Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 01.05.17 in Vol 19, No 5 (2017): May

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians’ and Health Care Consumers’ Perspectives"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.6875):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. Peuchaud SR. Respected as a Client, Cared for as a Patient: Evidence of Heuristic Decision-Making from Yelp Reviews of Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Health Communication 2020;35(7):842
    CrossRef
  2. Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e212
    CrossRef
  3. Liu J, Hou S, Evans R, Xia C, Xia W, Ma J. What Do Patients Complain About Online: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy Framework Based on Patient Centeredness. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e14634
    CrossRef
  4. Schulz PJ, Rothenfluh F. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e14134
    CrossRef
  5. Shah AM, Yan X, Khan S, Khurrum W, Khan QR. A multi-modal approach to predict the strength of doctor–patient relationships. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2020;
    CrossRef
  6. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(7):e243
    CrossRef
  7. Perrault EK, Hildenbrand GM. The Buffering Effect of Health Care Provider Video Biographies When Viewed in Combination With Negative Reviews: “You Can’t Fake Nice”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e16635
    CrossRef
  8. Li S, Lee-Won RJ, McKnight J. Effects of Online Physician Reviews and Physician Gender on Perceptions of Physician Skills and Primary Care Physician (PCP) Selection. Health Communication 2019;34(11):1250
    CrossRef
  9. McLennan S, Strech D, Kahrass H. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  10. Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13830
    CrossRef
  11. Lamb CC. Physician–patient shared decision making in the treatment of primary immunodeficiency: an interview-based survey of immunologists. LymphoSign Journal 2018;5(3):100
    CrossRef
  12. Shah AM, Yan X, Shah SAA, Shah SJ, Mamirkulova G. Exploring the impact of online information signals in leveraging the economic returns of physicians. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2019;98:103272
    CrossRef
  13. Shah AM, Yan X, Tariq S, Khan S. Listening to the patient voice: using a sentic computing model to evaluate physicians’ healthcare service quality for strategic planning in hospitals. Quality & Quantity 2020;
    CrossRef
  14. McLennan S. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14336
    CrossRef
  15. McLennan S. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816
    CrossRef