Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Published on 13.01.20 in Vol 22, No 1 (2020): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15793, first published Aug 07, 2019.

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

    Original Paper

    A Culturally Targeted eLearning Module on Organ Donation (Promotoras de Donación): Design and Development

    1College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    2Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    3Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States

    4Gift of Life Institute, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    5Enlace Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

    6Centro San Bonifacio, Chicago, IL, United States

    7Bexar County Community Health Collaborative, San Antonio, TX, United States

    8Esperanza Health Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Gerard P Alolod, MPhil

    College of Public Health

    Temple University

    1700 N Broad St

    Suite 417

    Philadelphia, PA, 19121

    United States

    Phone: 1 2152049186

    Email: gpalolod@temple.edu


    ABSTRACT

    Background: As an overrepresented population on the transplant waitlist, stagnated rates of organ donation registration among Latinxs must be redressed. Promotoras (community health workers), who are effective at advocating and spearheading health promotion efforts in the Latinx community, show promise in their ability to educate about organ donation and donor registration.

    Objective: This study aimed (1) to develop an interactive, evidence-based program to educate promotoras about organ donation, the need for organ donors in the Latinx American community, and ways to register as deceased organ donors and (2) to train promotoras to lead discussions about organ donation and to promote the act of donor registration.

    Methods: In partnership with 4 promotoras organizations, the culturally targeted Promotoras de Donación eLearning module was developed based on input from 12 focus groups conducted with Latina women (n=61) and promotoras (n=37). Formative work, existing literature, the Vested Interest Theory, and the Organ Donation Model guided curriculum development. In partnership with the Gift of Life Institute and regional promotoras, the curriculum was designed, filmed, and developed in a visually appealing module interface. The module was beta-tested with promotoras before launch.

    Results: Promotoras de Donación, available in Spanish with English subtitling, lasts just over an hour. The module comprised 6 sections including various activities and videos, with the curriculum divided into a skills-based communication component and a didactic educational component. Pre- and posttests assessed the module’s direct effects on promotoras’ organ donation knowledge and attitudes as well as confidence promoting the act of donor registration.

    Conclusions: This novel, theoretically and empirically based intervention leveraged the existing network of promotoras to promote the act of donor registration. Future research should assess whether the module helps increase rates of donor registration within Latinx communities and reduce disparities in access to transplantation.

    Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04007419; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04007419

    J Med Internet Res 2020;22(1):e15793

    doi:10.2196/15793

    KEYWORDS



    Introduction

    Background

    Although the number of deceased organ donors in the United States has increased modestly since 2010 [1], a shortage of transplantable organs still remains. The dearth of available organs for transplantation is particularly acute among Latinx populations, an increasingly accepted and common term to represent Hispanic and Latino communities [2]. As of September 2019, over 23,000 Latinxs were candidates on the national transplant waitlist [3], of whom 88% were in need of a kidney transplant [4] because of higher rates of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease compared with non-Hispanic whites. The need among older Latinxs is particularly acute. A large longitudinal study (n=453,162) of kidney transplant candidates showed that the proportion of Latinxs aged 45 years and older on the waitlist grew consistently from 56.4% during the 1995 to 1999 period to 69.8% in the 2010 to 2014 period [5]. Despite the need, only 1508 (14%) deceased organ donors were Latinxs in 2018 [6], although interest in and willingness to donate have been expressed within Latinx populations, including uninsured undocumented Latinx immigrants [7,8].

    Since the 2007 revision of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act making the act of registering as an posthumous organ donor legally binding [9], much like an advance directive or living will, it has become an even more critical first step to increasing the number of individuals converted to actual donors and the number of organs available for transplant. Currently, approximately half of the US population have designated themselves as posthumous organ donors through drivers’ licenses, donor cards, or Web-based registries—an act referred to as donor designation [10]. Donor designation rates among Latinxs have remained much lower than the national average. For instance, a retrospective cohort study of deceased donation decisions found that 6.4% of Latinx participants were designated organ donors [11], and a larger study (n=2070) found that less than 40% of Latinxs had documented their intentions to donate posthumously [12]. Although Latinxs in the United States come from various countries of origin and have distinct immigration histories, the extant literature describes this population as a homogeneous unit. Commonly cited barriers to donation among this population include low levels of acculturation, religious beliefs, mistrust of the medical and organ distribution systems, and cultural taboos regarding discussions about death [13-15]. Encouraging donor designation among all ethnic groups is imperative to improve access to transplantation for all patients on the waitlist. However, increasing the number of Latinx donors is of particular import, given the improved graft outcomes associated with receipt of organs from this subgroup of the population [16].

    Prior research has underscored the importance of culturally targeted approaches to addressing the specific health beliefs and transplantation-related needs among Latinx communities. For example, Hu et al’s family-based intervention on diabetes self-management among Latinxs yielded successful outcomes, such as improved blood pressure, higher knowledge about diabetes, healthier behaviors, and lowered body mass index [17]. Gordon et al created and evaluated a culturally targeted website about living kidney donation and transplantation for Latinx patients; exposure to the website in combination with transplant education generated significantly higher transplant knowledge compared with transplant education alone [18]. Other research aimed at increasing organ donation among Latinx populations has suggested women as ideal champions for promoting donor designation, given their dominant position in health-related decision making and their increased willingness to donate and discuss donation with family members [14,19,20].

