This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (856) Innovations and Technology in Cancer Care (304) Cancer Self-Management (34) Innovations and Technology for Cancer Prevention and Screening (116) Reviews on Innovations in Cancer (21) Doctor-Patient Communication on Cancer, Prevention, and Screening (37) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (484)

Published on in Vol 23 , No 9 (2021) :September

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28869, first published .
Effect of Digital Care Platforms on Quality of Care for Oncological Patients and Barriers and Facilitators for Their Implementation: Systematic Review

Effect of Digital Care Platforms on Quality of Care for Oncological Patients and Barriers and Facilitators for Their Implementation: Systematic Review

Effect of Digital Care Platforms on Quality of Care for Oncological Patients and Barriers and Facilitators for Their Implementation: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Jana S Hopstaken 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lynn Verweij 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Cees J H M van Laarhoven 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicole M A Blijlevens 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Martijn W J Stommel 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rosella P M G Hermens 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Heudel P, Delrieu L, Dumas E, Crochet H, Hodroj K, Charrier I, Chvetzoff G, Durand T, Blay J. Impact of Limited E-Health Literacy on the Overall Survival of Patients With Cancer. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2022;(6) View
  2. Anyidoho P, Verschraegen C, Markham M, Alberts S, Sweetenham J, Cameron K, Abu Hejleh T. Impact of the Immediate Release of Clinical Information Rules on Health Care Delivery to Patients With Cancer. JCO Oncology Practice 2023;19(5):e706 View
  3. Taylor M, Thomas E, Vitangcol K, Marx W, Campbell K, Caffery L, Haydon H, Smith A, Kelly J. Digital health experiences reported in chronic disease management: An umbrella review of qualitative studies. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2022;28(10):705 View
  4. Marshall-McKenna R, Kotronoulas G, Kokoroskos E, Granados A, Papachristou P, Papachristou N, Collantes G, Petridis G, Billis A, Bamidis P. A multinational investigation of healthcare needs, preferences, and expectations in supportive cancer care: co-creating the LifeChamps digital platform. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2022 View
  5. Meneses A, Pimentel F, da Cruz J, Candido dos Reis F. Experiences of Women With Breast Cancer Using Telehealth: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Clinical Breast Cancer 2023;23(2):101 View
  6. Raes S, Trybou J, Annemans L. How to Pay for Telemedicine: A Comparison of Ten Health Systems. Health Systems & Reform 2022;8(1) View
  7. Verweij L, Smit Y, Blijlevens N, Hermens R. A comprehensive eHealth implementation guide constructed on a qualitative case study on barriers and facilitators of the digital care platform CMyLife. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22(1) View
  8. Shaffer K, Turner K, Siwik C, Gonzalez B, Upasani R, Glazer J, Ferguson R, Joshua C, Low C. Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews. The Lancet Digital Health 2023;5(5):e316 View
  9. Leqi S, Kondo K, Bando T, Imai Y. Resilience in cancer care : What should nurses do?. The Journal of Medical Investigation 2023;70(1.2):1 View