This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information Retrieval (294) Information Seeking, Information Needs (477) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (301)

Published on in Vol 19, No 6 (2017): June

“You Sort of Go Down a Rabbit Hole...You’re Just Going to Keep on Searching”: A Qualitative Study of Searching Online for Pregnancy-Related Information During Pregnancy

“You Sort of Go Down a Rabbit Hole...You’re Just Going to Keep on Searching”: A Qualitative Study of Searching Online for Pregnancy-Related Information During Pregnancy

“You Sort of Go Down a Rabbit Hole...You’re Just Going to Keep on Searching”: A Qualitative Study of Searching Online for Pregnancy-Related Information During Pregnancy

Authors of this article:

Julie Prescott1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lynn Mackie1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (59) Tweetations (7) Metrics

Journals

  1. Verberne S, Batenburg A, Sanders R, van Eenbergen M, Das E, Lambooij M. Analyzing Empowerment Processes Among Cancer Patients in an Online Community: A Text Mining Approach. JMIR Cancer 2019;5(1):e9887 View
  2. Stitt C, Vang K. Midwife and Doula Information on the Web: An Analysis of Websites that Provide Information About Pregnancy and Childbirth. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2019;23(1):39 View
  3. Barnes L, Barclay L, McCaffery K, Aslani P. Factors influencing women’s decision-making regarding complementary medicine product use in pregnancy and lactation. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2019;19(1) View
  4. Ure C, Cooper-Ryan A, Condie J, Galpin A. Exploring Strategies for Using Social Media to Self-Manage Health Care When Living With and Beyond Breast Cancer: In-Depth Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(5):e16902 View
  5. Maslen S, Lupton D. “You can explore it more online”: a qualitative study on Australian women’s use of online health and medical information. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1) View
  6. Rathbone A, Prescott J. Pregnancy-specific health anxiety: symptom or diagnosis?. British Journal of Midwifery 2019;27(5):288 View
  7. Dai J, Granikov V, Sherif R, Grguric E, Turcotte E, Pluye P. Patient Information Aid: An innovative educational program to improve outcomes of online consumer health information. Education for Information 2019;35(1):41 View
  8. Pålsson P, Kvist L, Persson E, Kristensson Hallström I, Ekelin M. A survey of contemporary antenatal parental education in Sweden: What is offered to expectant parents and midwives’ experiences. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2019;20:13 View
  9. Pluye P, El Sherif R, Gonzalez-Reyes A, Turcotte E, Schuster T, Bartlett G, Grad R, Granikov V, Barwick M, Doray G, Lagarde F, Loignon C. Outcomes of Equity-Oriented, Web-Based Parenting Information in Mothers of Low Socioeconomic Status Compared to Other Mothers: Participatory Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(11):e22440 View
  10. Hughson J, Daly J, Woodward-Kron R, Hajek J, Story D. The Rise of Pregnancy Apps and the Implications for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women: Narrative Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(11):e189 View
  11. Ellis L, Roberts L. Exploring the use and quality of Internet discussion forums in pregnancy: A qualitative analysis. Birth 2020;47(1):153 View
  12. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Thoër C, Rodriguez C. Reducing Negative Outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information: Qualitative Interpretive Study with Clinicians, Librarians, and Consumers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e169 View
  13. Walker L, Mackert M, Ahn J, Vaughan M, Sterling B, Guy S, Hendrickson S. e‐Health and new moms: Contextual factors associated with sources of health information. Public Health Nursing 2017;34(6):561 View
  14. Prescott J, Rathbone A, Hanley T. Online mental health communities, self-efficacy and transition to further support. Mental Health Review Journal 2020;25(4):329 View
  15. Medley‐Rath S. Online Somatic Work: the Case of Sensory Processing Disorder. Sociological Inquiry 2021;91(3):647 View