    Promotores de Salud

    Promotores de Salud are a network of Latinx lay health educators (or community health workers) who disseminate health information to their communities through interpersonal channels. Indeed, platicas, or small group discussions typically held in homes or local community centers about different health topics, are organized and guided by promotores. In the 1960s, Promotores de Salud emerged out of necessity in low-income neighborhoods with sizable Latinx immigrant populations, to overcome significant barriers to accessing and utilizing health care services [21]. Promotores are a cost-efficient and effective workforce that expands the reach of the health care delivery system. As such, promotores have typically become the first point of contact between Latinx community members and formal health institutions. Given their knowledge of and membership in local and health care communities, promotores serve as cultural intermediaries, social/emotional supports, peer advocates, connections to available services, and catalysts for community action [22,23].

    Promotores de Salud have had demonstrable impacts on health knowledge and behaviors. For instance, they have increased Latinxs’ knowledge of and participation in preventive behaviors for diabetes [24], cervical cancer [25,26], obesity [27,28], and cardiovascular disease [29]. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests promotores can be effectively engaged in the research process and, once trained, can be successful partners in study implementation [30-35]. Promotores have been trained to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate information to Latinx Americans about a wide variety of health-related topics and to promote behaviors to improve health and prevent illness, disease, and disability [36,37]. As more than 80% of these community health workers are female [36] and older Latinxs are increasingly overrepresented on the national waitlist [5], we believed that this existing network of promotores could be leveraged to educate mature Latinas (aged 50 years and older) in their respective communities about organ donation. We also anticipated that mature Latinas would be influenced to designate themselves as posthumous organ donors and support donation within their families, as women are the primary source of information about health and health care in Latinx families. In addition, women, in particular, express greater willingness to register as deceased organ donors [14,19] and are more likely to register, be converted to actual donors, and discuss donation with their families [14,19,20].

    Web-Based eLearning Modules

    Web-based electronic learning (eLearning) platforms (ie, learning management systems) are highly variable in their features and methods of instruction [38]. Such customizability allows developers to remain sensitive to the practical and cultural needs of the target audience and helps ensure ease of use and engagement with material. Interactive computer- and Web-based public health and patient education trainings [38,39] have successfully addressed the learning needs of older adults [40-42], underserved populations [18,43-48], and those with chronic communicable disease [49], especially when culturally informed [50]. Previous studies employing Web-based interventions with targeted features to effectively train promotoras have demonstrated that eLearning leads to wider reach [51] and impact in Latinx communities [52]. The Office of Minority Health (OMH) of the US Department of Health and Human Services’ creation and promotion of a Web-based training for promotoras about best practices for promoting health in their communities underscores this fact [53].

    Promotoras de Donación

    We developed the Promotoras de Donación Web-based eLearning module to increase promotoras’ knowledge of organ donation and transplantation and to improve their communication skills and confidence discussing and promoting organ donation with mature Latinas. The feminine form of the term promotor was chosen because most community health workers are female, as are our target audiences. The module is designed to increase rates of donor designation within Latinx communities across the United States and to ultimately reduce disparities in transplantation among Latinxs. This paper describes our development of the Promotoras de Donación eLearning module, including the formative work involved in the module’s development and the module’s theoretical underpinnings. We present the module design, structure, cultural foundations, the results of beta-testing, and the plan for modifying the module in response to the feedback received. The paper concludes with challenges to the development of the module; limitations; and plans to evaluate the module’s direct, indirect, and sustained effects.


    Methods

    eLearning Module Development

    Study Team

    The research team comprised Temple University faculty and staff including the principal investigator with expertise in interpersonal health communication and organ donation and transplantation (HG), 2 coinvestigators—a medical anthropologist with expertise in developing culturally targeted interventions in organ transplantation and donation from Northwestern University (EJG) and an internationally recognized expert in deceased organ donation (LS)—a creative coordinator (GPA), a project coordinator (CA and JT), and an undergraduate research assistant (PJK). The Gift of Life Institute, a Philadelphia-based international training center with extensive experience designing and developing Web-based educational programs for donation professionals, aided in curriculum design and module interface development (TD and RN). Textbox 1 illustrates the steps in the module’s development.


    Textbox 1. Steps in module development, implementation, and evaluation.
    View this box

    We partnered with 4 promotoras organizations representing 3 geographically diverse locales and heterogeneous Latinx populations: the Bexar County Community Health Collaborative (San Antonio, Texas), Enlace Chicago and Centro San Bonifacio (Chicago, Illinois), and Esperanza Health Center (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). Each site was selected based on established relationships with local promotoras organizations, cost, and representation of Latinxs from different countries of origin. Leadership and promotoras from each organization met virtually with the Philadelphia-based research team on a quarterly basis for updates on study progress and discussion of challenges and next steps. Partners also provided feedback on study processes including recruitment plans and materials, the content of study instruments, Spanish translations, branding, module content, and beta-testing. Promotoras organizations guided the peripheral, evidential, linguistic, and sociocultural strategies employed to ensure the resulting module was culturally targeted and linguistically congruent [54].

