs de contenido sanitario, ¿necesidad imposible?. Medicina Clínica 2001;116(13):496 View
  21. Strech D. Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2011;13(4):e113 View
  22. Oh S, Yi Y, Worrall A. Quality of health answers in social Q&A. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012;49(1):1 View
  23. Hanif F, Read J, Goodacre J, Chaudhry A, Gibbs P. The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the Internet for health information. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2009;34(4):231 View
  24. Farrar F. Transforming Home Health Nursing with Telehealth Technology. Nursing Clinics of North America 2015;50(2):269 View
  25. Pezaro S, Clyne W, Gerada C. Confidentiality, anonymity and amnesty for midwives in distress seeking online support – Ethical?. Nursing Ethics 2018;25(4):481 View
  26. Kashihara H, Nakayama T, Hatta T, Takahashi N, Fujita M. Evaluating the Quality of Website Information of Private-Practice Clinics Offering Cell Therapies in Japan. interactive Journal of Medical Research 2016;5(2):e15 View
  27. Allam A, Schulz P, Nakamoto K. The Impact of Search Engine Selection and Sorting Criteria on Vaccination Beliefs and Attitudes: Two Experiments Manipulating Google Output. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(4):e100 View
  28. Heinsch M, Geddes J, Sampson D, Brosnan C, Hunt S, Wells H, Kay-Lambkin F. Disclosure of suicidal thoughts during an e-mental health intervention: relational ethics meets actor-network theory. Ethics & Behavior 2021;31(3):151 View
  29. Abdel-Karim R, Abdel-Halim A, El-Elemi A, Hagras A, Ali N. Evaluation of ethical and legal perspectives of physician–patient relationship on Arabic Health Websites. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 2012;2(2):73 View
  30. Tatsumi H, Mitani H, Haruki Y, Ogushi Y. Internet Medical Usage in Japan: Current Situation and Issues. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(1):e12 View
  31. Rao P. Wired and Worried: Understanding Users’ Emotions while Web Searching for Health Information. Procedia Computer Science 2016;84:132 View
  32. Penson R, Benson R, Parles K, Chabner B, Lynch T. Virtual Connections: Internet Health Care. The Oncologist 2002;7(6):555 View
  33. Buhi E, Daley E, Fuhrmann H, Smith S. An Observational Study of How Young People Search for Online Sexual Health Information. Journal of American College Health 2009;58(2):101 View
  34. Reavley N, Jorm A. The quality of mental disorder information websites: A review. Patient Education and Counseling 2011;85(2):e16 View
  35. Proudfoot J, Klein B, Barak A, Carlbring P, Cuijpers P, Lange A, Ritterband L, Andersson G. Establishing Guidelines for Executing and Reporting Internet Intervention Research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 2011;40(2):82 View
  36. Basyouni M, BinDhim N, Saini B, Williams K. Online Health Information Needs for Patients with Asthma in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2015;19(1):13 View
  37. Milutinovic M, De Decker B. Ethical aspects in eHealth – design of a privacy-friendly system. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2016;14(1):49 View
  38. Gilbert M, Bonnell A, Farrell J, Haag D, Bondyra M, Unger D, Elliot E. Click yes to consent: Acceptability of incorporating informed consent into an internet-based testing program for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;105:38 View
  39. Risk A, Dzenowagis J. Review Of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001;3(4):e28 View
  40. Verhoeven F, Steehouder M, Hendrix R, van Gemert‐Pijnen J. How nurses seek and evaluate clinical guidelines on the Internet. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010;66(1):114 View
  41. Forgie S, Duff J, Ross S. Twelve tips for using Twitter as a learning tool in medical education. Medical Teacher 2013;35(1):8 View
  42. Chang D, Abouassaly R, Lawrentschuk N. Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Urolithiasis on the Google Search Engine. Advances in Urology 2016;2016:1 View
  43. Kluge E. Health Information Professionals in a Global eHealth World: Ethical and legal arguments for the international certification and accreditation of health information professionals. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;97:261 View
  44. Riso B, Tupasela A, Vears D, Felzmann H, Cockbain J, Loi M, Kongsholm N, Zullo S, Rakic V. Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms – which values should be considered?. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2017;13(1) View
  45. Marziali E, Serafini J, McCleary L. A Systematic Review of Practice Standards and Research Ethics in Technology-Based Home Health Care Intervention Programs for Older Adults. Journal of Aging and Health 2005;17(6):679 View
  46. Kluge E. Secure e-Health: Managing risks to patient health data. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76(5-6):402 View
  47. Poland M, Nugent C, Wang H, Chen L. Smart Home Research. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence 2009;1(4):32 View
