The Karma system is currently undergoing maintenance (Monday, January 29, 2018).
The maintenance period has been extended to 8PM EST.

Karma Credits will not be available for redeeming during maintenance.

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 05.08.16 in Vol 18, No 8 (2016): August

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Exploring Patientsí Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.5865):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. McGowan M, Reid B. Using the Plan, Do, Study, Act cycle to enhance a patient feedback system for older adults. British Journal of Nursing 2018;27(16):936
    CrossRef
  2. McLennan S, Strech D, Kahrass H. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1)
    CrossRef
  3. Zhang W, Deng Z, Hong Z, Evans R, Ma J, Zhang H. Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(1):e35
    CrossRef
  4. Rothenfluh F, Schulz PJ. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e212
    CrossRef
  5. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(7):e243
    CrossRef
  6. McLennan S, Strech D, Meyer A, Kahrass H. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(11):e387
    CrossRef