    Theoretical Foundation

    Promotoras de Donación is theoretically rooted in the Organ Donation Model (ODM) and Vested Interest Theory (VIT). Figure 1 provides a pictorial representation of the module’s theoretical framework. Proposed by Morgan and Miller [55,56], the ODM is grounded in the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and highlights the importance of donation intentions on the act of becoming a designated organ donor. The model posits that attitudes toward and knowledge about organ donation influence designation intentions [55,56]. The model has found support in empirical tests among non-Hispanic whites and, in a slightly modified form, among African Americans [57-60]. In addition, constructs from both Azjen’s Theory of Planned Behavior, a descendent of the TRA, and VIT have been useful in explaining differences in perceptions about living and nonliving organ donation among Hispanics [61].

    Figure 1. Theoretical framework of Promotoras de Donación. Organ Donor Model (ODM) Vested Interest Theory (VIT).
    View this figure

    VIT similarly delineates the relationships among and between constructs thought to predict donor designation [61]. VIT has been used to help explain the discrepancy between highly positive attitudes toward donation and low rates of donor designation. Specifically, VIT posits that the relationship between donation-related attitudes and low donor designation rates is moderated by perceptions of personal importance (ie, vested interest). VIT delineates 5 dimensions of vested interest: stake (perceived positive and negative consequences associated with a given issue), salience (vividness and accessibility of the issue), self-efficacy (perceived ability to overcome behavioral barriers), certainty (belief that the perceived consequences will be realized), and immediacy (belief in the imminent manifestation of those consequences) [62]. Scholars recommend the application of VIT to understand organ donation designation behaviors, focusing on the first 3 dimensions and indicating that self-efficacy in designating oneself as a donor proved a strong predictor of donor registration [63-65]. We conceptualize VIT constructs of stake, salience, and self-efficacy as representing awareness of the benefits of donation, recognition of the importance of and need for organ donors in the Latinx community, and confidence in making a decision about donation and donor designation.

    These theoretical constructs are incorporated throughout the module. Short videos created by the Health Services and Resources Administration’s Division of Transplantation as well as narratives (ie, anecdotal and expert testimony) and statistical messages (ie, data about the need for organ donors) are included to increase and enhance promotoras’ knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation and donor designation. To increase self-efficacy, the module demonstrates the skills needed to introduce and manage platicas about organ donation through videos that model such discussions. VIT constructs are included in illustrations of the discrete skills needed to effectively present the need for Latinx donors (salience), articulation of the benefits of donation (stake), and presentation of instructions for donor registration (self-efficacy).

    Module Structure and Curriculum

    Promotoras de Donación was designed to be a highly engaging and interactive online learning experience (see Figure 2). Interactivity is an essential feature of learning in online environments and can support the pace at which the content is presented and enacted, development of associations between existing knowledge and acquisition of new information, reinforcement and refinement of newly acquired skills, guidance through the content learned, and enjoyment of the educational experience [66-68]. In addition, we accommodated multiple learning styles by incorporating a variety of pedagogic approaches into the module. For instance, written information and narration is accompanied by a public educational video promoting organ donation by depicting a canine pet following the deceased owner’s transplanted heart to another person [69]; a video describing the organ donation process [70]; an animated video of how to register as an organ donor; a true/false activity; and video testimonials from a donor mother, a liver transplant recipient, and a transplant expert. See Multimedia Appendix 1 for snapshots of its general elements.

    Figure 2. Screenshot of the login page of Promotoras de Donación to illustrate the branding standards.
    View this figure

    Produced in Spanish (with English subtitles), the module was designed to achieve 3 specific learning objectives. After completing the module, we anticipated that learners would (1) demonstrate high levels of knowledge of organ donation and donor designation; (2) confidently engage members of their community in conversations about organ donation; and (3) effectively persuade individuals to designate themselves as posthumous organ donors via a donor card, drivers’ license, or online registry. Guided by a female narrator (narradora), the module originally comprised 6 sections (secciones): (1) introduction to organ donation and transplantation, (2) how to register as an organ and tissue donor (3) how to talk with others about organ and tissue donation, (4) a true/false activity, (5) how to promote donor registration, and (6) conclusion. Table 1 lists the subjects covered within each section and the embedded media before the final version of the module after beta-testing.

    The curriculum consists of 2 components: a skills-based communication component and a didactic educational component. The communication skills needed to effectively discuss donation and share educational content were modeled in videos depicting a promotora leading a platica about organ donation and transplantation and promoting donor registration (see Figure 3). We employed and trained 7 promotoras from our local partnering organization to portray the roles of the promotora and platica attendees. In collaboration with the partnering organizations, scripts were developed to train the promotora actors and incorporate cultural concerns revealed in the formative focus group discussions throughout the module. The actors were trained weekly in October and November 2017, and the videos were filmed in December 2017. The videos and activities were edited, rendered, and embedded within a learning management system hosted by the Gift of Life Institute.

    The skills-based component provides instruction on the communication skills needed to effectively engage participants during platicas about organ donation. To be effective communicators, promotoras must acquire the skills needed to discuss organ donation and promote donor designation and be motivated to use the skills [71,72]. The platicas depicted in the module are intended to model these skills and build communication self-efficacy or confidence in starting the discussion about donation, addressing concerns raised by attendees, and promoting the act of donor designation using persuasive but noncoercive language. In addition, the program trains promotoras to exercise communicative tasks such as broaching the topic of organ donation, providing basic information, highlighting the benefits of donation to society, emphasizing the need for Latinx donors, promoting and addressing concerns about donor designation, providing instruction on how to register as an organ donor, answering questions, and closing the discussion.

