Published on in Vol 22, No 9 (2020): September

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/19471, first published .
Willingness to Use Home Collection Methods to Provide Specimens for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Research: Survey Study

Willingness to Use Home Collection Methods to Provide Specimens for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Research: Survey Study

Willingness to Use Home Collection Methods to Provide Specimens for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Research: Survey Study

Journals

  1. Zimba R, Kulkarni S, Berry A, You W, Mirzayi C, Westmoreland D, Parcesepe A, Waldron L, Rane M, Kochhar S, Robertson M, Maroko A, Grov C, Nash D. SARS-CoV-2 Testing Service Preferences of Adults in the United States: Discrete Choice Experiment. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2020;6(4):e25546 View
  2. Los J, Gaydos C, Gibert C, Gorse G, Lykken J, Nyquist A, Price C, Radonovich L, Rattigan S, Reich N, Rodriguez-Barradas M, Simberkoff M, Bessesen M, Brown A, Cummings D, Perl T. Take-home kits to detect respiratory viruses among healthcare personnel: Lessons learned from a cluster randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Infection Control 2021;49(7):893 View
  3. Cockerill F, Wohlgemuth J, Radcliff J, Sabol C, Kapoor H, Dlott J, Marlowe E, Clarke N. Evolution of Specimen Self-Collection in the COVID-19 Era: Implications for Population Health Management of Infectious Disease. Population Health Management 2021;24(S1):S-26 View
  4. Braz-Silva P, Mamana A, Romano C, Felix A, de Paula A, Fereira N, Buss L, Tozetto-Mendoza T, Caixeta R, Leal F, Grespan R, Bizário J, Ferraz A, Sapkota D, Giannecchini S, To K, Doglio A, Mendes-Correa M. Performance of at-home self-collected saliva and nasal-oropharyngeal swabs in the surveillance of COVID-19. Journal of Oral Microbiology 2021;13(1) View
  5. Jaspal R, Breakwell G. Social support, perceived risk and the likelihood of COVID-19 testing and vaccination: cross-sectional data from the United Kingdom. Current Psychology 2022;41(1):492 View
  6. LeBlanc J, Pettipas J, Di Quinzio M, Hatchette T, Patriquin G. Reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 with patient-collected swabs and saline gargles: A three-headed comparison on multiple molecular platforms. Journal of Virological Methods 2021;295:114184 View
  7. Nguyen T, Zeger W, Wadman M, Barksdale A. Accuracy and Acceptance of a Self-Collection Model for Respiratory Tract Infection Diagnostics: A Concise Clinical Literature Review. Journal of Emergency Nursing 2021;47(5):798 View
  8. Frediani J, Levy J, Rao A, Bassit L, Figueroa J, Vos M, Wood A, Jerris R, Van Leung-Pineda , Gonzalez M, Rogers B, Mavigner M, Schinazi R, Schoof N, Waggoner J, Kempker R, Rebolledo P, O’Neal J, Stone C, Chahroudi A, Morris C, Suessmith A, Sullivan J, Farmer S, Foster A, Roback J, Ramachandra T, Washington C, Le K, Cordero M, Esper A, Nehl E, Wang Y, Tyburski E, Martin G, Lam W. Multidisciplinary assessment of the Abbott BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care antigen test in the context of emerging viral variants and self-administration. Scientific Reports 2021;11(1) View
  9. Dubé K, Eskaf S, Hastie E, Agarwal H, Henley L, Roebuck C, Carter W, Dee L, Taylor J, Mapp D, Campbell D, Villa T, Peterson B, Lynn K, Lalley-Chareczko L, Hiserodt E, Kim S, Rosenbloom D, Evans B, Anderson M, Hazuda D, Shipley L, Bateman K, Howell B, Mounzer K, Tebas P, Montaner L. Preliminary Acceptability of a Home-Based Peripheral Blood Collection Device for Viral Load Testing in the Context of Analytical Treatment Interruptions in HIV Cure Trials: Results from a Nationwide Survey in the United States. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2022;12(2):231 View
  10. Schneider F, Molina L, Picot M, L’Helgoualch N, Espeut J, Champigneux P, Alali M, Baptiste J, Cardeur L, Carniel C, Davy M, Dedisse D, Dubuc B, Fenech H, Foulongne V, Gaillard C, Galtier F, Makinson A, Marin G, Santos R, Morquin D, Ouedraogo A, Lejeune A, Quenot M, Keiflin P, Robles F, Rego C, Salvetat N, Trento C, Vetter D, Molina F, Reynes J. Performances of rapid and connected salivary RT-LAMP diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 infection in ambulatory screening. Scientific Reports 2022;12(1) View
