Published on in Vol 6, No 2 (2004):

Web Content Accessibility of Consumer Health Information Web Sites for People with Disabilities: A Cross Sectional Evaluation

Web Content Accessibility of Consumer Health Information Web Sites for People with Disabilities: A Cross Sectional Evaluation

Web Content Accessibility of Consumer Health Information Web Sites for People with Disabilities: A Cross Sectional Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Xiaoming Zeng ;   Bambang Parmanto

Journals

  1. González López Ó, Bañegil Palacios T, Buenadicha Mateos M. El índice cuantitativo de calidad web como instrumento objetivo de medición de la calidad de sitios web corporativos. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 2013;19(1):16 View
  2. Huerta T, Hefner J, Ford E, McAlearney A, Menachemi N. Hospital Website Rankings in the United States: Expanding Benchmarks and Standards for Effective Consumer Engagement. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e64 View
  3. Sanchez Bocanegra C, Sevillano Ramos J, Rizo C, Civit A, Fernandez-Luque L. HealthRecSys: A semantic content-based recommender system to complement health videos. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2017;17(1) View
  4. Youngblood N. Digital inclusiveness of health information websites. Universal Access in the Information Society 2020;19(1):69 View
  5. Lee S, Hong S, An D, Lee H. Disability users’ evaluation of the web accessibility of SNS. Service Business 2014;8(4):517 View
  6. de la Torre Barbero M, Estepa Luna M, López-Pardo Martínez M, León Márquez M, Sánchez Laguna F, Toledano Redondo S. Evaluación de la calidad de las páginas webs de los hospitales del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía. Revista de Calidad Asistencial 2014;29(3):127 View
  7. Hamid A, Sarmad A. Evaluation of e‐health services: user's perspective criteria. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2008;2(4):243 View
  8. Välimäki M, Nenonen H, Koivunen M, Suhonen R. Patients' perceptions of Internet usage and their opportunity to obtain health information. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2007;32(4):305 View
  9. Renahy E, Chauvin P. Internet uses for health information seeking. Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 2006;54(3):263 View
  10. Huerta T, Walker D, Ford E. An Evaluation and Ranking of Children’s Hospital Websites in the United States. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e228 View
  11. Harrison S, Barlow J, Williams G. The content and interactivity of health support group websites. Health Education Journal 2007;66(4):371 View
  12. Parmanto B, Zeng X. Metric for Web accessibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2005;56(13):1394 View
  13. KOIVUNEN M, VÄLIMÄKI M, PITKÄNEN A, KUOSMANEN L. A preliminary usability evaluation of Web-based portal application for patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2007;14(5):462 View
  14. Liang H, Xue Y, Chase S. Online health information seeking by people with physical disabilities due to neurological conditions. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2011;80(11):745 View
  15. Evans W. Bibliography. Health Communication 2005;17(1):105 View
  16. Street A, Ottmann G. Addressing Online Information Needs in Palliative Care: An Action Research-Inspired Approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2007;20(2):151 View
  17. Street A, Swift K, Annells M, Woodruff R, Gliddon T, Oakley A, Ottman G. Developing a web-based information resource for palliative care: an action-research inspired approach. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007;7(1) View
  18. Thompson L, Ferdig R, Black E. Online Schools and Children With Special Health and Educational Needs: Comparison With Performance in Traditional Schools. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2012;14(3):e62 View
  19. Välimäki M, Anttila M, Hätönen H, Koivunen M, Jakobsson T, Pitkänen A, Herrala J, Kuosmanen L. Design and development process of patient-centered computer-based support system for patients with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2008;33(2):113 View
  20. Hanson V, Richards J. Progress on Website Accessibility?. ACM Transactions on the Web 2013;7(1):1 View
  21. Andrenucci A, Dalianis H, Velupillai S. Knowledge patterns for online health portal development. Health Informatics Journal 2019;25(4):1779 View
  22. Leroy G, Miller T, Rosemblat G, Browne A. A balanced approach to health information evaluation: A vocabulary-based naïve Bayes classifier and readability formulas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008;59(9):1409 View
  23. Hackett S, Parmanto B. A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites. Internet Research 2005;15(3):281 View
  24. de Vries McClintock H, Barg F, Katz S, Stineman M, Krueger A, Colletti P, Boellstorff T, Bogner H. Health care experiences and perceptions among people with and without disabilities. Disability and Health Journal 2016;9(1):74 View
  25. Wang Y, Liu Z. Automatic detecting indicators for quality of health information on the Web. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76(8):575 View
  26. Kruikemeier S, Aparaschivei A, Boomgaarden H, Van Noort G, Vliegenthart R. Party and Candidate Websites: A Comparative Explanatory Analysis. Mass Communication and Society 2015;18(6):821 View
  27. Mancini C, Zedda M, Barbaro A. Health information in Italian public health websites: moving from inaccessibility to accessibility. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2005;22(4):276 View
  28. Alajarmeh N. Evaluating the accessibility of public health websites: An exploratory cross-country study. Universal Access in the Information Society 2021 View
  29. Kumar S, Shree DV J, Biswas P. Comparing ten WCAG tools for accessibility evaluation of websites. Technology and Disability 2021:1 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. . Teenagers, Sexual Health Information and the Digital Age. View
  2. Mutingi M. E-Manufacturing and E-Service Strategies in Contemporary Organizations. View
  3. Hamid A, Sarmad A. Healthcare Delivery Reform and New Technologies. View