    Table 1. Promotoras de Donación module content.
    View this table

    The didactic component provides basic information about organ donation and transplantation and the need for donors in the Latinx community. It also addresses concerns about organ donation and donor designation commonly shared by the target population, as revealed through the extant literature and a series of 12 focus groups we conducted with promotoras (n=37) and older Latinas (n=61) to inform the module’s development [73]. Focus group participants reported myths and misinformation about organ donation, medical mistrust, and family aversion of discussing sensitive topics as some of the major barriers to organ donation and donor designation. Participants also acknowledged the need for transplantable organs and increased education about the topic within Latinx communities.

    The didactic component featured several topics during the dramatized platicas. Platica attendees asked about stories they heard about the black market, beliefs about health care providers doing less to save the lives of designated organ donors, worries about the incompatibility of organ donation and religious beliefs, the impact of being undocumented immigrants on the ability to receive a transplant, and how to handle discussions about organ donation with family members. The module depicts the promotora skillfully and thoughtfully responding to the attendees’ questions and fears about organ donation in Latinx communities and drew on their shared experiences and cultural concerns to deliver information about organ donation and to promote donor designation. The true/false activity was designed to test retention of and reinforce the information provided throughout the module.

    Figure 3. Screenshot of a platica dramatization from the Promotoras de Donación.
    View this figure

    A primary goal of module development was ensuring its cultural appropriateness and receptivity by the target population. Throughout the scriptwriting and postproduction process, Spanish-speaking Latinx consultants and our Latinx community partners offered guidance to ensure that the module and its content were realistic, culturally targeted, and linguistically congruent [46]. Our collaborators helped to refine the dialog and educational material by providing insight on focus group data reflecting cultural beliefs and myths about donation. Promotora actors represented different Latin American countries and accents to model realistic donation discussions that reflect the variety of Latinx nationalities represented in the United States. The module’s script also incorporated specific statistics about the need for donors in the Latinx community. Table 2 details the specific design and content features that were included to ensure the module’s cultural and linguistic appropriateness [55].

    A certificate of completion is provided upon module conclusion. The Promotoras de Donación module is accompanied by an Educator’s Manual containing a list of potential discussion topics, commonly asked questions about donation and their answers, and sample language to sensitively correct myths about donation.

    Table 2. Strategies for achieving cultural and linguistic appropriateness.
    View this table

    Beta-Testing

    Procedure

    The original version of the module was timed at 1 hour, 14 min, and 29 seconds. The module underwent beta-testing from September 17, 2018, to October 12, 2018. Beta-testing involved full navigation of the module and completion of a postmodule questionnaire measuring user experience and soliciting feedback for improvement. A total of 10 people participated in beta-testing including 3 members of the leadership teams at partnering promotoras organizations, 6 promotoras, and 1 partnering organization administrator. Promotoras participating in beta-testing were compensated with a US $25.00 gift card.

    Survey

    The beta-test questionnaire comprised 40 questions evaluating perceptions of the module; cultural sensitivity; platform navigability; and sociodemographics including job role, length in job role, and preferred language spoken at home. See Multimedia Appendix 2 for the beta-test questionnaire.

    Perceptions of the module were assessed through 13 5-point Likert questions (1—strongly disagree; 5—strongly agree) ascertaining organization, length, realism, and interest in the material covered. Cultural competency was assessed through 5 4-point Likert-type questions (1—strongly disagree; 4—strongly agree) adapted from the Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool [74]. Participants were asked to assess website and module navigability using 5 4-point Likert-type questions (1—strongly disagree; 5—strongly agree) adapted from the Informational Fit-to-Task Items [75].

    Participants were then asked to identify which segments (ie, true/false activity and testimonials) could be shortened or removed through 8 3-point Likert-type questions (1—definitely remove; 3—definitely do not remove). A single 5-point Likert-type item measured respondents’ rating of the overall quality of the module (1—poor; 5—excellent). The questionnaire ended with 5 open-ended questions that asked respondents to indicate suggestions for improving the training program, features that were missing or did not feel right, the most important message for people unfamiliar with the topic of organ donation and transplantation, and the most and least liked aspects.


    Results

    Quantitative Results

    Most beta-testers spoke Spanish and English equally at home (7/10) and identified as promotoras (6/10); the remaining 4 were leadership from the 4 partnering organizations. Most respondents somewhat or strongly agreed that the information presented was novel (7/10), felt the module activities helped them learn (9/10), enjoyed module activities (9/10), felt ready to teach others about organ donation and transplantation after viewing the module (8/10), would recommend this training to other promotoras (9/10), and felt the module was too long (6/10). Most respondents (9/10) agreed or strongly agreed that the module was free from stereotypes about the Latinx community, that the people in their community would believe the messages in the module were from credible sources, and that the messages in the module address commonly shared organ donation and organ transplantation myths in the Latinx community. Regarding website navigability, all respondents disagreed with the statement, “the website was too complex”; all respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the website was easy to use and that they liked the look and feel of the website. Most respondents (9/10) disagreed that the words, phrases, and expressions used in the module were too technical for the average promotora, and most respondents (8/10) agreed or strongly agreed that promotoras would find the website easy to use.

    Half of the respondents (5/10) suggested removing the true/false activity, and 40% (4/10) of the respondents suggested removing the interview with a transplant expert. Most (8/10) respondents recommended definitely not removing the segments describing personal experiences with donation (mother of an organ donor) and transplantation (liver transplant recipient).

