Published on in Vol 27 (2025)
Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are
available at
https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/78554, first published
.
Flagged for Fraud: Lessons From 3 Case Studies on Detecting Inauthentic Participants in Online Research
Flagged for Fraud: Lessons From 3 Case Studies on Detecting Inauthentic Participants in Online Research
Journals
- Stemmer M, Tauscher J, Buck B, Wedgeworth P, Bear Don’t Walk O, Cohen T, Ben-Zeev D. Practical guidance for mitigating fraud in online research: The Configure, Assess, Triage, Corroborate, and Hone (CATCH) framework. DIGITAL HEALTH 2026;12 View
- Hoy L, Dashper K. Fraudulent participation in online qualitative leisure research: a cautionary tale from a dog walking study. Leisure Studies 2026:1 View
- Stemmer M, Buck B, Tauscher J, Tsai A, Larsen A, Wedgeworth P, Sparks G, DeVries E, Bishop M, Beaulieu A, Cohen T, Ben-Zeev D. Cost and Data Quality Impact of Fraud Mitigation in Online Research: Framework Application and Evaluation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2026;28:e93951 View
- Farash S, Sienkiewicz H, Solomon M, Lynch K. Equitable spam detection and prevention in a community-engaged public health survey. Frontiers in Public Health 2026;14 View
- Niles L, Graham L, Prevost S. Fraud in nursing research: lessons learned from two case studies. Nurse Researcher 2026 View