Published on in Vol 16, No 9 (2014): September

Replacing Ambulatory Surgical Follow-Up Visits With Mobile App Home Monitoring: Modeling Cost-Effective Scenarios

Replacing Ambulatory Surgical Follow-Up Visits With Mobile App Home Monitoring: Modeling Cost-Effective Scenarios

Replacing Ambulatory Surgical Follow-Up Visits With Mobile App Home Monitoring: Modeling Cost-Effective Scenarios

Journals

  1. Paul M, Kamali P, Ibrahim A, Medin C, Lee B, Lin S. Initial Assessment, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Minor Pediatric Burn Wounds in Four Patients Remotely: A Preliminary Communication. Telemedicine and e-Health 2018;24(5):379 View
  2. Belarmino A, Walsh R, Alshak M, Patel N, Wu R, Hu J. Feasibility of a Mobile Health Application To Monitor Recovery and Patient-reported Outcomes after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. European Urology Oncology 2019;2(4):425 View
  3. Waller A, Forshaw K, Carey M, Robinson S, Kerridge R, Proietto A, Sanson-Fisher R. Optimizing Patient Preparation and Surgical Experience Using eHealth Technology. JMIR Medical Informatics 2015;3(3):e29 View
  4. Sanger P, Simianu V, Gaskill C, Armstrong C, Hartzler A, Lordon R, Lober W, Evans H. Diagnosing Surgical Site Infection Using Wound Photography: A Scenario-Based Study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2017;224(1):8 View
  5. Higgins J, Semple J, Murnaghan L, Sharpe S, Theodoropoulos J. Mobile Web-Based Follow-up for Postoperative ACL Reconstruction: A Single-Center Experience. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2017;5(12):232596711774527 View
  6. Giunti G. 3MD for Chronic Conditions, a Model for Motivational mHealth Design: Embedded Case Study. JMIR Serious Games 2018;6(3):e11631 View
  7. Ross T, Dvorani E, Saskin R, Khoshbin A, Atrey A, Ward S. Temporal Trends and Predictors of Thirty-Day Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ontario Between 2003 and 2016. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2020;35(2):364 View
  8. Iribarren S, Cato K, Falzon L, Stone P, Mihalopoulos C. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLOS ONE 2017;12(2):e0170581 View
  9. Dumestre D, Redwood J, Webb C, Temple-Oberle C. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Enables Safe Same-Day Discharge After Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction. Plastic Surgery 2017;25(4):249 View
  10. Croghan S, Carroll P, Ridgway P, Gillis A, Reade S. Robot-assisted surgical ward rounds: virtually always there. BMJ Health & Care Informatics 2018;25(1):41 View
  11. Germine L, Reinecke K, Chaytor N. Digital neuropsychology: Challenges and opportunities at the intersection of science and software. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2019;33(2):271 View
  12. Kumar N, Faqih A, Feng M, Miller R, Pierce R, Sharp K, Holzman M, Poulose B. Using Quality Improvement Principles to Enhance Long-Term Completion of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Ventral Hernia Repair. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2017;224(2):172 View
  13. van Hout L, Bökkerink W, Ibelings M, Vriens P. Perioperative monitoring of inguinal hernia patients with a smartphone application. Hernia 2020;24(1):179 View
  14. van der Meij E, Huirne J, Bouwsma E, van Dongen J, Terwee C, van de Ven P, den Bakker C, van der Meij S, van Baal W, Leclercq W, Geomini P, Consten E, Schraffordt Koops S, van Kesteren P, Stockmann H, ten Cate A, Davids P, Scholten P, van den Heuvel B, Schaafsma F, Meijerink W, Bonjer H, Anema J. Substitution of Usual Perioperative Care by eHealth to Enhance Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing General Surgical or Gynecological Procedures: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2016;5(4):e245 View
  15. De La Cruz Monroy M, Mosahebi A. The Use of Smartphone Applications (Apps) for Enhancing Communication With Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Surgical Innovation 2019;26(2):244 View
  16. Wani T, Mendoza A, Gray K. Hospital Bring-Your-Own-Device Security Challenges and Solutions: Systematic Review of Gray Literature. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(6):e18175 View
  17. Tofte J, Anthony C, Polgreen P, Buckwalter J, Caldwell L, Fowler T, Ebinger T, Hanley J, Dowdle S, Holte A, Arpey N, Lawler E. Postoperative care via smartphone following carpal tunnel release. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2020;26(4):223 View
  18. DeNicola N, Marko K. Connected Health and Mobile Apps in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2020;47(2):317 View
  19. Meregaglia M, Cairns J. Economic evaluations of follow-up strategies for cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the literature. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 2015;15(6):913 View
  20. Snyder S. Editorial. Telemedicine for elective neurosurgical routine follow-up care: a promising patient-centered and cost-effective alternative to in-person clinic visits. Neurosurgical Focus 2018;44(5):E18 View
  21. Warrington L, Absolom K, Conner M, Kellar I, Clayton B, Ayres M, Velikova G. Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(1):e10875 View