  16. Xie J, He Z, Burnett G, Cheng Y. How do mothers exchange parenting-related information in online communities? A meta-synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior 2021;115:106631 View
  17. Smith M, Mitchell A, Townsend M, Herbert J, East C. The relationship between digital media use during pregnancy, maternal psychological wellbeing, and maternal-fetal attachment. PLOS ONE 2020;15(12):e0243898 View
  18. Prescott J, Rathbone A, Brown G. Online peer to peer support: Qualitative analysis of UK and US open mental health Facebook groups. DIGITAL HEALTH 2020;6 View
  19. Mahony C, Heavin C, Sammon D. Health-related information resource use: an exploratory study of expectant mothers. Journal of Decision Systems 2022;31(3):234 View
  20. Mahony C, Heavin C, Sammon D. Identifying design guidelines for online information resources: a study of expectant and new mothers. Information Technology & People 2022;35(8):23 View
  21. Hinton L, Chisholm A, Jakubowski B, Greenfield S, Tucker K, McManus R, Locock L. “You Probably Won’t Notice Any Symptoms”: Blood Pressure in Pregnancy—Discourses of Contested Expertise in an Era of Self-Care and Responsibilization. Qualitative Health Research 2021;31(9):1632 View
  22. Brown G, Rathbone A, Prescott J. Social media use for supporting mental health (SMILE). Mental Health Review Journal 2021;26(3):279 View
  23. Rathbone A, Prescott J, Cross D. Pregnancy in a pandemic: generalised anxiety disorder and health anxiety prevalence. British Journal of Midwifery 2021;29(8):440 View
  24. Agyemang F. Examining the information seeking and sharing activities in a virtual community of librarians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2022;54(4):591 View
  25. Hanna E, Donetto S. The pregnancy experiences of amputee women: a qualitative exploration of online posts. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 2023;41(3):362 View
  26. Shirabe R, Okuhara T, Okada H, Goto E, Kiuchi T. Support Needs for Anxiety among Pregnant Women in Japan: A Qualitative Pilot Study. Women 2023;3(1):95 View
  27. Peter M, McInnes‐Dean H, Fisher J, Tapon D, Chitty L, Hill M. What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing. Prenatal Diagnosis 2022;42(1):97 View
  28. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Schuster T, Grad R. Proxy Information Seeking by Users of a Parenting Information Website: Quantitative Observational Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2022;5(1):e32406 View
  29. Liu X, Tumolo M, Biedendorf J. Content Analysis of Social Support, and Disease Framing of Klinefelter Syndrome and Down Syndrome: Social Support, Framing and Decision Tendencies. Health Communication 2023;38(4):803 View
  30. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Ibekwe F. Contexts and Outcomes of Proxy Online Health Information Seeking: Mixed Studies Review With Framework Synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(6):e34345 View
  31. Lee J, Lee E. What topics are women interested in during pregnancy: exploring the role of social media as informational and emotional support. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022;22(1) View
  32. Newson L, Bould K, Aspin‐Wood B, Sinclair L, Ikramullah Z, Abayomi J. The lived experiences of women exploring a healthy lifestyle, gestational weight gain and physical activity throughout pregnancy. Health Expectations 2022;25(4):1717 View
  33. Murray J, Sharp A, Munro S, Janssen P. Expectant Parents’ Preferences for Teaching by Texting: Development and Usability Study of SmartMom. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e44661 View
  34. Sylvie V, Catherine F, Nicolas B, Jacky N. Which women uses social Internet networks during pregnancy?. Clinical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021;4(1):025 View
  35. Ortiz Juarez-Paz A, Doherty E, Storch S, Kallis R, Kleinman S. “Anyone else? Is this normal?”: anonymously seeking information on the Ovia Pregnancy App. Atlantic Journal of Communication 2023;31(1):30 View
  36. Hood R, Zabatiero J, Silva D, R. Zubrick S, Straker L. ‘There’s good and bad’: parent perspectives on the influence of mobile touch screen device use on prenatal attachment. Ergonomics 2022;65(12):1593 View
  37. Conrad M. Health information-seeking internet behaviours among pregnant women: a narrative literature review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 2024;42(2):194 View
