Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 20.05.13 in Vol 15, No 5 (2013): May

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Works citing "Crowdsourcing a Normative Natural Language Dataset: A Comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and In-Lab Data Collection"

According to Crossref, the following articles are citing this article (DOI 10.2196/jmir.2620):

(note that this is only a small subset of citations)

  1. . Making Vaccine Messaging Stick: Perceived Causal Instability as a Barrier to Effective Vaccine Messaging. Journal of Health Communication 2017;22(8):631
    CrossRef
  2. Lu W, Guttentag A, Elbel B, Kiszko K, Abrams C, Kirchner TR. Crowdsourcing for Food Purchase Receipt Annotation via Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Feasibility Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e12047
    CrossRef
  3. Thawrani V, Londhe ND, Singh R. Crowdsourcing of Medical Data. IETE Technical Review 2014;31(3):249
    CrossRef
  4. Sadler PM, Sonnert G, Coyle HP, Miller KA. Identifying Promising Items: The Use of Crowdsourcing in the Development of Assessment Instruments. Educational Assessment 2016;21(3):196
    CrossRef
  5. Costela FM, Saunders DR, Kajtezovic S, Rose DJ, Woods RL. Measuring the Difficulty Watching Video With Hemianopia and an Initial Test of a Rehabilitation Approach. Translational Vision Science & Technology 2018;7(4):13
    CrossRef
  6. Costela FM, Woods RL. When Watching Video, Many Saccades Are Curved and Deviate From a Velocity Profile Model. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2019;12
    CrossRef
  7. Lewinson RE, Katz JD. Influencing Pain Inferences Using Random Numerical Anchoring: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Human Factors 2020;7(1):e17533
    CrossRef
  8. . Negative Affect as a Mechanism of Exemplification Effects. Communication Research 2016;43(6):761
    CrossRef
  9. Sauter M, Draschkow D, Mack W. Building, Hosting and Recruiting: A Brief Introduction to Running Behavioral Experiments Online. Brain Sciences 2020;10(4):251
    CrossRef
  10. Dixon G, McComas K, Besley J, Steinhardt J. Transparency in the food aisle: the influence of procedural justice on views about labeling GM foods. Journal of Risk Research 2016;19(9):1158
    CrossRef
  11. Costela FM, Woods RL. The Impact of Field of View on Understanding of a Movie Is Reduced by Magnifying Around the Center of Interest. Translational Vision Science & Technology 2020;9(8):6
    CrossRef
  12. Martins N, Matthews NL, Ratan RA. Playing by the Rules: Parental Mediation of Video Game Play. Journal of Family Issues 2017;38(9):1215
    CrossRef
  13. Costela FM, Sheldon SS, Walker B, Woods RL. People with Hemianopia Report Difficulty with TV, Computer, Cinema Use, and Photography. Optometry and Vision Science 2018;95(5):428
    CrossRef
  14. Turner-McGrievy GM, Helander EE, Kaipainen K, Perez-Macias JM, Korhonen I. The use of crowdsourcing for dietary self-monitoring: crowdsourced ratings of food pictures are comparable to ratings by trained observers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2015;22(e1):e112
    CrossRef
  15. Kreitewolf J, Wöstmann M, Tune S, Plöchl M, Obleser J. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2019;81(4):1108
    CrossRef
  16. Woods KJP, Siegel MH, Traer J, McDermott JH. Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2017;79(7):2064
    CrossRef
  17. Hosseini M, Shahri A, Phalp K, Taylor J, Ali R. Crowdsourcing: A taxonomy and systematic mapping study. Computer Science Review 2015;17:43
    CrossRef
  18. Sato P, Hötzel M, von Keyserlingk M. American Citizens’ Views of an Ideal Pig Farm. Animals 2017;7(12):64
    CrossRef
