Published on in Vol 2, No suppl2 (2000): Supplement 2

A framework for evaluating e-health: Systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet

A framework for evaluating e-health: Systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet

A framework for evaluating e-health: Systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet

Authors of this article:

Gunther Eysenbach

Journals

  1. Wright S, Tseng W, Kolodner K. Physician opinion about electronic publications. The American Journal of Medicine 2001;110(5):373 View
  2. Finn J, Krysik J. Agency-Based Social Workers' Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Service-Related Unsolicited E-mail. Journal of Technology in Human Services 2007;25(3):21 View
  3. Castrén J, Huttunen T, Kunttu K. Users and non-users of web-based health advice service among Finnish university students – chronic conditions and self-reported health status (a cross-sectional study). BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008;8(1) View
  4. Sidhu H, Raynor D, Knapp P. Evaluation of website medicines information content, in comparison with official patient information. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2010;14(3):189 View
  5. Bouchier H, Bath P. Evaluation of Websites that Provide Information on Alzheimer's Disease. Health Informatics Journal 2003;9(1):17 View
  6. Martin-Facklam M, Kostrzewa M, Schubert F, Gasse C, Haefeli W. Quality markers of drug information on the internet: an evaluation of sites about St. John’s Wort. The American Journal of Medicine 2002;113(9):740 View
  7. KOH S, CATTELL G, COCHRAN D, KRASNER A, LANGHEIM F, SASSO D. Psychiatrists’ Use of Electronic Communication and Social Media and a Proposed Framework for Future Guidelines. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 2013;19(3):254 View
  8. Battineni G, Baldoni S, Chintalapudi N, Sagaro G, Pallotta G, Nittari G, Amenta F. Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information. DIGITAL HEALTH 2020;6:205520762094899 View
  9. Chang K, Grubbs E, Ingledew P. AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THYROID CANCER WEBSITES. Endocrine Practice 2019;25(10):1003 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Eysenbach G. Consumer Health Informatics. View
  2. Eysenbach G. Consumer Health Informatics. View