    Qualitative Results

    In addition to scale items, responses to open-ended questionnaire questions provided rich, contextualizing data suggesting improvements to the original module. Table 3 presents the qualitative questions and a selection of corresponding responses.

    We gleaned several lessons from themes emerging from the open-ended responses. First, although beta-testers stated the module was informative and interactive, most found the module to be too lengthy and offered suggestions on content that could be shortened or edited out. Moreover, they noted that the most important messages of the module included life-saving opportunities of organ donation and the need for Latinx donors; they also liked the testimonials included in the module.

    Table 3. Selected responses to open-ended questions.
    View this table

    Discussion

    Principal Findings

    Promotoras de Donación is the first online training program about organ donation designed specifically for promotoras. We employed a rigorous process to develop this eLearning module. Specifically, following well-established guidelines, we incorporated findings from the extant literature research on organ donation beliefs among Latinx Americans, relied on established theories for guidance, and engaged promotoras and leadership from promotora organizations for advice and feedback throughout the process. As no research had yet examined the knowledge of and attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation or the act of donor designation among either promotoras or mature Latinas—our target audiences—we conducted a series of focus group interviews to elicit this information [74]. The findings of the group interviews were integrated in the design and content of the module. The result was the creation of an empirically and theoretically based, culturally and linguistically appropriate eLearning module designed through a collaborative partnership with promotoras and promotora organizations.

    Beta-testing offered valuable feedback about user experience, acceptability, and content. To prepare the module for implementation and evaluation, we made several modifications. For example, we modified the module by increasing the font size for the true/false activity, enabling sensible advancement to subsequent sections for ease of module progression, including removing numbered sections on the menu bar, adding English subtitles, and disabling user manipulation of the progress bar. To reduce module length, we edited testimonials from the mother who had donated her deceased son’s organs and the transplant expert. We moved the animation depicting 3 ways to donate and the true/false activity to appear on the homepage after module completion as supplemental, rather than required material. After revisions, the Promotoras de Donación module lasts 1 hour, 3 min, and 38 seconds, with 7 min and 49 seconds of supplemental content. Table 4 provides a comparison of the original and final versions of the module.

    Table 4. Design elements in original and final versions of the module.
    View this table

    Next Steps

    The module is currently undergoing evaluation of its direct, indirect, and sustained effects. In the first phase of evaluation, we will recruit 40 promotoras (10 per partnering site) to complete the Promotoras de Donación module and associated pre- and postsurveys. The presurvey will be administered before participants are given access to the module, and the postsurvey will be administered upon module completion; both surveys have been translated into Spanish and will be administered online via Qualtrics. The surveys assess changes in organ donation knowledge and attitudes and confidence communicating about and promoting the act of donor designation.

    After completing phase 1, the same promotoras will be invited to enroll in the second phase of the evaluation, conducted to test the indirect effects of the module on mature Latinas’ organ donation knowledge, attitudes, and intentions to register as posthumous organ donors. Specifically, trained promotoras will lead 2 platicas in their respective communities with up to 8 mature Latinas in each session. Before leading the platicas, participating promotoras will be apprised of the study protocols and trained in human subject’s protections. Promotoras will administer anonymous paper-pencil surveys to mature Latinas before beginning the discussion and before attendees leave the platica.

    To measure the module’s sustained impact on promotoras’ organ donation knowledge and attitudes as well as communication confidence, participating promotoras will complete self-administered surveys before leading their first platica and after completing both. If the intervention demonstrates significantly increased rates of donor designation, our Web-based training will be disseminated widely to promotoras organizations across the United States and a petition will be made to the HHS OMH to include the module in its existing eLearning program for Promotores de Salud [53].

    Challenges

    Several challenges arose in the development of Promotoras de Donación module. Reliance on multiple sources (ie, focus groups, partner organizations, and beta-testers) for input on module content and format increased module production and revision time frames. Although the feedback was critical to ensure the cultural appropriateness and relevance of the module for the target population, we underestimated the time needed to solicit, review, and incorporate feedback from every collaborating partner. Turnover in staff also contributed to the delays. Our original creative coordinator, who was a fluent Spanish speaker with advanced training in research, resigned necessitating the search for Spanish-speaking consultants in each state to facilitate the focus groups and analyze the resulting data. We also lost 2 study coordinators during critical periods of module development—the first was during finalization of the original version and the second was just before final modifications were made. Other researchers developing similar community-based eLearning interventions would do well to anticipate longer production timetables by adding 2 to 3 months before the launch of the intervention.

    The decision to incorporate multiple sources of feedback on the module’s content also led to a longer overall running time than was originally planned. Although the final version of Promotoras de Donación was shortened by making original components supplemental, the module still lasts over 63 min in its final form with close to 8 min of supplemental material. This is considerably longer than initial plans of an approximately 20 to 30 min eLearning module. Even though we have yet to see if the increased length of the module will have any demonstrable impact on participant’s experience and satisfaction, the substantial increase in content required additional time for editing, additional hosting space to accommodate the size of media files, and troubleshooting with the Gift of Life Institute’s technological capabilities.

