Published on in Vol 22, No 4 (2020): April

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/13726, first published .
Age-Related Differences in the Evaluation of a Virtual Health Agent’s Appearance and Embodiment in a Health-Related Interaction: Experimental Lab Study

Age-Related Differences in the Evaluation of a Virtual Health Agent’s Appearance and Embodiment in a Health-Related Interaction: Experimental Lab Study

Age-Related Differences in the Evaluation of a Virtual Health Agent’s Appearance and Embodiment in a Health-Related Interaction: Experimental Lab Study

Journals

  1. Kefi H, Besson E, Sokolova K, Aouina-Mejri C. Privacy and Intelligent Virtual Assistants Usage across Generations. Systèmes d'information & management 2021;Volume 26(2):43 View
  2. Zhong R, Ma M, Zhou Y, Lin Q, Li L, Zhang N. User acceptance of smart home voice assistant: a comparison among younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society 2024;23(1):275 View
  3. Curtis R, Bartel B, Ferguson T, Blake H, Northcott C, Virgara R, Maher C. Improving User Experience of Virtual Health Assistants: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(12):e31737 View
  4. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Chen X, Fang H. Operational Performance and Subjective Preferences of Elderly Users in Intelligent Interactive Interfaces: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2025;41(8):4609 View
  5. Zsoldos I, Trân E, Fournier H, Tarpin-Bernard F, Fruitet J, Fouillen M, Bailly G, Elisei F, Bouchot B, Constant P, Ringeval F, Koenig O, Chainay H. The Value of a Virtual Assistant to Improve Engagement in Computerized Cognitive Training at Home: Exploratory Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2024;11:e48129 View
  6. Hou G, Li X, Wang H. How to improve older adults’ trust and intentions to use virtual health agents: an extended technology acceptance model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024;11(1) View
  7. Sagaspe P, Sanchez-Ortuno M, Dupuy L, Pecune F, Coelho J, Micoulaud-Franchi J, Levavasseur Y, de Sevin E, Chanteclair A, Philip P, Salles N, Boron J. Perceptions and Effectiveness of a Fully Automated Brief Behavioral Insomnia Therapy, Delivered by a Virtual Companion, in Older and Young Adults. Innovation in Aging 2025;9(2) View
  8. Weiß M, Krop P, Treml L, Neuser E, Botsch M, Herrmann M, Latoschik M, Hein G. The buffering of autonomic fear responses is moderated by the characteristics of a virtual character. Computers in Human Behavior 2025;168:108657 View
  9. Daassi M. The realism of augmented reality (AR)–based apps: Antecedents and implications for continuance use. Human Systems Management 2025 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Esposito A, Amorese T, Cuciniello M, Cavallo F, Vinciarelli A, Cordasco G. Ambient Assisted Living. View
  2. Verdugo-Castro S, Sánchez-Gómez M, Martín-Cilleros M. Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. View
  3. Chang Y, Yao K, Zou M, Zhong R. Cross-Cultural Design. View
  4. Zhang X, Xue C. Artificial Intelligence in HCI. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Sun N, Botev J. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Immersive Mixed and Virtual Environment Systems (MMVE '21). Virtual Agent Representation for Critical Transactions View
  2. Greco C, Amorese T, Cuciniello M, Cordasco G, Esposito A. 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). Android Robots vs Virtual Agents: which system differently aged users prefer? View
  3. Kruse L, Hertel J, Mostajeran F, Schmidt S, Steinicke F. 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). Would You Go to a Virtual Doctor? A Systematic Literature Review on User Preferences for Embodied Virtual Agents in Healthcare View