  48. Albarrak A, Mohammed R, Zakaria N, Alyousef L, Almefgai N, Alqahtani H, Alamer H, Alsulaiman A. The impact of obesity related websites on decision making among students in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2016;24(5):605 View
  49. Das D, Maji P, Dey G, Dey N. Ethical E-Health. International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications 2014;5(3):17 View
  50. Bouchier H, Bath P. Evaluation of Websites that Provide Information on Alzheimer's Disease. Health Informatics Journal 2003;9(1):17 View
  51. Klischewski R, Wetzel I. Serviceflow management for health provider networks. Logistics Information Management 2003;16(3/4):259 View
  52. Chaet D, Clearfield R, Sabin J, Skimming K. Ethical practice in Telehealth and Telemedicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2017;32(10):1136 View
  53. Verma P, Kumar S, Sharma S. Multiple dimensions of e-healthcare ethics and its relationship to the ethical concerns of the consumer. International Journal of Ethics and Systems 2021;37(1):70 View
  54. KARABEKMEZ M. Dijital Sağlık ve Genomik Veri Etiği. TRT Akademi 2021 View
  55. Brulet A, Llorca G, Letrilliart L. Medical Wikis Dedicated to Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(2):e48 View
  56. Karabekmez M. Data Ethics in Digital Health and Genomics. The New Bioethics 2021;27(4):320 View
  57. Lenaerts G, Bekkering G, Goossens M, De Coninck L, Delvaux N, Cordyn S, Adriaenssens J, Aertgeerts B, Vankrunkelsven P. A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(10):e27174 View
  58. Bhargava Y, Baths V. Technology for dementia care: benefits, opportunities and concerns. Journal of Global Health Reports 2022;6 View
  59. Sterling R. The on-line promotion and sale of nutrigenomic services. Genetics in Medicine 2008;10(11):784 View
  60. Steerling E, Houston R, Gietzen L, Ogilvie S, de Ruiter H, Nygren J. Examining how Ethics in Relation to Health Technology is Described in the Research Literature: Scoping Review. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2022;11(2):e38745 View
  61. Ashdown-Lambert J. A review of low birth weight: predictors, precursors and morbidity outcomes. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 2005;125(2):76 View
  62. Lee M, Lin X, Chai J, Lee E, Smith H, Tudor Car L. Smartphone apps for point-of-care information summaries: systematic assessment of the quality and content. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2023;28(5):320 View
  63. ZHU Y, Song T, Zhang Z, Yu P. Developing an Instrument for General Health Consumers to Evaluate the Quality of Dementia Websites. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022 View
  64. EKE E, ÇETİN R, ÇETİN B. MOBİL SAĞLIK UYGULAMALARININ GÜVENLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN HABERLER ARACILIĞIYLA YAŞANAN ETİK SORUNLARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2018;18(3):129 View
  65. Capelo M, Lopes N, Rosa B, Silvestre M. Reflexão ética sobre a teleconsulta. Revista Bioética 2023;31 View
  66. Capelo M, Lopes N, Rosa B, Silvestre M. Reflexión ética sobre la teleconsulta. Revista Bioética 2023;31 View
  67. Capelo M, Lopes N, Rosa B, Silvestre M. Reflections on remote consultation. Revista Bioética 2023;31 View
  68. Peleg O, Hadar E, Boniel-Nissim M. A novel questionnaire for evaluating digital tool use (DTUQ-D) among individuals with type 2 diabetes: exploring the digital landscape. Frontiers in Public Health 2024;12 View
  69. Wang Q, Liu L, Li H, Zhang Q, Ma Q. Quality of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Information on the Chinese Internet: Website Evaluation Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e56594 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Remmers H, Hülsken-Giesler M. Human-Centered Design of E-Health Technologies. View
  2. Poland M, Nugent C, Wang H, Chen L. Ubiquitous Developments in Ambient Computing and Intelligence. View
  3. Gottlieb B, Stroud K. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. View
  4. Remmers H, Hülsken-Giesler M. User-Driven Healthcare. View
  5. Faiella G, Komnios I, Voss-Knude M, Cano I, Duquenoy P, Nalin M, Baroni I, Matrisciano F, Clemente F. Security in Computer and Information Sciences. View
  6. Jähn K, Mayer J. Patient Relationship Management. View
  7. Klischewski R, Wetzel I. Information Age Economy. View
  8. Moumtzoglou A. M-Health Innovations for Patient-Centered Care. View
  9. Grebenshchikova E. The Changing Scope of Technoethics in Contemporary Society. View
  10. Grebenshchikova E. Human Performance Technology. View
  11. Mifsud J, Gavrilovici C. Ethics and Integrity in Health and Life Sciences Research. View
  12. Samuel H, Zaïane O. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. View
  13. Das D, Maji P, Dey G, Dey N. Healthcare Ethics and Training. View
  14. . Technological Tools for Value-Based Sustainable Relationships in Health. View
  15. Beidler S, Chase S. Technology and Nursing. View
  16. Moumtzoglou A. Mobile Health Applications for Quality Healthcare Delivery. View
  17. Moumtzoglou A. Research Anthology on Improving Health Literacy Through Patient Communication and Mass Media. View