This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (654) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1558) Information Quality in Digital Media (407) Innovations and Technology for Cancer Prevention and Screening (201)

Published on in Vol 22, No 6 (2020): June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/16701, first published .
Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility

Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility

Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility

Authors of this article:

Olivia A Mac1 Author Orcid Image ;   Amy Thayre1 Author Orcid Image ;   Shumei Tan1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rachael H Dodd1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (25) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Dodd R, Nickel B, Smith M, Brotherton J, McCaffery K. Getting the timing right: Women’s views on the best time to announce changes to cancer screening policy recommendations. Preventive Medicine Reports 2020;20:101268 View
  2. Kershaw S, Birrell L, Deen H, Newton N, Stapinski L, Champion K, Kay-Lambkin F, Teesson M, Chapman C. Evaluation of a Digital Health Initiative in Illicit Substance Use: Cross-sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(8):e29026 View
  3. Xie W, Ji M, Liu Y, Hao T, Chow C. Predicting Writing Styles of Web-Based Materials for Children’s Health Education Using the Selection of Semantic Features: Machine Learning Approach. JMIR Medical Informatics 2021;9(7):e30115 View
  4. Ji M, Bodomo A, Xie W, Huang R. Assessing Communicative Effectiveness of Public Health Information in Chinese: Developing Automatic Decision Aids for International Health Professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(19):10329 View
  5. Hardman M, Reynolds K, Petty S, Pryor T, Pierce S, Bernstein M, Furer P. An evaluation of the quality of online perinatal depression information. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022;22(1) View
  6. Dhinagaran D, Martinengo L, Ho M, Joty S, Kowatsch T, Atun R, Tudor Car L. Designing, Developing, Evaluating, and Implementing a Smartphone-Delivered, Rule-Based Conversational Agent (DISCOVER): Development of a Conceptual Framework. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(10):e38740 View
  7. Schuster A, Crossnohere N, Paskett J, Thomas N, Hampel H, Ma Q, Tiner J, Paskett E, Bridges J. Promoting patient engagement in cancer genomics research programs: An environmental scan. Frontiers in Genetics 2023;14 View
  8. Ahmadzadeh K, Bahrami M, Zare‐Farashbandi F, Adibi P, Boroumand M, Rahimi A. Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2023;40(1):3 View
  9. Ji M, Xie W, Huang R, Qian X. Automatic Diagnosis of Mental Healthcare Information Actionability: Developing Binary Classifiers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(20):10743 View
  10. Mohamed H, O’Malley L, Kelly D. An infodemiology study on exploring the quality and reliability of colorectal cancer immunotherapy information. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  11. Basnet R, Mendez D, Lugo-González I, O'Hagan E, O'Keeffe M, Sharma S, Pate J, Kennedy D. Online information on chronic pain in 3 countries: an assessment of readability, credibility, and accuracy. PAIN Reports 2023;8(4):e1078 View
  12. Kinghorn M, Garvey G, Butler T. Gynaecological cancer resources for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: A resource audit. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 2024;35(4):966 View
  13. Tan D, Ko T, Fan K. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e47762 View
  14. DiSipio T, Scholte C, Diaz A. Evaluation of online text‐based information resources of gynaecological cancer symptoms. Cancer Medicine 2024;13(9) View
  15. Willburger B, Chen Z, Mansfield K. Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2024;64(6):542 View
  16. Dihan Q, Chauhan M, Eleiwa T, Hassan A, Sallam A, Khouri A, Chang T, Elhusseiny A. Using Large Language Models to Generate Educational Materials on Childhood Glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;265:28 View
  17. Probst Y, Sharp M, Zoszak K. Health literacy demand and quality of website nutrition information for multiple sclerosis. Journal of Public Health 2025 View
  18. Otero M, Bernolo L, Miguel R, Regencia Z, Murao L, Baja E. COVID-19 Control in Highly Urbanized Philippine Cities: Leveraging Public Health Open-Source Government Data for Epidemic Preparedness and Response. COVID 2025;5(3):42 View
  19. He W, Tang D, Jin Y, Zhang W, Kang Y, Xia Q. Quality of cerebral palsy videos on Chinese social media platforms. Scientific Reports 2025;15(1) View
  20. Pavuloori M, Lin A, Mi M. Tools/instruments for assessing YouTube videos on surgical procedures for patient/consumer health education: a systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health 2025;13 View
  21. Sarangi P, Hui P, Mondal H, Kumar Nayak D, Swarup M, Ishan , Panda S. Evaluating the Capability of Large Language Model Chatbots for Generating Plain Language Summaries in Radiology. iRADIOLOGY 2025;3(4):289 View
  22. Haghighi R, Farhadloo M. Quality Assessment of Health Information on Social Media During a Public Health Crisis: Infodemiology Study. JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e70756 View
  23. Korkmaz Y, Aydın O, Güngör F, Kudaş İ, Sarigoz T, Bostanci O. ChatGPT and other large language models in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multidimensional audit of reliability, quality, and readability. Surgical Endoscopy 2025 View
  24. Maxwell‐Smith C, Smith S, Nicholson L, O'Connor M, Davies J, Basson M, Dhillon H, Halkett G. SUN‐SHINE Sarcoma Systematic Environmental Scan: Evaluation of the Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Websites Supporting Patients Diagnosed With Sarcoma and Their Caregivers. Psycho-Oncology 2025;34(12) View
  25. Cherrez‐Ojeda I, Zuberbier T, Rodas‐Valero G, Sanchez J, Rudenko M, Dramburg S, Demoly P, Caimmi D, Gómez R, Ramon G, Fouda G, Quimby K, Chong‐Neto H, Llosa O, Larco J, Monge Ortega O, Faytong‐Haro M, Pfaar O, Bousquet J, Robles‐Velasco K. Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of ChatGPT‐4's Responses on Allergen Immunotherapy Using Validated Instruments for Health Information Quality Assessment. Clinical and Translational Allergy 2025;15(12) View