JMIR Publications

Recent Articles:

• 

  Consumer & Patient Education and...

  May 15, 2026

  Digital Patient Decision Aid for Antiobesity Medications: Mixed Methods Study of Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Li-Jen Wang  
  • Yi-Jen Wang  
  • Yu-Lun Cheng  
  • Wen-Liang Fang  
  • Weu Wang  
  • Meng-Cong Zheng  

  Abstract:

  Background: The global burden of obesity continues to rise, highlighting the need for patient-centered approaches to weight management. Shared decision-making is particularly important in the selection of antiobesity medications (AOMs), as treatment options differ in mechanism, effectiveness, side effects, routes of administration, and cost. Despite this preference-sensitive context, only a few patient decision aids (PDAs) have been culturally and clinically adapted for use in Asian populations. Objective: This study aims to design, develop, and evaluate a digital PDA, OptiWeight, to support shared decision-making for AOM selection, incorporating perspectives from health care professionals and patients. Methods: This mixed methods, multicenter study, conducted between August 2022 and November 2025, applied a 4-stage human-centered design process. An evidence-informed prototype was developed based on clinical guidelines, followed by 2 rounds of usability testing using think-aloud protocols to assess navigation structures, perceived usability (System Usability Scale [SUS]), and cognitive workload (NASA Task Load Index [NASA-TLX]). Semistructured interviews with health care professionals specializing in weight management, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, informed clinical implementation and workflow integration. Finally, patients with overweight or obesity evaluated usability, cognitive workload, and overall user experience in outpatient settings. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis, and 1-way analysis of variance examined changes in usability and workload across stages. Results: A total of 174 individuals were included across all study stages (usability testing among adults: n=78; health care professional interviews: n=18; and clinical evaluation among patients: n=78). Iterative usability testing comparing system- and user-controlled navigation structures revealed complementary strengths and limitations, leading to the adoption of a hybrid navigation structure supporting both sequential guidance and flexible comparison. Additional design requirements included the use of icon arrays to enhance risk comprehension and localization features such as treatment cost displays and clarification of socially impactful side effects. Perceived usability increased from initial testing to clinical evaluation (SUS: 60.53-73.65, P<.001), meeting good usability thresholds, while cognitive workload decreased (NASA-TLX: 40.35-16.69, P<.001). Conclusions: Through a systematic human-centered design process integrating health care professional and patient perspectives, OptiWeight addresses the lack of culturally adapted PDAs for AOM decision-making in Mandarin-speaking populations while capturing user needs—particularly regarding navigation flexibility and risk visualization. The final tool demonstrated good usability and feasibility, and workflow considerations suggest potential for integration into routine weight-management care. Further research is needed to evaluate its impact on decision quality and real-world implementation outcomes.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e89428

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Mobile Health (mhealth)

  May 15, 2026

  Assessing the Use of Wearable Mobile-Monitoring Devices Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness: Qualitative Acceptability and Feasibility Study

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Aubrey M Freitas  
  • Jesus G Chavez  
  • Melissa Chinchilla  
  • Ronald Calderon  
  • Stephanie Chassman  
  • Lauren Hoffmann  
  • Alexander S Young  

  Abstract:

  Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) is difficult to treat for various reasons, such as rapid changes in symptoms, comorbid health conditions, long gaps between provider visits, and additional societal barriers experienced by this population. Wearable mobile-sensing devices can be used to passively collect valuable patient-generated health data, such as daily step count, heart rate variability, sleep information, and other health-related behaviors, which could inform and improve treatment for individuals with SMI. Wearable health devices have become more economically accessible, providing promise for the possibility of their implementation in health care. However, more information regarding how individuals with SMI perceive and interact with these devices is needed. Objective: This study aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of using wearable mobile-sensing devices to improve treatment outcomes for Veterans with SMI. In addition, we were also interested in learning if privacy concerns would influence acceptability of devices, specifically surrounding location tracking and health information sharing, as well as assessing other barriers to device use. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants who had been using a wearable health and fitness tracker for at least 2 weeks to explore their thoughts and perceptions of these devices. A total of 15 Veterans diagnosed with a SMI participated in interviews. Both thematic analysis and rapid qualitative analysis approaches were used to uncover findings in key domains and emergent themes. Results: Wearable fitness trackers allowed participants to conveniently monitor various aspects of their physical and mental health, provided a greater understanding of their overall well-being, and motivated them to reach personal health goals. Individuals were open to sharing their personal health information collected from the devices with providers to improve their health care treatment and expressed no privacy concerns surrounding data tracking or the device’s global positioning system that monitors physical location. Participants experienced some technological challenges with using the fitness trackers, as well as the device’s accompanying cell phone app. Furthermore, participants expressed difficulties in understanding and interpreting the health data that was collected from the health and fitness trackers. Greater ongoing technological support, in addition to physical device adjustments to enhance comfort and usability, were suggested ways of improving overall user experience. Conclusions: Participants with SMI in this sample were accepting of wearable mobile-monitoring devices and believe it is feasible to incorporate these fitness trackers into their daily lives. Furthermore, participants in this sample expressed no privacy concerns regarding location tracking or the sharing of health information collected from these devices with providers. Patient-generated health data collected from these devices may offer valuable information that could be used to inform health care treatment for this population.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e85087