    Conclusions

    Promotoras de Donación is a novel, culturally targeted intervention firmly grounded in theory, extant literature, and formative research. In response to a lack of knowledge of organ donation and low willingness to register as a posthumous organ donor among Latinxs, the module aims to engender more favorable attitudes toward organ donation, improve knowledge levels, and build confidence discussing donor designation among promotoras as means of increasing registration rates within Latinx communities. The results of our beta-testing demonstrated strong user acceptability of the platform and the content. Furthermore, the module may be dispersed to Latinx communities across the nation at low cost and has considerable potential to increase the number of Latinx registered as deceased organ donors, thus helping to reduce the ongoing national shortage of transplantable organs.

    Acknowledgments

    This study was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration’s Division of Transplantation (HRSA/DoT R39OT29878, PI: Traino). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of HRSA/DoT.

    Authors' Contributions

    All authors participated in research design, writing of the paper, performance of the research. HG, EG, PJK, and JT participated in data analysis.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Screenshots of the Promotoras de Donación eLearning module.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 19215 KB

    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Post Module Questionnaire.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 64 KB

    References

    1. OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Donors Recovered in the US by Donor Type: Donors Recovered: January 1, 1988 - August 31, 2019, Based on OPTN data as of September 23, 2019   URL: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/# [accessed 2019-09-23]
    2. Salinas C, Lozano A. Mapping and recontextualizing the evolution of the term Latinx: an environmental scanning in higher education. J Latinos Educ 2017;18(4):302-315 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    3. OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Waitlist: Ethnicity by Gender: Current US Waiting list, Based on OPTN data as of September 23, 2019   URL: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/build-advanced/ [accessed 2019-09-23]
    4. OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Organ by Ethnicity: Current US Waiting List, Based on OPTN data as of September 23, 2019   URL: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/# [accessed 2019-09-23]
    5. Purnell TS, Luo X, Cooper LA, Massie AB, Kucirka LM, Henderson ML, et al. Association of race and ethnicity with live donor kidney transplantation in the United States from 1995 to 2014. J Am Med Assoc 2018 Jan 2;319(1):49-61 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation. Deceased Donors Recovered in the US by Donor Ethnicity: Donors Recovered: January 1, 1988 - August 31, 2019, Based on OPTN data as of September 23, 2019   URL: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/# [accessed 2019-09-23]
    7. Purnell TS, Powe NR, Troll MU, Wang N, LaVeist TA, Boulware LE. Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs. Transpl Int 2011 Oct;24(10):999-1007 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Baru JS, Lucas BR, Martinez C, Brauner D. Organ donation among undocumented hispanic immigrants: an assessment of knowledge and attitudes. J Clin Ethics 2013;24(4):364-372. [Medline]
    9. Verheijde JL, Rady MY, McGregor JL. The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): new challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2007 Sep 12;2:19 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Donate Life America. 2017. Donate Life America: 2017 Annual Update   URL: https://www.donatelife.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/2017_AnnualUpdate_singlepages_small.pdf [accessed 2019-10-08]
    11. Traino HM, Siminoff LA. Attitudes and acceptance of First Person Authorization: a national comparison of donor and nondonor families. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013 Jan;74(1):294-300 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Sehgal NK, Scallan C, Sullivan C, Cedeño M, Pencak J, Kirkland J, et al. The relationship between verified organ donor designation and patient demographic and medical characteristics. Am J Transplant 2016 Apr;16(4):1294-1297 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Salim A, Schulman D, Ley EJ, Berry C, Navarro S, Chan LS. Contributing factors for the willingness to donate organs in the Hispanic American population. Arch Surg 2010 Jul;145(7):684-689 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Breitkopf CR. Attitudes, beliefs and behaviors surrounding organ donation among Hispanic women. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2009 Apr;14(2):191-195 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Frates J, Bohrer G. Hispanic perceptions of organ donation. Prog Transplant 2002 Sep;12(3):169-175. [Medline]
    16. Kwan JM, Hajjiri Z, Chen YF, Metwally A, Perkins DL, Finn PW. Donor and recipient ethnicity impacts renal graft adverse outcomes. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2018 Oct;5(5):1003-1013. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Hu J, Wallace DC, McCoy TP, Amirehsani KA. A family-based diabetes intervention for Hispanic adults and their family members. Diabetes Educ 2014;40(1):48-59 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Gordon EJ, Feinglass J, Carney P, Ramirez D, Olivero M, O'Connor K, et al. An interactive, bilingual, culturally targeted website about living kidney donation and transplantation for hispanics: development and formative evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2015 Apr 20;4(2):e42 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Alvaro EM, Jones SP, Robles AS, Siegel JT. Predictors of organ donation behavior among Hispanic Americans. Prog Transplant 2005 Jun;15(2):149-156. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Organ Donor. 2013 Sep. 2012 National Survey of Organ Donation Attitudes and Behaviors   URL: https://www.organdonor.gov/sites/default/files/about-dot/files/nationalsurveyorgandonation.pdf [accessed 2019-10-08]
    21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Services. 2019 Jan 01. Community Health Representatives (CHR) Fact Sheet   URL: https://www.ihs.gov/sites/chr/themes/responsive2017/display_objects/documents/chrfactsheet2018.pdf [accessed 2019-10-08]
