Published on in Vol 20, No 3 (2018): March

Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study

Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study

Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study

Journals

  1. Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13830 View
  2. Han X, Qu J, Zhang T. Exploring the impact of review valence, disease risk, and trust on patient choice based on online physician reviews. Telematics and Informatics 2019;45:101276 View
  3. Zillioux J, Pike C, Sharma D, Rapp D. Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?. Journal of Patient Experience 2020;7(6):1062 View
  4. Liu J, Goldberg H, Lentz E, Matelski J, Alam A, Bell C. Association Between Web-Based Physician Ratings and Physician Disciplinary Convictions: Retrospective Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(5):e16708 View
  5. Rotman L, Alford E, Shank C, Dalgo C, Stetler W. Is There an Association Between Physician Review Websites and Press Ganey Survey Results in a Neurosurgical Outpatient Clinic?. World Neurosurgery 2019;132:e891 View
  6. Hong Y, Liang C, Radcliff T, Wigfall L, Street R. What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e12521 View
  7. McLennan S. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816 View
  8. McLennan S. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e18374 View
  9. Haffey S, Hopman W, Leveridge M. Physicians' Earnings Do Not Affect Their Online Ratings. Frontiers in Public Health 2020;8 View
  10. Mulgund P, Sharman R, Anand P, Shekhar S, Karadi P. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15916 View
  11. Zhao H, Luu M, Spiegel B, Daskivich T. Correlation of Online Physician Rating Subscores and Association With Overall Satisfaction: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e11258 View
  12. Yan Q, Jensen K, Thomas R, Field A, Jiang Z, Goei C, Davies M. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study. JMIR Cardio 2021;5(1):e22975 View
  13. Wachs D, Lorah V, Boynton A, Hertzler A, Nichols B, Kraft J, Wang J, Dang I, Kalekas P, Vanier C. Online Ratings of Primary Care Physicians: Comparison of Gender, Training, and Specialty. Journal of Patient Experience 2021;8:237437352110077 View
  14. Imbergamo C, Brzezinski A, Patankar A, Weintraub M, Mazzaferro N, Kayiaros S. Negative Online Ratings of Joint Replacement Surgeons: An Analysis of 6,402 Reviews. Arthroplasty Today 2021;9:106 View
  15. Emmert M, McLennan S. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(7):e24229 View
  16. Mazanderani F, Kirkpatrick S, Ziebland S, Locock L, Powell J. Caring for care: Online feedback in the context of public healthcare services. Social Science & Medicine 2021;285:114280 View
  17. Saifee D, Hudnall M, Raja U. Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians’ Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(4):e31659 View
  18. Chang I, Wells M, Chang I, Arquette C, Tang C, Gatherwright J, Furnas H. The Positive Patient Experience: A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastic Surgery Online Reviews. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2022;42(9):1083 View
  19. Borg D, Bon J, Foster M, Lakhani A, Kendall M, Geraghty T. Healthcare services for people with acquired disability in South-East Queensland, Australia: Assessing potential proximity and its association with service obstacles. SSM - Population Health 2022;19:101209 View
  20. Hussain A, Hakeem-ur-Rehman , Muhammad Usman Awan . Analyzing physicians ratings and reviews landscape of a developing country (Pakistan). Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight 2021;4(2):153 View
  21. Knoedler S, Sofo G, Kern B, Frank K, Cotofana S, von Isenburg S, Könneker S, Mazzarone F, Dorafshar A, Knoedler L, Alfertshofer M. Modern Machiavelli? The illusion of ChatGPT-generated patient reviews in plastic and aesthetic surgery based on 9000 review classifications. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 2024;88:99 View
  22. Kim J, Tawk K, Kim J, Shahbaz H, Lipton J, Haidar Y, Tjoa T, Abouzari M. Online ratings and narrative comments of American Head and Neck Society surgeons. Head & Neck 2024 View
  23. SHAMBOUR Q, ABUALHAJ M, SHAREHA A. An Effective Doctor Recommendation Algorithm for Online Healthcare Platforms. Romanian Journal of Information Science and Technology 2024;2024(1):81 View