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Digital Health Reviews

  May 15, 2026

  Concerns of Using Large Language Models in Health Care Research and Practice: Umbrella Review

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Feyza Yarar  
  • Pauline Addis  
  • Megan Fairweather  
  • Dawn Craig  
  • Hannah O'Keefe  

  Abstract:

  Background: Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT (OpenAI), are rapidly evolving, and their applications in health care are increasing. There is a growing demand for automation of routine tasks and a drive to use LLMs or similar to support research. Objective: This umbrella review examines concerns of health care professionals and researchers related to the use of LLMs in health care research and practice. We aimed to identify common issues raised and the implications for patient care, policy, and practice. Methods: A protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420250640997). Searches were conducted in 7 databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Epistemonikos) in February 2025 and updated in February 2026. Screening was conducted in 2 stages, with independent screening by 2 reviewers. Studies published in the English language after January 2017 with at least one outcome expressing concerns of LLM or generative artificial intelligence use in health care research were included. The included studies were quality appraised for risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), respectively. Data was extracted using a piloted form and narratively synthesized following SWiM guidelines and the PRIOR (Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews) checklist. Results: The search retrieved 448 systematic reviews, of which 42 met the inclusion criteria. Further, 12 distinct populations were identified, including researchers and clinicians in various medical specialties. The included reviews were assessed to be of very poor quality, and the level of overlap between primary studies could not be determined. Additionally, 15 reviews focused on ChatGPT, a further 15 on two or more LLMs, and 12 on generic artificial intelligence. Thus, 3 main themes emerged from the narrative synthesis. In order of most to least frequently discussed: (1) technical capability; (2) ethical, legal, and societal; and (3) costs. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first umbrella review to address the concerns of LLMs in health care research and practice. Thematic analyses provided insight into the complexity of different perspectives, and by using a whole population approach, it demonstrates common narratives. However, the poor quality of the included studies and potential overlap of results are substantial limitations. Data quality is at the heart of these concerns, and combative action must ensure health care professionals and researchers have the resources required to overcome these apprehensions. Ethical, legal, and societal implications of artificial intelligence use were also commonly raised. As technology accelerates and demands on health care increase, we must adapt and embrace change with equity, diversity, inclusion, and safety at the core. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD420250640997; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420250640997

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e87804

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Telehealth and Telemonitoring

  May 14, 2026

  Effectiveness of Telemedicine vs Face-to-Face Consultation in Fighting COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study of Adult Patients With COVID-19 in a Primary Care...

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Fangfang Jiao  
  • Ka Ming Ho  
  • Lapkin Chiang  
  • Siu Hin Ko  
  • Catherine Xiaorui Chen  

  Abstract:

