This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1558) Mass Media/Social Media Communication and Campaigns (574) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (617) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1911)

Published on in Vol 24, No 3 (2022): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/31687, first published .
The Public Perception of the #GeneEditedBabies Event Across Multiple Social Media Platforms: Observational Study

The Public Perception of the #GeneEditedBabies Event Across Multiple Social Media Platforms: Observational Study

The Public Perception of the #GeneEditedBabies Event Across Multiple Social Media Platforms: Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Congning Ni1 Author Orcid Image ;   Zhiyu Wan1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Chao Yan1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Yongtai Liu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ellen Wright Clayton3, 4, 5, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Bradley Malin1, 2, 3, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Zhijun Yin1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Kang Y, Deng H, Pray C, Hu R. Managers’ attitudes toward gene-editing technology and companies’ R&D investment in gene-editing: the case of Chinese seed companies. GM Crops & Food 2022;13(1):309 View
  2. Liu Y, Yin Z, Ni C, Yan C, Wan Z, Malin B. Examining Rural and Urban Sentiment Difference in COVID-19–Related Topics on Twitter: Word Embedding–Based Retrospective Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42985 View
  3. Li N, Li R, Yao Q, Song L, Deeprasert J. Housing safety and health academic and public opinion mining from 1945 to 2021: PRISMA, cluster analysis, and natural language processing approaches. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
  4. Liu Y, Yin Z, Wan Z, Yan C, Xia W, Ni C, Clayton E, Vorobeychik Y, Kantarcioglu M, Malin B. Implicit Incentives Among Reddit Users to Prioritize Attention Over Privacy and Reveal Their Faces When Discussing Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results: Topic and Attention Analysis. JMIR Infodemiology 2022;2(2):e35702 View
  5. Crossland-Marr L, Giurca A, Tsingos M, Schnurr M, Ely A, Glover D, Stone G, Fischer K. Siloed discourses: a year-long study of twitter engagement on the use of CRISPR in food and agriculture. New Genetics and Society 2023;42(1) View
  6. Meyer M, Vergnaud F. Key and emerging themes in gene editing: A lexicometric analysis of publications in the biological sciences (1990–2022). PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET 2024;6(2):399 View
  7. Fang G, Hong Z, Chen G, Wang J, Park C. Analyzing the diffusion of feminist discourses on Chinese social media: A case study of the 2022 Tangshan restaurant attack. PLOS ONE 2024;19(8):e0308870 View
  8. Xing Y, Zhang J, He Y, Li Y. Toward an ecosystem of non-fungible tokens from mapping public opinions on social media. Financial Innovation 2025;11(1) View
  9. Chin A, Weerasekera T. Normative, empirical, and pragmatic ethical objections to Singapore permitting human genetic enhancement via germline genome editing. Science and Public Policy 2025 View
  10. Slobogin C, Tellis K, Clayton E, Clayton J, Eilmus A, Malin B. A decade of research on genetic privacy: the findings of the GetPreCiSe Center at Vanderbilt University. Frontiers in Genetics 2025;16 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Meyer M, Vergnaud F. Genome Editing in Biomedical Sciences. View
  2. Schmidt M, Dluzen D. Rigor and Reproducibility in Genetics and Genomics. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Ni C, Chen Q, Song L, Commiskey P, Song Q, Malin B, Yin Z. Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025. Catalysts of Conversation: Examining Interaction Dynamics Between Topic Initiators and Commentors in Alzheimer's Disease Online Communities View