This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (4050) Registered Report (800) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (3339) Smoking Cessation (633) Prevention and Health Promotion (1385) Behavioural Surveillance for Public Health (294) Public (e)Health, Digital Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics (1022)

Published on in Vol 26 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/47040, first published .
Comparing the Effectiveness of the Blended Delivery Mode With the Face-to-Face Delivery Mode of Smoking Cessation Treatment: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the Effectiveness of the Blended Delivery Mode With the Face-to-Face Delivery Mode of Smoking Cessation Treatment: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing the Effectiveness of the Blended Delivery Mode With the Face-to-Face Delivery Mode of Smoking Cessation Treatment: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Lutz Siemer1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Marcel E Pieterse2 Author Orcid Image ;   Somaya Ben Allouch4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Marloes G Postel3 Author Orcid Image ;   Marjolein G J Brusse-Keizer6, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Isbel J, Kennedy M, West M, O’Grady K, Peardon-Freeman S. Quitline Queensland: the journey to a globally unique smoking cessation service in Australia. Frontiers in Public Health 2025;13 View