  22. Al Ayubi S, Pelletier A, Sunthara G, Gujral N, Mittal V, Bourgeois F. A Mobile App Development Guideline for Hospital Settings: Maximizing the Use of and Minimizing the Security Risks of "Bring Your Own Devices" Policies. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2016;4(2):e50 View
  23. Dahlberg K, Philipsson A, Hagberg L, Jaensson M, Hälleberg-Nyman M, Nilsson U. Cost-effectiveness of a systematic e-assessed follow-up of postoperative recovery after day surgery: a multicentre randomized trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017;119(5):1039 View
  24. Taylor J, Stem M, Chen S, Yu D, Fang S, Gearhart S, Safar B, Efron J. The Safety of Outpatient Stoma Closure: on the Verge of a Paradigm Shift?. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2019;23(10):2019 View
  25. van der Meij E, Bouwsma E, van den Heuvel B, Bonjer H, Anema J, Huirne J. Using e-health in perioperative care: a survey study investigating shortcomings in current perioperative care and possible future solutions. BMC Surgery 2017;17(1) View
  26. Shalowitz D, Moore C. Telemedicine and Gynecologic Cancer Care. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2020;47(2):271 View
  27. Lane T, Armin J, Gordon J. Online Recruitment Methods for Web-Based and Mobile Health Studies: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(7):e183 View
  28. Bashshur R, Howell J, Krupinski E, Harms K, Bashshur N, Doarn C. The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care. Telemedicine and e-Health 2016;22(5):342 View
  29. Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell M, Tan M, Semple J, Schrag C, Barreto M, Blondeel P, Hamming J, Dayan J, Ljungqvist O. Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2017;139(5):1056e View
  30. Molina G, Neville B, Lipsitz S, Gibbons L, Childers A, Gawande A, Berry W, Haynes A. Postoperative acute care use after freestanding ambulatory surgery. Journal of Surgical Research 2016;205(2):331 View
  31. Barbieri M, Richardson G, Paisley S. The cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies after cancer treatment: a systematic literature review. British Medical Bulletin 2018;126(1):85 View
  32. Price M, Sawyer T, Harris M, Skalka C. Usability Evaluation of a Mobile Monitoring System to Assess Symptoms After a Traumatic Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Mental Health 2016;3(1):e3 View
  33. Cohen-Yatziv L, Cohen M, Halevy J, Kaliner E. No-shows in ambulatory clinics and non-utilized appointments for elective operations in selected surgical departments at a tertiary hospital in Israel. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 2019;8(1) View
  34. Semple J, Evans H, Lober W, Lavallee D. Implementing Mobile Health Interventions to Capture Post-Operative Patient-Generated Health Data. Surgical Infections 2019;20(7):566 View
  35. Semple J, Sharpe S, Murnaghan M, Theodoropoulos J, Metcalfe K. Using a Mobile App for Monitoring Post-Operative Quality of Recovery of Patients at Home: A Feasibility Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2015;3(1):e18 View
  36. Beaussier M, Marchand-Maillet F, Dufeu N, Sciard D. Organizational aspects to optimize patient's ambulatory pathway. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2015;28(6):636 View
  37. Bauder A, Gross C, Killelea B, Butler P, Kovach S, Fox J. The Relationship Between Geographic Access to Plastic Surgeons and Breast Reconstruction Rates Among Women Undergoing Mastectomy for Cancer. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2017;78(3):324 View
  38. Higgins J, Chang J, Hoit G, Chahal J, Dwyer T, Theodoropoulos J. Conventional Follow-up Versus Mobile Application Home Monitoring for Postoperative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 2020;36(7):1906 View
  39. Raison N, Khan M, Challacombe B. Telemedicine in Surgery: What are the Opportunities and Hurdles to Realising the Potential?. Current Urology Reports 2015;16(7) View
  40. Chung B, Oh E, Song S. Mobile Health for Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Asian Oncology Nursing 2017;17(3):133 View
  41. Berglund D, McGraw T, Falvo A, Vacharathit V, Daouadi M, Parker D, Petrick A. Examining emergency department utilization in the post-foregut surgery patient. Surgical Endoscopy 2021;35(8):4563 View
  42. Armstrong K, Coyte P, Bhatia R, Semple J. The Effect of Mobile App Home Monitoring on Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(2):e65 View
  43. Wang S, Au Y, Ramirez-GarciaLuna J, Lee L, Berry G. The Promise of Smartphone Applications in the Remote Monitoring of Postsurgical Wounds: A Literature Review. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2020;33(9):489 View
  44. Ertel A, Kaiser T, Abbott D, Shah S. Use of video-based education and tele-health home monitoring after liver transplantation: Results of a novel pilot study. Surgery 2016;160(4):869 View
  45. Lau A, Piper K, Bokor D, Martin P, Lau V, Coiera E. Challenges During Implementation of a Patient-Facing Mobile App for Surgical Rehabilitation: Feasibility Study. JMIR Human Factors 2017;4(4):e31 View
  46. Mourrégot A, Leclerc G, Lemanski C, Gutowski M, Carrère S, Saint-Aubert B, Colombo P, Rouanet P. La chirurgie ambulatoire adaptée à la vie d’aujourd’hui, aux évolutions chirurgicales et anesthésiques. Oncologie 2016;18(2-3):109 View