    22. Ingram M, Reinschmidt KM, Schachter KA, Davidson CL, Sabo SJ, de Zapien JG, et al. Establishing a professional profile of community health workers: results from a national study of roles, activities and training. J Community Health 2012 Apr;37(2):529-537 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Rosenthal EL, Wiggins N, Ingram M, Mayfield-Johnson S, de Zapien JG. Community health workers then and now: an overview of national studies aimed at defining the field. J Ambul Care Manage 2011;34(3):247-259. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Lujan J, Ostwald SK, Ortiz M. Promotora diabetes intervention for Mexican Americans. Diabetes Educ 2007;33(4):660-670. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Byrd TL, Wilson KM, Smith JL, Coronado G, Vernon SW, Fernandez-Esquer ME, et al. AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women. Cancer 2013 Apr 1;119(7):1365-1372 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Fernández ME, Gonzales A, Tortolero-Luna G, Williams J, Saavedra-Embesi M, Chan W, et al. Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women. Am J Public Health 2009 May;99(5):936-943. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Sosa E, Biediger-friedman L, Yin Z. Lessons learned from training of promotores de salud for obesity and diabetes prevention. J Health Dispar Res Pract 2013;6(1):1-13 [FREE Full text]
    28. Staten LK, Cutshaw CA, Davidson C, Reinschmidt K, Stewart R, Roe DJ. Effectiveness of the Pasos Adelante chronic disease prevention and control program in a US-Mexico border community, 2005-2008. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:E08 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Balcázar H, Alvarado M, Cantu F, Pedregon V, Fulwood R. A promotora de salud model for addressing cardiovascular disease risk factors in the US-Mexico border region. Prev Chronic Dis 2009 Jan;6(1):A02 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    30. Marsh T, Derose KP, Rios M, Cohen D. Promotoras as data collectors in a large study of physical activity in parks. Health Promot Pract 2015 May;16(3):354-361 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Johnson CM, Sharkey JR, Dean WR, St John JA, Castillo M. Promotoras as research partners to engage health disparity communities. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013 May;113(5):638-642 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. St John JA, Huber JC, Sharkey JR, Dean WR. Using direct observations on multiple occasions to measure household food availability among low-income Mexicano residents in Texas colonias. BMC Public Health 2010;12(445). [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. O'Hegarty M, Pederson LL, Thorne SL, Caraballo RS, Evans B, Athey L, et al. Customizing survey instruments and data collection to reach Hispanic/Latino adults in border communities in Texas. Am J Public Health 2010 Apr 1;100(Suppl 1):S159-S164. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Rhodes SD, Foley KL, Zometa CS, Bloom FR. Lay health advisor interventions among Hispanics/Latinos: a qualitative systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2007 Nov;33(5):418-427. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Hanbury MM, Sadeghi B, Tseregounis IE, Gomez-Camacho R, Manzo RD, Rangel MI, et al. A web-based application to improve data collection in an interventional study targeting childhood obesity: pre-post analysis. J Med Internet Res 2019 Jan 16;21(1):e10861 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Bureau of Health Workforce. 2007 Mar. Community Health Workers National Workforce Study   URL: https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bhw/nchwa/projections/communityhealthworkforce.pdf [accessed 2019-10-08]
    37. Gonzalez M, Sanders-Jackson A, Wright T. Web-based health information technology: access among Latinos varies by subgroup affiliation. J Med Internet Res 2019 Apr 16;21(4):e10389 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Cook DA, Garside S, Levinson AJ, Dupras DM, Montori VM. What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions. Med Educ 2010 Aug;44(8):765-774. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Ryhänen AM, Siekkinen M, Rankinen S, Korvenranta H, Leino-Kilpi H. The effects of Internet or interactive computer-based patient education in the field of breast cancer: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns 2010 Apr;79(1):5-13. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Neafsey PJ, Strickler Z, Shellman J, Chartier V. An interactive technology approach to educate older adults about drug interactions arising from over-the-counter self-medication practices. Public Health Nurs 2002;19(4):255-262. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Fox MP. A systematic review of the literature reporting on studies that examined the impact of interactive, computer-based patient education programs. Patient Educ Couns 2009 Oct;77(1):6-13. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Bond GE, Burr R, Wolf FM, Price M, McCurry SM, Teri L. The effects of a web-based intervention on the physical outcomes associated with diabetes among adults age 60 and older: a randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2007 Feb;9(1):52-59 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Bell M, MacDougall K. Adapting online learning for Canada's Northern public health workforce. Int J Circumpolar Health 2013;72 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Choi J, Bakken S. Web-based education for low-literate parents in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: development of a website and heuristic evaluation and usability testing. Int J Med Inform 2010 Aug;79(8):565-575 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Andersen S, Andersen P, Youngblood N. Multimedia computerized smoking awareness education for low-literacy Hispanics. Comput Inform Nurs 2011 Feb;29(2 Suppl):TC35-TC42. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Internet-based mental health programs: a powerful tool in the rural medical kit. Aust J Rural Health 2007 Apr;15(2):81-87. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Gordon EJ, Feinglass J, Carney P, Vera K, Olivero M, Black A, et al. A culturally targeted website for Hispanics/Latinos about living kidney donation and transplantation. Transplantation 2016 May;100(5):1149-1160. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Gordon EJ, Feinglass J, Carney P, Vera K, Olivero M, Black A, et al. A website intervention to increase knowledge about living kidney donation and transplantation among Hispanic/Latino dialysis patients. Prog Transplant 2016 Mar;26(1):82-91. