This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

E-Health / Health Services Research and New Models of Care (718) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (894) Health Services Research (557) Assisted Living for the Elderly and Nursing Home Care (209) Nursing in a Long-Term Care Facility / Nursing Home for the Elderly (53)

Published on in Vol 23, No 8 (2021): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/22316, first published .
Integrating Welfare Technology in Long-term Care Services: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study

Integrating Welfare Technology in Long-term Care Services: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study

Integrating Welfare Technology in Long-term Care Services: Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey Study

Authors of this article:

Hanne Marie Rostad1 Author Orcid Image ;   Randi Stokke1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (20) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Oelschlägel L, Christensen V, Moen A, Heggdal K, Österlind J, Dihle A, Steindal S. Patients' experiences with a welfare technology application for remote home care: A longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2023;32(17-18):6545 View
  2. Rostad H, Skinner M, Wentzel-Larsen T, Hellesø R, Sogstad M. Modes and models of care delivery in municipal long-term care services: a cross-sectional study from Norway. BMC Health Services Research 2023;23(1) View
  3. Malthouse R, Križaj T, Warren A, Turner K. A scoping review and thematic analysis of the use of technology in everyday occupations amongst adults aged 55 years or older in supported housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2024;39(1):371 View
  4. Oelschlägel L, Moen A, Dihle A, Christensen V, Heggdal K, Österlind J, Steindal S. Implementation of remote home care: assessment guided by the RE-AIM framework. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  5. Sun L, Yang B, Kindt E, Chu J. Privacy Barriers in Health Monitoring: Scoping Review. JMIR Nursing 2024;7:e53592 View
  6. Gustafsson C, Dannapfel P. Leaders’ experiences of successfully implementing health and welfare technology in sparsely populated Nordic areas. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2025;20(1):85 View
  7. Hvalič-Touzery S, Šetinc M, Dolničar V, Chen Q. Exploring Acceptance Factors for Welfare Technology among Nurses in Non‐Clinical Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review. Health & Social Care in the Community 2024;2024(1) View
  8. Skinner M, Førland O, Sogstad M, Rostad H. Strategiske prioriteringer på nasjonalt og lokalt nivå: Gir omsorgspolitikken på nasjonalt plan gjenklang i kommunene?. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning 2024;10(2):108 View
  9. Frennert S, Skagert K, Williamsson A. It is a matter of convenience: why welfare technologies have become domesticated in Swedish eldercare. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  10. Svärdh S, Lorenzini G, Siverskog A, Schmidt S, Iwarsson S, Fristedt S. Detangling experiences of agency in welfare technology use by home care recipients and their staff. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2025;20(4):1104 View
  11. Welsch J, Schicktanz S. Empowerment in structures. Practical-ethical considerations of the preconditions for technology-assisted dementia care in Germany based on an expert-interview study. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2025;15 View
  12. van Gaans-Riteco D, Stoop A, Wouters E. Values of Stakeholders Involved in Applying Surveillance Technology for People With Dementia in Nursing Homes: Scoping Review. JMIR Aging 2025;8:e64074 View
  13. Park S, Lee S. Importance-Performance Analysis of Welfare Technology Utilization in Long-Term Care Facilities. Korean Journal of Geriatrics & Gerontology 2025;26(1):32 View
  14. Naseer M, Dellve L. Assessing the Use of Welfare Technology in Social Care for Older Adults Through Assistant Nurses’ Perceptions of Upskilling and Care Delivery Outcomes: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e65641 View
  15. Felder M, Bal R, Ree E, Sogstad M, Stoddart S, Ellis L, Tibu F, Vola F, Cantarelli P, Delgado-Saborit J, Aparicio E, Lahti M, Kankaanpää E, Wiig S, Wallenburg I, Lyng H. Different systems, same challenges: a comparative analysis of long-term care resilience in Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, Romania, Spain, Italy and Australia. Health Policy 2026;163:105484 View
  16. Oh J, Yoo J, Han J. Sustainable Care Models in Aging Rural Communities: Lessons from a Community-Based Pilot Program in South Korea. Journal of Social Science 2025;36(4):183 View
  17. Ziglioli G. The Technofix Illusion. A Discourse Analysis of Norway’s Welfare Technology Policy and the Transformation of Eldercare. Nordisk välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research 2025;11(1):1 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Skjelvik A, Yang B. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybersecurity, Situational Awareness and Social Media. View
  2. Chang F, Zhao J, Zhu D, Gu Z, Ostlund B. Cross-Cultural Design. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Skjelvik A, Vestad A. European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference. Digital safety alarms – Exploring the understandings of the cybersecurity practice in Norwegian municipalities View