Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Artificial Intelligence (5023) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (1238) Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in AI (218) Responsible Health AI (266)

Published on in Vol 28 (2026)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/88766, first published .
Laptop screen displaying AI brain graphic and code, with person typing

Performance of AI Tools in Citing Retracted Literature : Content Analysis

Performance of AI Tools in Citing Retracted Literature : Content Analysis

Authors of this article:

Sebastian Labenbacher1 Author Orcid Image ;   Maximilian Niederer1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sascha Hammer1 Author Orcid Image ;   Matthias Bader1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nikolaus Schreiber1 Author Orcid Image ;   Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Snyder J, Turner L. Why retracted articles can have an influential afterlife—and what to do about it. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2026;15(9) View
  2. Yan H. Metric pressure, signal decoupling, and the scholarly record: a multilevel framework with a journal-level design agenda for research evaluation. Research Evaluation 2026;35 View
  3. Wang J, Liu P. Beyond Output Faithfulness: Claim-Centered Relational Auditability for Source-Grounded Generative AI. Information 2026;17(10):992 View
  4. Aydin M. Reply to Reference Authenticity and Citation Validity in AI-Generated Medical Writing. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2026;52 View