  11. Vincent W. Developing and Evaluating a Measure of the Willingness to Use Pandemic-Related mHealth Tools Using National Probability Samples in the United States: Quantitative Psychometric Analyses and Tests of Sociodemographic Group Differences. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e38298 View
  12. Vindeirinho J, Pinho E, Azevedo N, Almeida C. SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostics Based on Nucleic Acids Amplification: From Fundamental Concepts to Applications and Beyond. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 2022;12 View
  13. Cramer E, Snyder T, Ravenhurst J, Lover A. Optimizing the implementation of a participant-collected, mail-based SARS-CoV-2 serological survey in university-affiliated populations: lessons learned and practical guidance. BMC Public Health 2022;22(1) View
  14. Barrett E, Andrews T, Roy J, Greenberg P, Ferrante J, Horton D, Gordon M, Rivera-Núñez Z, Pellerano M, Tallia A, Budolfson M, Georgopoulos P, Reed D, Lynn B, Rosati R, Castañeda M, Dixon F, Pernell C, Hill D, Jimenez M, Blaser M, Panettieri R, Hudson S. Community- Versus Health Care Organization–Based Approaches to Expanding At-Home COVID-19 Testing in Black and Latino Communities, New Jersey, 2021. American Journal of Public Health 2022;112(S9):S918 View
  15. Röhr F, Uellner F, Deckert A, Anders S, Burk R, Knop M, Brugnara L, Bärnighausen T, Jahn A, McMahon S, Souares A. From disgusting and complicated to simple and brilliant: Implementation perspectives and lessons learned from users and rejectors of mail-in SARS-CoV-2 gargle tests. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;10 View
  16. Croker J, Valenti S, Baus H, Ford E, Mathias D, Yasko L, McGaughey D, Smith T, Underwood K, Avolio J, Sadtler K, Memoli M, Kimberly R, Reis S. Leveraging CTSA hubs for rapid, large-scale, high-impact research: A case study during a global public health emergency. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2023;7(1) View
  17. Pétré B, Paridans M, Gillain N, Husson E, Donneau A, Dardenne N, Breuer C, Michel F, Dandoy M, Bureau F, Gillet L, Leclercq D, Guillaume M. Acceptability of Community Saliva Testing in Controlling the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned from Two Case Studies in Nursing Homes and Schools. Patient Preference and Adherence 2022;Volume 16:625 View
  18. Nwaozuru U, Obiezu-Umeh C, Diallo H, Graham D, Whembolua G, Bourgeau M, Ritchwood T, Nelson L, Shato T, Mathews A, Moise R, Ward M, Raude J, Ahonkhai A, Young D, Conserve D. Perceptions of COVID-19 self-testing and recommendations for implementation and scale-up among Black/African Americans: implications for the COVID-19 STEP project. BMC Public Health 2022;22(1) View
  19. Liu Y, Kumblathan T, Feng W, Pang B, Tao J, Xu J, Xiao H, Joyce M, Tyrrell D, Zhang H, Li X, Le X. On-Site Viral Inactivation and RNA Preservation of Gargle and Saliva Samples Combined with Direct Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on Magnetic Beads. ACS Measurement Science Au 2022;2(3):224 View
  20. Wixted D, Neighbors C, Pieper C, Wu A, Kingsbury C, Register H, Petzold E, Newby L, Woods C. Comparison of a Blood Self-Collection System with Routine Phlebotomy for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing. Diagnostics 2022;12(8):1857 View
  21. Fakieh B, Happonen A. Exploring the Social Trend Indications of Utilizing E-Commerce during and after COVID-19’s Hit. Behavioral Sciences 2022;13(1):5 View
  22. Baron S, Cuervo I, Shah D, Gonzalez A, Harari H, Flores D. COVID-19 Infections, Pandemic-Related Social and Economic Impacts, and Changes to Mental and Self-Rated Health Among Latinx Immigrant Housecleaners in New York City: The Safe and Just Cleaners Study. American Journal of Public Health 2023;113(8):893 View
  23. Schröder D, Müller F, Heesen G, Hummers E, Dopfer-Jablonka A, Vahldiek K, Klawonn F, Steffens S, Mikuteit M, Niewolik J, Heinemann S, Arteaga-Livias K. Feasibility of self-organized blood sample collection in adults for study purposes in a primary care setting. PLOS ONE 2023;18(5):e0286014 View
  24. Rossetti T, Daziano R. The effect of perceived risk of false diagnosis on preferences for COVID-19 testing: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Choice Modelling 2024;50:100455 View