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Kurth AE, Chhun N, Cleland CM, Crespo-Fierro M, Parés-Avila JA, Lizcano JA, et al. Linguistic and cultural adaptation of a computer-based counseling program (CARE+Spanish) to support HIV treatment adherence and risk reduction for people living with HIV/ADIS: A randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2016 Jul 13;18(7):e195 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Montague E, Perchonok J. Health and wellness technology use by historically underserved health consumers: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2012 May 31;14(3):e78 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Santos SL, Tagai EK, Wang MQ, Scheirer MA, Slade JL, Holt CL. Feasibility of a web-based training system for peer community health advisors in cancer early detection among african americans. Am J Public Health 2014 Dec;104(12):2282-2289. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Balcázar H, Alvarado M, Hollen ML, Gonzalez-Cruz Y, Pedregón V. Evaluation of Salud Para Su Corazón (Health for your Heart) -- National Council of La Raza Promotora Outreach Program. Prev Chronic Dis 2005 Jul;2(3):A09 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    53. Think Cultural Health. US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health   URL: https://www.thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov/education/promotores [accessed 2019-10-08]
    54. Kreuter MW, Lukwago SN, Bucholtz RD, Clark EM, Sanders-Thompson V. Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches. Health Educ Behav 2003 Apr;30(2):133-146. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Morgan S, Miller J. Communicating about gifts of life: the effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. J Appl Commun Res 2002;30(2):163-178 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    56. Morgan SE, Miller JK. Beyond the organ donor card: the effect of knowledge, attitudes, and values on willingness to communicate about organ donation to family members. Health Commun 2002;14(1):121-134. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Morgan SE, Miller JK, Arasaratnam LA. Similarities and differences between African Americans' and European Americans' attitudes, knowledge, and willingness to communicate about organ donation. J Appl Social Pyschol 2003;33(4):693-715 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    58. Morgan SE. The power of talk: African Americans’ communication with family members about organ donation and its impact on the willingness to donate organs. J Soc Person Relat 2016;21(1):112-124 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    59. Morgan SE. Many facets of reluctance: African Americans and the decision (not) to donate organs. J Natl Med Assoc 2006 May;98(5):695-703. [Medline]
    60. Robinson DH, Perryman JP, Thompson NJ, Amaral S, Arriola KR. Testing the utility of a modified organ donation model among African American adults. J Behav Med 2012 Jun;35(3):364-374 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Sivacek J, Crano WD. Vested interest as a moderator of attitude–behavior consistency. J Pers Soc Psychol 1982 Aug;43(2):210-221. [CrossRef]
    62. Crano WD, Prislin R. Components of vested interest and attitude-behavior consistency. Basic Appl Soc Psych 2011 Jun 22;17(1-2):1-21 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    63. Anker AE, Feeley TH. Are nonparticipants in prosocial behavior merely innocent bystanders? Health Commun 2011 Jan;26(1):13-24. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    64. Anker A, Feeley T, Kim H. Examining the attitude-behavior relationship in prosocial donation domains. J Appl Soc Psychol 2010;40(6):1293-1324 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    65. Quick BL, Anker AE, Feeley TH, Morgan SE. An examination of three theoretical models to explain the organ donation attitude--registration discrepancy among mature adults. Health Commun 2016;31(3):265-274. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    66. Holmberg B. Theory And Practice Of Distance Education. London: Routledge; 1989.
    67. Domagk S, Schwartz RN, Plass JL. Interactivity in multimedia learning: an integrated model. Comput Human Behav 2010 Sep 01;26(5):1024-1033 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    68. Dewey J. Democracy And Education: An Introduction To The Philosophy Of Education. New York City: Nabu Press; 1916.
    69. YouTube. 2015. Fundacion Argentina de Transplante Hepatico. The man and the dog   URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nySUhtaf2QQ [accessed 2019-10-08]
    70. Health RA. Organ donation and transplantation: how does it work?. Organ donation and transplantation: how does it work?; 2013 Jan 01.   URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuKx2a5HkIM [accessed 2019-10-08]
    71. Hargie O. The Handbook Of Communication Skills. Fourth Edition. New York: Routledge; 2018.
    72. Spitzberg B, Cupach W. Interpersonal Communication Competence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 1984.
    73. Gordon E, Agu C, Siminoff L, Alolod G, Kim R, Gonzalez T, et al. Organ donation attitudes and behaviors among older hispanic women and hispanic community health workers. Transplantation 2017;101:S60. [CrossRef]
    74. Guidry JJ, Walker VD. Assessing cultural sensitivity in printed cancer materials. Cancer Pract 1999;7(6):291-296. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    75. Kim S, Stoel L. Apparel retailers: website quality dimensions and satisfaction. J Retail Consum Serv 2004;11(2):109-117 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]


    Abbreviations

    HRSA/DoT: Health Resources and Services Administration’s Division of Transplantation
    ODM: Organ Donation Model
    OMH: Office of Minority Health
    TRA: Theory of Reasoned Action
    VIT: Vested Interest Theory


    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 07.08.19; peer-reviewed by A Waterman, N Yamashiki; comments to author 14.09.19; revised version received 30.09.19; accepted 01.10.19; published 13.01.20

    ©Gerard P Alolod, Heather Gardiner, Chidera Agu, Jennie L Turner, Patrick J Kelly, Laura A Siminoff, Elisa J Gordon, Robert Norden, Theresa A Daly, Amanda Benitez, Ilda Hernandez, Nancy Guinansaca, Lori Ramos Winther, Caroline D Bergeron, Antonette Montalvo, Tony Gonzalez. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 13.01.2020.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.