  Background: Telemedicine use expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA) launched both tele-designated clinics (Tele-DCs) and face-to-face physical designated clinics (PDCs) to manage mild cases. However, the comparative effectiveness of these models remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes, specifically hospitalization and severe complications, between patients with mild COVID-19 managed via Tele-DCs versus PDCs in Hong Kong’s public primary care setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving all patients with COVID-19, aged 18 years or older, who visited a PDC (n=23,031) or a Tele-DC (n=38,628) at the Kowloon Central Cluster in Hong Kong from July 28, 2022, to January 29, 2023. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching based on age, sex, smoking status, comprehensive social security assistance (CSSA) status, and the Charlson comorbidity score, resulting in 17,199 patients per group. The primary outcome was the hospital admission rate between day 1 and day 28. Secondary outcomes included severe complications, mortality, accident and emergency department (AED) use, the antiviral prescription rate, and DC revisit. Results: The average age of patients in the Tele-DC and PDC groups was 58.55 (SD 17.53) and 58.53 (SD 17.54) years, respectively (P=.93). In both groups, 9.05% (n=1557) of patients were on CSSA, and 11% (n=1892) were smokers. Compared to the PDC group, the Tele-DC group demonstrated similar hospital admission rates (Tele-DC: n=497, 2.89%; PDC: n=471, 2.74%; between-group difference 0.15%, 95% CI –0.20% to 0.50%, P=.40), lengths of stay (Tele-DC: mean 6.92, SD 0.47 days; PDC: mean 6.61, SD 0.50 days; between-group difference 0.31 days, 95% CI –1.65 to 1.04, P=.66), severe complication rates (Tele-DC: n=46, 0.27%; PDC: n=33, 0.19%; between-group difference 0.08%, 95% CI –0.03% to 0.18%, P=.18), and mortality rates (Tele-DC: n=23, 0.13%; PDC: n=18, 0.10%; between-group difference 0.03%, 95% CI –0.04% to 0.10%, P=.39). However, the Tele-DC group exhibited a higher AED visit rate (n=641, 3.73%, vs n=542, 3.15%; between-group difference 0.58%, 95% CI 0.19%-0.96%, P.003) and DC revisit rate (n=1446, 8.41%, vs n=1287, 7.48%; between-group difference 0.93%, 95% CI 0.09%-1.50%, P.002). In addition, the Tele-DC group had a lower antiviral prescription rate (n=9872, 57.4%, vs n=10,797, 62.78%; between-group difference –5.38%, 95% CI –6.41% to –4.32%, P<.001). Conclusions: The tele-DC demonstrated clinical safety comparable to the PDC regarding hospitalization and severe complications for patients with mild COVID-19. By validating a scalable model without complex home monitoring, these findings challenge the strict necessity of physical examinations for safe triage and support a digital-first strategy for future infectious surges. However, the disparities observed in AED visits and antiviral prescription rates suggest that integrated remote monitoring tools and improved medication logistics are needed to fully replicate the efficacy of conventional care.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e74046

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Clinical Informatics

  May 14, 2026

  Evaluating Encoder and Decoder Models for Extended Clinical Concept Recognition in Japanese Clinical Texts: Comparative Study With Weighted Soft Matching

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Yuya Tsukiji  
  • Satoshi Kataoka  
  • Masafumi Itokazu  
  • Ryozo Nagai  
  • Takeshi Imai  

  Abstract:

  Background: Extracting medical knowledge for secondary purposes, such as diagnostic support, continues to pose a substantial challenge. Conventional named entity recognition has focused on short terms (eg, genes, diseases, and chemicals), whereas extraction and assessment of longer, complex expressions remain underexplored. Clinically vital concepts, such as diseases, pathologies, symptoms, and findings, often appear as long phrases, and accurate extraction is crucial for applications such as constructing causal knowledge from case reports. Consequently, a framework addressing both short terms and clinically meaningful long phrases—termed extended Clinical Concept Recognition (E-CCR)—is essential. Objective: This study, the first comprehensive investigation of E-CCR model selection, aimed to identify optimal strategies by comparing encoder versus decoder models and general-purpose versus domain-specific pretraining. We analyzed variation in effectiveness by target length and proposed a novel E-CCR evaluation metric. Methods: We evaluated 17 encoder and decoder models using J-CaseMap, a database of approximately 20,000 Japanese case reports annotated with clinical concepts. Performance was primarily assessed using the weighted soft matching score, which penalizes fragmentation of long extraction targets and weights scores by target length to account for the greater difficulty of extracting longer expressions. Results: On J-CaseMap, JMedDeBERTa(s)—an encoder model pretrained on domain-specific medical text—achieved the highest mean performance (F1-score=0.758, SD 0.002), with similarly strong results from JMedDeBERTa(c), suggesting comparable performance among the top encoder models. As the fragmentation penalty increased, performance generally declined; however, no consistently severe degradation was observed. On the Medical Report Named Entity Recognition for positive disease dataset, the general-domain DeBERTaV2-base yielded the highest mean F1 score, and differences among the medical-domain JMedDeBERTa(s) and JMedDeBERTa(c) variants were small, suggesting limited benefit of domain-specific pretraining. Overall, under our experimental settings (low-rank adaptation fine-tuning for decoders and full fine-tuning for encoders), encoder models outperformed decoder models, and token classification outperformed our instruction tuning setup. Conclusions: Under our experimental setting, encoder-based token classification achieved the highest mean performance on our internal dataset. Differences among the top encoder models were small and should be interpreted as comparable within the uncertainty implied by our annotation review, whereas decoder-based approaches did not surpass encoder-based models in this setup, suggesting that encoder models can deliver high accuracy with fewer parameters and may offer practical advantages in resource-constrained environments. Token classification outperformed instruction tuning for extracting long expressions, whereas instruction tuning was better suited to short terms. Using the weighted soft matching score, we found that performance did not substantially deteriorate as the fragmentation penalty increased, indicating that extracted spans were rarely fragmented. Similar trends in external validation datasets suggest that findings under our setup may generalize to information extraction tasks on Japanese medical text. Further investigation is needed to determine whether these findings hold across other languages and medical document types.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e78681

