Published on in Vol 20, No 9 (2018): September

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study

Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study

Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study


  1. Moschetti A, Cavallo F, Esposito D, Penders J, Di Nuovo A. Wearable Sensors for Human–Robot Walking Together. Robotics 2019;8(2):38 View
  2. Bevilacqua R, Casaccia S, Cortellessa G, Astell A, Lattanzio F, Corsonello A, D’Ascoli P, Paolini S, Di Rosa M, Rossi L, Maranesi E. Coaching Through Technology: A Systematic Review into Efficacy and Effectiveness for the Ageing Population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(16):5930 View
  3. Di Nuovo A, Varrasi S, Lucas A, Conti D, McNamara J, Soranzo A. Assessment of Cognitive skills via Human-robot Interaction and Cloud Computing. Journal of Bionic Engineering 2019;16(3):526 View
  4. Cavallo F, Semeraro F, Mancioppi G, Betti S, Fiorini L. Mood classification through physiological parameters. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 2021;12(4):4471 View
  5. Rossi S, Conti D, Garramone F, Santangelo G, Staffa M, Varrasi S, Di Nuovo A. The Role of Personality Factors and Empathy in the Acceptance and Performance of a Social Robot for Psychometric Evaluations. Robotics 2020;9(2):39 View
  6. Sorrentino A, Cavallo F, Fiorini L. A Plug and Play Transparent Communication Layer for Cloud Robotics Architectures. Robotics 2020;9(1):17 View
  7. Naneva S, Sarda Gou M, Webb T, Prescott T. A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 2020;12(6):1179 View
  8. Fiske A, Henningsen P, Buyx A. Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(5):e13216 View
  9. Eichenberg C, Khamis M, Hübner L. The Attitudes of Therapists and Physicians on the Use of Sex Robots in Sexual Therapy: Online Survey and Interview Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e13853 View
  10. Wang N, Di Nuovo A, Cangelosi A, Jones R. Temporal patterns in multi-modal social interaction between elderly users and service robot. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 2019;20(1):4 View
  11. Fiorini L, Tabeau K, D’Onofrio G, Coviello L, De Mul M, Sancarlo D, Fabbricotti I, Cavallo F. Co-creation of an assistive robot for independent living: lessons learned on robot design. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 2020;14(2):491 View
  12. Belmonte L, García A, Morales R, de la Vara J, López de la Rosa F, Fernández-Caballero A. Feeling of Safety and Comfort towards a Socially Assistive Unmanned Aerial Vehicle That Monitors People in a Virtual Home. Sensors 2021;21(3):908 View
  13. Di Nuovo A, Cangelosi A. Abstract Concept Learning in Cognitive Robots. Current Robotics Reports 2021;2(1):1 View
  14. Zhong J, Ling C, Cangelosi A, Lotfi A, Liu X. On the Gap between Domestic Robotic Applications and Computational Intelligence. Electronics 2021;10(7):793 View
  15. Sorrentino A, Mancioppi G, Coviello L, Cavallo F, Fiorini L. Feasibility Study on the Role of Personality, Emotion, and Engagement in Socially Assistive Robotics: A Cognitive Assessment Scenario. Informatics 2021;8(2):23 View
  16. Tan S, Taeihagh A, Tripathi A. Tensions and antagonistic interactions of risks and ethics of using robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2021;167:120686 View
  17. Vandemeulebroucke T, Dzi K, Gastmans C. Older adults’ experiences with and perceptions of the use of socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of quantitative evidence. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2021;95:104399 View
  18. Isabet B, Pino M, Lewis M, Benveniste S, Rigaud A. Social Telepresence Robots: A Narrative Review of Experiments Involving Older Adults before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(7):3597 View
  19. Mattiassi A, Sarrica M, Cavallo F, Fortunati L. What do humans feel with mistreated humans, animals, robots, and objects? Exploring the role of cognitive empathy. Motivation and Emotion 2021;45(4):543 View
  20. Rampioni M, Moșoi A, Rossi L, Moraru S, Rosenberg D, Stara V. A Qualitative Study toward Technologies for Active and Healthy Aging: A Thematic Analysis of Perspectives among Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary End Users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(14):7489 View
  21. Morley J. Robots and Aging. The Journal of nutrition, health and aging 2021;25(8):949 View
