Published on in Vol 20, No 3 (2018): March

Ethical Concerns of and Risk Mitigation Strategies for Crowdsourcing Contests and Innovation Challenges: Scoping Review

Ethical Concerns of and Risk Mitigation Strategies for Crowdsourcing Contests and Innovation Challenges: Scoping Review

Ethical Concerns of and Risk Mitigation Strategies for Crowdsourcing Contests and Innovation Challenges: Scoping Review

Journals

  1. Tucker J, Day S, Tang W, Bayus B. Crowdsourcing in medical research: concepts and applications. PeerJ 2019;7:e6762 View
  2. Adamik A, Nowicki M. Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0. Sustainability 2019;11(18):4954 View
  3. Cheng W, Wang C, Tang W, Ong J, Fu H, Marks M, Smith M, Li C, Nie J, Zhao P, Zheng H, Yang B, Tucker J. Promoting routine syphilis screening among men who have sex with men in China: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of syphilis self-testing and lottery incentive. BMC Infectious Diseases 2020;20(1) View
  4. Wu D, Ong J, Tang W, Ritchwood T, Walker J, Iwelunmor J, Tucker J. Crowdsourcing Methods to Enhance HIV and Sexual Health Services: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2019;82(3):S271 View
  5. Wang , Xia , Li , Wang . A Bibliometric Analysis of Crowdsourcing in the Field of Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16(20):3825 View
  6. Nguyen V, Young B, Ravaud P, Naidoo N, Benchoufi M, Boutron I. Overcoming Barriers to Mobilizing Collective Intelligence in Research: Qualitative Study of Researchers With Experience of Collective Intelligence. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13792 View