  19. Saunders DR, Bex PJ, Rose DJ, Woods RL, Pelli DG. Measuring Information Acquisition from Sensory Input Using Automated Scoring of Natural-Language Descriptions. PLoS ONE 2014;9(4):e93251
    CrossRef
  20. Costela FM, Saunders DR, Rose DJ, Katjezovic S, Reeves SM, Woods RL. People With Central Vision Loss Have Difficulty Watching Videos. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2019;60(1):358
    CrossRef
  21. Lansford KL, Borrie SA, Bystricky L. Use of Crowdsourcing to Assess the Ecological Validity of Perceptual-Training Paradigms in Dysarthria. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2016;25(2):233
    CrossRef
  22. Kuang J, Argo L, Stoddard G, Bray BE, Zeng-Treitler Q. Assessing Pictograph Recognition: A Comparison of Crowdsourcing and Traditional Survey Approaches. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(12):e281
    CrossRef
  23. Ogletree AM, Katz B. How Do Older Adults Recruited Using MTurk Differ From Those in a National Probability Sample?. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 2021;93(2):700
    CrossRef
  24. Cardoso CS, Hötzel MJ, Weary DM, Robbins JA, von Keyserlingk MA. Imagining the ideal dairy farm. Journal of Dairy Science 2016;99(2):1663
    CrossRef
  25. Cui L, Carter R, Zhang G. Evaluation of a Novel Conjunctive Exploratory Navigation Interface for Consumer Health Information: A Crowdsourced Comparative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e45
    CrossRef
  26. Clarke CE, Weberling McKeever B, Holton A, Dixon GN. The Influence of Weight-of-Evidence Messages on (Vaccine) Attitudes: A Sequential Mediation Model. Journal of Health Communication 2015;20(11):1302
    CrossRef
  27. Bateman DR, Brady E, Wilkerson D, Yi E, Karanam Y, Callahan CM. Comparing Crowdsourcing and Friendsourcing: A Social Media-Based Feasibility Study to Support Alzheimer Disease Caregivers. JMIR Research Protocols 2017;6(4):e56
    CrossRef
  28. Mares M, Stephenson L, Martins N, Nathanson AI. A house divided: Parental disparity and conflict over media rules predict children's outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior 2018;81:177
    CrossRef
  29. Costela FM, Reeves SM, Woods RL. An implementation of Bubble Magnification did not improve the video comprehension of individuals with central vision loss. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2021;41(4):842
    CrossRef
  30. Huynh HP, Dicke-Bohmann A, Nelson C. What do humble doctors do? A conceptualization of clinician humility from the patient’s perspective. Patient Education and Counseling 2021;104(12):3066
    CrossRef
  31. Costela FM, Reeves SM, Woods RL. The Effect of Zoom Magnification and Large Display on Video Comprehension in Individuals With Central Vision Loss. Translational Vision Science & Technology 2021;10(8):30
    CrossRef
  32. Segen V, Avraamides M, Slattery T, Colombo G, Wiener JM, Castro-Alonso JC. Comparable performance on a spatial memory task in data collected in the lab and online. PLOS ONE 2021;16(11):e0259367
    CrossRef
  33. Del Popolo Cristaldi F, Granziol U, Bariletti I, Mento G. Doing Experimental Psychological Research from Remote: How Alerting Differently Impacts Online vs. Lab Setting. Brain Sciences 2022;12(8):1061
    CrossRef
  34. Morales A, Costela FM, Woods RL. Saccade Landing Point Prediction Based on Fine-Grained Learning Method. IEEE Access 2021;9:52474
    CrossRef
  35. Knowlton KF, von Keyserlingk MAG. To Treat or Not to Treat: Public Attitudes on the Therapeutic Use of Antibiotics in the Dairy Industry—A Qualitative Study. Animals 2023;13(18):2913
    CrossRef
  36. Kuo C, Koralesky KE, von Keyserlingk MA, Weary DM. Gene editing in animals: What does the public want to know and what information do stakeholder organizations provide?. Public Understanding of Science 2024;
    CrossRef