  38. Lawrence V, Richardson S, Philp L. How does social media influence expectations, decision making and experiences of childbirth?. British Journal of Midwifery 2023;31(4):210 View
  39. Martínez-Abraín A, Santidrián Tomillo P, Mouriño J, Rodríguez-Silvar J, Bermejo A. Predator-prey collapses at the edge of predator distribution: the case of clupeids and common guillemots (Uria aalge) in NW Iberia. Scientia Marina 2023;87(1):e053 View
  40. Lander J, Bitzer E, von Sommoggy J, Pawellek M, Altawil H, John C, Apfelbacher C, Dierks M. How do parents access, appraise, and apply health information on early childhood allergy prevention? A focus group and interview study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  41. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Paquet V, Ibekwe F, Grad R. How People Use Web-Based Parenting Information to Support Others in Their Social Circle: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2023;6:e40043 View
  42. Šoštarić M, Mikac U, Jokić-Begić N. Understanding cyberchondria in pregnant women: longitudinal assessment of risk factors, triggers, and outcomes. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 2023;44(1) View
  43. Hussain I, Hartney N, Sweet L. A survey of Australian women’s digital media usage in pregnancy and labour and birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2023;23(1) View
  44. Chee R, Capper T, Muurlink O. Social media influencers' impact during pregnancy and parenting: A qualitative descriptive study. Research in Nursing & Health 2024;47(1):7 View
  45. Whitworth K, Donnellan‐Fernandez R, Fleet J. Women's experiences of online antenatal education: An integrative literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2024;80(5):1761 View
  46. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Hong Q, Rihoux B. Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example. Research Synthesis Methods 2024;15(3):450 View
  47. Šoštarić M, Jokić-Begić N, Vukušić Mijačika M. Can’t stop, won’t stop - understanding anxiety’s role in cyberchondria among pregnant women. Women & Health 2024;64(2):185 View
  48. Rathbone A, Neill S, Prime S, Thomas N, Everett K. Supporting parents with acutely ill children: Environment scan and user evaluation of mobile applications (the SuPa kids project). International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024;189:105504 View
  49. Ferrarello S. Technology, intimacy and motherhood. New Techno Humanities 2024 View
  50. Rathbone A, Clarry L, Prescott J. Skilful surfing: modelling the optimum method of online health information seeking during pregnancy. Mental Health and Digital Technologies 2024;1(1):53 View
  51. Adekunle T. US black women’s pregnancy communication networks: A qualitative network analysis. Social Science & Medicine 2024;353:117028 View
  52. Dubbelman J, Ooms J, Havgry L, Simonse L. Communal Load Sharing of Miscarriage Experiences: Thematic Analysis of Social Media Community Support (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024 View
  53. Çelenk Y, Yakar B. The relationship between pregnancy-related anxiety, trait anxiety, and internet use in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. Family Practice and Palliative Care 2024;9(2):32 View
  54. Hives L, Bray E, Nowland R, Thomson G. Social media influencers in the space of pregnancy and parenting: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2024;14(10):e087200 View
  55. Nissen M, Huang S, Jäger K, Flaucher M, Titzmann A, Bleher H, Pontones C, Huebner H, Danzberger N, Fasching P, Eskofier B, Leutheuser H. Smartphone pregnancy apps: systematic analysis of features, scientific guidance, commercialization, and user perception. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2024;24(1) View
  56. Gibson J, Oxtoby C, Brennan M, White K, Ptaszynski M. Understanding veterinary practitioners’ responses to adverse events using a combined grounded theory and netnographic natural language processing approach. PLOS ONE 2024;19(12):e0314081 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Rathbone A, Cross D, Prescott J. Digital Innovations for Mental Health Support. View
  2. Rathbone A, Cross D, Prescott J. Digital Innovations for Mental Health Support. View