This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (781) Digital Health Reviews (1318)

Published on in Vol 22, No 6 (2020): June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/16656, first published .
Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review

Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review

Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review

Authors of this article:

Kathleen Yin1 Author Orcid Image ;   Joshua Jung1 Author Orcid Image ;   Enrico Coiera1 Author Orcid Image ;   Liliana Laranjo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ann Blandford2 Author Orcid Image ;   Adeel Khoja3 Author Orcid Image ;   Wan-Tien Tai1 Author Orcid Image ;   Daniel Psillakis Phillips1 Author Orcid Image ;   Annie Y S Lau1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (32) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Abu Dabrh A, Boehmer K, Shippee N, Rizza S, Perlman A, Dick S, Behnken E, Montori V. Minimally disruptive medicine (MDM) in clinical practice: a qualitative case study of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic care model. BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1) View
  2. Werner N, Ponnala S, Doutcheva N, Holden R. Human factors/ergonomics work system analysis of patient work: state of the science and future directions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2021;33(Supplement_1):60 View
  3. Verdezoto N, Bagalkot N, Akbar S, Sharma S, Mackintosh N, Harrington D, Griffiths P. The Invisible Work of Maintenance in Community Health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2021;5(CSCW1):1 View
  4. Yin K, Jung J, Coiera E, Ho K, Vagholkar S, Blandford A, Rapport F, Lau A. How Patient Work Changes Over Time for People With Multimorbid Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(7):e25992 View
  5. Mackintosh N, Gong Q, Hadjiconstantinou M, Verdezoto N. Digital mediation of candidacy in maternity care: Managing boundaries between physiology and pathology. Social Science & Medicine 2021;285:114299 View
  6. Yin K, Coiera E, Jung J, Rohilla U, Lau A. Consumer workarounds during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis and technology implications using the SAMR framework. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2022;29(7):1244 View
  7. Whitman S, Pine K, Thorsteinsdottir B, Organick-Lee P, Thota A, Espinoza Suarez N, Johnston E, Boehmer K. Bodily Experiences of Illness and Treatment as Information Work: The Case of Chronic Kidney Disease. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2021;5(CSCW2):1 View
  8. Emhan A, Elkefi S, Asan O. Predictors of Healthcare Professionals’ Work Difficulty Perception during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Study of Work Environment in a Pandemic Hospital. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(9):5174 View
  9. Tahsin F, Austin T, McKinstry B, Mercer S, Loganathan M, Thavorn K, Upshur R, Steele Gray C. Examining Use Behavior of a Goal-Supporting mHealth App in Primary Care Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(4):e37684 View
  10. Koros H, Nolte E, Kamano J, Mugo R, Murphy A, Naanyu V, Willis R, Pliakas T, Eton D, Barasa E, Perel P, Jeemon P. Understanding the treatment burden of people with chronic conditions in Kenya: A cross-sectional analysis using the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management (PETS) questionnaire. PLOS Global Public Health 2023;3(1):e0001407 View
  11. Xiong H, Phan H, Yin K, Berkovsky S, Jung J, Lau A. Identifying daily activities of patient work for type 2 diabetes and co-morbidities: a deep learning and wearable camera approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2022;29(8):1400 View
  12. Koopman W, LaDonna K, Anne Kinsella E, Venance S, Watling C. Getting airtime: Exploring how patients shape the stories they tell health practitioners. Medical Education 2021;55(10):1142 View
  13. Bell S, Dong Z, Desroches C, Hart N, Liu S, Mahon B, Ngo L, Thomas E, Bourgeois F. Partnering with patients and families living with chronic conditions to coproduce diagnostic safety through OurDX: a previsit online engagement tool. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2023 View
  14. Werner N, Rutkowski R, Holden R, Ponnala S, Gilmore-Bykovskyi A. A human factors and ergonomics approach to conceptualizing care work among caregivers of people with dementia. Applied Ergonomics 2022;104:103820 View
  15. Burgess E, Kaziunas E, Jacobs M. Care Frictions: A Critical Reframing of Patient Noncompliance in Health Technology Design. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2022;6(CSCW2):1 View
  16. Trupia D, Mathieu-Fritz A, Duong T. The Sociological Perspective of Users’ Invisible Work: A Qualitative Research Framework for Studying Digital Health Innovations Integration. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(11):e25159 View
  17. Wildman J, Morris S, Pollard T, Gibson K, Moffatt S. “I wouldn't survive it, as simple as that”: Syndemic vulnerability among people living with chronic non-communicable disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2022;2:100032 View
  18. Galliford N, Yin K, Blandford A, Jung J, Lau A. Patient Work Personas of Type 2 Diabetes—A Data-Driven Approach to Persona Development and Validation. Frontiers in Digital Health 2022;4 View
  19. Smith C, Masters P. College students and patient work: Health information management by emerging young adults. Library & Information Science Research 2023;45(1):101216 View
  20. Negoescu E, Marcilly R, Cromie S, Koay A, Grimes T. The medication self-management work system of patients and informal carers from a human factors & ergonomics perspective: A scoping review protocol. HRB Open Research 2023;6:4 View
  21. Papautsky E. Patient decision making in recovering from surgery. Frontiers in Psychology 2023;14 View
  22. Rohilla U, Ramarao J, Lane J, Khatri N, Smith J, Yin K, Lau A. How general practitioners and patients discuss type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases concerns during consultations: Implications for digital health. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  23. Bell S, Harcourt K, Dong J, DesRoches C, Hart N, Liu S, Ngo L, Thomas E, Bourgeois F. Patient and family contributions to improve the diagnostic process through the OurDX electronic health record tool: a mixed method analysis. BMJ Quality & Safety 2024;33(9):597 View
  24. Haaland I, Metta E, Moen K. The use of PrEP among men who have sex with men and transgender women as Biomedical Prevention Work: A conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine 2023;333:116147 View
  25. Tahsin F, Bahr T, Shaw J, Shachak A, Gray C. The relationship between treatment burden and the use of telehealth technologies among patients with chronic conditions: A scoping review. Health Policy and Technology 2024;13(2):100855 View
  26. Valdez R, Lyon S, Corbett J, Wellbeloved-Stone C, Hasan S, Taylor L, DeBoer M, Cherñavvsky D, Patek S. Macroergonomic components of the patient work system shaping dyadic care management during adolescence: a case study of type 1 diabetes. Ergonomics 2024;67(11):1575 View
  27. Lee J, Lee J, Shin R, Oh O, Lee K. Treatment burden in multimorbidity: an integrative review. BMC Primary Care 2024;25(1) View
  28. Samost-Williams A, Thomas E, Lounsbury O, Tannenbaum S, Salas E, Bell S. Bringing team science to the ambulatory diagnostic process: how do patients and clinicians develop shared mental models?. Diagnosis 2024 View
  29. Holden R, Abebe E. Medication transitions: Vulnerable periods of change in need of human factors and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics 2021;90:103279 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Carayon P, Wust K, Hose B, Salwei M. HANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS. View
  2. Blandford A. Handbook of Human Computer Interaction. View
  3. Gil Deza E. Improving Clinical Communication. View