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Digital Health Reviews

  May 14, 2026

  Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Predicting Future Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal...

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Ying Gao  
  • Doudou Xu  
  • Xinru Li  
  • Jue Wang  
  • Linbin Wang  
  • Beiwen Wu  
  • Haifeng Zhao  
  • Xian Qiu  
  • Weiyi Zhu  

  Abstract:

  Background: Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) show promise for fall risk prediction, but prior reviews focused mainly on real-time fall detection, in-hospital falls, or conventional statistical models. The performance of ML-DL–based models for predicting future falls in community-dwelling older adults remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to review ML-DL studies for predicting future falls among community-dwelling older adults and meta-analyze discrimination where feasible. Methods: Six databases were searched from inception to September 23, 2024, with updates on August 31, 2025, and February 28, 2026. We included longitudinal studies developing or validating ML-DL models to predict future falls in community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years and excluded real-time detection, simulated or no fall, and inpatient studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Areas under the curve (AUCs) were meta-analyzed using Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects models with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity, 95% prediction intervals (PIs), sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results: After screening 10,253 records, 28 (0.3%) studies were included; 18 (64.3%) focused on general older adults. Prediction horizons ranged from 3 months to 7 years, and fall incidence ranged from 1.6% to 46.6%. Twenty-three (82.1%) studies applied ML, and 5 (17.9%) studies used DL. Input modalities included text (n=18, 64.3%), sensor (n=5, 17.9%), image (n=1, 3.6%), and multimodal data (n=4, 14.3%). Common predictors included age, sex, fall history, depression, and basic daily activities. Only one model underwent external validation. Calibration reporting was sparse. All models were rated at high risk of bias. Ten models were meta-analyzed, yielding a pooled AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.69‐0.87) with extreme heterogeneity (=0.64; =0.80; =99.8%; =4128.99). The confidence-distribution bootstrap PI was 0.20 to 0.99, indicating substantial uncertainty in expected performance across new populations. Subgroup analyses indicated moderation by sample size and population type, with higher discrimination in specific populations than in general samples; however, the specific population subgroup included only 2 studies. Although all participants were community dwelling, some cohorts were recruited through clinically enriched pathways rather than general community sampling. Conclusions: ML-DL models show potential for identifying community-dwelling older adults at elevated future fall risk; however, wide PIs, limited external validation, and high risk of bias suggest real-world performance may be optimistic. The pooled AUC should be interpreted as a summary of reported discrimination under study-specific conditions, predominantly from internally validated, high-risk-of-bias models, rather than as a robust estimate of transportable real-world performance. This review extends prior reviews by focusing on community-dwelling settings and by integrating PROBAST, Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman meta-analysis, PIs, and modality-specific synthesis to evaluate both discrimination and uncertainty. Findings support the use of ML-DL models for proactive fall prevention while emphasizing the need for validation and context-specific implementation. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024580902; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024580902

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e84844

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Web-based and Mobile Health...

