Published on in Vol 16, No 1 (2014): January

Biological Calibration for Web-Based Hearing Tests: Evaluation of the Methods

Biological Calibration for Web-Based Hearing Tests: Evaluation of the Methods

Biological Calibration for Web-Based Hearing Tests: Evaluation of the Methods

Journals

  1. Chu Y, Cheng Y, Lai Y, Tsao Y, Tu T, Young S, Chen T, Chung Y, Lai F, Liao W. A Mobile Phone–Based Approach for Hearing Screening of School-Age Children: Cross-Sectional Validation Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(4):e12033 View
  2. Stefanczyk M, Oleszkiewicz A. It’s not you, it’s me – disgust sensitivity towards body odor in deaf and blind individuals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2020;82(7):3728 View
  3. Thoms L, Collichia G, Girwidz R. Real-life physics: phonocardiography, electrocardiography, and audiometry with a smartphone. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2019;1223:012007 View
  4. Masalski M, Kipiński L, Grysiński T, Kręcicki T. Hearing Tests on Mobile Devices: Evaluation of the Reference Sound Level by Means of Biological Calibration. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(5):e130 View
  5. Sorokowska A, Hummel T, Oleszkiewicz A. No Olfactory Compensation in Food-related Hazard Detection Among Blind and Deaf Adults: A Psychophysical Approach. Neuroscience 2020;440:56 View
  6. Masalski M, Morawski K. Worldwide Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among Smartphone Users: Cross-Sectional Study Using a Mobile-Based App. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e17238 View
  7. Masalski M, Grysiński T, Kręcicki T. Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(1):e10 View
  8. Shafiro V, Hebb M, Walker C, Oh J, Hsiao Y, Brown K, Sheft S, Li Y, Vasil K, Moberly A. Development of the Basic Auditory Skills Evaluation Battery for Online Testing of Cochlear Implant Listeners. American Journal of Audiology 2020;29(3S):577 View
  9. Deshpande A, Shimunova T. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Tinnitus Apps. American Journal of Audiology 2019;28(3):605 View
  10. Oleszkiewicz A, Kupczyk T, Brañas-Garza P. Sensory impairment reduces money sharing in the Dictator Game regardless of the recipient’s sensory status. PLOS ONE 2020;15(3):e0230637 View
  11. Bright T, Pallawela D. Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2016;3(2):e13 View
  12. Paglialonga A, Tognola G, Pinciroli F. Apps for Hearing Science and Care. American Journal of Audiology 2015;24(3):293 View
  13. Pieniak M, Lachowicz‐Tabaczek K, Masalski M, Hummel T, Oleszkiewicz A. Self‐rated sensory performance in profoundly deaf individuals. Do deaf people share the conviction about sensory compensation?. Journal of Sensory Studies 2020;35(4) View
  14. Thoms L, Colicchia G, Girwidz R. Audiometric Test with a Smartphone. The Physics Teacher 2018;56(7):478 View
  15. Batte C, Olayanju T, Mukisa J, Namusobya M, Alenoghena I, Sulaiman L, Tazifua E, Oladele D, Morton B. The accuracy of a mobile phone application (Wulira app) compared to standard audiometry in assessing hearing loss among patients on treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Uganda. Journal of the Pan African Thoracic Society 2020;1:20 View
  16. Li L, Wang S, Wu C, Tsai C, Wu T, Lin Y. Screening for Hearing Impairment in Older Adults by Smartphone-Based Audiometry, Self-Perception, HHIE Screening Questionnaire, and Free-Field Voice Test: Comparative Evaluation of the Screening Accuracy With Standard Pure-Tone Audiometry. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(10):e17213 View
  17. Linkenheimer E. Telehealth Audiology and Virtual Hearing Screenings: A Case Report. Seminars in Hearing 2021;42(02):152 View