This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (1724) Mobile Health (mhealth) (3464) Opioid and Related Substance Misuse (200) Substance Abuse (530) mHealth for Symptom and Disease Monitoring, Chronic Disease Management (1732)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

This is a member publication of University of Stirling (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/40389, first published .
Overdose Alert and Response Technologies: State-of-the-art Review

Overdose Alert and Response Technologies: State-of-the-art Review

Overdose Alert and Response Technologies: State-of-the-art Review

Authors of this article:

Alberto Oteo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hadi Daneshvar2 Author Orcid Image ;   Alexander Baldacchino1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Catriona Matheson4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (25) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Dumbrell J, Daneshvar H, Oteo A, Baldacchino A, Matheson C. The acceptability of overdose alert and response technologies: introducing the TPOM-ODART framework. Harm Reduction Journal 2023;20(1) View
  2. Tay Wee Teck J, Oteo A, Baldacchino A. Rapid opioid overdose response system technologies. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2023;36(4):308 View
  3. Rioux W, Enns B, Jackson J, Quereshi H, Irvine M, Ghosh S. A cost benefit analysis of a virtual overdose monitoring service/mobile overdose response service: the national overdose response service. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2023;18(1) View
  4. Rioux W, Marshall T, Ghosh S. Virtual overdose monitoring services and overdose prevention technologies: Opportunities, limitations, and future directions. International Journal of Drug Policy 2023;119:104121 View
  5. Rioux W, Enns B, Ghosh S. Virtual overdose monitoring services/mobile overdose response services: estimated number of potentially averted drug poisoning fatality events by various telephone and digital-based overdose prevention/harm reduction services in North America. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  6. Tas B, Walker H, Lawn W, Matcham F, Traykova E, Evans R, Strang J. What impacts the acceptability of wearable devices that detect opioid overdose in people who use opioids? A qualitative study. Drug and Alcohol Review 2024;43(1):213 View
  7. Litvinova O, Hammerle F, Stoyanov J, Ksepka N, Matin M, Ławiński M, Atanasov A, Willschke H. Patent and Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Landscape of the Use of Pulse Oximeters and Their Prospects in the Field of Digital Medicine. Healthcare 2023;11(22):3003 View
  8. Scheibein F, Caballeria E, Taher M, Arya S, Bancroft A, Dannatt L, De Kock C, Chaudhary N, Gayo R, Ghosh A, Gelberg L, Goos C, Gordon R, Gual A, Hill P, Jeziorska I, Kurcevič E, Lakhov A, Maharjan I, Matrai S, Morgan N, Paraskevopoulos I, Puharić Z, Sibeko G, Stola J, Tiburcio M, Tay Wee Teck J, Tsereteli Z, López-Pelayo H. Optimizing Digital Tools for the Field of Substance Use and Substance Use Disorders: Backcasting Exercise. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e46678 View
  9. Rioux W, Kilby K, Jones S, Joshi P, Vandenberg S, Ghosh S. Perspectives of healthcare workers on the integration of overdose detection technologies in acute care settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 2024;19(1) View
  10. Rioux W, Taplay P, Morris-Miller L, Ghosh S. Implementing Canada’s first national virtual phone based overdose prevention service: lessons learned from creating the National Overdose Response Service (NORS). Harm Reduction Journal 2024;21(1) View
  11. Strachan G, Daneshvar H, Carver H, Greenhalgh J, Matheson C. Using digital technology to reduce drug-related harms: a targeted service users’ perspective of the Digital Lifelines Scotland programme. Harm Reduction Journal 2024;21(1) View
  12. Algharagholy L, García-Suárez V, Dhahi H. Stable and robust discriminative sensing of illicit drug molecules utilizing a specific geometry of nanotubes. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects 2024;39:101281 View
  13. Daneshvar H, Carver H, Strachan G, Greenhalgh J, Matheson C. From Digital Inclusion to Digital Transformation in the Prevention of Drug-Related Deaths in Scotland: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e52345 View
  14. Ciatti J, Vázquez-Guardado A, Brings V, Park J, Ruyle B, Ober R, McLuckie A, Talcott M, Carter E, Burrell A, Sponenburg R, Trueb J, Gupta P, Kim J, Avila R, Seong M, Slivicki R, Kaplan M, Villalpando-Hernandez B, Massaly N, Montana M, Pet M, Huang Y, Morón J, Gereau R, Rogers J. An autonomous implantable device for the prevention of death from opioid overdose. Science Advances 2024;10(43) View
  15. Amer M, Gittins R, Millana A, Scheibein F, Ferri M, Tofighi B, Sullivan F, Handley M, Ghosh M, Baldacchino A, Tay Wee Teck J. Are Treatment Services Ready for the Use of Big Data Analytics and AI in Managing Opioid Use Disorder?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2025;27:e58723 View
  16. Rioux W, Viste D, Sedaghat N, Rider N, Teck J, Perri M, Schwartz D, Ritchie K, Carrà G, Carreiro S, Kreig O, Marcu G, Bartlett N, Arthur J, Cogdell J, Brown M, Marshall T, Ghosh S. Defining terminology and outcome measures for evaluating overdose response technology: An international Delphi study. Drug and Alcohol Review 2025;44(5):1430 View
  17. Hussain S, Lehmann H, Buresh M, Niessen T, Fingerhood M, Ahmed N, Cavallio K, Maslen A, Knight A. Academic Detailing to Enhance Adoption of Clinical Decision Support for Patients at Risk of Opioid Overdose. Applied Clinical Informatics 2025;16(02):393 View
  18. Roth A, D'Angelo A, Gordon D, Cocchiaro B, Lingamoorthy A, Laurano R, Salzman M, Brenner J, Baston C. “Nobody Deserves to Overdose and Die by Themselves”: A Qualitative User Experience Study of a Shoulder-Mounted Wearable Sensor Prototype Designed to Detect Opioid-Related Overdose (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2025 View
  19. Maila B, Zúñiga M, Marienfeld C. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with overdose among patients with a substance-related diagnosis in the emergency department of Southern California. Harm Reduction Journal 2025;22(1) View
  20. Royall P, Courtney P, Orkin A. In-Time-Naloxone: How Can we Get Drones off the Ground for the First Response to Opioid Overdose?. Prehospital Emergency Care 2025;29(4):374 View
  21. Chen H, Westneat S, Young A. Willingness to Use Wearable Devices for Overdose Detection and Response: A Cross-Sectional Survey of People Who Use Drugs in Rural Appalachian Kentucky. Substance Use & Misuse 2025;60(14):2299 View
  22. Park J, McKee H, Ramsey S, Rich J, Green T, Frank H, Chatterjee A, Rosen J. Feasibility and Acceptability of Restroom Motion Sensors for Detecting Overdoses. Substance Use & Addiction Journal 2025 View
  23. Strang J, Appiah-Kusi E, Chesney E, Utrilla M, Hayes A, Lawn W, Tas B. Recent Innovations to Detect and Intervene to Prevent Opioid Overdose Deaths. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 2025;86(10):1 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Schaub M. Suchtmedizin. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Yu Z, Sherpa M, Iadarola S, Shamlian K, Daley S, Levine G, Bajorski P, Zheng Z. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. Understanding Stress in Children with ASD and Their Caregivers in Daily Life: A Feasibility Study Using Mobile Devices View