This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (781) Quantified Self and Wellness (78)

Published on in Vol 20, No 1 (2018): January

Exploring Entertainment Medicine and Professionalization of Self-Care: Interview Study Among Doctors on the Potential Effects of Digital Self-Tracking

Exploring Entertainment Medicine and Professionalization of Self-Care: Interview Study Among Doctors on the Potential Effects of Digital Self-Tracking

Exploring Entertainment Medicine and Professionalization of Self-Care: Interview Study Among Doctors on the Potential Effects of Digital Self-Tracking

Authors of this article:

Katleen Gabriels1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tania Moerenhout2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (36) Tweetations (24) Metrics

Journals

  1. Ayre J, Bonner C, Bramwell S, McClelland S, Jayaballa R, Maberly G, McCaffery K. Factors for Supporting Primary Care Physician Engagement With Patient Apps for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management That Link to Primary Care: Interview Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(1):e11885 View
  2. Wendrich K, van Oirschot P, Martens M, Heerings M, Jongen P, Krabbenborg L. Toward Digital Self-monitoring of Multiple Sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care 2019;21(6):282 View
  3. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine Learning in Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 2019;380(14):1347 View
  4. Fiske A, Buyx A, Prainsack B. The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany. Social Science & Medicine 2020;260:113174 View
  5. Grill E, Akdal G, Becker-Bense S, Hübinger S, Huppert D, Kentala E, Strobl R, Zwergal A, Celebisoy N. Multicenter data banking in management of dizzy patients: first results from the DizzyNet registry project. Journal of Neurology 2018;265(S1):3 View
  6. Chrisinger B. The Quantified Self-in-Place: Opportunities and Challenges for Place-Based N-of-1 Datasets. Frontiers in Computer Science 2020;2 View
  7. Rubanovich C, Cheung C, Mandel J, Bloss C. Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States. Human Molecular Genetics 2018;27(R2):R250 View
  8. Gabriels K. Response to “uncertainty in emotion recognition”. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2019;17(3):295 View
  9. Leese J, Macdonald G, Tran B, Wong R, Backman C, Townsend A, Davis A, Jones C, Gromala D, Avina‐Zubieta J, Hoens A, Li L. Using Physical Activity Trackers in Arthritis Self‐Management: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Rehabilitation Professional Perspectives. Arthritis Care & Research 2019;71(2):227 View
  10. Heidel A, Hagist C. Potential Benefits and Risks Resulting From the Introduction of Health Apps and Wearables Into the German Statutory Health Care System: Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e16444 View
  11. Chung C, Wang Q, Schroeder J, Cole A, Zia J, Fogarty J, Munson S. Identifying and Planning for Individualized Change. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2019;3(1):1 View
  12. Oravec J. Digital iatrogenesis and workplace marginalization: some ethical issues involving self-tracking medical technologies. Information, Communication & Society 2020;23(14):2030 View
  13. Dhivyaa C, Sangeetha K, Balamurugan M, Amaran S, Vetriselvi T, Johnpaul P. Skin lesion classification using decision trees and random forest algorithms. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 2020 View
  14. Jongsma K, Bekker M, Haitjema S, Bredenoord A. How digital health affects the patient-physician relationship: An empirical-ethics study into the perspectives and experiences in obstetric care. Pregnancy Hypertension 2021;25:81 View
  15. Feng S, Mäntymäki M, Dhir A, Salmela H. How Self-tracking and the Quantified Self Promote Health and Well-being: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(9):e25171 View
  16. Volpato L, del Río Carral M, Senn N, Santiago Delefosse M. General Practitioners' Perceptions of the Use of Wearable Electronic Health Monitoring Devices: Qualitative Analysis of Risks and Benefits. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(8):e23896 View
  17. Predel C, Timmermann C, Ursin F, Orzechowski M, Ropinski T, Steger F. Conflicting Aims and Values in the Application of Smart Sensors in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Ethical Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(6):e32910 View
  18. Calvignac C. Des médecins du sommeil aux prises avec les technologies d’automesure. Médecine du Sommeil 2023;20(4):213 View
  19. Fiske A, Schneider A, McLennan S, Karapetyan S, Buyx A. Impact of COVID-19 on patient health and self-care practices: a mixed-methods survey with German patients. BMJ Open 2021;11(9):e051167 View
  20. Müller A, Baumann E, Dierks M. Cyberchondrie – ein neues Verhaltenssyndrom?. PSYCH up2date 2022;16(02):129 View
  21. Wendrich K, Krabbenborg L. Digital Self-monitoring of Multiple Sclerosis: Interview Study With Dutch Health Care Providers on the Expected New Configuration of Roles and Responsibilities. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(4):e30224 View
  22. Leese J, MacDonald G, Backman C, Townsend A, Nimmon L, Li L. Experiences of Wearable Technology by Persons with Knee Osteoarthritis Participating in a Physical Activity Counseling Intervention: Qualitative Study Using a Relational Ethics Lens. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(11):e30332 View
  23. Wieczorek M, O’Brolchain F, Saghai Y, Gordijn B. The ethics of self-tracking. A comprehensive review of the literature. Ethics & Behavior 2023;33(4):239 View
  24. Tabaeeian R, Hajrahimi B, Khoshfetrat A. A systematic review of telemedicine systems use barriers: primary health care providers' perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2024;15(3):610 View
  25. Haase C, Ajjawi R, Bearman M, Brodersen J, Risor T, Hoeyer K. Data as symptom: Doctors’ responses to patient-provided data in general practice. Social Studies of Science 2023;53(4):522 View
  26. Green S, Prainsack B, Sabatello M. Precision medicine and the problem of structural injustice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2023;26(3):433 View
  27. Albrecht-Birkner V, Habscheid S, Schubert C. Expert*innen-Lai*innen-Kommunikation im institutionellen Wandel – Beispiele aus Medizin, Kommunalpolitik und Kirche. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 2023;53(4):797 View
  28. De Proost M, Segers S. Revisiting the ought implies can dictum in light of disruptive medical innovation. Journal of Medical Ethics 2024;50(7):466 View
  29. Hummel P, Braun M, Bischoff S, Samhammer D, Seitz K, Fasching P, Dabrock P. Perspectives of patients and clinicians on big data and AI in health: a comparative empirical investigation. AI & SOCIETY 2024;39(6):2973 View
  30. Oewel B, Azizan N, Arean P, Agapie E. Technology's Role in Fostering Therapist-Client Collaboration and Engagement with Goals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2024;8(CSCW2):1 View
  31. Augst A, Lämmerhirt D, Schubert C. Patient‐Generated Data as Interventions in Doctor‐Patient Relationships? Negotiating (Un)Invited Participation in Medical Consultations. Sociology of Health & Illness 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Stepanovic S. Well-Being in the Information Society. Fruits of Respect. View
  2. Bogoviz A, Elykomov V. Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. View
  3. Chrisinger B, Espinosa P, Fernes P, Rosas L, Banchoff A, King A. Global Handbook of Health Promotion Research, Vol. 3. View