Published on in Vol 24, No 5 (2022): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/37970, first published .
Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study

Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study

Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study

Journals

  1. Amirzadeh gougheri K, Ahmadi A, Ahmadabadi M, Babajani A, Yazdanpanah G, Bahrami S, Hassani M, Niknejad H. Exosomal Cargo: Pro-angiogeneic, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative effects in ischemic and non-ischemic heart diseases – A comprehensive review. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2023;168:115801 View
  2. Chen M, Li C, Zhang J, Cui X, Tian W, Liao P, Wang Q, Sun J, Luo L, Wu H, Li Y. Cancer and Atrial Fibrillation Comorbidities Among 25 Million Citizens in Shanghai, China: Medical Insurance Database Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2023;9:e40149 View
  3. Kim J, Oh I, Lee H, Lee J, Cho Y, Gil Y, Jung S, Kim D, Shin M, Yoo J, Kwak J. The efficacy of detecting arrhythmia is higher with 7‐day continuous electrocardiographic patch monitoring than with 24‐h Holter monitoring. Journal of Arrhythmia 2023;39(3):422 View
  4. Naydenov S, Jekova I, Krasteva V. Recognition of Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Holter ECG Recordings by ECHOView Color Map: A Case Series Study. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 2023;10(9):360 View