Published on in Vol 19, No 3 (2017): March

Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods

Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods

Comparison of Different Recruitment Methods for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research: Social Media–Based Versus Conventional Methods

Journals

  1. Clewley D, Rhon D, Flynn T, Koppenhaver S, Cook C. Physical therapists familiarity and beliefs about health services utilization and health seeking behaviour. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2018;22(4):336 View
  2. van Gelder M, van de Belt T, Engelen L, Hooijer R, Bredie S, Roeleveld N. Google AdWords and Facebook Ads for Recruitment of Pregnant Women into a Prospective Cohort Study With Long-Term Follow-Up. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2019;23(10):1285 View
  3. Marx D, Greif R, Egloff M, Balmer Y, Nabecker S. Recruiting Medical Students for a First Responder Project in the Social Age: Direct Contact Still Outperforms Social Media. Emergency Medicine International 2020;2020:1 View
  4. Kelleher E, Moreno M. Hot Topics in Social Media and Reproductive Health. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 2020;33(6):619 View
  5. Li G, Li W, Song B, Wang C, Shen Q, Li B, Tang D, Xu C, Geng H, Gao Y, Wang G, Wu H, Zhang Z, Xu X, Zhou P, Wei Z, He X, Cao Y. Differences in the Gut Microbiome of Women With and Without Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder: Case Control Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(2):e25342 View