The Karma system is currently undergoing maintenance (Monday, January 29, 2018).
The maintenance period has been extended to 8PM EST.

Karma Credits will not be available for redeeming during maintenance.

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 28.08.13 in Vol 15, No 8 (2013): August

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2702):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Emmert M, Meszmer N, Schlesinger M. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  2. Calixto NE, Chiao W, Durr ML, Jiang N. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 2018;127(8):521
    CrossRef
  3. Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Fuller G, Black JT, Kim HL, Spiegel B. Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2018;25(4):401
    CrossRef
  4. Qiu Y, Liu Y, Ren W, Qiu Y, Ren J. Internet-Based and Mobile-Based General Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(9):e266
    CrossRef
  5. Haglin JM, Eltorai AEM, Kalagara S, Kingrey B, Durand WM, Aidlen JP, Daniels AH. Patient-Rated Trust of Spine Surgeons: Influencing Factors. Global Spine Journal 2018;8(7):728
    CrossRef
  6. Li S, Lee-Won RJ, McKnight J. Effects of Online Physician Reviews and Physician Gender on Perceptions of Physician Skills and Primary Care Physician (PCP) Selection. Health Communication 2018;:1
    CrossRef
  7. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(7):e243
    CrossRef
  8. Trehan SK, Nguyen JT, Marx R, Cross MB, Pan TJ, Daluiski A, Lyman S. Online Patient Ratings Are Not Correlated with Total Knee Replacement Surgeon–Specific Outcomes. HSS Journal ® 2018;14(2):177
    CrossRef
  9. Daskivich T, Luu M, Noah B, Fuller G, Anger J, Spiegel B. Differences in Online Consumer Ratings of Health Care Providers Across Medical, Surgical, and Allied Health Specialties: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e176
    CrossRef
  10. McLennan S, Strech D, Kahrass H. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  11. Lu SF, Rui H. Can We Trust Online Physician Ratings? Evidence from Cardiac Surgeons in Florida. Management Science 2018;64(6):2557
    CrossRef
  12. Levin JM, Winkelman RD, Smith GA, Tanenbaum JE, Xiao R, Mroz TE, Steinmetz MP. Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. The Spine Journal 2018;18(2):226
    CrossRef
  13. Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e212
    CrossRef
  14. Emmert M, Wiener M. What factors determine the intention to use hospital report cards? The perspectives of users and non-users. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(7):1394
    CrossRef
  15. Obele CC, Duszak R, Hawkins CM, Rosenkrantz AB. What Patients Think About Their Interventional Radiologists: Assessment Using a Leading Physician Ratings Website. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017;14(5):609
    CrossRef
  16. Prabhu AV, Kim C, De Guzman E, Zhao E, Madill E, Cohen J, Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Heron DE, Beriwal S. Reputation Management and Content Control: An Analysis of Radiation Oncologists' Digital Identities. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 2017;99(5):1083
    CrossRef
  17. Emmert M, Meszmer N, Jablonski L, Zinth L, Schöffski O, Taheri-Zadeh F. Public release of hospital quality data for referral practices in Germany: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Health Economics Review 2017;7(1)
    CrossRef
  18. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275
    CrossRef
  19. Hu Y. How does freemium strategy affect the demand of the paid premium mobile healthcare service: from an information asymmetry perspective. Information Development 2017;:026666691772449
    CrossRef
  20. Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians’ and Health Care Consumers’ Perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(5):e127
    CrossRef
  21. Gill BC, Zhang JJH, Knoedler MA, Shoskes DA, Vasavada SP. Digital Identity in Academic Urology: Assessment of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, and Opportunity for Improvement. Urology Practice 2017;4(5):425
    CrossRef
  22. McLennan S, Strech D, Meyer A, Kahrass H. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e387
    CrossRef
  23. McLennan S, Strech D, Reimann S. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e299
    CrossRef
  24. Liang Y, Tukachinsky RH. Narrative Persuasion 2.0: Transportation in Participatory Websites. Communication Research Reports 2017;34(3):201
    CrossRef
  25. Hao H, Zhang K, Wang W, Gao G. A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;99:37
    CrossRef
  26. Ricciardi BF, Waddell BS, Nodzo SR, Lange J, Nocon AA, Amundsen S, Tarity TD, McLawhorn AS. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites. Orthopedics 2017;40(5):304
    CrossRef
  27. Kool RB, Kleefstra SM, Borghans I, Atsma F, van de Belt TH. Influence of Intensified Supervision by Health Care Inspectorates on Online Patient Ratings of Hospitals: A Multilevel Study of More Than 43,000 Online Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e198
    CrossRef
  28. Rosenkrantz AB, Hughes DR, Duszak R. How Do Publicly Reported Medicare Quality Metrics for Radiologists Compare With Those of Other Specialty Groups?. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016;13(3):243
    CrossRef
  29. Vijayasarathi A, Loehfelm T, Duszak R, Hawkins CM. JOURNAL CLUB: Radiologists' Online Identities: What Patients Find When They Search Radiologists by Name. American Journal of Roentgenology 2016;207(5):952
    CrossRef
  30. Samora JB, Lifchez SD, Blazar PE. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):104
    CrossRef
  31. Trehan SK, DeFrancesco CJ, Nguyen JT, Charalel RA, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):98
    CrossRef