  May 14, 2026

  A Digital Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program Integrated With Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Ashley Berthoumieux  
  • Jeanean B Naqvi  
  • Sean Zion  
  • Jenna Napoleone  
  • Amanda McGuill  
  • Christian J Cerrada  
  • Hyun Jung Lee  
  • Timothy C Dunn  
  • David Kerr  
  • Carolyn Bradner Jasik  
  • Sarah Linke  

  Abstract:

  Background: Previous research has demonstrated that the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can improve glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes when used regularly alongside a digital diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) program. However, to date, there is limited evidence showing the benefits of a digitally delivered DSMES program combined with real-time CGM for adults with type 2 diabetes. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a DSMES program coupled with CGM on hemoglobin A (HbA) and CGM-derived glycemic measures compared to usual care for adults with type 2 diabetes over 6 months. Methods: Participants with type 2 diabetes and HbA of 8% or higher (64 mmol/mol) who were not using mealtime bolus insulin (aged 26‐83 y; mean HbA 9.6%, SD 1.4% [mean 81.2 mmol/mol, SD 15.8 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned to a digital DSMES+CGM integrated solution (n=51) or usual care (n=49) for 6 months. The primary outcome was HbA. The secondary outcomes were CGM-derived glycemic measures, including glucose management indicator, percent time in range 70 to 180 mg/dL, percent time above range (>180 mg/dL), percent time below range (<70 mg/dL), and mean glucose. Linear mixed effects models were used for intention-to-treat analyses. Results: HbA was lower among the intervention group versus the usual care group at 3 months (difference=−0.7%, 95% CI −1.4% to −0.1% or difference=−8.1 mmol/mol, 95% CI −15.5 to −0.7 mmol/mol; =.03) and at 6 months (difference=−0.6%, 95% CI −1.4% to 0.2% or difference=−6.9 mmol/mol, 95% CI −15.7 to 1.9 mmol/mol; =.12) but only reached statistical significance at 3 months. CGM-derived glycemic measures, including glucose management indicator (difference=−0.9%, 95% CI −1.7% to −0.1%; =.03), time in range (difference=14.6%, 95% CI 1.0% to 28.2%; =.04), time above range (difference=−14.9%, 95% CI −29.0% to −0.9%; =.04), and mean glucose (difference=−36.4 mg/dL, 95% CI −70.0 to −2.9 mg/dL; =.03), also significantly improved for the intervention group versus the usual care group at 6 months. Conclusions: The combination of digital DSMES+CGM is effective for supporting adults with type 2 diabetes in managing their condition and has the potential to reduce the risk of long-term health complications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05368454; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05368454

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e78321

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Electronic/Mobile Data Capture,...

  May 14, 2026

  Mode Effects Between Mobile Web and Telephone Surveys on Patient Experience Scores in South Korea: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial Under...

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Young-Geun Choi  
  • Bon Mi Koo  
  • Yeongchae Song  
  • Young Kyung Do  

  Abstract:

  Background: Patient experience surveys are essential tools for assessing health care quality, yet the potential influence of survey mode on patient experience scores remains understudied. This study investigates the mode effects between mobile web and telephone surveys within South Korea’s Patient Experience Assessment. Objective: This study aimed to examine the presence and extent of the mode effects of mobile web versus telephone surveys on patient experience scores. The primary outcome was defined as the total score across all 21 survey items, rescaled to 0‐100. Methods: This is a secondary analysis using experimental data from a parallel-group randomized controlled trial involving 3200 patients (adults aged ≥19 years, hospitalized >1 day, discharged 2‐56 days before the survey) from 4 general hospitals between October and November 2022, equally allocated to telephone and mobile web survey modes. An independent survey company generated the random allocation sequence using computer-generated random numbers and assigned participants to the survey modes. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants, interviewers, and outcome assessors was not feasible after assignment. We calculated unadjusted score differences among respondents and estimated adjusted differences accounting for nonresponse using inverse probability weighting (IPW) and multiple imputation (MI) under the missing-at-random assumption. Sensitivity analyses, using the delta-adjustment method based on the missing-not-at-random assumption, assessed robustness to departures from the missing-at-random assumption. Subgroup analyses by sex, age group, and field of care were also conducted. Results: Of 3200 patients randomized (1600 per mode), 878 completed the survey (520 mobile web and 358 telephone). Analyses included all randomized participants (n=3200), with nonresponse addressed through IPW and MI. No adverse events were reported in this survey-based study. The total patient experience score was significantly lower in the mobile web group (mean 81.5, SD 16.4) than in the telephone group (mean 84.9, SD 14.3; unadjusted difference –3.41 points, 95% CI –5.51 to –1.31; IPW-adjusted –4.11, 95% CI –6.17 to –2.04; MI-adjusted –4.59, 95% CI –7.45 to –1.73). Similar patterns were observed across most subdomains. Subgroup analyses revealed consistent mode effects across different demographic categories. Sensitivity analyses using the delta-adjustment method confirmed the robustness of these findings under various missing data scenarios. Conclusions: Mobile surveys may yield substantially lower patient experience scores than telephone surveys. Unlike previous studies, our study analyzes randomized experimental data under various missingness scenarios and provides evidence that this mode effect is unlikely to be attributable to analytical methods or heterogeneity in respondent characteristics between the 2 survey administration modes. Accordingly, caution is warranted when comparing patient experience scores obtained from traditional telephone surveys with those from mobile surveys. Methodologically, our sensitivity analysis approach provides a robust framework for assessing and addressing potential nonresponse bias in patient experience assessments. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service KCT0011374; https://tinyurl.com/3e3u5mjs