  47. DeFrancesco C, Lebrun D, Molony J, Heath M, Fabricant P. Safer and Cheaper: An Enhanced Milestone-Based Return to Play Program After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Athletes Is Cost-Effective Compared With Standard Time-Based Return to Play Criteria. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2020;48(5):1100 View
  48. Reider-Demer M, Raja P, Martin N, Schwinger M, Babayan D. Prospective and retrospective study of videoconference telemedicine follow-up after elective neurosurgery: results of a pilot program. Neurosurgical Review 2018;41(2):497 View
  49. Hazel C, Bull S, Greenwell E, Bunik M, Puma J, Perraillon M. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of behavior change communication apps: Assessment of key methods. DIGITAL HEALTH 2021;7:205520762110005 View
  50. Forget P, Dahlberg K. Is multi-source feedback the future of perioperative medicine?. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine 2021;40(3):100886 View
  51. Villegas F, Martínez-Borba V, Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragoza I, García-Palacios A, Ferrer C. Characterizing Breakthrough Cancer Pain Using Ecological Momentary Assessment with a Smartphone App: Feasibility and Clinical Findings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(11):5991 View
  52. Stoehr J, Hamidian Jahromi A, Hunter E, Schechter L. Telemedicine for Gender-Affirming Medical and Surgical Care: A Systematic Review and Call-to-Action. Transgender Health 2022;7(2):117 View
  53. Ben-Ali W, Lamarche Y, Carrier M, Demers P, Bouchard D, El-Hamamsy I, Cartier R, Pellerin M, Perrault L. Use of Mobile-Based Application for Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery 2021;16(6):536 View
  54. Miranda R, Bhuiya A, Thraya Z, Hancock-Howard R, Chan B, Steele Gray C, Wodchis W, Thavorn K. An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Older Adults With Complex Chronic Conditions: Cost-Utility Analysis. JMIR Aging 2022;5(2):e35075 View
  55. Faessen J, van Vugt R, Veldhuizen R, Stoot J. Using an E‐Health Application for Post‐operative Monitoring After Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Feasibility Study. World Journal of Surgery 2023;47(1):182 View
  56. Tully L, Sorensen J, O'Malley G. Pediatric Weight Management Through mHealth Compared to Face-to-Face Care: Cost Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(9):e31621 View
  57. Wani T, Mendoza A, Gray K, Smolenaers F. BYOD usage and security behaviour of hospital clinical staff: An Australian survey. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2022;165:104839 View
  58. Payne S, Nguyen L, Afshari A, Drolet B. The Flexible Care Pathway: An Alternative Paradigm for Post-Operative Care. Journal of Medical Systems 2022;46(6) View
  59. Robin F, Roy M, Kuftedjian A, Perret L, Lavoie F, Castonguay A, Pomey M, Zaouter C, Pare G. A Medicoeconomic Evaluation of a Telehealth Platform for Elective Outpatient Surgeries: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e44006 View
  60. Branca M, Longatto-Filho A. Recommendations on Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytology. Acta Cytologica 2015;59(5):361 View
  61. Ahmadi M, Shahrokhi S, Khavaninzadeh M, Alipour J. Development of a Mobile-Based Self-care Application for Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in Iran. Applied Clinical Informatics 2022;13(05):935 View
  62. Wolfstadt J, Soong C, Ward S. Improving patient outcomes following total joint arthroplasty: is there an app for that?. BMJ Quality & Safety 2019;28(10):775 View
  63. van Hout L, Bökkerink W, Vriens P. Clinical feasibility of the Q1.6 Inguinal Hernia application: a prospective cohort study. Hernia 2022;27(2):449 View
  64. Diehl T, Barrett J, Abbott D, Cherney Stafford L, Hanlon B, Yang Q, Van Doorn R, Weber S, Voils C. Protocol for the MobiMD trial: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a self-monitoring mobile app on hospital readmissions for complex surgical patients. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2022;113:106658 View
  65. Wani T, Mendoza A, Gray K, Smolenaers F. Status of bring-your-own-device (BYOD) security practices in Australian hospitals – A national survey. Health Policy and Technology 2022;11(3):100627 View
  66. Temple-Oberle C, Yakaback S, Webb C, Assadzadeh G, Nelson G. Effect of Smartphone App Postoperative Home Monitoring After Oncologic Surgery on Quality of Recovery. JAMA Surgery 2023;158(7):693 View
  67. Baniasadi T, Hassaniazad M, Rostam Niakan Kalhori S, Shahi M, Ghazisaeedi M. Developing a mobile health application for wound telemonitoring: a pilot study on abdominal surgeries post-discharge care. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2023;23(1) View
  68. Hoffer A, McConkey M, Lodhia P, Leith J. Not all patient-reported outcome measures are equivalent at two years compared to one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on a retrospective analysis. Journal of ISAKOS 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Temple-Oberle C, Webb C. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. View
  2. Salmon M, Patel B. Ambulatory Urology and Urogynaecology. View