This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Mobile Health (mhealth) (2021) E-Health Policy and Health Systems Innovation (146) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (485) Wearable Devices and Sensors (678)

Published on in Vol 22 , No 10 (2020) :October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18801, first published .
Wearable Technology Acceptance in Health Care Based on National Culture Differences: Cross-Country Analysis Between Chinese and Swiss Consumers

Wearable Technology Acceptance in Health Care Based on National Culture Differences: Cross-Country Analysis Between Chinese and Swiss Consumers

Wearable Technology Acceptance in Health Care Based on National Culture Differences: Cross-Country Analysis Between Chinese and Swiss Consumers

Authors of this article:

Dong Yang Meier 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Petra Barthelmess 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Wei Sun 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Florian Liberatore 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Zhang Z, Xia E, Huang J. Impact of the Moderating Effect of National Culture on Adoption Intention in Wearable Health Care Devices: Meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(6):e30960 View
  2. Dagher L, Nedunchezhian S, El Hajjar A, Zhang Y, Deffer O, Russell A, Pottle C, Marrouche N. A cardiovascular clinic patients’ survey to assess challenges and opportunities of digital health adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal 2022;3(1):31 View
  3. Chen J, Li T, You H, Wang J, Peng X, Chen B. Behavioral Interpretation of Willingness to Use Wearable Health Devices in Community Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(4):3247 View
  4. Bianchi C, Tuzovic S, Kuppelwieser V. Investigating the drivers of wearable technology adoption for healthcare in South America. Information Technology & People 2023;36(2):916 View
  5. Ahn H, Park E. Determinants of consumer acceptance of mobile healthcare devices: An application of the concepts of technology acceptance and coolness. Telematics and Informatics 2022;70:101810 View
  6. Chapman B, Lucey E, Boyer E, Babu K, Smelson D, Carreiro S. Perceptions on wearable sensor-based interventions for monitoring of opioid therapy: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Digital Health 2022;4 View
  7. Calegari L, Tortorella G, Fettermann D. Getting Connected to M-Health Technologies through a Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(5):4369 View
  8. Ramasawmy M, Poole L, Thorlu-Bangura Z, Chauhan A, Murali M, Jagpal P, Bijral M, Prashar J, G-Medhin A, Murray E, Stevenson F, Blandford A, Potts H, Khunti K, Hanif W, Gill P, Sajid M, Patel K, Sood H, Bhala N, Modha S, Mistry M, Patel V, Ali S, Ala A, Banerjee A. Frameworks for Implementation, Uptake, and Use of Cardiometabolic Disease–Related Digital Health Interventions in Ethnic Minority Populations: Scoping Review. JMIR Cardio 2022;6(2):e37360 View
  9. Rha J, Nam Y, Ahn S, Kim J, Chang Y, Jang J, Kurita K, Park J, Eom K, Moon H, Jung M, Kim Y, Hwang J, Choo H. What drives the use of wearable healthcare devices? A cross-country comparison between the US and Korea. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211203 View
  10. Peng C, Zhao H, Zhang S. Determinants and Cross-National Moderators of Wearable Health Tracker Adoption: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability 2021;13(23):13328 View
  11. Calegari L, R.D. B, Fettermann D. A meta-analysis of a comprehensive m-health technology acceptance. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 2023 View
  12. Yao Y, Li Z, He Y, Zhang Y, Guo Z, Lei Y, Zhao Q, Li D, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Liao X. Factors affecting wearable ECG device adoption by general practitioners for atrial fibrillation screening: cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View