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e79398

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Telehealth and Telemonitoring

  May 14, 2026

  Understanding How a Digital Platform for Chronic Disease Management Can Enable and Limit Patient Self-Care: Qualitative Study

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Lysanne Lessard  
  • Mark de Reuver  
  • Kerri-Anne Mullen  

  Abstract:

  Background: A growing segment of the population requires ongoing care and support for managing their chronic diseases. Digital platforms for self-management are rapidly emerging to meet this need, but patients’ experiences with these platforms vary significantly. This may be due to the complexity and flexibility of digital platforms, where the wide array of available features can generate unexpected impacts. Objective: This study aims to explore how a digital platform can both enable and limit patients with a chronic disease in managing their own health. Methods: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with patients to better understand their experience of using a digital platform for self-managing their chronic diseases. Patients who had been using a digital platform (the Chronic Care Platform) for at least 1 month were invited to participate. Twenty-four patients were recruited and interviewed in person or by phone. The collected data were analyzed using template analysis, which is a type of thematic analysis that allows inductive identification of themes from data and deductive application of theory-informed themes. We leveraged Self-Care Theory to understand how patients’ motivation to use the platform and their subsequent use of its features generated perceived value and challenges in achieving this value. Results: The platform was shown to support patients’ development of core self-care abilities (cognitive, psychosocial, and sociocultural abilities) and self-care behaviors (maintenance, monitoring, management), but it did not provide any support to the development of physiological abilities. Moreover, results indicate important limitations in the way in which the digital platform supported all self-care abilities and behaviors—in particular, self-care management. Hence, while the platform was viewed as valuable overall, patients reported several challenges in effectively using the Chronic Care Platform for self-care. Conclusions: Digital platforms for chronic disease management can enhance patient self-care by providing valuable resources and support for reinforcing desired behaviors. However, gaps in platform features can limit patients’ ability to comprehensively care for themselves. This study shows that relating platform features to specific dimensions of self-care can help identify missing features, providing a fine-grained understanding of how a given platform is generating positive impacts and how it may be improved to fully support self-care.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e71875

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Personal Health Records,...

  May 14, 2026

  Understanding Patient-Reported Offenses in Electronic Health Records: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Survey

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Saija Simola  
  • Sari Kujala  
  • Åsa Cajander  
  • Anna Kharko  
  • Bridget Kane  
  • Bo Wang  
  • Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt  
  • Maria Hägglund  

  Abstract:

  Background: Patients’ access to their electronic health record (EHR) supports their participation and satisfaction with care. Despite the benefits, some patients have been upset after reading their EHR. Additionally, health care professionals are concerned that patients, particularly those with mental health conditions, may be offended, and they have expressed a need for further guidelines on how to write EHRs. Experiences among various patient groups are essential to support the relationship between patients and professionals. However, prior studies have often focused on single patient groups or specific clinical contexts, leaving a limited understanding of differences across multiple patient groups. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether certain patient groups are more likely to feel offended while reading their EHRs and which information is perceived as offensive and to provide a comparison across multiple patient groups using a mixed methods approach. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted via the Finnish national patient portal using a web-based patient survey, adopting a mixed methods approach. The survey included multiple-choice and open-ended questions. The total sample comprised 4681 respondents. The survey respondents were placed into 4 patient groups: those who had received care for mental health, cancer, or other conditions and those who had received no care. Associations between the type of care and patients who felt offended were estimated using multivariate binary logistic regression. Inductive content analysis (n=502) was conducted to identify information perceived as offensive in the EHR. Results: The patients who had received mental health care (166/654, 25.4%) or cancer and mental health care (9/39, 23.1%) were more likely to be offended by information in their EHR compared to the other groups (cancer care: 37/375, 9.9%; other conditions care: 383/3316, 11.6%; no care: 22/206, 10.7%; other conditions care: odds ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.29‐0.46; <.001; model A). Additionally, female patients, those with bad or very bad health conditions, and patients with bachelor’s or master’s degrees were significantly more likely to feel offended. Errors, the health care professionals’ disrespectful language, and perceived unnecessary information were the most frequently mentioned reasons for being offended. Patients with mental health care reported more often that unnecessary information and professionals’ opinions and word choices were experienced as offensive compared to other patients. Conclusions: This study contributes new knowledge by identifying differences across multiple patient groups. Although a minority of patients felt offended by their EHR, health care professionals should consider that some patients, particularly those who have received mental health care or cancer and mental health care, may be offended by specific information or word choices in their EHRs. To address this, health care professionals should receive education on how to write their notes in a neutral tone and avoid potentially offensive topics. Improving the quality of EHRs could strengthen the relationship between patients and professionals.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e86178

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Demographics of Users, Social &...

  May 14, 2026

  Digital Health Literacy, Technology Acceptance, and Competence Among Older Adults Aged ≥65 Years: Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Differences Between...

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Franziska Ulrike Jung  
  • Melanie Luppa  
  • Matthias Reusche  
  • Kerstin Wirkner  
  • Melanie Eberl  
  • Yvonne Dietz  
  • Christoph Engel  
  • Steffi G Riedel-Heller  

  Abstract:

  Background: Digital health literacy (DHL) has the potential to improve health among older adults by enhancing access to health-related information and health care services. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between DHL and technology commitment in adults aged 65 years and older, while also investigating possible gender differences. Methods: The analytical sample consisted of 1824 individuals. The analysis included descriptive comparisons in terms of DHL, technology acceptance, competency, support, and internet use. Multivariate regression models (generalized linear models) were applied in order to test the association between DHL and technology commitment, controlling for internet use as well as health-related and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Male and female participants did not differ in terms of DHL (mean score: 3.5, SD 1.2 [men] and 3.5, SD 1.3 [women]; =.70); however, male participants reported significantly higher technology acceptance (<.001) and higher technology competencies (<.001), but less support with regard to technology use (<.001). Within regression models, only higher technology acceptance (coefficient=0.023, 95% CI 0.006‐0.041; =.01) and support (coefficient=0.027, 95% CI 0.014‐0.040; <.001) were significantly linked to greater DHL. The subgroup analysis revealed that DHL was significantly associated with technology acceptance among men (coefficient=0.036, 95% CI 0.012‐0.060; =.003) but not women (coefficient=0.024, 95% CI 0.008‐0.040; =.44). Conclusions: According to the current results, DHL is highly related to technology commitment. Gender differences should be taken into account when developing and evaluating appropriate interventions to improve DHL by addressing the acceptance of technologies and optimizing support infrastructures.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e85846

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.

• 

  Commentary

  May 14, 2026

  Maturity, Safety, and Equity of AI-Enabled Systems and Triage in Integrated Primary Care

  View Authors View Abstract

  Authors List:

  • Siaw-Teng Liaw  

  Abstract:

  Artificial intelligence (AI)–enabled systems must simultaneously improve the Quintuple Aim and digital health maturity, including equitable access to and quality and interoperability of data, tools, agents, and services. This requires a comprehensive sociotechnical and global approach to cocreation, management, and governance for individuals and organizations in the ecosystem.

  • J Med Internet Res 2026;28(1):e97341

  • Choose one of the following formats:

  • Share this article:

    Or, copy the article link to your clipboard:

    Article URL

  • Citation

    • END

      for: Endnote

    • BibTeX

      for: BibDesk and LaTeX

    • RIS

      for: RefMan, Procite, Endnote, RefWorks

    Add this article to your Mendeley library Add this article to your CiteULike library Copy Citation to Clipboard

  • Metrics

    Discover Social Media mentions by hovering over the donut. Click the 'details' link for a full report.