  22. Fiorini L, Sorrentino A, Pistolesi M, Becchimanzi C, Tosi F, Cavallo F. Living With a Telepresence Robot: Results From a Field-Trial. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022;7(2):5405 View
  23. Khalili-Mahani N, Sawchuk K. Double-Bind of Recruitment of Older Adults Into Studies of Successful Aging via Assistive Information and Communication Technologies: Mapping Review. JMIR Aging 2022;5(4):e43564 View
  24. Shao M, Pham-Hung M, Alves S, Snyder M, Eshaghi K, Benhabib B, Nejat G. Long-Term Exercise Assistance: Group and One-on-One Interactions between a Social Robot and Seniors. Robotics 2023;12(1):9 View
  25. He Y, He Q, Liu Q, Morales R. Technology Acceptance in Socially Assistive Robots: Scoping Review of Models, Measurement, and Influencing Factors. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2022;2022:1 View
  26. Khanijahani A, Iezadi S, Dudley S, Goettler M, Kroetsch P, Wise J. Organizational, professional, and patient characteristics associated with artificial intelligence adoption in healthcare: A systematic review. Health Policy and Technology 2022;11(1):100602 View
  27. Chen H, Zhang Y, Wang L. A study on the quality evaluation index system of smart home care for older adults in the community ——based on Delphi and AHP. BMC Public Health 2023;23(1) View
  28. Phibbs C, Rahman S. A Synopsis of “The Impact of Motivation, Price, and Habit on Intention to Use IoT-Enabled Technology: A Correlational Study”. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy 2022;2(3):662 View
  29. Mahdi H, Akgun S, Saleh S, Dautenhahn K. A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and future. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2022;156:104193 View
  30. Marchang J, Di Nuovo A. Assistive Multimodal Robotic System (AMRSys): Security and Privacy Issues, Challenges, and Possible Solutions. Applied Sciences 2022;12(4):2174 View
  31. Bevilacqua R, Di Rosa M, Riccardi G, Pelliccioni G, Lattanzio F, Felici E, Margaritini A, Amabili G, Maranesi E. Design and Development of a Scale for Evaluating the Acceptance of Social Robotics for Older People: The Robot Era Inventory. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 2022;16 View
  32. Yuan F, Anderson J, Wyatt T, Lopez R, Crane M, Montgomery A, Zhao X. Assessing the Acceptability of a Humanoid Robot for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementia Care Using an Online Survey. International Journal of Social Robotics 2022;14(5):1223 View
  33. Di Napoli C, Ercolano G, Rossi S. Personalized home-care support for the elderly: a field experience with a social robot at home. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2023;33(2):405 View
  34. Ringwald M, Theben P, Gerlinger K, Hedrich A, Klein B. How Should Your Assistive Robot Look Like? A Scoping Review on Embodiment for Assistive Robots. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 2023;107(1) View
  35. Tónay G, Pilissy T, Tóth A, Fazekas G. Methods to assess the effectiveness and acceptance of information and communication technology-based assistive technology for older adults: a scoping review. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2023;46(2):113 View
  36. Kachaturoff M, Shidler K, Fasbinder A, Caboral-Stevens M. Acceptability of Socially Assistive Robots Among Cognitively Intact Older Adults: An Integrative Review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 2021;47(9):49 View
  37. Camp N, Johnston J, Lewis M, Zecca M, Di Nuovo A, Hunter K, Magistro D. Perceptions of In-home Monitoring Technology for Activities of Daily Living: Semistructured Interview Study With Community-Dwelling Older Adults. JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e33714 View
  38. Haltaufderheide J, Lucht A, Strünck C, Vollmann J. Socially Assistive Devices in Healthcare–a Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence from an Ethical Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 2023;29(1) View
  39. Luperto M, Monroy J, Renoux J, Lunardini F, Basilico N, Bulgheroni M, Cangelosi A, Cesari M, Cid M, Ianes A, Gonzalez-Jimenez J, Kounoudes A, Mari D, Prisacariu V, Savanovic A, Ferrante S, Borghese N. Integrating Social Assistive Robots, IoT, Virtual Communities and Smart Objects to Assist at-Home Independently Living Elders: the MoveCare Project. International Journal of Social Robotics 2023;15(3):517 View
