Published on in Vol 19, No 9 (2017): September

Barriers and Facilitators to eHealth Use in Daily Practice: Perspectives of Patients and Professionals in Dermatology

Barriers and Facilitators to eHealth Use in Daily Practice: Perspectives of Patients and Professionals in Dermatology

Barriers and Facilitators to eHealth Use in Daily Practice: Perspectives of Patients and Professionals in Dermatology

Journals

  1. Jiang Q, Cohen N. Use of Online Focus Groups for Nutrition and Health Studies. Topics in Clinical Nutrition 2020;35(1):9 View
  2. May C, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair F, May C, Murray E, Myall M, Rapley T, Finch T. Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implementation Science 2018;13(1) View
  3. Christie H, Schichel M, Tange H, Veenstra M, Verhey F, de Vugt M. Perspectives From Municipality Officials on the Adoption, Dissemination, and Implementation of Electronic Health Interventions to Support Caregivers of People With Dementia: Inductive Thematic Analysis. JMIR Aging 2020;3(1):e17255 View
  4. Leigh S, Ashall-Payne L, Andrews T. Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Mobile Health Among Health Care Professionals From the United Kingdom: Discrete Choice Experiment. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(7):e17704 View
  5. Nguyen M, Waller M, Pandya A, Portnoy J. A Review of Patient and Provider Satisfaction with Telemedicine. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 2020;20(11) View
  6. Byambasuren O, Beller E, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Barriers to and Facilitators of the Prescription of mHealth Apps in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(7):e17447 View
  7. Hazzam J, Lahrech A. Health Care Professionals’ Social Media Behavior and the Underlying Factors of Social Media Adoption and Use: Quantitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(11):e12035 View
  8. Tates K, Antheunis M, Kanters S, Nieboer T, Gerritse M. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(12):e421 View
  9. Hermes E, Burrone L, Perez E, Martino S, Rowe M. Implementing Internet-Based Self-Care Programs in Primary Care: Qualitative Analysis of Determinants of Practice for Patients and Providers. JMIR Mental Health 2018;5(2):e42 View
  10. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(2):e15935 View
  11. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Factors Impacting Clinicians’ Adoption of a Clinical Photo Documentation App and its Implications for Clinical Workflows and Quality of Care: Qualitative Case Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e20203 View
  12. Klösch M, Klösch C, Kundt F, van der Zee-Neuen A, Dieplinger A. eHealth systems for the optimised care of patients with type 2 diabetes. British Journal of Nursing 2020;29(5):274 View
  13. Greis C, Meier Zürcher C, Djamei V, Moser A, Lautenschlager S, Navarini A. Unmet digital health service needs in dermatology patients. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 2018;29(7):643 View
  14. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Understanding Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(7):e18072 View
  15. Peracca S, Jackson G, Weinstock M, Oh D. Implementation of Teledermatology: Theory and Practice. Current Dermatology Reports 2019;8(2):35 View
  16. Brantnell A, Woodford J, Baraldi E, van Achterberg T, von Essen L. Views of Implementers and Nonimplementers of Internet-Administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety: Survey of Primary Care Decision Makers in Sweden. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e18033 View
  17. Alam K, Mahumud R, Alam F, Keramat S, Erdiaw-Kwasie M, Sarker A. Determinants of access to eHealth services in regional Australia. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2019;131:103960 View
  18. Jurkeviciute M, van Velsen L, Eriksson H, Lifvergren S, Trimarchi P, Andin U, Svensson J. Identifying the Value of an eHealth Intervention Aimed at Cognitive Impairments: Observational Study in Different Contexts and Service Models. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e17720 View
  19. Alkire (née Nasr) L, O'Connor G, Myrden S, Köcher S. Patient experience in the digital age: An investigation into the effect of generational cohorts. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2020;57:102221 View
  20. Schreiweis B, Pobiruchin M, Strotbaum V, Suleder J, Wiesner M, Bergh B. Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of eHealth Services: Systematic Literature Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(11):e14197 View
  21. Waller M, Taylor L, Portnoy J. The Medical Virtualist: Is Pediatric Patient Care Using Telemedicine, a New Specialty?. Pediatric Annals 2019;48(6) View
  22. van Houwelingen T, Ettema R, Bleijenberg N, van Os-Medendorp H, Kort H, ten Cate O. Educational intervention to increase nurses’ knowledge, self-efficacy and usage of telehealth: A multi-setting pretest-posttest study. Nurse Education in Practice 2021;51:102924 View
  23. Schmalz O, Jacob C, Ammann J, Liss B, Iivanainen S, Kammermann M, Koivunen J, Klein A, Popescu R. Digital Monitoring and Management of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Cancer Immunotherapy and Its Impact on Quality of Clinical Care: Interview and Survey Study Among Health Care Professionals and Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e18655 View
  24. van Os-Medendorp H, Deprez E, Maes N, Ryan S, Jackson K, Winders T, De Raeve L, De Cuyper C, Ersser S. The role of the nurse in the care and management of patients with atopic dermatitis. BMC Nursing 2020;19(1) View
  25. Song X, Hallensleben C, Zhang W, Jiang Z, Shen H, Gobbens R, Kleij R, Chavannes N, Versluis A. Blended Self-Management Interventions to Reduce Disease Burden in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(3):e24602 View
  26. Bentvelsen R, Veldkamp K, Chavannes N. A Smartphone App for Engaging Patients With Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: Protocol for an Interrupted Time-Series Analysis. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(3):e28314 View
  27. Trettin B, Danbjørg D, Andersen F, Feldman S, Agerskov H. Development of an mHealth App for Patients With Psoriasis Undergoing Biological Treatment: Participatory Design Study. JMIR Dermatology 2021;4(1):e26673 View
  28. Ummels D, Beekman E, Braun S, Beurskens A. Using an Activity Tracker in Healthcare: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals and Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(10):5147 View
  29. Trettin B, Danbjørg D, Andersen F, Feldman S, Agerskov H. An mHealth App to Support Patients With Psoriasis in Relation to Follow-up Consultations: Qualitative Study. JMIR Dermatology 2021;4(1):e28882 View
  30. Parker K, Chia M. Patient and clinician satisfaction with video consultations in dentistry - part one: patient satisfaction. British Dental Journal 2021 View
  31. Parker K, Chia M. Patient and clinician satisfaction with video consultations in dentistry - part two: clinician satisfaction. British Dental Journal 2021 View
  32. Yedulla N, Montgomery Z, Koolmees D, Battista E, Day C. Orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care. Bone & Joint Open 2021;2(6):405 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Bregenzer A, Jiménez P. Handbuch Digitale Wirtschaft. View
  2. Bregenzer A, Jiménez P. Handbuch Medizinökonomie I. View