This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (456) eHealth Literacy / Digital Literacy (290) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (532) Development of Instruments and Surveys (63) Cancer Rehabilitation (16)

Published on in Vol 21 , No 2 (2019) :February

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10377, first published .
Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals’ Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting

Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals’ Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting

Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals’ Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting

Authors of this article:

Lars Kayser 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sine Rossen 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Astrid Karnoe 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Gerald Elsworth 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Jette Vibe-Petersen 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Jesper Frank Christensen 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Mathias Ried-Larsen 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Richard H Osborne 1, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (24) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Lindskrog S, Christensen K, Osborne R, Vingtoft S, Phanareth K, Kayser L. Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Context of an Innovative Digitally Supported 24-Hour Service: Longitudinal Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(6):e10924 View
  2. Slevin P, Kessie T, Cullen J, Butler M, Donnelly S, Caulfield B. Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 2019 View
  3. Terp R, Kayser L, Lindhardt T. “It is not rocket science..” – Older peoples’ understanding of nutrition – A qualitative study. Appetite 2021;156:104854 View
  4. Holt K, Overgaard D, Engel L, Kayser L. Health literacy, digital literacy and eHealth literacy in Danish nursing students at entry and graduate level: a cross sectional study. BMC Nursing 2020;19(1) View
  5. Zrubka Z, Brito Fernandes Ó, Baji P, Hajdu O, Kovacs L, Kringos D, Klazinga N, Gulácsi L, Brodszky V, Rencz F, Péntek M. Exploring eHealth Literacy and Patient-Reported Experiences With Outpatient Care in the Hungarian General Adult Population: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e19013 View
  6. Rossen S, Kayser L, Vibe-Petersen J, Christensen J, Ried-Larsen M. Cancer Survivors’ Receptiveness to Digital Technology–Supported Physical Rehabilitation and the Implications for Design: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e15335 View
  7. Thorsen I, Rossen S, Glümer C, Midtgaard J, Ried-Larsen M, Kayser L. Health Technology Readiness Profiles Among Danish Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e21195 View
  8. Rossen S, Kayser L, Vibe-Petersen J, Ried-Larsen M, Christensen J. Technology in exercise-based cancer rehabilitation: a cross-sectional study of receptiveness and readiness for e-Health utilization in Danish cancer rehabilitation. Acta Oncologica 2019;58(5):610 View
  9. Jones A, Bardram J, Bækgaard P, Cramer-Petersen C, Skinner T, Vrangbæk K, Starr L, Nørgaard K, Lind N, Bechmann Christensen M, Glümer C, Wang-Sattler R, Laxy M, Brander E, Heinemann L, Heise T, Schliess F, Ladewig K, Kownatka D. Integrated personalized diabetes management goes Europe: A multi-disciplinary approach to innovating type 2 diabetes care in Europe. Primary Care Diabetes 2021;15(2):360 View
  10. Foley K, Freeman T, Ward P, Lawler A, Osborne R, Fisher M. Exploring access to, use of and benefits from population-oriented digital health services in Australia. Health Promotion International 2021;36(4):1105 View
  11. Terp R, Kayser L, Lindhardt T. Older Patients’ Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study. JMIR Human Factors 2021;8(2):e27005 View
  12. Geukes C, Stark A, Dockweiler C. eHealth Literacy als Grundlage zur Entwicklung digitaler Technologien in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention? Eine systematische Übersicht der Literatur. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2022;17(2):163 View
  13. Brennan L, Sadeghi F, O’Neill L, Guinan E, Smyth L, Sheill G, Smyth E, Doyle S, Timon C, Connolly D, O’Sullivan J, Reynolds J, Hussey J. Telehealth Delivery of a Multi-Disciplinary Rehabilitation Programme for Upper Gastro-Intestinal Cancer: ReStOre@Home Feasibility Study. Cancers 2022;14(11):2707 View
  14. Terp R, Lindhardt T, Kayser L. Theory-driven development of an educative nutritional intervention (ENI) supporting older hospital patients to eat sufficiently, assisted by an eHealth solution: an intervention mapping approach. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22(1) View
  15. Nielsen A, Appel C, Larsen B, Kayser L, Hanna L. Patient perspectives on digital patient reported outcomes in routine care of inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2021;5(1) View
  16. Moshood T, Sorooshian S, Nawanir G, Okfalisa S. Efficiency of medical technology in measuring service quality in the Nigerian healthcare sector. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences 2022;16:100397 View
  17. Kristjánsdóttir Ó, Welander Tärneberg A, Stenström P, Castor C, Kristensson Hallström I. eHealth literacy and socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of parents of children needing paediatric surgery in Sweden. Nursing Open 2023;10(2):509 View
  18. Agbafe V, Berlin N, Butler C, Hawk E, Offodile II A. Prescriptions for Mitigating Climate Change–Related Externalities in Cancer Care: A Surgeon's Perspective. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2022;40(18):1976 View
  19. Safdari R, Yu P, Khenarinezhad S, Ghazanfari Savadkoohi E, Javanmard Z, Yousefi A, Barzegari S. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Patient readiness to engage in health information technology (PRE-HIT) instrument. BMC Primary Care 2022;23(1) View
  20. Tighe S, Ball K, Kayser L, Kensing F, Maddison R. Qualitative study of the views of people living with cardiovascular disease, and healthcare professionals, towards the use of a digital platform to support cardiovascular disease self-management. BMJ Open 2022;12(11):e056768 View
  21. Appel C, Pedersen S, Nielsen A, Larsen B. Telemedicine based on patient-reported outcomes in management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a real-life setting – a before and after cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2022;57(7):825 View
  22. Gillie M, Ali D, Vadlamuri D, Carstarphen K. Telehealth Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health: A Novel Screening Tool to Support Vulnerable Patient Equity. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports 2022;6(1):67 View
  23. Peixoto M, Ferreira J, Oliveira L. Drivers for Teleconsultation Acceptance in Brazil: Patients’ Perspective during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 2022;26(2) View
  24. Nielsen A, Hanna L, Larsen B, Appel C, Osborne R, Kayser L. Readiness, acceptance and use of digital patient reported outcome in an outpatient clinic. Health Informatics Journal 2022;28(2):146045822211060 View