  40. David D, Thérouanne P, Milhabet I. The acceptability of social robots: A scoping review of the recent literature. Computers in Human Behavior 2022;137:107419 View
  41. Bevilacqua R, Felici E, Cavallo F, Amabili G, Maranesi E. Designing Acceptable Robots for Assisting Older Adults: A Pilot Study on the Willingness to Interact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(20):10686 View
  42. Busse T, Kernebeck S, Nef L, Rebacz P, Kickbusch I, Ehlers J. Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(11):e20046 View
  43. Mahmoudi Asl A, Molinari Ulate M, Franco Martin M, van der Roest H. Methodologies Used to Study the Feasibility, Usability, Efficacy, and Effectiveness of Social Robots For Elderly Adults: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(8):e37434 View
  44. Gomez-Quispe J, Pérez-Zuñiga G, Arce D, Urbina F, Gibaja S, Paredes R, Cuellar F. Non Linear Control System for Humanoid Robot to Perform Body Language Movements. Sensors 2023;23(1):552 View
  45. Bi X, Gao Y, Sun E, Yan Y, Zhou Y, Ye X. Heterogeneity of Attitudes toward Robots in Healthcare among the Chinese Public: A Latent Profile Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;20(1):508 View
  46. Asgharian P, Panchea A, Ferland F. A Review on the Use of Mobile Service Robots in Elderly Care. Robotics 2022;11(6):127 View
  47. Bevilacqua R, Benadduci M, Bonfigli A, Riccardi G, Melone G, La Forgia A, Macchiarulo N, Rossetti L, Marzorati M, Rizzo G, Di Bitonto P, Potenza A, Fiorini L, Cortellessa Loizzo F, La Viola C, Cavallo F, Leone A, Rescio G, Caroppo A, Manni A, Cesta A, Cortellessa G, Fracasso F, Orlandini A, Umbrico A, Rossi L, Maranesi E. Dancing With Parkinson's Disease: The SI-ROBOTICS Study Protocol. Frontiers in Public Health 2021;9 View
  48. Isabet B, Rigaud A, Li W, Pino M. Telepresence Robot Intervention to Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults Living at Home (Project DOMIROB): Protocol for a Clinical Nonrandomized Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2022;11(10):e40528 View
  49. Li M, Shen J, Wang X, Chen Q, Xiaoyan L, Ren L. A theoretical framework based on the needs of smart aged care for Chinese community‐dwelling older adults: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge 2024;35(1):13 View
  50. Maus P, Kim J, Nocentini O, Bashir M, Cavallo F. The Impact of Data Augmentation on Tactile-Based Object Classification Using Deep Learning Approach. IEEE Sensors Journal 2022;22(14):14574 View
  51. Ravankar A, Tafrishi S, Salazar Luces J, Seto F, Hirata Y. CARE: Cooperation of ai Robot Enablers to Create a Vibrant Society. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 2023;30(1):8 View
  52. He Q, He Y, Liu Q, Ma C. Acceptance of social assistant robots for the older adults living in the community in China. Geriatric Nursing 2023;52:191 View
  53. AboJabel H, Ayalon L. Attitudes of Israelis toward family caregivers assisted by a robot in the delivery of care to older people: The roles of collectivism and individualism. Technology in Society 2023;75:102386 View
  54. Raja M, Kymre I, Bjerkan J, Galvin K, Uhrenfeldt L. National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults’ dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries. BMC Health Services Research 2023;23(1) View
  55. Ciuffreda I, Amabili G, Casaccia S, Benadduci M, Margaritini A, Maranesi E, Marconi F, De Masi A, Alberts J, de Koning J, Cuijpers R, Revel G, Nap H, Vastenburg M, Naveira A, Bevilacqua R. Design and Development of a Technological Platform Based on a Sensorized Social Robot for Supporting Older Adults and Caregivers: GUARDIAN Ecosystem. International Journal of Social Robotics 2023 View
  56. Yeo Y, Lau Y, Ang W, Wong Q, Tam H, Loh W, Wong S, Lau S. Unpacking older adults’ experiences using mobile telepresence robots: A systematic mixed-studies review. Geriatric Nursing 2023;54:280 View
  57. Luo C, Yuan R, Mao B, Liu Q, Wang W, He Y. Technology Acceptance of Socially Assistive Robots Among Older Adults and the Factors Influencing It: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Gerontology 2024;43(2):115 View
  58. Deveci M, Pamucar D, Gokasar I, Zaidan B, Martinez L, Pedrycz W. Assessing alternatives of including social robots in urban transport using fuzzy trigonometric operators based decision-making model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2023;194:122743 View
