Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 06.12.11 in Vol 13, No 4 (2011): Oct-Dec

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1899):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. McLennan S. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14336
    CrossRef
  2. McLennan S. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e13816
    CrossRef
  3. Velasco BT, Chien B, Kwon JY, Miller CP. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Foot & Ankle Specialist 2019;:193864001983236
    CrossRef
  4. Okike K, Uhr NR, Shin SYM, Xie KC, Kim CY, Funahashi TT, Kanter MH. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2019;34(11):2575
    CrossRef
  5. Hong YA, Liang C, Radcliff TA, Wigfall LT, Street RL. What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e12521
    CrossRef
  6. Kranzbühler A, Kleijnen MHP, Verlegh PWJ, Teerling M. When Similarity Beats Expertise—Differential Effects of Patient and Expert Ratings on Physician Choice: Field and Experimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(6):e12454
    CrossRef
  7. McLennan S, Strech D, Kahrass H. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  8. Adjekum A, Blasimme A, Vayena E. Elements of Trust in Digital Health Systems: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(12):e11254
    CrossRef
  9. Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e212
    CrossRef
  10. Qiu Y, Liu Y, Ren W, Qiu Y, Ren J. Internet-Based and Mobile-Based General Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(9):e266
    CrossRef
  11. McLennan S, Strech D, Meyer A, Kahrass H. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e387
    CrossRef
  12. McLennan S, Strech D, Reimann S. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e299
    CrossRef
  13. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275
    CrossRef
  14. Vu AF, Espinoza GM, Perry JD, Chundury RV. Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2017;33(6):466
    CrossRef
  15. Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians’ and Health Care Consumers’ Perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(5):e127
    CrossRef
  16. Kendall L, Botello T. Internet Sabotage: Negative Online Reviews of Psychiatrists. Psychiatric Annals 2016;46(12):715
    CrossRef
  17. Rothenfluh F, Germeni E, Schulz PJ. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(6):e129
    CrossRef
  18. Kleefstra SM, Zandbelt LC, Borghans I, de Haes HJ, Kool RB. Investigating the Potential Contribution of Patient Rating Sites to Hospital Supervision: Exploratory Results From an Interview Study in the Netherlands. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e201
    CrossRef
  19. Samora JB, Lifchez SD, Blazar PE. Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):104
    CrossRef
  20. Kool RB, Kleefstra SM, Borghans I, Atsma F, van de Belt TH. Influence of Intensified Supervision by Health Care Inspectorates on Online Patient Ratings of Hospitals: A Multilevel Study of More Than 43,000 Online Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(7):e198
    CrossRef
  21. Trehan SK, Daluiski A. Online Patient Ratings: Why They Matter and What They Mean. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(2):316
    CrossRef
  22. Ranney ML, Peimer CA. Commentary on “Physician-Rating Web Sites: Ethical Implications”. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2016;41(1):111
    CrossRef
  23. Hawkins CM, DeLaO AJ, Hung C. Social Media and the Patient Experience. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016;13(12):1615
    CrossRef
  24. Ranney ML, Peimer CA. Online emergency department ratings, patient satisfaction and the age-old issue of communication. BMJ Quality & Safety 2016;25(1):1
    CrossRef
  25. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e276
    CrossRef
  26. Frost C, Mesfin A. Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons: An Emerging Trend. Orthopedics 2015;38(4):e257
    CrossRef
  27. Greaves F, Millett C, Nuki P. England’s Experience Incorporating “Anecdotal” Reports From Consumers into Their National Reporting System. Medical Care Research and Review 2014;71(5_suppl):65S
    CrossRef
  28. Verhoef LM, Van de Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L, Kool RB. Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e56
    CrossRef
  29. Ferrara S, Hopman WM, Leveridge M. Diagnosis, Bedside Manner and Comment Style are Predictive Factors in Online Ratings of Urologists. Urology Practice 2014;1(3):117
    CrossRef
  30. Chretien KC, Kind T. Social Media and Clinical Care. Circulation 2013;127(13):1413
    CrossRef
  31. Merrell JG, Levy BH, Johnson DA. Patient Assessments and Online Ratings of Quality Care: A “Wake-Up Call” for Providers. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;108(11):1676
    CrossRef
  32. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(2):e24
    CrossRef
  33. Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A. Online Reviews of 500 Urologists. Journal of Urology 2013;189(6):2269
    CrossRef
  34. Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(1):e38
    CrossRef

According to Crossref, the following books are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.1899)

:
  1. Fox D. Transparency in Health and Health Care in the United States. 2019. 19:286
    CrossRef
  2. Chiu M, Cheng W. HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations: Information Systems. 2016. Chapter 3:28
    CrossRef