  32. Huis in ’t Veld EA, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. The Impact of a Plastic Surgeon’s Gender on Patient Choice. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2016;:sjw180
    CrossRef
  33. Trehan SK, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings: Why They Matter and What They Mean. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(2):316
    CrossRef
  34. Kleefstra SM, Zandbelt LC, Borghans I, de Haes HJ, Kool RB. Investigating the Potential Contribution of Patient Rating Sites to Hospital Supervision: Exploratory Results From an Interview Study in the Netherlands. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e201
    CrossRef
  35. Rosenkrantz AB, Won E, Doshi AM. Assessing the Content of YouTube Videos in Educating Patients Regarding Common Imaging Examinations. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016;13(12):1509
    CrossRef
  36. Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz PJ. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e129
    CrossRef
  37. Liu JJ, Matelski J, Cram P, Urbach DR, Bell CM. Association Between Online Physician Ratings and Cardiac Surgery Mortality. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2016;9(6):788
    CrossRef
  38. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Exploring Patients’ Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e217
    CrossRef
  39. Wong-Rieger D. Not Surprising: Patients Not Engaged and Not Using Public Healthcare Quality Information. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2016;9(3):191
    CrossRef
  40. Vorhies JS, Weaver MJ, Bishop JA. Admission Through the Emergency Department Is an Independent Risk Factor for Lower Satisfaction With Physician Performance Among Orthopaedic Surgery Patients. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2016;24(10):735
    CrossRef
  41. Emmert M, Meszmer N, Sander U. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(9):e254
    CrossRef
  42. Smith MA, Bednarz L, Nordby PA, Fink J, Greenlee RT, Bolt D, Magnan EM. Increasing Consumer Engagement by Tailoring a Public Reporting Website on the Quality of Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(12):e332
    CrossRef
  43. Pelliccia F, Coats AJ, Pani L, Gaudio C, Rosano G. Transparency in medical research: Time for a paradigm shift. Clinical Trials and Regulatory Science in Cardiology 2015;2-3:1
    CrossRef
  44. Burkle CM, Keegan MT. Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients’ choices of physicians. BMC Health Services Research 2015;15(1)
    CrossRef
  45. Emmert M, Adelhardt T, Sander U, Wambach V, Lindenthal J. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites. BMC Health Services Research 2015;15(1)
    CrossRef
  46. Gilbert K, Hawkins CM, Hughes DR, Patel K, Gogia N, Sekhar A, Duszak R. Physician Rating Websites: Do Radiologists Have an Online Presence?. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2015;12(8):867
    CrossRef
  47. Hao H. The Development of Online Doctor Reviews in China: An Analysis of the Largest Online Doctor Review Website in China. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(6):e134
    CrossRef
  48. Bäumer FS, Dollmann M, Geierhos M. Find a Physician by Matching Medical Needs Described in your Own Words. Procedia Computer Science 2015;63:417
    CrossRef
  49. Grabner-Kräuter S, Waiguny MK. Insights Into the Impact of Online Physician Reviews on Patients’ Decision Making: Randomized Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(4):e93
    CrossRef
  50. Pelliccia F, Coats AJ, Pani L, Gaudio C, Rosano G. Transparency in medical research: Time for a paradigm shift. International Journal of Cardiology 2015;186:259
    CrossRef
  51. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276
    CrossRef
  52. Baum N. Online Reputation Management for Urologists. Urology Practice 2015;2(2):69
    CrossRef
  53. Hesse T. Arztbewertungsportale im Internet. Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie 2015;8(2):84
    CrossRef
  54. Bardach NS, Hibbard JH, Greaves F, Dudley RA. Sources of Traffic and Visitors’ Preferences Regarding Online Public Reports of Quality: Web Analytics and Online Survey Results. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(5):e102
    CrossRef
  55. Romppel M, Grande G. Qualität der Gesundheitsversorgung – Was wollen Patienten wissen?. Public Health Forum 2014;22(2)
    CrossRef
  56. Curtin C. Preface. Hand Clinics 2014;30(1):ix
    CrossRef
  57. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56
    CrossRef
  58. Atkinson S. Current status of online rating of Australian doctors. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2014;20(3):222
    CrossRef
  59. Emmert M, Meier F, Heider A, Dürr C, Sander U. What do patients say about their physicians? An analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website. Health Policy 2014;118(1):66
    CrossRef
  60. Bidmon S, Terlutter R, Röttl J. What Explains Usage of Mobile Physician-Rating Apps? Results From a Web-Based Questionnaire. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(6):e148
    CrossRef
  61. Terlutter R, Bidmon S, Röttl J. Who Uses Physician-Rating Websites? Differences in Sociodemographic Variables, Psychographic Variables, and Health Status of Users and Nonusers of Physician-Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e97
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2702)

:
  1. Bäumer FS, Kersting J, Kuršelis V, Geierhos M. Information and Software Technologies. 2018. Chapter 4:43
    CrossRef
  2. Bäumer FS, Grote N, Kersting J, Geierhos M. Information and Software Technologies. 2017. Chapter 7:77
    CrossRef
  3. Geierhos M, Bäumer FS, Schulze S, Klotz C. Modeling and Using Context. 2015. Chapter 12:159
    CrossRef