  59. Liao Y, Jao Y, Boltz M, Adekeye O, Berish D, Yuan F, Zhao X. Use of a Humanoid Robot in Supporting Dementia Care: A Qualitative Analysis. SAGE Open Nursing 2023;9:237796082311795 View
  60. Ghafurian M, Wang K, Dhode I, Kapoor M, Morita P, Dautenhahn K. Smart Home Devices for Supporting Older Adults: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access 2023;11:47137 View
  61. Amabili G, Maranesi E, Margaritini A, Benadduci M, Barbarossa F, Casaccia S, Nap H, Bevilacqua R. Usability and Feasibility Assessment of a Social Assistive Robot for the Older People: Results from the GUARDIAN Project. Bioengineering 2023;11(1):20 View
  62. Fiorini L, D'Onofrio G, Sorrentino A, Cornacchia Loizzo F, Russo S, Ciccone F, Giuliani F, Sancarlo D, Cavallo F. The Role of Coherent Robot Behavior and Embodiment in Emotion Perception and Recognition During Human-Robot Interaction: Experimental Study. JMIR Human Factors 2024;11:e45494 View
  63. Gültekin M, Şahin M. The use of artificial intelligence in mental health services in Turkey: What do mental health professionals think?. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 2024;18(1) View
  64. Weber S, Wyszynski M, Godefroid M, Plattfaut R, Niehaves B. How do medical professionals make sense (or not) of AI? A social-media-based computational grounded theory study and an online survey. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2024;24:146 View
  65. Janssen S, Schadenberg B. A Psychological Need-Fulfillment Perspective for Designing Social Robots that Support Well-Being. International Journal of Social Robotics 2024;16(5):857 View
  66. Madi M, Nielsen S, Schweitzer M, Siebert M, Körner D, Langensiepen S, Stephan A, Meyer G. Acceptance of a robotic system for nursing care: a cross-sectional survey with professional nurses, care recipients and relatives. BMC Nursing 2024;23(1) View
  67. Zhang Y, Luo L, Wang X. Aging with robots: A brief review on eldercare automation. Interdisciplinary Nursing Research 2024;3(1):49 View
  68. Amin M, Johnson V, Prybutok V, Koh C. An investigation into factors affecting the willingness to disclose personal health information when using AI-enabled caregiver robots. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2024;124(4):1677 View
  69. Vagnetti R, Camp N, Story M, Ait-Belaid K, Mitra S, Zecca M, Di Nuovo A, Magistro D. Instruments for Measuring Psychological Dimensions in Human-Robot Interaction: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e55597 View
  70. Cavallaro A, Perillo F, Romano M, Sebillo M, Vitiello G. Social robot in service of the cognitive therapy of elderly people: Exploring robot acceptance in a real-world scenario. Image and Vision Computing 2024;147:105072 View
  71. Sørensen L, Johannesen D, Johnsen H. Humanoid robots for assisting people with physical disabilities in activities of daily living: a scoping review. Assistive Technology 2024:1 View
  72. Li Y, Ma Y, Wang Y, Hong W. The Adoption of smart health services by older adults in retirement communities: analysis with the technology acceptance model (TAM). Universal Access in the Information Society 2024 View
  73. Costanzo M, Smeriglio R, Nuovo S. New technologies and assistive robotics for elderly: A review on psychological variables. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus 2024;1(4):100056 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Conti D, Di Nuovo S, Di Nuovo A. Human Centred Intelligent Systems. View
  2. Lin C, Liao H, Tung F. HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Cognition, Learning and Games. View
  3. Thoduka S, Hochgeschwender N. Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. AI, Product and Service. View
  4. Jovanović M, Jevremović A, Pejović-Milovančević M. Artificial Intelligence: Theory and Applications. View
  5. Maranesi E, Amabili G, Cucchieri G, Bolognini S, Margaritini A, Bevilacqua R. Internet of Things for Human-Centered Design. View
  6. Reutov V, Simchenko N, Strelnikov V, Dujunova S, Kharitonova E. Business 4.0 as a Subject of the Digital Economy. View
  7. Camp N, Di Nuovo A, Hunter K, Johnston J, Zecca M, Lewis M, Magistro D. Social Robotics. View
  8. Vagnetti R, Camp N, Story M, Ait-Belaid K, Bamforth J, Zecca M, Di Nuovo A, Mitra S, Magistro D. Social Robotics. View
  9. A. Ansari K. COPD - Pathology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions. View
  10. Greiner N, Lauer N. Digitale Technik für ambulante Pflege und Therapie III. View